Lab 7 Thermo
Lab 7 Thermo
Lab 7 Thermo
ABSTRACT
Firstly, the experiment is to demonstrate the filmwise and dropwise condensation. Secondly, to
determine the filmwise heat flux and surface heat transfer coefficient at constant pressure.And
thirdly is to determine the dropwise heat flux and surface heat transfer coefficient at constant
pressure. In this experiment, the value of the result of heat transfer for dropwise is higher that
the filmwise condensation.It means that the dropwise condensation having more heat transfer
compared to filmwise condensation. Next for the last experiment is to demonstate the effect of
air inside the chamber which is heat coefficient of condensation. The table of result is showed
the heat transfer coefficient reduses radically for both dropwise and filmwise condensation. It
will prove according the theory which is with the presence of air, the surface heat transfer
coefficient will decreased.
.
2.0
INTRODUCTION
Condensation of steam on the surface of a condenser causes heat to transfer from the steam
into the cooling medium flowing through the condenser. This type of heat transfer may occur at
very high fluxes depending on the conditions at the condenser surface. Steam may condense in
two different manners--filmwise or dropwise. For the same operating conditions, dropwise
condensation exhibits a much higher and efficient heat transfer compared to filmwise
condensation. Although dropwise condensation is always desirable, it seldom occurs in practice
for a continuous period of time. Filmwise Condensation is most heat transfer surfaces on a heat
exchanger are made of wettable materials. During condensation, a film of condensate spreads
over these surfaces. As more vapor condenses on the outside of the film, its thickness
increases and the film will start flowing downwards due to its weight. Heat transfer occurs
through this film of condensate to the surface material beneath, then to the cooling medium. The
liquid film is generally a poor conductor of heat, contributing much to the thermal resistance and
inefficiency of this mode of condensation. Dropwise condensation is the heat transfer surfaces
are treated to become non-wettable , the condensate that forms on the surface will be shaped
like spherical beads. These beads adheres together to become larger as condensation
proceeds. The bigger beads will then start to flow downwards due to their weight thus collecting
all other static beads along the way. As the beads increase in size, the velocity increases, finally
leaving a trail of bare surface free from liquid film. This bare surface offers very little resistance
to the transfer of heat. Therefore, very high heat fluxes are possible.
3.0
OBJECTIVES
4.0
THEORY
4.1
Mechanism of Condensation
Condensation of a vapor to a liquid and vaporization of a liquid to a vapor both involve a change
of phase of a fluid with large heat-transfer coefficients. Condensation occurs when a saturated
vapor such as steam comes in contact with a solid whose surface temperature is below the
saturation temperature, to form a liquid such as water.
Normally, when a vapor condenses on a surface such as a vertical or horizontal tube or other
surface, a film of condensate is formed on the surface and flows over the surface by the action
of gravity. It is this film of liquid between the surface and the vapor that forms the main
resistance to heat-transfer. This is called filmwise condensation.
Another type of condensation, dropwise condensation, can occur, where small drops are formed
on the surface. These drops grow and coalesce, and the liquid flows from the surface. During
this condensation, large areas of tube are devoid of any liquid and are exposed directly to the
vapor. Very high rates of heat-transfer occur on these bare areas. The average heat transfer
coefficient for dropwise condensation is five to 10 times larger than the filmwise coefficients.
Dropwise condensation can be promoted by making the surface non-wetting (via coating).
However, dropwise condensation is difficult to maintain in industrial applications due to
oxidation, fouling and degradation of coating, and eventually film condensation occurs.
Therefore, condenser designs are often based on the assumption of filmwise condensation.
