Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 21 views

    Dedes v. Page, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's award of Rule 11 sanctions against the appellant in a case. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling awarding sanctions to various defendants. It denied the appellant's motion for monetary damages and to disbar one of the defendants. The court also denied the appellees' various motions for additional sanctions, attorney's fees, and costs.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Dedes v. Page, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    21 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's award of Rule 11 sanctions against the appellant in a case. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling awarding sanctions to various defendants. It denied the appellant's motion for monetary damages and to disbar one of the defendants. The court also denied the appellees' various motions for additional sanctions, attorney's fees, and costs.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-06-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-1176

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's award of Rule 11 sanctions against the appellant in a case. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling awarding sanctions to various defendants. It denied the appellant's motion for monetary damages and to disbar one of the defendants. The court also denied the appellees' various motions for additional sanctions, attorney's fees, and costs.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    21 views3 pages

    Dedes v. Page, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming a district court's award of Rule 11 sanctions against the appellant in a case. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling awarding sanctions to various defendants. It denied the appellant's motion for monetary damages and to disbar one of the defendants. The court also denied the appellees' various motions for additional sanctions, attorney's fees, and costs.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-1176

    CHRISTOS D. DEDES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    CHRISTOS D. DEDES, as Legal Custodian for his
    children Quincy Sophia Dedes and Dionysios
    Christos
    Dedes;
    ALL
    PARENTS
    SIMILARLY
    SITUATED,
    Plaintiffs,
    versus
    ROSWELL PAGE; JOHN O'BRION; MURRAY J. JANUS;
    SYLVIA CLUTE; DONALD LEMONS; ALFRED SHILLING;
    DANIEL T. BALFOUR; MELVIN R. HUGHES, Judge,
    Judge of the Circuit Court in the City of
    Richmond; RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, Judge, Judge of
    the United States District Court for the
    Eastern District of Virginia,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (CA-94-186-3)
    Submitted:

    April 30, 1998

    Decided:

    June 2, 1998

    Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Christos D. Dedes, Appellant Pro Se. James Watson Morris, III,
    MORRIS & MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia; John Henry O'Brion, Jr., COWAN
    & OWEN, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Murray Joseph Janus, BREMNER,
    JANUS & COOK, Richmond, Virginia; Sylvia Lanabeth Clute, Richmond,
    Virginia; Alfred Louis Shilling, Richmond, Virginia; Daniel T.
    Balfour, BEALE, BALFOUR, DAVIDSON, ETHERINGTON & PARKER, Richmond,
    Virginia; Robert William Jaspen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order awarding Fed. R.
    Civ. P. 11 sanctions to various Defendants in this action. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Dedes v. Page, No. CA-94-186-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 2,
    1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion
    for monetary damages and to disbar M. J. Janus is denied, and the
    Appellees' various motions for sanctions, attorney's fees, and
    costs are denied.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like