Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 15 views

    Keith Richards v. United States Air Force, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Keith Richards' complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act against the United States Air Force. The appeals court reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its July 7, 2011 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Keith Richards v. United States Air Force, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Keith Richards' complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act against the United States Air Force. The appeals court reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its July 7, 2011 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-08-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1948

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Keith Richards' complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act against the United States Air Force. The appeals court reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its July 7, 2011 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    Keith Richards v. United States Air Force, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case. The court affirmed the district court's dismissal of Keith Richards' complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act against the United States Air Force. The appeals court reviewed the record and briefs and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the case for the reasons stated in its July 7, 2011 opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    You are on page 1of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1948

    KEITH P. RICHARDS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:10cv-01474-RWT)

    Submitted:

    July 31, 2012

    Decided:

    August 3, 2012

    Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert C. Davis, Jr., DAVIS & DAVIS LLP, Annapolis, Maryland,


    for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Jason
    D. Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore,
    Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Keith P. Richards appeals from the district courts
    order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal
    Tort Claims Act.

    We have reviewed the record on appeal and the

    briefs

    the

    filed

    by

    parties

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.
    RWT

    (D.

    Richards v. United States Air Force, No. 8:10-cv-01474Md.

    July 7,

    2011).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like