Iatss40 Theory 01
Iatss40 Theory 01
Iatss40 Theory 01
Cities and
transportation
Kenji Doi
Professor, Department of Global Architecture, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University
1.1
Cities change with the passage of time, moving from growth to decline. To make an analogy with human
life, cities pass from periods of childhood to adolescence (urbanization), young adulthood to middle age
(suburbanization), and into old age (disurbanization). However, cities also expect a fourth phase not
comparable to human life, one of reurbanization.1) The form of urban transportation changes with the
growth phase of the city, and the role of urban transportation changes as well according to the life cycle
of the city as shown in Figure 1.
The role of transportation demanded in the urbanization phase is the carrying of large numbers of
people into the city, for example by railways. During suburbanization, the emphasis is on moving people
quickly over long distances. In the latter half of the suburbanization phase, the increasing development
of low-density suburbs shifts the predominant modes of transportation toward private automobiles.
Later in the disurbanization phase, increased spread of low-density urban areas (urban sprawl) causes a
decline in public transportation created on the premise of mass transport, further increasing the dependence on automobiles. Many Japanese cities are still experiencing the effects of disurbanization (urban
decline), but some cities are trying to proceed to the reurbanization stage. The role of transportation in
this fourth stage is, in contrast to that during the suburbanization stage, connecting areas of agglomeration within the city at short distances and moderate speeds, and promoting interconnectedness between
these areas of agglomeration.
The heavily automobile-dependent United States has been often called a suburban nation.2) ,3)
However, the spread of road infrastructure and automobile use during the 20th century made it the
suburban era for many countries worldwide. Those looking to escape from problems caused by
increased urban density due to increasing populations looked to suburbs as a kind of utopia that would
provide a wealthier countryside lifestyle, resulting in the mass production of largely uniform residential
and commercial suburban development all over the world. Artificially planned suburbs with decentralized and individualistic lifestyles were supported by freedom of movement for private car owners, and
later changed form into widespread sprawl development. This exacerbates the problem of automobile
Urbanization
Suburbanization
Disurbanization
Reurbanization
dependence, creating a negative synergistic effect between motorization and suburban sprawl.4)
The root of such urban and transportation problems is, in short, that our thinking regarding the
role of transportation has halted at the suburbanization phase, considering that the goal of transportation must be long distances, high speeds. We must evolve our thinking to the reurbanization phase,
where the goal is rather short distances, low speeds.
1.2
Individuals
ing
ell
Dw
y
vit
(resources)
ti
Ac
contrast, accessibility refers to the ability to perform demanding activities through movement to
Ab
il
re ity t
so o u
(m urc til
ob
e iz
ilit s e
y)
Place
Opportunity
Travel
(service)
(residence)
Ease
(acce
Freedom
of choices
of rea
ch
ssibilit
y)
14Theory
1.3
At the national level, emphasis should be placed on fast mobility to connect cities and hubs at high speed
by the latest technologies, including a maglev Shinkansen and a logistics Shinkansen for the countrys
high-speed rail network. On the other hand, slow mobility for enjoying excursions and interactions at a
safe and comfortable speed should be emphasized for personal and social reasons at the local level. Rigid
differentiation of travel speed according to location is required for achieving sustainable transportation
as well as increasing the attractiveness of cities.
In Japan, which is experiencing the problems of population decline and super-aging of society,
large-scale shrinking of cities is required from the perspective of national land and urban management.
However, such severe constraints can also serve to foster creativity that can break through the impasse
and lead to co-evolution of transportation, urban, and social developments. The development of shrinking cities to achieve sustainability and the development of creative cities to increase competitiveness
are strategies that are two sides of the same coin, and the realization of both will require a reconfiguration of the bonds between the elements of people, knowledge, goods, services, money, and time. Mobility is the key to doing so. As mentioned in Section 1.2, mobility refers both to freedom of movement and
ability to make use of resources.
Building a mobility system for cities that are both sustainable and highly competitive will require a
multifaceted understanding of the value of mobility, along with the formation of a hierarchical network,
consisting of a fast mobility layer that connects cities and hubs at high speed and a slow mobility layer
within cities and hubs that promotes excursions and interactions at low to medium speeds. Slow mobility refers to means and forms of transportation at near-human speeds. But why is such distinction
between speeds necessary?
