Teoria Frank Chiappeta . - REVISAR
Teoria Frank Chiappeta . - REVISAR
Teoria Frank Chiappeta . - REVISAR
Sponsored by:
Prepared for:
October 8, 2009
c
Main Concerns
Vibration / Airblast Complaints
Field Controls (Geologic info, drilling accuracy,
Irregular floors, & explosive quantity
Top stemming Plugs
Oversize
Muck pile shape
Dam material & fragmentation
Vibration / Airblast
Average vibration in community = 1.3 mm/s
Airblast = ? (No airblast measurements recorded to date.)
Vibration/Airblast Recommendations
Airblast is cause of 95 % of complaints not vibrations.
Measure airblast on all future measurements.
Set up permanent seismograph along mine perimeter.
Irregular Floors
High spot
Low spot
High spot
Pumping explosives
in wet holes
Water level
Bottom explosive
column is diluted
and contaminated
Mud, slimes
& sediments
Loading starts in mud
Density measurements = OK
Truck calibration recommended
(minimum) every three months
5m
5m
Stem tite, conic
plug, Taponex,
etc.
3m
Drill Cuttings
2m
5m
Presplit
line
Oversize,
Fragmentation,
Timing and Electronic
Detonators
Mine
Mill
Explosive energy
Energy distribution in rock mass
Timed and controlled release of energy
Major Sources
of Oversize
Bench top
6
9
11
12
Stemming
Explosive
column
1 Collar / Stemming
2 Free Face
8
10
Boulders
Stemming volume
can be 20 50%
of blast volume
Pit floor
Subgrade
For illustrative
purpose only
Decreasing stemming
Stemming
Explosive
column
Major Sources
of Oversize
Bench top
6
9
11
12
Stemming
Explosive
column
1 Collar / Stemming
2 Free Face
8
10
Boulders
Stemming volume
can be 20 50%
of blast volume
Pit floor
Subgrade
For illustrative
purpose only
Stab
Hole
Subgrade
Stemming
Stem
Charge
Subgrade
Imperial Units
Explosive density = 1.15 g/cc
Explosive diameter = 9 in
Surface
Length of W
Stemming = 16.4 ft
Stemming
5 m (16.4 ft)
Metric Units
W
D = Distance from
surface to center of W
W = Weight of explosive
occupied in top of
explosive column,
equivalent to the length of
10 borehole or explosive
diameters
and
and
D = Stemming + (L)
D = Stemming + (L)
= 16.4 + (7.5) = 20.2
SD =
D
W 1/3
20.2
=
6.19
= 3.3
SD =
D
W 1/3
6.15
=
= 1.3
4.75
Uncontrolled Energy
Controlled Energy
Good fragmentation.
Larger fragmentation.
Acceptable vibration/airblast.
Good heave and muck pile
mound.
No
fallback
Insignificant
surface effects
Some
fallback
No
breakage
zone
SD = 0 0.60
Metric Units
0.64 0.88
(m/Kg1/3)
0.92 1.40
SD = 0 1.5
1.6 2.2
Imperial Units
1.44 1.80
2.3 3.5
(ft/lb1/3)
3.6 4.5
1.84 2.40
2.40 +
4.6 6.0
6.0 +
SD = D/W1/3
D = SD * W1/3
W = ( D/SD)3
W = Stem charge quantity (lbs).
D = Distance from surface to
center of stem charge (ft).
SD = Selected Scaled Depth of
Burial (ft/lbs1/3 )
Surface
Stemming
5m
= (2.75)3
= 21 Kg
SD is chosen as 1.2
21 Kg
Top
stemming
Stem
charge
Stem
charge
0 ms
525 ms
0 ms
0 ms
0 ms
Explosive
column
500 ms
0 ms
1 m Air
Deck
Taponex
Taponex
C
c
0 ms
0 ms
0 ms
1 m Air
Deck
Explosive
deck
Pressure
Time
Hole Delay = 17 42 ms
Row Delay = 65 109 ms
Hole Delay = 1 3 ms
Row Delay = 100 300 ms
Delay Timing
0 ms
0 ms
25 ms
2 ms
50 ms
4 ms
0 ms
Vp
Vs
2 ms
4 ms
Example Calculation
Assume hole spacing S = 7.2 m and Vp = 2500 m/s.
T = 1.7 ms
Improving fragmentation
Increasing plant throughput
Max. 13% @ 6 in. + (152 mm)
Normal Blast
Results
Stem Charge, 2 ms
hole delay & electronic
detonators
South Africa
South Africa
KN2 - Right
2 m Stemming
2 m Stem charge
2 m Stemming
Main Charge
BEFORE
Quarry 2 Pennsylvania, USA
After
Before
After
After
Western Australia
180 ft
(55m)
Sequence
Stemming
525 ms
0 ms
0 ms
180 ft
(55m)
Explosive
column
525 ms
0 ms
0 ms
500 ms
Nonelectric
Detonator Timing
Hole Delay = 42 ms
0 ms
Electronic
Detonator Timing
Hole Delay = 10 ms
Prepared for:
October 8, 2009
c