4.2
In Figure 1 (a), vapor at Tsat is condensing on a wall whose temperature is Tw. The condensate
is flowing downward in laminar flow. Assuming unit thickness, the mass of the element with
liquid density l in Figure 1 (b) is (-y) (dx1) l. The downward force on this element is the
gravitational force minus the buoyancy force, or (-y)(dx)(l-) g, where is the density of the
saturated vapor. This force is balanced by the viscous-shear force at the plane y of l (dv/dy)
(dx1). Equating these forces;
d
dx
dy
y dx l g l
(1.2-1)
g l
y y 2 / 2
(1.2-2)
The mass flow rate of film condensate at any point x for unit depth is;
m ldy l
g l
y y 2 / 2 dy
l
(1.2-3)
Integrating;
l g l 3
3 l
(1.2-4)
At the wall, for area (dx1) m2, the rate of heat transfer is as follows if a linear temperature
distribution is assumed in the liquid between the wall and the vapor;
q x k l dx 1
dT
dy
k l dx
y 0
Tsat Tw
(1.2-5)
In a dx distance, the rate of heat transfer is qx. Also, in this dx distance, the increase in mass
from condensation is dm. Using Eq. (1.2-4);
l g l 3
l g l 2d
3 l
l
dm d
(1.2-6)
Making a heat balance for dx distance, the mass flow rate dm times the latent heat hfg must
equal the qx from Eq. (1.2-5):
l g l 2d
T T
hfg
k l dx sat w
l
(1.2-7)
Integrating, with = 0 at s = 0 and = at x = x;
4 l k l x Tsat Tw
gh fg l l
1/ 4
(1.2-8)
h x dx 1Tsat Tw k l dx 1
Tsat Tw
(1.2-9)
This gives
kl
hx
(1.2-10)
l l gh fg k l 3
hx
1/ 4
4 l x Tsat Tw
(1.8-17)
By integrating over the total length L, the average value of h is obtained as follows;
1 L
4
h x dx h x L
L 0
3
(1.2-11)
l l gh fg k l 3
h 0.943
l LTsat Tw
1/ 4
(1.2-12)
However, for laminar flow, experimental data are about 20% above Eq. (1.2-12). Hence, the final
recommended expression for vertical surfaces in laminar flow is shown as Eq. (1.2-13):
N Nu
l l ghfg L3
hL
1.13
kl
T
l l
1/ 4
(1.2-13)
where l is the density of liquid in kg/m3 and that of the vapor, g is 9.8066 m/s2, L is the
vertical height of the surface or tube in m, l is the viscosity of liquid in Pas, kl is the liquid
thermal conductivity in W/mK, T = Tsat-Tw in K, and hfg is the latent heat of condensation in J/kg
at Tsat. All physical properties of the liquid except hfg are evaluated at the film temperature Tf =
(Tsat + Tw)/2. For long vertical surfaces the flow at the bottom can be turbulent. The Reynolds
number is defined as;
N Re
N Re
4m
4
D l l
(vertical tube, diameter D)
(1.2-14)
(1.2-15)
4m 4
W l
l
where m is the total kg mass/s of condensate at tube or plate bottom and = m/D or m/W. The
NRe should be below 1800 for Eq. (4.2-13) to hold. The reader should note that some references
define NRe as /. Then this NRe should be below 450.
g l L3
hL
0.0077
2
kl
N Nu
1/ 3
N Re 0.4
(1.2-16)
Solution of this equation is by trial and error, since a value of NRe must first be assumed in order
to calculate h.
5.0
APPARATUS
6
4
1. Indicator
2. Filmwise condenser
9
3.
4.
5.
6.
6.0
Power
Discharge valve
Dropwise condenser
Coiler heater
PROCEDURES
starts to increase.
Water was heated up to boiling point untilled the pressure has reached 1.02 to 1.10 bar.
Valve V1 was open immediately and followed y valve V5 for 1 minute in order for
10
Experiment 2: The Filmwise Heat Flux and Surface Heat Transfer Coefficient Determination at
Constant Pressure
1. Cooling water was circulated through the filmwise condenser starting the experiment
with minimum value of 0.1LPM.
2. The heater power was adjusted in order to obtain desired pressure at 1.01 bar.
3. When the condition has been stabilized, the steam (T sat) and surface temperature (Tsurf),
Tin (T1) and Tout (T2) also flow rate was recorded.
Experiment 3: The Dropwise Heat Flux and Surface Heat Transfer Coefficient Determination At
Constant Constant Pressure
1. Cooling water was circulated through the dropwise condenser starting the experiment
with minimum value of 0.4LPM.
2. The heater power was adjusted in order to obtain desired pressure at 1.01 bar.
3. When the condition has been stabilized, the steam (T sat) and surface temperature (Tsurf),
Tin (T1) and Tout (T2) also flow rate was recorded.
11
5. When the condition has been stabilized, the steam (T sat) and surface temperature (Tsurf),
Tin (T1) and Tout (T2) also flow rate was recorded.
