A Study On Employee Perception Towards P
A Study On Employee Perception Towards P
A Study On Employee Perception Towards P
1.
Performance Appraisal System are the means of telling a subordinate how the
employee is doing and suggesting needed changes in employees behavior,
attitudes, skills or job knowledge. They let the employee know where he/she stands
with the Boss.
Superior uses Performance Appraisal System as a base for coaching and counseling
the individual
3.
METHODOLOGY
Date Requirement
The data is required to analyse the perception of the employee. Data will be collected
from the employees via a framed questionnaire.
A questionnaire acts as a tool to obtain information from respondents and as a guide to
interviewer to get the best out of the time the interviewer spend with the interviewee. In
simple terms, it is a form to obtain responses from the interviewee in a way that
optimizes the information value to time ratio. Data processors in the research agencies
use the completed questionnaires to generate analytical frequency tables, charts, graphs
and other statistical application to answer the research questions using the data
collected.
As a questionnaire is a vehicle to obtain information from certain targeted respondents,
it must be designed and framed in view of the respondents. Careful consideration must
be placed on the content, use of words, sequence of questions, routing and coding (if
any) to enable all parties involved in the research process to get the best out of the
questionnaire. All interviewees are not same. Their level of education, attitude and
willingness to co-operate in the interview are not alike. The fieldworkers or interviewers
must also fully understand the objective of the questionnaire and the meaning and
expectation from each question. Data entry people should have convenience and are
able to prepare a data sheet which is easy for Data Processors to understand and
generate tables.
A good questionnaire is one that creates a balance between all of the above. A
questionnaire that fails to achieve the research objective is a poorly designed
questionnaire and ultimately be detrimental to health of whole research project.
Designing questionnaire is one of the preliminary tasks of the research projects. Once
the client company gives the project briefing, the researchers will start designing the
questionnaire addressing the objectives and expected information content of the
research project.
The quality of questionnaire is a function of type of questions, language used, sequence
of questions and question content. Type of question depends on type of expected
responses and the nature of research. There are several choices as for the type of
questions. There are various classifications of questions.
Behavioural questions these types of questions are those that are used to obtain
factual information on who they are (what they do and what they have) and location
where they live. Behavioural questions are used in surveys which are aimed at finding
out market size, market share, and level of awareness and rate of usage of
products/service.
Attitudinal questions this type of question can get responses as for what people
think, opinion, level of preference and agreement, and why they think so. Attitudinal
questions are commonly used in satisfaction studies, brand mapping studies, positioning
research, etc.
Classification questions classification questions are used for the purpose of
segmentation. The information can be used to segment respondents based on their
differences in terms of such things as age, gender, income, etc. Classification questions
are used in all surveys.
There are three major types of questionnaires; namely structured, semi-structured and
unstructured.
Structured: Structured Questionnaires are normally used for large surveys of over 50
samples. Structured designs are used when the responses from the survey can be
anticipated to a large extent. This type of questionnaire can be used for telephone, mail,
face-to-face and online surveys.
Semi-structured: This type of questionnaire is used for B2B research where a large
extend of differences may exist among the respondents.
Unstructured: Unstructured designs are used mainly for qualitative research such as
focus groups, in-depth interviews, etc. The design allows interviewer or moderator to
probe and search for specific details as for why and why not.
In order to design a good questionnaire, the following factors must be considered;
Survey Objective A questionnaire must know and fully understand the objective of
the research project.
Conducting Medium Researcher designing the questionnaire must be clear of how
the interview will be conducted whether face-to-face, telephone, online, mail, etc.
Knowledge and preferences of interviewee In designing and framing questions in a
questionnaire, researcher must consider the knowledge, their likes and dislikes so that
interview can be smoothly completed without compromising the scope and quality of
data.
Introduction The way an interviewer introduces the survey can win the heart of the
interviewee. The questionnaire designer must include and interesting introduction of the
survey in the beginning of the survey. The initial questions must also be interesting.
Sequence The order in which the questions are arranged throughout the question is
very important for a successful survey. The simple rule is first things first.
Type of Questions - The questions must be chosen with care. The type of question
must suit the expected responses and objective of the question.
