RUBRICS FOR PROJECT EVALUATION

(Total marks-100)

Criteria Level of Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor

Performa (100%) (75%) (50%) (25%)
nce
1. Project scope and Relevant to the Relevant to Relevant to the Neither
suitability branch of study the branch of branch of relevant to
(10 marks) and suitable for study and study and the branch
bachelor degree suitable for suitable for of study nor
Objectives are bachelor bachelor suitable for
clearly defined degree degree bachelor
All requirements degree
are identified to Objectives are Most of the
achieve the clearly objectives are
objectives. defined clearly defined The
objectives
Socially relevant Majority of the are not
requirements Some matched
Potential for are identified requirements with the
further to achieve the are identified project goal
research/product objectives. to achieve the
development/busi objectives
ness merit. Socially
relevant Limited
potential for
Potential for further
further research
research/prod /product
uct development/
development/ business merit.
business
merit.
2. Review of Literature: Literature review Literature Information is Information
(Source/Reference: Peer provide review gathered from is gathered
reviewed journals, books, background and provide a limited from a
conference proceedings, context to the background
number of single
videos, etc.) project and context to
the project sources. source.
Information is
Information is Summarized Summary of
gathered from
multiple, gathered from the relevant the
(15Marks) research-based literature literature is
multiple
sources. inadequate.
sources.
Summarized the
Summarized
relevant literature
in order to explain the relevant
the history, literature to
development and formulate the
current state of problem.
the chosen field
and leads to
problem
formulation.
 The problem The problem The problem No clarity in
3. Problem statement & statement, scope statement, statement, problem
Methodology : and objectives are scope and scope and statement
specified with objectives are
objectives are
clarity specified with
specified with Fails to
clarity
Able to choose clarity identify or
Able to
(20 Marks) choose a Identifies a explain a
the most
methodology method; method
appropriate
which is Not able to
method. and
relevant to Able to apply apply
justify
the problem relevant relevant
Able to apply knowledge of knowledge
relevant the curriculum of the
Able to apply
knowledge of the content curriculum
relevant
curriculum content
knowledge of
content along the curriculum
with research content but The method
effort limited relies on an
research existing
Novelty in concept or
effort
implementation- technology.
The method relies The method
on an existing relies on an
concept or existing
technology with concept or
students technology
contribution
 4. Team work and progress Excellent team The team Involvement of Team did
work worked well the team in not
Each member most of the activity/project collaborate
(10 Marks) contributed in a time. implementatio or
valuable Each member n is communicat
way to the contributed satisfactory. e well.
project. to the project. . some
Planning and Limited members
Exhibits resource planning or worked
management forethought. independent
professionalism in
have Project hastily ly.
planning and
resource enhanced the completed for
management overall quality deadline No evidence
project of planning.

5. Project Presentation/ Team is able to Team Team presents The team is

Demonstration. justify and presents all all the above not able to
articulate all the the above criteria, but justify and
(Presentation and slides: Content above criteria in criteria and is with room for articulate
outline, the presentation; able to justify improvement most of the
The slides and articulate in justification above
Literature review, presented are in most of Slides are criteria;
the correct them; mostly in Slides
problem identification, format and The slides correct format presented
logical order; presented are and logical are not in
problem statement, scope, Presentation is in correct order; logical
clear and is aided format and order;
with properly logical order; Presentation is Presentation
methodology, results and
formatted Presentation clear and is is
discussion, figures/charts etc. is clear and is aided with ambiguous;
aided with properly no
references, with slide number) Finishes on time properly formatted satisfactory
with a proper formatted figures/charts response to
conclusion and figures/charts etc most of the questions,
excellent etc. time No proper
(20 Marks) response to Finishes on demonstrati
questions. time with a Finishes with a on
Demonstration(If proper proper
any) conclusion conclusion and
of the developed and good a satisfactory
system with response to response to
 clarity along with questions questions
typical Demonstratio Demonstration
examples/cases n of the of the
developed developed
system with system with
clarity limited clarity

6. Project Report Well Properly Organized and Lacked

organized and organized clarity is overall
clearly and clearly maintained for organization
written. The written most of the . Most of the
Format of report underlying . parts . time failed
logic is clearly Text written in in
(Introduction, Literature review, articulated correct format conveying
and easy to follow. with all Text written in the idea.
Problem definition, sections correct format
Text written in mentioned for most of the Format is
correct format Text written in parts not as per
with contents in correct format Format for standards
Methodology, Design and logical order and with all most of the References
all sections sections figures and are mostly
implementation/Experiment/Sim
properly divided properly tables . is absent
ulation Results and discussion, and numbered divided and strictly References
Conclusion, References) Format for tables, numbered followed are not
figures, charts, References are cited in the
etc. is strictly Format for , listed cite
followed with tables, Clear
(15 Marks) labeling and figures, Most of the evidences of
properly referred charts, etc. is references are plagiarism
in the text) strictly properly cited
List of references followed in the text
is in the standard List of
format references is
References are in the
properly cited in standard
the text following format
a references
consistent style are properly
cited in the
 No evidences of text
plagiarism No evidence
of plagiarism

7. Quality of the project Students Project and Project No evidence

demonstrate a project demonstrates of genuine
superior level of experience genuine learning
knowledge and
clearly learning for
skills acquired Little
(10 Marks) through the stretched expanding
student knowledge and concern for
project work
Project quality knowledge skills project
approaches and skills Project quality or
professional level Project completed but incomplete
Maintained high demonstrates demonstrates project
level of ethics good quality moderate
The work can be Maintained quality Not tried to
published in peer ethical Maintained maintain
reviewed journals ethical
aspects ethical aspects
Multidisciplinary aspects
May lead to a Limited scope
involvement
High level of data publication for publication
interpretation,
integration, Multidisciplina
analysis ry
discussion, and involvement
results. to some
extent