6. Step 1-6 was repeated for dropwise condensation.
12
7.0
RESULTS
1.02
Tsat steam
Tsurf
Tsurf
Tin
Tout
Power
(C)
(Filmwise),
(Dropwise),
(T1) (C)
(T2) (C)
(w)
(C)
(C)
90.0
92.3
33.5
63.0
294
71.8
13
Figure 2:
The boiling
process
occur
Experiment
2:
The
surface
transfer
coefficient
filmwise
heat
determination
of
constant
pressure
Table 2: The
and surface
heat
transfer
Power
Tin
Tout
Tsat
Tsurf
Tsat - Tsurf
Tm
(LPM)
(w)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(W/m2)
(W/m2.K
)
0.1
124
33.6
56.0
71.5
33.4
38.1
25.05
38 717
1546
0.2
214
33.2
48.5
71.1
33.1
38.0
29.42
52893
1798
0.3
267
33.3
46.0
71.0
33.5
37.5
30.98
65857
2126
0.4
290
34.1
44.5
71.2
33.2
38.0
32.50
71907
2213
0.5
251
33.9
41.1
70.6
33.2
37.3
34.29
62227
1815
14
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
37.2 37.3 37.4 37.5 37.6 37.7 37.8 37.9
38
38.1 38.2
Temperature Difference, C
38
38.2
Temperature Difference, C
15
Experiment 3: The dropwise heat flux and surface heat transfer coefficient determination at
constant pressure
Table 3: The dropwise heat flux and surface heat transfer coefficient determination at constant
pressure
Flowrate
Power
Tin
Tout
Tsat
Tsurf
Tsat - Tsurf
Tm
(LPM)
(w)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(W/m2)
(W/m2.K
)
0.4
209
32.2
39.7
71.6
45.9
25.7
35.55
51856
1459
0.8
279
32.4
37.4
71.2
44.6
26.6
36.23
69141
1908
1.2
368
32.2
36.6
70.9
43.1
27.8
36.67
91266
2489
1.6
502
32.0
36.5
71.1
43.2
27.9
35.95
124 454
3461
2.0
544
32.3
36.2
71.3
43.3
28.0
37.02
134 825
3643
80000
Y-Values
60000
40000
20000
0
25.5
26
26.5
27
27.5
28
28.5
Temperature Difference, C
6
4
2
0
25.5 26 26.5 27 27.5 28 28.5
Temperature Difference, C
Graph 4: Surface heat transfer coefficient c=versus temperature difference for dropwise
condensation.
17
Heat Flux versus Temperature Difference for Filmwise and Dropwise condensation
160000
140000
120000
100000
filmwise
dropwise
40000
20000
0
25.5
26
26.5
27
27.5
28
28.5
Temperature Difference, C
Graph 5: Heat flux versus temperature difference for filwise and dropwise condensation
Surface Heat Transfer Coefficient versus Temperature Difference for Filmwise and Dropwise condensation
4000
3500
3000
2500
Surface heat transfer coefficient, 2000
W/m2.K
1500
filmwise
dropwise
1000
500
0
25.5 26 26.5 27 27.5 28 28.5
Temperature Difference, C
Graph 6: Surface heat transfer coefficient versus temperature difference for filmwise and
dropwise condensation
18
Power
Tin
Tout
Tsat
Tsurf
Tsat - Tsurf
Tm
(LPM)
(w)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(W/m2)
(W/m2.K
)
0.1
145
33.6
46.9
68.9
33.8
35.1
29.35
35918
1224
0.2
211
32.9
44.2
70.1
32.7
37.4
30.00
52266
1742
0.3
243
33.1
42.4
70.1
32.3
37.8
30.11
60193
2000
0.4
267
32.8
41.1
70.1
32.1
38.0
32.98
66138
2005
0.5
298
33.0
40.5
70.0
31.5
38.5
33.00
73817
2237
B) Dropwise condensation
Table 5: The effect of the air inside the chamber for dropwise condensation
Flowrate
Power
Tin
Tout
Tsat
Tsurf
Tsat - Tsurf
Tm
(LPM)
(w)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(W/m2)
(W/m2.K
)
0.4
210
33.8
36.3
68.0
41.0
27.0
32.93
52 018
1579
0.8
231
33.8
35.2
68.1
39.7
28.4
33.60
57 221
1703
1.2
250
33.8
35.0
68.1
39.1
29.0
33.70
61927
1838
1.6
282
34.0
34.9
68.0
37.5
30.5
33.55
69854
2082
2.0
298
34.0
34.6
68.0
37.1
30.9
33.70
73817
2190
19
Surface Heat Transfer Coefficient versus Temperature Difference of filmwise with and without air
2500
2000
1500
with air
without air
500
0
34 35 36 37 38 39
Temperature Difference, C
Graph 7: Surface heat transfer coefficient versus temperature difference of filmwise with and
