Trapping of A Free Vortex by Joukowski Airfoils: Ming-Ke Huang and Chuen-Yen Chowf
Trapping of A Free Vortex by Joukowski Airfoils: Ming-Ke Huang and Chuen-Yen Chowf
Trapping of A Free Vortex by Joukowski Airfoils: Ming-Ke Huang and Chuen-Yen Chowf
AIAA 82-4059
The ability of trapping a free vortex by a Joukowski airfoil in its vicinity for lift augmentation is investigated
through a two-dimensional potential flow analysis. The effects of angle of attack, thickness, and camber on the
trapping performance of the airfoil are examined separately. It is found that to capture a vortex which is stable
to small disturbances, the proper arrangement is to have a rather thick symmetric airfoil at a small angle of
attack.
(10)
df
(3)
(4)
I dCQSjJL /
r K
(14)
-iog(r -a' (7)
in which
7T ' 7T
2
in which a bar is used to denote the complex conjugate. a \
The complex velocity of the flow about the airfoil is then ( P -
0
Po
)cos(0 ~a)
/ 0
derived from Eq. (7)
da2
r (15)
dw dw dw / dz Po
(8)
^_
where (16)
Po
dvv _ 7 7
dp = ^e~la~2 R3 =
da2
r-sin(/z-0
P20-a2)
1/ 1 1\
0)-- ( - )
2\S1 S2/
Po(Po-
(9)
(17)
294 M.-K. HUANG ANDC.-Y. CHOW AIAA JOURNAL
a2 \ V. Method of Solution
= (PO+ lsin(0 0 -a)+5sin(ji-a)
On / We now have three algebraic equations, Eqs. (13), (14), and
(23), for three of the four unknowns AC, F, p0, and 60. The
da2 system of equations can be rearranged in a more convenient
(18)
Po form. Equations (13) and (14) are first combined to obtain
_d_ (19) F
Po (27)
7T R2I3-R3I2
K " R, TR )
(28)
7T
x (20)
Upon substitution into Eq. (23) a single equation results
where
+2p0dcos([j,-eo) -2p0cos00-2dcosn (21)
sin (a + 0) -I-
S2 = 1 +p20 + d2 (22)
2a R2I3-R3I2 (i")
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN on October 28, 2014 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/3.7913
The complex velocity of the free vortex is, from Eq. (1 1), neighborhood of 5 deg. For example, the case of a. = 0.1. rail
(or 5.73 deg) is presented in Ref. 5 r The figure also reveals
t2 [ . / a \1 : IK 1
that stronger vortices can be captured only at distances farther
1J 77; = - \P ~lci I I Pl<* away from the flat plate.
^-l(e \f)e rt'-a'/t' The sum T + K, which is proportional to the lift, is plotted
against y0 in Fig. 4 for constant values of a. Each of the
curves is cut off when F,=0, that is, when the trailing edge
7 becomes a stagnation point. The cut-off point represents the
maximum vortex lift that the flat plate can attain at a given
in which f and f' are related through Eq. (2), and Q(?o* f) = 0 angle of attack; whereas the lowest point on the same constant
in the equilibrium position f.' = f0. For a small displacement a curve, which occurs at y0 = 0 when K = 0, represents the lift
f; away from the equilibrium point f, we have in the absence of an external vortex. The plot shows that the
leading-edge vortices are more effective in generating lift, but
_ _ unfortunately they are not stable to small disturbances.
Nevertheless, considering the stable loci near the trailing edge
dr -dz d/ - d z e ( f ' n at 5 deg angle of attack, the maximum vortex-augmented lift
Taylor's expansion about ^ results in is about ten times the original lift on the flat-plate airfoil.
Plots of some representative streamline patterns and
pressure distributions are referred to in Ref. 5.