A negative aspect of motorization is its standardization of travel speed. Whether in towns, suburbs,
or between cities, most automobile drivers pursue speed. The desire for long distances, high speeds
mentioned in Section 1.1 is ever-present, whether one is inside or outside of urban areas.
The pursuit of speed regardless of places results in uniform expansion that impairs the hierarchy of
urban spaces. The result is longer daily trips to work and school, increased energy consumption for
transportation, increased production of CO2 and local environmental load, and even threats to life due
Economy (efficiency)
Metropolitan
area
expansion
Hierarchical
structure
of networks
Total length of
road and rail
networks
Hierarchical
structure of
urban spaces
Concentration and
dispersion of
urban functions
Metropolitan
area
population
User benefit
Operator profits
Social (safety)
Value of
mobility
TDM, ITS
Smart choices
CO2 emissions
Environmental load
Ownership and
usage of
automobiles
Traffic fatalities
and injuries
Figure 3. A causal relationship regarding the value of mobility and travel speed as the key factor
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
10
15
50
7.0
45
6.0
7.0
40
35
30
25
20
0.4
0.6
0.8
1 .0
1.2
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
20
30
40
50
Figure 4. Urban population density and distribution versus average automobile travel speeds and rates of road
trafc deaths
16Theory
society, the economy, and the environment, while keeping in mind the causal
relationships indicated by Figure 4.
One result of increasingly slower
movement speeds in urban areas and
Bus
50
Walking
60
Bicycle
Automobile
Train
40
30
20
10
10
quicker travel speed than do automobiles and trains, and as is well known in Japan bicycles serve as an excellent, efficient and fast transportation mode within cities. The cycling revolution in London is famous for results such as its cycle superhighways and cycle hire (bike-sharing) scheme, but the social background and events leading up to this
realization is rich in lessons. A series of socioeconomic factors such as soaring fuel prices starting
around 2002, the introduction of in-town road pricing in 2003, and subway and bus terrorist attacks in
2005 are some of the influences that led people to use bicycles for their travel needs.
1.4
As humans age they experience changes in physiological functions, reduced physical ability, reduced
Ability
cognitive characteristics, and other changes in psychology and awareness that cause a decline in movement ability (Fig. 6). Figure 7 shows some of these mental changes that accompany increased age and
result in changes in travel needs.
Assumed previous
level of ability
travel that is safe, secure, and beneficial to health and the environment.
When this is displayed as a ternary
plot showing the positioning of vari-
Assumed ability in a
(super-) aged society
Changes in physiological function due to aging
Reduced physical ability
Decline in cognitive characteristics
Changes in psychology and awareness
20
40
60
80
Age
per
che
a
nd
Fas
ter
a
0.2
25
3
4
35 year
4
s
4
y
45 ear
s
5
4y
55 ear
s
6
4y
ea
rs
65
+y
ea
rs
liv 65+
ing ye
alo ars
ne ,
0.0
Comfortable travel
3544` 4554
2534 years
0.5
0.25
nity
65+
5564
ma
0.4
Hu
0.6
bili
ty
tra
ve
0.8
Walking
0.5
Mo
0.25
1.0
th
eal
to h t
ial men
efic iron
ben env
vel he
Tra and t
0.25
0.50
Automobile
Public
transportation
Safety and
transportation capacity
low-speed slow mobility that is located in the position between public transportation and private
transportation. This is the position associated with transportation modes such as next-generation LRT
systems, low-speed electric community buses, community cycles, and other forms of shared personal
mobility.
Building the mobility system for a sustainable city will require a bold outlook on making these
changes, and enhanced safety is the starting point of the change process. Doing so will require making
decisions on the priorities for and extensive management of speeds of road transportation. Efforts to
achieve the harmonious coexistence of humans and automobiles through reducing speeds can be seen
in European speed management programs such as the establishment of the Zone 30 measure, which
establishes establish a 30 km/h (20 mph) zone. In recent years there have been increased efforts toward
retaining comfortable space via improved road design that attempts to change driver behavior in ways
that reduce their running speed. There has also been a worldwide trend toward promoting walkable
cities, which allow residents to walk to places necessary for daily life. These are some examples in which
human-centered prioritization has been established as the guiding principle for road and urban space
design.