without air
Surface Heat Transfer Coefficient versus Temparature Difference for dropwise with and without air
14000
12000
10000
8000
Surface heat transfer coefficient,
6000
W/m2.K
with air
without air
4000
2000
0
26
28
30
32
Temperature Difference, C
20
Graph 8: Surface heat transfer coefficient versus temperature difference for dropwise with and
without air
8.0
SAMPLE CALCULATION
Flowrate
Power
Tin
Tout
Tsat
Tsurf
Tsat - Tsurf
Tm
(LPM)
(w)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(C)
(W/m2)
(W/m2.K
)
0.1
145
33.6
46.9
68.9
33.8
35.1
29.35
35918
1224
min
1L
60 s
= 1.667 g/s
Power, qx
T
qx = mC
21
= 156.3 W
Log mean temperature difference, T
Tm=
Tm=
t 1 t 2
t
ln 1
t2
( 71.533.6 ) (71.556.0 )
( 71.533.6 )
ln
(71.556.0 )
= 25.05 C
Heat flux,
qx
dL+
d
4
156.3
(3.142 0.0127 0.098)+
3.142 0.01272
4
= 38717 W/m2
22
U=
Tm
38717
25.05
= 1546 W/m2.K
9.0
DISCUSSION
In this experiment, heat flux is increases with steam pressure and the temperature difference
between the steam and the condenser surface. The values for heat flux for each set value of
pressure is increase by using dropwise condensation compared using filmwise condensation.
The Heat Flux in dropwise condensation can be more than twenty times larger than in
filmwise at atmospheric pressure. This depends on how the condensation forms on the
condenser. The vapour drops in dropwise condensation are constantly formed. They are
reduces which continually exposed the surface of the condenser. The surface of the condenser
always being covered by the film created in filmwise condensation .It is because the film are
poor conductor of heat, and will reduce the value for Heat Flux for filmwise.
The graph shows that for a certain temperature difference, the Heat Flux for a condenser
using steam mixed with 5% of air is significantly smaller than pure steam. The magnitude of this
difference increases with temperature difference. In the case of Heat Transfer Coefficients, the
value for both steam and steam with air approaches zero, but when the steam is mixed with air
it is consistently low.
23
10.0
CONCLUSION
As conclusion, the dropwise condensation was more effective method of heat transfer
compared to filmwise condensation. This conclusion is proven by getting the result according to
the theory that is supported by Heat and mass transfer book. After that, it also showed the
effectiveness of the presence of air inside the chamber radically reduce surfaces heat transfer
coefficient. But the result is not accurate because of the some error that occurs during the
experiment.
11.0
1.
2.
3.
4.
RECOMMENDATION
Must follow the procedure correctly to avoid an error occur in the experiment.
Use pump so that water can be supplied to the system without failure.
The eyes need to be parallel to the reading when changing the pressure.
Make sure water was supplied clearly to the system during the experiment to prevent the
12.0
REFERENCES
and
Fimwise
Condensation
Lab
Report.
(n.d.).
Retrieved
from
http://www.scribd.com/doc/22992765/Dropwise-and-Fimwise-Condensation-Lab-Report
3. Rose, J. (2011). DROPWISE CONDENSATION. Retrieved April 9, 2014, from
http://www.thermopedia.com/content/708/?tid=110&sn=8
4. http://www.scribd.com/doc/22992765/Dropwise-and-Fimwise-Condensation-Lab-Report
5. Welty, Wicks, Wilson, Rorrer. (2008). Fundamentals of Momentum, Heat, and Mass
Transfer. Wiley Publication
6. Yunus, A Cengel & Afshin J. Ghafar (2007). Heat and mass Transfer: McGrrawHill
24
13.0
APPENDICES
25