Acc Unit 1 3 Unit of Study
Acc Unit 1 3 Unit of Study
Acc Unit 1 3 Unit of Study
10
Content to Be Learned
from a graph.
Southern Rhode Island Regional Collaborative with process support from The Charles A. Dana Center at
the University of Texas at Austin
11
function.
Essential Questions
Southern Rhode Island Regional Collaborative with process support from The Charles A. Dana Center at
the University of Texas at Austin
12
Written Curriculum
Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Content
Creating Equations
A-CED
Create equations that describe numbers or relationships [Linear, quadratic, and exponential (integer
inputs only); for A.CED.3 linear only]
ACED.2 Createequationsintwoormorevariablestorepresentrelationshipsbetweenquantities;graph
equationsoncoordinateaxeswithlabelsandscales. (Major Content)
Writeafunctionthatdescribesarelationshipbetweentwoquantities. (SupportingContent)
a. Determine an explicit expression, a recursive process, or steps for calculation from a
context. (Tasks have a real-life context; limited to linear functions, quadratic functions,
and exponential functions with domains in the integers)
Build a new functions from existing functions [Linear, exponential, quadratic, and absolute value; for
F.BF.4a, linear only]
FBF.3
Identifytheeffectonthegraphofreplacingf(x)byf(x)+k,kf(x),f(kx),andf(x+k)forspecific
valuesofk(bothpositiveandnegative);findthevalueofkgiventhegraphs.Experimentwith
casesandillustrateanexplanationoftheeffectsonthegraphusingtechnology.(Identifying
thetransformationsislimitedtolinearandquadraticfunctions.Experimentingwithcases
usingtechnologyislimitedtolinearfunctions,quadraticfunctions,squarerootfunctions,cube
rootfunctions,piecewisedefinedfunctions,includingstepfunctionsandabsolutevalue
functions,andexponentialfunctionswithdomainsintheintegers.)(Additionalcontent;
extendedinAlgebra2)
Mathematically proficient students start by explaining to themselves the meaning of a problem and
looking for entry points to its solution. They analyze givens, constraints, relationships, and goals. They
make conjectures about the form and meaning of the solution and plan a solution pathway rather than
simply jumping into a solution attempt. They consider analogous problems, and try special cases and
simpler forms of the original problem in order to gain insight into its solution. They monitor and evaluate
their progress and change course if necessary. Older students might, depending on the context of the
problem, transform algebraic expressions or change the viewing window on their graphing calculator to
get the information they need. Mathematically proficient students can explain correspondences between
equations, verbal descriptions, tables, and graphs or draw diagrams of important features and
relationships, graph data, and search for regularity or trends. Younger students might rely on using
concrete objects or pictures to help conceptualize and solve a problem. Mathematically proficient students
Southern Rhode Island Regional Collaborative with process support from The Charles A. Dana Center at
the University of Texas at Austin
13
check their answers to problems using a different method, and they continually ask themselves, Does
this make sense? They can understand the approaches of others to solving complex problems and
identify correspondences between different approaches.
2
Mathematically proficient students make sense of quantities and their relationships in problem situations.
They bring two complementary abilities to bear on problems involving quantitative relationships: the
ability to decontextualizeto abstract a given situation and represent it symbolically and manipulate the
representing symbols as if they have a life of their own, without necessarily attending to their referents
and the ability to contextualize, to pause as needed during the manipulation process in order to probe into
the referents for the symbols involved. Quantitative reasoning entails habits of creating a coherent
representation of the problem at hand; considering the units involved; attending to the meaning of
quantities, not just how to compute them; and knowing and flexibly using different properties of
operations and objects.
3
Mathematically proficient students understand and use stated assumptions, definitions, and previously
established results in constructing arguments. They make conjectures and build a logical progression of
statements to explore the truth of their conjectures. They are able to analyze situations by breaking them
into cases, and can recognize and use counterexamples. They justify their conclusions, communicate
them to others, and respond to the arguments of others. They reason inductively about data, making
plausible arguments that take into account the context from which the data arose. Mathematically
proficient students are also able to compare the effectiveness of two plausible arguments, distinguish
correct logic or reasoning from that which is flawed, and - if there is a flaw in an argument - explain what
it is. Elementary students can construct arguments using concrete referents such as objects, drawings,
diagrams, and actions. Such arguments can make sense and be correct, even though they are not
generalized or made formal until later grades. Later, students learn to determine domains to which an
argument applies. Students at all grades can listen or read the arguments of others, decided whether they
make sense, and ask useful questions to clarify or improve the arguments.
