THE FIVE PROCESSES

MECHANICAL ENGINEERS HATE

(AND WHY.)

INTRODUCTION
Mechanical engineering is among the best jobs on the planet. Inventing new things and solving problems requires both
smarts and creativity. However, its not always fun and its not always easy. Even Batman has to be Bruce Wayne every
now and then. Some of the most critical tasks are seen as mundane or inefficient which is the exact opposite of what
engineers look forward to every day. The trick is to identify the painful processes, understand what
is driving the angst, and create a solution. After all, problem solving is what we do.

Design Reviews
Design reviews were put in place to make sure designs meet
their specific requirements. These requirements might be
product specific, project specific, or even customer specific.
Sometimes design reviews are a corporate policy or even a
governmental mandate.

WHY DO WE DO IT?
To allow stakeholders to weigh in on the designs
ability to meet/exceed various expectations and
specifications, such as:

To identify potential issues from people with

different areas of expertise, so that:

Performance The consumer is expecting the

product to perform as it is marketed.

Issues with compliance or regulations can be

identified early so fines are avoided up-front.

Quality Materials used, appearance, durability

and reliability influence the perceived quality of
the product.

Issues with the design can be found prior to

production, protecting the profitability of the
product.

Manufacturability The feasibility to manufacture

the product may require adjustments to the
design.

Environmental/sustainability Compliance and

regulations that impact the design need to be
closely considered.

WHY DO WE HATE IT?

Nobody likes to be criticized. Nobody wants to be called out in a room full of their peers. Designs require
a personal investment and the perceived value may be different to the others involved. Design reviews
often yield rework in the eleventh hour, which adds another layer of difficulty.
Criticism from peers is a necessary evil. The types of feedback fall under a few categories:

Factual, mathematical issues

with the design

Subjective, preference, personal

taste differences

This type of criticism is likely the easiest

to take. There is no arguing with math and
science so its easier to accept that a few
recalculations are warranted.

This type of feedback challenges engineers

not to take things personally. Changes in
the appearance, color, finishes, and final
touches can seem petty and may contradict
with your taste. Finding resolve with these
changes requires a thick skin and an
open mind.

Last minute changes

The issues that didnt come up earlier
dont just go away. The changes required
following a design review meeting may
require an unnecessary amount of rework
and the finger-pointing begins to identify
who missed this detail.

HOW CAN WE MAKE IT BETTER?

Ask questions early on and create a list of the changes requested that remains visible.

Be a leader throughout the process

Identify requirements as early as possible

Listen attentively, take good notes and follow up with others on how
you were able or unable to incorporate their ideas.

Nobody wants to go through a difficult design review. Come up with

a plan, make it easy and make it repeatable. Remind yourself that
everyone in that design review meeting is there for a reason, so the
more you can solicit their ideas and feedback, the less they will have
to question later on.

Anticipate and embrace the changes that come up

Your ability to expect the unexpected will allow you to handle the
curve balls as they get thrown your way.

Remain confident in the process

Keep an open mind that the folks in the review meeting are entitled
to their own opinions, which may be an indicative of the potential
customers opinion as well.

Collaboration
Nothing really great was ever built alone - collaboration
makes you better, makes your products better and, in turn,
makes your organization better.

WHY DO WE DO IT?
Communication is essential for creating great products. The more perspectives going into a design,
the more likely you will discover new ideas or improvements that you may have missed on your own.

Collaboration is all about working inside and outside your organization with all types of engineers and data. Sometimes its
a second set of eyes during a design review helping catch errors and create better results. Other times it may be working
with engineers inside your building or around the world collaborating on complex mechanical assemblies.
Working to reduce design cycles and get products to market quickly requires collaboration while some engineering tasks
are performed simultaneously.

WHY DO WE HATE IT?

Forced collaboration feels like school all over again. Others

constantly looking over the shoulder, monitoring every click.
The extra work we take on as a result of collaboration
seems fruitless.
Deliverables inherited from others may slow progress and
may not even enhance the design. And if they are using
software different than your own, importing and translating
models can be a challenging and time-intensive process.

HOW CAN WE MAKE IT BETTER?

Dont be the roadblock!

Timing is key.

Be attentive and listen to others,

ask questions that could yield
valuable input.

Engaging others too early can lead to

having too many chefs in the kitchen which
only adds frustration and sets a negative
tone for the rest of the design process.
Engaging others too late often leads to last
minute issues creating angst and panic.

Set up a system other than

email to communicate.
Provide access to lightweight files using
your CAD sharing capabilities. This way you
can protect your intellectual property while
providing others with the information they
need to support you.
Generate feedback in an organized and
traceable way. By creating a single place to
gather and organize the input received it
simplifies the effort of incorporating data
coming from multiple directions.

Creating Drawings and

Manufacturing Instructions

10

WHY DO WE DO IT?

