Heat Transfer Enhancement by Using Dimpled Surface: Hemant C. Pisal, Avinash A. Ranaware
Heat Transfer Enhancement by Using Dimpled Surface: Hemant C. Pisal, Avinash A. Ranaware
Heat Transfer Enhancement by Using Dimpled Surface: Hemant C. Pisal, Avinash A. Ranaware
ABSTRACT: The importance of heat transfer enhancement has gained greater significance in such areas as
microelectronic cooling, especially in central processing units, macro and micro scale heat exchangers, gas
turbine internal airfoil cooling, fuel elements of nuclear power plants, and bio medical devices. A tremendous
amount of effort has been devoted to developing new methods to increase heat transfer from fined surface to the
surrounding flowing fluid. Rib turbulators, an array of pin fins, and dimples have been employed for this
purpose. An investigation was conducted to determine whether dimples on a heat sink fin can increase heat
transfer for laminar airflows. This was accomplished by performing an experimental and numerical
investigation using two different types of dimples: 1) circular (spherical) dimples, and 2) oval (elliptical)
dimples. Dimples were placed on both sides of a copper plate with a relative pitch of S/D=1.20 and relative
depth of /D=0.2 (e.g., circular dimples). For oval dimples, similar ratios with the same total depth and
circular-edge-to-edge distance as the circular dimples were used. For those configurations the average heat
transfer coefficient and Nusselt number ratio were determined experimentally. For circular and oval dimples,
heat transfer enhancements (relative to a flat plate) were observed for Reynolds number range from 600 to 2000
(Reynolds number based on channel height). Moreover, pressure drop, thermal performance and flow
characteristic were simulated numerically.
7| Page
8| Page
Fig.2. Schematic drawings, (a) the entire test surface of the flat copper plate; (b) the entire test surface of the
circular type copper plate with dimple dimensions ; (c) the entire test surface of the oval (elliptical) type copper
plate with dimple dimensions. All dimensions are given in mm.
The blower will be turned on and air is forced through the test setup. The flow rate through the test section will
be controlled with the help of a valve downstream of the orifice plate. The flow rate will be set in such a way so
that the pressure drop across the orifice corresponds to required Reynolds number. After the flow will be set
across the test section, the heaters will be turn on and the voltage supplied to the heaters will be roughly set to
15W. According to the temperature of the test plate, voltage and current will be changed. After the measured
temperatures will reach a specific value, the voltage will be controlled to an input power 14W. After as time
elapse of roughly 6 hours, the temperature of the test plate will reaches steady state. The pressure difference
across the orifice will be checked frequently so that the flow rate does not change from the intended value of
Reynolds number. At steady state, the temperatures of the test plate will be checked by the data acquisition
system. The pressure difference across the orifice plate and the pressure across upstream of the orifice plate will
be measured. The voltage supplied to the heater and the corresponding current will be taken to calculate the heat
supplied to the test plate. The temperatures of the inlet air into the test section and into the orifice plate will also
check. The objective of this investigation is to study the heat transfer characteristics using dimples at low
Reynolds number flow conditions. An average heat transfer coefficient will be calculated from the net heat
transfer per unit area, the average temperature of the plate, and the bulk mean air temperature. To quantify the
average heat transfer coefficient, the following expression will be used:
h
Qnet
Qtotal Qloss
As (Tw Tb )
As (Tw Tb )
--- (1)
9| Page
Tbinlet
Tbexit
Qtotal Qloss
mCp
---- (4)
III. UNCERTAINTY
The uncertainty of the average heat transfer coefficient depends on the uncertainties in the average wall
temperature, bulk air temperature difference, and the net heat input for each test section. This uncertainty
increases with decreasing both the average wall temperature to bulk air temperature difference and the net heat
flux. Based on a confidence level of 95% described by Kline and McClintock, uncertainty value of 0.5% for all
properties of the air, and 0.5% for all physical dimensions were used. Based on the maximum uncertainties for
pressure at the orifice flow meter, and the pressure drop across the orifice of 1.0% and 4.1%, respectively, the
maximum uncertainty of the air mass flow rate was calculated to be 2.8%. The corresponding maximum
uncertainty of the Reynolds number was 2.9. The uncertainty for the power input and heat loss were found to
be 3.1% and 5.4%, respectively, and those for the average wall and bulk temperatures 3.0% and 3.5%,
respectively. With these values, the uncertainty of the Nusselt number was calculated to be 7.8 %.
V. RESULTS
This investigation presents both experimental and numerical studies for the heat transfer characteristics
for a heat sink with laminar airflow conditions. This was conducted with two different types of dimples: 1)
circular (spherical) dimples, and 2) oval (elliptical) dimples. The average heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt
Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in engineering (SICETE)
Dr. J.J. Magdum College of Engineering, Jaysingpur
10| Page
12| Page
13| Page
14| Page
References:
[1] P.W. Bearman and J.K. Harvey, Control of circular cylinder flow by the use of dimples, AIAA J. 31 (1993) 1753-1756.
[2] M.K. Chyu, Y. Yu, H. Ding, J.P. Downs and F.O. Soechting, Concavity enhanced heat transfer in an internal cooling passage,
International Gas Turbine & Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition ASME paper 97-GT-437.
[3] H.K. Moon, T. O` Connell and B. Glezer, Channel height effect on heat transfer and friction in a dimpled passage, J. Gas Turbine
Power 122 (2000) 307-313.
[4] G.I. Mamood, M.L. Hill, D.L. Nelson, P.M. Ligrani, H.K. Moon and B. Glezer, Local heat transfer and flow structure on and above a
dimpled surface in a channel, J. Turbomachinery 123 (2001) 115-123.
[5] P.M. Ligrani, G.I. Mamood and M.Z. Sabbagh, Heat transfer in a channel with dimples and protrusion on opposite walls, J.
Thermophys. Heat Transfer 15 (3) (2001) 275-283.
[6] G.I. Mahmood and P.M. Ligrani, Heat Transfer in a dimpled channel: combined influences of aspect ratio, temperature ratio, Reynolds
number, and flow structure, Int. J. heat Mass Transfer 45 (2002) 2011-2020.
[7] N.K. Burgess and P.M. Ligrani, Effects of dimple depth on channel nusselt numbers and friction factors, J. Heat Transfer 127 (8) (2005)
839-847.
[8] R.S. Bunker and K.F. Donellan, Heat transfer and friction factors for flow inside circular tubes with concavity surfaces, J.
Turbomachinery 125 (4) (2003) 665- 672..
15| Page