1.5
The term integrated transportation came into common use in the latter half of the 1990s. It goes without saying that a unified perspective is needed when developing transportation policy. The most important point is that one performs not an additive unification, but an integrated approach that combines
diverse aspects into a whole. There are four levels in a desirable integrated transportation system:
1) Operational integration: integration of public transportation services, fare structures, and operation information
2) Strategy integration: integration of policy instruments for the infrastructure, management,
18Theory
Infrastructure
Mobility
Public
transportation Dynamic
linkage
TOD Corridor
District
continuation
program
Personal
mobility
measures
Road diet/renovation
Conversion to a compact
city through shrinking and
re-agglomeration of
urban functions and
spaces
Environment
City
Safety
Priority and speed
management in road
transportation
New infrastructure
ICT Smart
Community
Community
infrastructure
Society
Design process
Equity
lanes. This allows existing roads renovated with an emphasis on the usability of road spaces by a broader
range of users, and has already been implemented in many countries. In addition, transit-oriented development and corridor development are methods of supporting public and shared transportation from a
land use aspect. Detailed discussions of these are presented in chapter 2.
As the design process loop in the figure shows, priority-based road space allocation and strict speed
management to secure traffic safety are the primary pursuit, and they result in the ability to render social
systems standardized on the elderly in which universal design can assist in providing increased accessibility. Also promoted is a conversion to compact cities in which urban functions and spaces are more
aggregated. When these conditions are met, regional public transportation becomes sustainable, and the
strategy of allocating the right transportation modes in the right places will lead to improved overall
efficiency. Implementing a mobility revolution will be impossible without holistic perspectives that
clearly prioritize management of speeds (slowness) and spaces (compactness), as well as time management that harnesses the opportunities and threats of external shocks and constraints, converting these
to revolutionary force. In Japan, there are continued trends for neglecting the global optimization in
transportation policy; public transportation policy is still being discussed in isolation, and slow mobility
modes such as bicycles are positioned merely as local solutions without intermodal integration.
In a future of increasingly harsh economic and financial conditions, it will be difficult to improve
the quality of mobility in a super-aged society without meeting prerequisites of priority, slowness, and
compactness (PSC). Quality of mobility refers to social usability for users with diverse needs. Moving
beyond the physical, physiological, and ease-of-use levels of todays usable mobility systems to a higher
level in which one psychologically wants to use the system will require a revolutionary process that
emphasizes PSC.
The view of linear growth that aims at an American- or European-style society has become less
effective.13) Nevertheless, we find it difficult to abandon such concepts of growth in our pursuit of a
future mobility society. This is why our thinking on the role of transportation comes to a halt as
described at the beginning of this chapter. The development of a mobility society best suited to ourselves
will require consideration of not only technologies and systems, but also culture and ethos.
References
1) Klassen, L. H., J. A. Bonrdrez, and J. Volmuller. 1981. Transport and Reurbanisation. Gower.
2) Duany, A., E. Plater-Zyberk, and J. Speck. 2000. Suburban Nation: The rise of sprawl and the decline for the American Dream.
North Point Press.
3) Hall, P. 1996. Cities of Tomorrow. Blackwell Publish Ltd.
4) Hayashi, Y., R. Suparat, R. Mackett, K. Doi, Y. Tomita, N. Nakazawa, and H. Kato. Urbanization, motorization and the environment nexus: An international comparative study of London, Tokyo and Bangkok. Memoirs of the School of Engineering,
Nagoya Univ. Vol. 46, No. 1: 5598.
5) Ota, K. 1988. Kotsu shisutemu keikaku [Transportation system plan]. Gijutsu shoin (in Japanese)
6) Doi, K., H. Nakanishi, M. Kii, and I. Sugiyama. 2006. Examining policy implications of location efficiency as a key concept
in TOD implementation. Journal of JSCE(D) Vol. 62, No. 2, 207212. (in Japanese)
7) Alshih, R., and D. Hensher. 2003. The mobility and accessibility expectations of seniors in an aging population. Transportation Research Part A Vol. 37 (A): 903915.
