Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5K views

    Patel - Dave PDF

    Uploaded by

    Moneylife Foundation
    The plaintiff sought several weeks to file a rejoinder in response to the defendant's reply. The court granted the request, setting deadlines of April 15th for the rejoinder and June 15th for the sur-rejoinder. It further set a deadline of July 20th for a sur-sur-rejoinder, after which all filings would stop. Noting the record would likely exceed 2000 pages, the court scheduled a hearing for November 3rd, 2020 to review the matter. The court also allowed the parties to continue advertising until the hearing and would not prioritize the case unless the plaintiff deposited Rs. 10 lakhs for potential costs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Patel - Dave PDF

    Uploaded by

    Moneylife Foundation
    5K views2 pages
    The plaintiff sought several weeks to file a rejoinder in response to the defendant's reply. The court granted the request, setting deadlines of April 15th for the rejoinder and June 15th for the sur-rejoinder. It further set a deadline of July 20th for a sur-sur-rejoinder, after which all filings would stop. Noting the record would likely exceed 2000 pages, the court scheduled a hearing for November 3rd, 2020 to review the matter. The court also allowed the parties to continue advertising until the hearing and would not prioritize the case unless the plaintiff deposited Rs. 10 lakhs for potential costs.

    Original Description:

    Justice Gautam Patel's Order in Gillette vs Reckitt case

    Original Title

    Patel - Dave.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The plaintiff sought several weeks to file a rejoinder in response to the defendant's reply. The court granted the request, setting deadlines of April 15th for the rejoinder and June 15th for the sur-rejoinder. It further set a deadline of July 20th for a sur-sur-rejoinder, after which all filings would stop. Noting the record would likely exceed 2000 pages, the court scheduled a hearing for November 3rd, 2020 to review the matter. The court also allowed the parties to continue advertising until the hearing and would not prioritize the case unless the plaintiff deposited Rs. 10 lakhs for potential costs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    5K views2 pages

    Patel - Dave PDF

    Uploaded by

    Moneylife Foundation
    The plaintiff sought several weeks to file a rejoinder in response to the defendant's reply. The court granted the request, setting deadlines of April 15th for the rejoinder and June 15th for the sur-rejoinder. It further set a deadline of July 20th for a sur-sur-rejoinder, after which all filings would stop. Noting the record would likely exceed 2000 pages, the court scheduled a hearing for November 3rd, 2020 to review the matter. The court also allowed the parties to continue advertising until the hearing and would not prioritize the case unless the plaintiff deposited Rs. 10 lakhs for potential costs.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    922-NMCD-143-2016.

    DOC

    JSN

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY


    ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
    IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
    NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 143 OF 2016
    IN
    SUIT NO. 305 OF 2016

    Gillette India Ltd Plaintiff


    Versus
    Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt Ltd Defendant

    Mr Nimay Dave, i/b Mustafa Motiwala, for the Plantiff.


    Mr Sumit Raghani, with Hardik Sanghavi i/b Agrud Partners for
    Defendant.

    CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J


    DATED: 22nd February 2017
    PC:-

    1. Mr Dave for the Plaintiffs seeks several weeks time to file a


    Rejoinder.

    2. Far be it for me to come between Mr Dave and his filings.


    since Mr Dave says that there is a substantial Reply and his
    Rejoinder is likely to be equally substantial, the Rejoinder is to be
    filed and served in the Registry on or before 15th April 2017. I have
    no doubt that a Sur-Rejoinder will also then be necessary. Rather

    Page 1 of 2
    22nd February 2017

    ::: Uploaded on - 23/02/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 27/02/2017 14:35:15 :::


    922-NMCD-143-2016.DOC

    than wasting time in an application for adjournment: Affidavit in


    Sur-Rejoinder to be filed and served on or before 15th June 2017 and
    this will be followed by a months time until 20th July 2017 for an
    Affidavit in Sur-Sur-Rejoinder.

    3. At this point all filings will stop. By then the record should
    have crossed at least 2000 pages. It will take any Court some time to
    read all this material. Hence, list the matter for direction very low on
    board on 3rd November 2020.

    4. There is not the slightest urgency, and this is evident from the
    delay thus far and the application for three weeks time for an
    Affidavit in Rejoinder. Parties are in the meantime free to advertise,
    counter-advertise and re-advertise their respective products with
    such a statements as they believe are permissible or as their in-house
    legal counsel thinks fit.

    5. No application for priority hearing will be entertained; at least


    not until the Plaintiffs deposit in advance an amount of not less than
    Rs.10 lakhs to cover a potential order of costs for this attempt to
    consume scarce judicial time in a battle over advertisements of rival
    depilation products for women.

    (G. S. PATEL, J.)

    Page 2 of 2
    22nd February 2017

    ::: Uploaded on - 23/02/2017 ::: Downloaded on - 27/02/2017 14:35:15 :::

    You might also like