4
Mathematically proficient students can apply the mathematics they know to solve problems arising in
everyday life, society, and the workplace. In early grades, this might be as simple as writing an addition
equation to describe a situation. In middle grades, a student might apply proportional reasoning to plan a
school event or analyze a problem in the community. By high school, a student might use geometry to
solve a design problem or use a function to describe how one quantity of interest depends on another.
Mathematically proficient students who can apply what they know are comfortable making assumptions
and approximations to simplify a complicated situation, realizing that these may need revision later. They
are able to identify important quantities in a practical situation and map their relationships using such
tools as diagrams, two-way tables, graphs, flowcharts and formulas. They can analyze those relationships
mathematically to draw conclusions. They routinely interpret their mathematical results in the context of
the situation and reflect on whether the results make sense, possibly improving the model if it has not
served its purpose.
7
Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure. Young students, for
example, might notice that three and seven more is the same amount as seven and three more, or they may
Southern Rhode Island Regional Collaborative with process support from The Charles A. Dana Center at
the University of Texas at Austin
14
sort a collection of shapes according to how many sides the shapes have. Later, students will see 7 8
equals the well remembered 7 5 + 7 3, in preparation for learning about the distributive property. In
the expression x2 + 9x + 14, older students can see the 14 as 2 7 and the 9 as 2 + 7. They recognize the
significance of an existing line in a geometric figure and can use the strategy of drawing an auxiliary line
for solving problems. They also can step back for an overview and shift perspective. They can see
complicated things, such as some algebraic expressions, as single objects or as being composed of several
objects. For example, they can see 5 3(x y)2 as 5 minus a positive number times a square and use that
to realize that its value cannot be more than 5 for any real numbers x and y.
8
Mathematically proficient students notice if calculations are repeated, and look both for general methods
and for shortcuts. Upper elementary students might notice when dividing 25 by 11 that they are repeating
the same calculations over and over again, and conclude they have a repeating decimal. By paying attention
to the calculation of slope as they repeatedly check whether points are on the line through (1, 2) with slope
3, middle school students might abstract the equation (y 2)/(x 1) = 3. Noticing the regularity in the way
terms cancel when expanding (x 1)(x + 1), (x 1)(x2 + x + 1), and (x 1)(x3 + x2 + x + 1) might lead them
to the general formula for the sum of a geometric series. As they work to solve a problem, mathematically
proficient students maintain oversight of the process, while attending to the details. They continually
evaluate the reasonableness of their intermediate results.
Southern Rhode Island Regional Collaborative with process support from The Charles A. Dana Center at
the University of Texas at Austin
15
Future Learning
Students will use the knowledge gained in this unit to investigate and solve systems of linear equations
(unit 2.2) and to support their further study of the graphs of more complex functions (unit 3.2, 3.3, 4.2).
Students will also use the material learned in this unit during unit 3.1 when they fit a linear function to a
given set of data. They will continue to build on these concepts in subsequent mathematics courses.
Additional Findings
In middle grades, students should work more frequently with algebraic symbols than in lower grades. It
is essential that they become comfortable in relating symbolic expressions containing variables to verbal,
tabular, and graphical representations of numerical and quantitative relations (Principles and Standards
for School Mathematics, p. 223).
According to the PARCC Model Content Frameworks for Mathematics, Algebra I students become
fluent in solving characteristic problems involving the analytic geometry of lines, such as writing down
the equation of a line given a point and a slope. Such fluency can support them in solving less routine
mathematical problems involving linearity, as well as in modeling linear phenomena (including modeling
using systems of linear inequalities in two variables).
Southern Rhode Island Regional Collaborative with process support from The Charles A. Dana Center at
the University of Texas at Austin
16