(33)
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN on October 28, 2014 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/3.7913
1.5
1.0
0.5
a =0'
-1.0 1.0 Fig. 5 Loci of free-vortex equilibrium position for the symmetric
Fig. 3 Loci of free-vortex equilibrium position plotted for both airfoil with n = ir and 5 = 0.15. Below the trailing edge, the vortex is
constant a and constant K for the flat-plate wing; the vortex is stable stable on the entire a = 0- and 5-deg curves and to the right of the cross
along the a = 5 deg curve above the point marked by a cross. on a = 10- and 15-deg curves.
296 M.-K. HUANG AND C.-Y. CHOW AIAA JOURNAL
Loci of free-vortex equilibrium positions plotted in Fig. 5 arrangement that the vortex is at the point (-0.631, 0.515)
show that, for positive angles of attack, vortices of clockwise and the angle of attack is 5 deg. The corresponding pressure
and counterclockwise circulations can be trapped above and distribution on the surface of this airfoil is plotted in Fig. 10
below the wing, respectively. This property is different from to compare with that on the same airfoil but without the
that of the flat plate, below which no vortex can be trapped. A external vortex. It shows that on the upper surface of the
blown-up plot of the region above the trailing edge is shown in airfoil, there exists an extremely low-pressure region below
Fig. 6. The vortex is still unstable in the leading-edge region the vortex, which is followed by a high-pressure region up to
either above or below the airfoil, but may become stabilized the trailing edge. The pressure change on the lower surface of
near the trailing edge. Increasing angle of attack has a the airfoil caused by the vortex is relatively small. The vortex-
destabilizing effect, and the area occupied by the stable loci augmented lift, which is 2.27 times the lift of the airfoil in the
above the airfoil is much larger than that above the flat plate. absence of the vortex, is mainly attributed to the low pressure
The lift as a function of height y0 is plotted in Fig. 7 for under the vortex. Note that a strong nose-up moment about
vortices trapped above the wing, and in Fig. 8 for those the midchord results from such a pressure distribution.
trapped below it. For vortices above the wing, the general Figure 11 depicts the flow pattern when a vortex of
trend is that the maximum lift generated from a leading-edge coordinates (0.746, 0.180) becomes stationary near the
position of the symmetric airfoil is higher than that of the flat trailing edge of the airfoil at a = 5 deg. A stagnation point
plate at the same angle of attack, whereas the opposite is true occurs at the trailing edge, corresponding to the maximum-lift
considering the trailing-edge positions. Figure 8 shows that arrangement for that angle of attack. The pressure
lift decreases when a vortex of counterclockwise circulation is distribution on the surface is plotted in Fig. 12. The extremely
trapped below the wing. Such a case therefore is not in- low-pressure region below the vortex still appears in addition
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN on October 28, 2014 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/3.7913
teresting for practical applications. to the low-pressure region near the leading edge on the upper
A representative flow pattern with a vortex trapped in a surface. In this case the moment about the midchord is in the
leading-edge position is shown in Fig. 9, plotted for the nose-down sense.
0.4 -
o.i -
i.o
Fig. 6 Blown-up view of the region above trailing edge of Fig. 5. The
vortex is stable on the entire a = 0-deg curve and above the point
marked by a cross on each of the other constant a curves. The cross on
the a = 5-deg curve, being very close to the trailing edge, is not shown.
It is unstable on the entire a = 30-deg curve.
-5
Fig. 8 Lift on the symmetric airfoil as a function of the vertical
coordinate y0 of the vortex captured below the wing for various angles
of attack. Solid lines are for the leading-edge loci and dashed lines are
for the trailing-edge loci.
Fig. 7 Lift on the symmetric airfoil as a function of the vertical Fig. 9 Streamline pattern for vortex of coordinates (- 0.631, 0.515)
coordinate y0 of the vortex captured above the wing for various angles on leading-edge locus of symmetric airfoil (n = ir, 5 = 0.15) at 5-deg
of attack. angle of attack.