Data Processing/processors The questionnaire designer must also think from the
perspective of data processors. The structure must be convenient for preparing the data
entry sheet and avoid confusion during the data entry process.
The questionnaire is designed in a way where the employee can rate the present
Performance Appraisal System and also rate an ideal Performance Appraisal system. The
Questionnaire is designed to be anonymous so as to encourage the employees to come
up their real perception of a performance appraisal system and removes fear of
repercussions from the company.
: Descriptive research
Research Instrument
: Structured Questionnaire
Sampling Framework
i)
Sample Method
ii)
Sample Size
: 56
Sampling Design
Convenience sampling, as the name implies, is based on the convenience of the
researcher who is to select a sample. Respondents in the sample are included in it
merely on account of their being available on the spot where the survey was in progress.
Source of Data
a) Primary Data
: Structured Questionnaire
b) Secondary Data
test is always testing what scientists call the null hypothesis, which states that there is
no significant difference between the expected and observed result.
The formula for calculating chi-square is = (O-E) 2/E
That is, chi-square is the sum of the squared difference between observed (o) and the
expected (e) data (or the deviation, d), divided by the expected data in all possible
categories.
Percentage Analysis
Percentage analysis consists of reducing a series of related amounts to a series of
percentages of a given base. All items in an income statement are frequently expressed
as a percentage of sales or sometimes as a percentage of cost of goods sold. A balance
sheet may be analysed on the basis of total assets. This analysis facilitates comparison
and is helpful in evaluating the relative size of items or the relative change in items. A
conversion of absolute dollar amounts to percentages may also facilitate comparison
between companies of different size.
4. DATA COLLECTION
Existing appraisal system in Arun Industries
The Current appraisal system in Arun industries is of old traditional appraisal system
which involves
As appraisal was based on seniority, person who performs better than seniors
were not considered for appraisal or promotion.
Not Regular feedbacks were received from employees before appraisal and after
appraisal review.
The Questionnaire was given to the employees of Arun industries and was asked to fill in
by them. These Questionnaires was given to 56 employees who consist of 5 different
teams such as Finance, Marketing etc... Each team involves 10 team member headed by
a lead forming 11 persons for a team.
The hard copy of collected filled in Questionnaire were submitted and the questionnaire
given to the employee were attached above.
The answers of the questionnaire can be classified into 3 categories majorly
a) Positive feedback (Agree and Strongly agree)
b) Neutral feedback (Neutral)
c) Negative feedback (Strongly disagree and disagree)
5. DATA ANALYSIS
Calculations showing the results obtained out of the study using statistical tests and
inferences derived must be elaborated. The results obtained must provide answers to the
stated objectives. All calculations must be based on the data file as in the previous
section. Hypotheses must be tested using appropriate tools in addition to simple
percentage analysis (which is only descriptive of the sample).
Total No of employees 56 inclusive of 11 team leaders
From overall analysis it is found that the most 64 percent of employee agree and
strongly agree with the Ideal Performance appraisal system where as for Existing
traditional appraisal system is supported by only 35 percent of employees.
Calculations based on Chi Square Test, Percentage Analysis and Pie & Bar charts are
explained below.
Note: The questionnaire for this analysis can be referred from Annexure and below
values are based on the data obtained as a result of this questionnaire.
(O-E)2 /E
Unsatisfied
Average
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Total
84.00
347.00
173.00
111.00
69.00
784.00
156.80
156.80
156.80
156.80
156.80
784.00
-72.80
190.20
16.20
-45.80
-87.80
0.00
5,299.84
36,176.04
262.44
2,097.64
7,708.84
51544.8
33.80
230.71
1.67
13.38
49.16
328.73
Strongly
TEST
Disagree
Strongly
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
60.00
109.00
196.00
472.00
227.00
1,064.00
(E = 1064/5)
212.80
212.80
212.80
212.80
212.80
1,064.00
(O-E)
-152.80
-103.80
-16.80
259.20
14.20
0.00
23,347.84
10,774.44
282.24
67,184.64
201.64
101,790.80
109.72
50.63
1.33
315.72
0.95
478.34
Agree
Total
Observed Numbers
(O)
Expected Numbers
(O-E)
(O-E) /E
Observation
From Chi Square Test, the Total (478.34) in Ideal Performance Appraisal system is
observed to be promoting compared to Current Appraisal system.