Creating drawings and manufacturing instructions allow non-engineers to access information they need, such as: 2D prints
or assembly/disassembly instructions for manufacturing, service, or technical publications.
This type of data is critical to those who do not have (or need) access to a CAD tool. Procurement is a good example, as they
do not need all the data and formulas, but they need the BOM and measurements in order to ensure the right materials are
purchased.
In certain situations regulations require 2D drawings and service manuals as part of the final deliverable. 2D drawings are
what most expect to have when fabricating designs are shared with them during a design review.

11

WHY DO WE HATE IT?

The need for this data often interrupts the natural flow of engineering. Creating these documents is a manual, tedious
process and results in creative energy and valuable time shifting from the product to paperwork.
The deliverables themselves can create issues as well. 2D views of rich 3D data can easily be misinterpreted, requiring us to
spend time with whomever receives them to clarify important details.

12

HOW CAN WE MAKE IT

BETTER?
By sharing designs in 3D there is less room for
interpretation of the data.

Consider making 3D models the master copy or provided as

supplementary information to drawings. This can be done
through file viewers from you CAD vendor or through universal
formats such as 3D PDF. Using the 3D model as the primary
source for data and dimensions, you can reduce the risk of
misinterpretation or human error.
Automate the documentation process as much as possible
and remember to leverage all your available resources. Once
designs are finalized in 3D, an intern or junior engineer could
be tasked with creating the downstream documentation.

13

Data Management
Being proactive and having the right tools upfront
streamlines the workflow.

14

WHY DO WE DO IT?
Proper data management allows for quick and easy data reuse.

Data management is the never ending process of maintaining design

files and related engineering data in an orderly and searchable location.
A proactive approach to Data Management maintains data integrity,
ensuring that the data is saved, backed up, and in the proper location.
Revision control is critical to keep files from being lost or overwritten.
The potential loss of time and money for working on the wrong or old
design can be significant. This can also lead to unnecessary rework to
recreate something that already exists.
One day spent on data management likely saves twice as much on the
design and engineering process.

15

WHY DO WE HATE IT?

Product data management is commonly misperceived
as a waste of time.

One quarter of the companies surveyed indicate their

technical personnel spend the equivalent of one day per week
(20%) on non-value added data management activities.
Tech-Clarity Research Report

The expectation is that data management could/should be

automated, rather than a never-ending loop of check-ins and
check-outs.
Manually adding BOM information to CAD or ERP is another
opportunity for error and manual data entry.

16

HOW CAN WE MAKE IT BETTER?

Use a data management system to reduce significant amount of overhead from the current process.

Tech Claritys research shows that world-class manufacturers are 30

percent more likely to be using a PDM or PLM system to manage their
design data.
With a data management system in place, you no longer have
to waste time on things like finding the file youre looking for or
manually copying designs for use in new projects. Theres also less
chance of duplicating effort, since you always know who is working
on what.
And integrating data management into downstream processes such
as BOM generation can prevent time-consuming and error prone
duplicate entry.

17

Engineering
Change Orders
Engineering change orders are a process by which all
changes to the design are documented and signed off by
specific approvers inside and outside your organization.

18

WHY DO WE DO IT?

Documenting changes to a design reduces error and

allow changes to be implemented more rapidly. Some
change orders result in cost reduction, effective ECO
management allows these changes to be implemented
more rapidly.
Properly implemented ECOs ensure changes dont
introduce new issues. If changes are implemented
without the proper ECO a preventable domino-effect
can create significant problems and drive costs up.

19

WHY DO WE HATE IT?

Change is an uncomfortable word, especially when it is
unforeseen and disrupts the creative design phase.

In many cases ECOs require multiple tradeoffs and compromises that

are easier during the early stages of design, but become increasingly
hard to implement as the product approaches its launch date.
ECOs very rarely affect one item as adjacent or connecting items
need to be analyzed to determine if they require adjustment as well.
Similarly, if downstream data and deliverables have already been
created then they will likely require updates.
Approved changes need to be reflected in multiple systems, such as:
CAD, ERP, and potentially many others.

20

HOW CAN WE MAKE IT BETTER?

Consider

Automate

The implementation of a quick ECO for changes

that have smaller impacts to minimize the
administrative effort and streamline the process.

An impact analysis to identify where

designs are used.

Leverage

Simulate

Data management properly to automate the

process of updating all downstream data to
eliminate recreating the wheel.

The impact of proposed changes to

prevent the introduction of new issues.

21

CONCLUSION
Theres a lot of things mechanical engineers really dont like to do, these five are critical to your business, and need your attention.
Design Review | Collaboration | Creating Drawings and Manufacturing Instructions | Data Management | Engineering Change Orders
Your time is best spent on activities that add value to the product for your customer. Coming up with ideas that improve product
performance or make your products more affordable. Identifying and eliminating waste everywhere else makes sure your focus
remains on the activities that deliver the highest impact.

Title of e-Book

Section of e-Book

23
22

Autodesk and the Autodesk logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of Autodesk, Inc., and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates in the USA and/or other countries. All other brand names, product names,
or trademarks belong to their respective holders. Autodesk reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical
errors that may appear in this document.
2016 Autodesk, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Tech-Clarity Perspective: The Facts About Managing Product Data, Tech-Clarity, Inc., 2015.