MARCH 1982 TRAPPING OF A FREE VORTEX BY JOUKOWSKI AIRFOILS 297
- 14--
- I2 - -
-10--
I.O--
-1.0
1.5
1.5-r 1.5-r'
I.O--
(UNSTABLE)
0.5-- = 0.10-
0.5-- 8 =0
0.05 0.05
0.10
0.15 (STABLE )
1.5 l.5i-
LEADING EDGE LOCI
Downloaded by UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN on October 28, 2014 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/3.7913
8 = O.I5 N
0.10,
1.0 0.05 N
Fig. 14 Loci of free vortex and lift for circular-arc airfoils of dif- Fig. 15 Loci of free vortex and lift for cambered airfoils of almost
ferent camber at a = 0.1 rad. the same thickness (a = 1.15) but different camber at a = 0.1 rad.
edge loci are stable for /3 = 0 (symmetric airfoil), and are 4) The effect of increasing thickness is to stabilize the
unstable for both ft = 0.05 and 0.1. trailing-edge vortex but in the meantime to reduce the
Combining these two sets of results, we can say that for a maximum lift of the airfoil.
fixed thickness, either vanishing or finite, the camber 5) The effect of increasing camber is similar to that of
decreases the ability of the airfoil to stably trap a vortex near increasing angle of attack as far as the stability and maximum
the trailing edge. A small camber may make all equilibrium lift are concerned. It has such a particularly strong
positions of the free vortex unstable. destabilizing effect that a small camber may cause all
equilibrium positions of the vortex to become unstable.
^ X. Conclusions 6) For the purpose of increasing the lift of a wing by
To summarize the results presented in the previous sections utilizing a trapped external vortex, it is appropriate to use a
for airfoils of various geometries, we make the following reasonably thick symmetric airfoil at a small angle of attack.
conclusions. The conclusion is made based on the analysis for a two-
1) Although very high lifting forces can be generated by a dimensional potential flow model.
stationary vortex captured above the leading edge, the vortex
is always unstable in the sense that the vortex will move away Acknowledgment
after being displaced slightly from its equilibrium position. This work was supported by the Air Force Office of
From the cases that have been considered, this conclusion Scientific Research under Grant AFO$R 81 -0037.
seems to be true independent of both the thickness and
camber of the airfoil. References
2) A free vortex may become stably trapped above the J
Cox, J., 'The Revolutionary Kasper Wing," Soaring, Vol. 37,
trailing edge for lift generation according to a linearized Dep. 1973, pp. 20-23.
stability analysis for two-dimensional disturbances. The 2
Walton, D., "A Brief Wind Tunnel Test of the Kasper Airfoil,"
maximum lift that can be generated by a stable tr ailing-edge Soaring, Vol. 38, Nov. 1974, pp. 26-27.
3
vortex is generally several times higher than the lift on the Kurppa, E. W., "A Wind Tunnel Investigation of the Kasper
same airfoil without an external vortex, even if it is small in Vortex Concept," AIAA Paper 77-310, Jan. 1977.
4
comparison with the maximum lift generated by the leading- Rossow, V. J., "Lift Enhancement by an Externally Trapped
edge vortex. The vortex trapped below the airfoil has an Vortex," AIAAPaper.77-672, June 1977.
5
opposite effect of decreasing the lift of the airfoil. Saffman, P. Q. and Sheffield, J. S., "Flow over a Wing with an
Attached Free Vortex," Studies in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 57,
3) Increasing angle of attack diminishes the vortex-trapping 1977, pp. 107-117.
ability of the airfoil and reduces the magnitude of the Sheffield, J. S., 'Topics in Vortex1 Motion," Ph.D. Thesis,
maximum lift that can be produced by the stable vortices. For California Institute of Technology, 1978.
7
a given airfoil, no vortex can be captured if the angle of attack Chow, C.-Y., An' Introduction to Computational Fluid
exceeds a limiting value. Mechanics, 1st ed., Wiley, New York, 1979, Sec. 2.7.