Percentage Analysis
The percentage analysis had been done using the data from the questionnaire (refer
Annexure) for both the current appraisal system and an ideal appraisal system.
Calculations based on the given data is shown below.
Current Appraisal System
Current Appraisal System
Statement
No. Of Employees = 56
Very
Average
Good
35
10
10
25
40
16
18
13
12
31
Poor
Very
Poor
Good
No. Of Employees = 56
Statement
Unsatisfied
Average
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
42
Performance Evaluation
18
12
10
Development Planning
38
10
Coaching
10
20
26
Training
11
20
25
Leadership Development
19
20
17
Rewards
20
24
Discipline
35
10
11
10
25
10
The below table explains the overall numbers for 56 employees in total for the given
statements and categories.
Unsatisfied
Average
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
84
347
173
111
69
No. Of Employees = 56
Strongly
Strongly
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
35
14
30
17
32
10
11
45
11
36
22
32
38
12
36
13
32
10
10
30
38
12
disagree
Agree
12
37
36
10
33
11
34
13
11
35
10
33
15
11
35
10
30
10
30
10
10
25
21
21
35
The below table explains the overall numbers for 56 employees in total for the given
statements and categories.
Ideal Appraisal Performance
Strongly
System
Disagree
65
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
117
236
528
Strongly
Agree
286
Observation
From Percentage Analysis, the Agree (528) in Ideal Performance Appraisal system is
observed to be promoting compared to Current Appraisal system.
Observation
From the Pie Chart & Bar Chart, the Agree (528) in Ideal Performance Appraisal system
is observed to be promoting compared to Current Appraisal system.
6. WORK TO BE DONE
Using analysed data come up with expected outcome and recommendations.
REFERENCES
1. Deepa,
E.;
Palaniswamy,
R.;
Kuppusamy,
S.
Journal
of
Contemporary
J. Jasmine Sharon
(Signature of Student)
ANNEXURE 1
QUESTIONNAIRE FOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM
Gender
Male
Experience
Female
2-6 year
6-10 Year
Above 10Years
Please rate your satisfaction with the following parts of your current Appraisal system
(Marking tick)
Statements
1) Performance Planning /
Goal Setting
2) Performance Evaluation
3) Development Planning
4) Coaching
5) Training
6) Leadership Development
7) Rewards
8) Discipline
9) Effectiveness of current
system
Unsatisfied
Average
Satisfactory
Good
Excellent
Please rate the following statements on an Ideal Performance Appraisal (Marking tick)
Statements
1) Employee should have authority to
determine work objective
2) Employee should have authority to
determine goal
3) Employee should receive feedback
regularly on performance
4) Employee
should
understand
organizational goal and objective
5) Employee should have his/her
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
ANNEXURE 2
SURVEY DATA BASED ON THE QUESTIONNAIRE
The below table explains the feedback from 56 employees in total for different
statements, based on Current Appraisal System.
Current Appraisal System
No. Of Employees = 56
Very
Poor
Statement
Poor
Average
Very
Good
Good
35
10
10
25
40
16
18
13
12
31
The below table explains the feedback from 56 employees in total for different
categories, based on Current Appraisal System.
Current Appraisal System
Statement
No. Of Employees = 56
Unsatisfied
Average
Satisfactory
42
18
12
10
Development Planning
38
10
Coaching
10
20
26
Training
11
20
25
Leadership Development
19
20
17
Rewards
20
24
Discipline
35
10
11
10
25
10
Performance Planning/
Setting
Performance Evaluation
Goal
Good
Excellent
No. Of Employees = 56
Strongly
disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly
Agree
35
14
30
17
32
10
11
45
11
36
22
32
38
12
36
13
32
10
10
30
38
12
12
37
36
10
33
11
34
13
11
35
10
33
15
11
35
10
10
30
10
10
25
21
21
35