20Theory
8) Doi, K. 2013. Suro mobiritei [Slow mobility]. International Journal of Automotive Engineering Vol. 67, No. 3, 2431. (in
Japanese)
9) Doi, K., T. Hasegawa, S. Kobayashi, I. Sugiyama, M. Mizohata. 2011. A Study on Quality of Mobility Demanded in Superaged Cities. IATSS Review Vol. 35, No. 3: 3849. (in Japanese)
10) Doi, K. 2011. Komobiritei ga michibiku kotsu to toshi no kyohatten [Co-mobility leading to transportation and social
developments] Japan Railway Engineers Association Vol. 54, No. 7: 46. (in Japanese)
11) Hayashi, Y., K. Doi, H. Kato, and International Association of Traffic and Safety Sciences, eds. 2009. Toshi no kuoritei sutokku:
Tochi riyo, ryokuchi, kotsu no togo senryaku [Quality Stock of Cities: Integrated strategy of land use, green space and transportation]. Kajima Institute Publishing. (in Japanese)
12) Doi, K., and M. Kii. 2012. Looking at sustainable urban mobility through a cross-assessment model within the framework
of land-use and transport integration. IATSS Research Vol.35: 6270.
13) Takeuchi, K. 2014. The ideal form of transdisciplinary research as seen from the perspective of sustainability science, considering the future development of IATSS. IATSS Research Vol.38.
Recommended Reading
1) Alonso, W. 1964. Location and Land Use. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
2) Anas, A. 1982. Residential Location Markets and Urban Transportation: Economic Theory, Econometrics and Policy Analysis
with Discrete Choice Models. New York: Academic Press.
3) Banister, D. 2003. Transport Planning: In the UK, USA and Europe. Routledge.
4) Batty, M. 1994. A chronicle of scientific planning: the Anglo-American modeling experience. Journal of the American Planning Association 60: 716.
5) Berechman, J., and K. A. Small. 1988. Modeling land use and transportation: an interpretive review for growth areas. Environment and Planning A 20: 12831422.
6) Boarnet, M. G., and R. Crane. 2000. Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel. New York: Oxford University
Press.
7) Calthorpe, P. 1993. The Next American Metropolis. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
8) Cervero, R. 1989. Americas Suburban Centers: The Land-use-Transportation Link. Unwin Hyman.
9) De la Barra, T. 1989. Integrated Transport and Land Use Modeling: Decision Chains and Hierarchies. Cambridge University
Press.
10) Dunham-Jones, E. 2011. Retrofitting Suburbia, Updated Edition: Urban Design Solutions for Redesigning Suburbs. Wiley.
11) Grant, J. 2006. Planning the Good Community: New Urbanism in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
12) Hall, P. 2002. Cities of Tomorrow. Wiley.
13) Hensher, D. A., K. J. Button, K. E. Haynes, and P. R. Stopher, eds. 2004. Handbook of Transport Geography and Spatial Systems. Elsevier.
14) Howard, E. 2010. To-morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform. Cambridge University Press.
15) Iacono, M., D. Levinson, and A. El-Geneidy. 2008. Models of transportation and land use change: a guide to the territory.
Journal of Planning Literature 22 (4): 32340.
16) Irwin, E. G. 2010. New directions for urban economic models of land use change: incorporating spatial dynamics and heterogeneity. Journal of Regional Science 50: 6591.
17) Jacobs, J. 1992. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage.
18) Jenks, M., and N. Dempsey. 2005. Future Forms and Design for Sustainable Cities. Routledge.
19) Lynch, K. 1981. Good City Form. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
20) Mees, P. 2009. Transport for Suburbia: Beyond the Automobile Age. Routledge.
21) Newman, P., and J. Kenworth. 1999. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press.
22) Simmonds, D., P. Waddell, and M. Wegener. 2013. Equilibrium versus dynamics in urban modelling. Environment and
Planning B: Planning and Design 40 (6): 10511070.
23) Speck, J. 2012. Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
24) Vuchic, V. R. 2005. Urban Transit: Operations, Planning and Economics. Wiley.
25) Waddell, P. 2002. UrbanSim: Modeling urban development for land use, transportation and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 68: 297314.
26) Walker, J. 2011. Human Transit: How Clearer Thinking about Public Transit Can Enrich Our Communities and Our Lives.
Island Press.
27) Webster, F. V., and N. J. Paulley. 1990. An international study on land-use and transport interaction. Transport Reviews 10:
287322.
28) Wegener, M. 1982. Modeling urban decline: a multilevel economic-demographic model of the Dortmund region. International Regional Science Review 7: 2141.
29) Wegener, M. 1994. Operational urban models: state of the art. Journal of the American Planning Association 60: 1729.
30) Wilson, A. G. 1997. Land use/transport interaction models: past and future. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 32:
323.
Practical application projects for reference
A land utilization framework and transportation system for declining population: 132135
Quality of mobility required for super-aged cities: 136139