Glaucoma Guidelines
Glaucoma Guidelines
Glaucoma Guidelines
Core requirements for the appropriate care of open and closed angle glaucoma have been summarized,
and consider low and intermediate to high resource settings.
This is the first edition of the ICO Guidelines for Glaucoma Eye Care (February 2016). They are designed to
be a working document to be adapted for local use, and we hope that the Guidelines are easy to read and
translate.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Ivo Kocur, Medical Officer, Prevention of Blindness, World Health
Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland, for his invaluable input and participation in the discussions
of the Task Force.
We sincerely thank Professor Hugh Taylor, ICO President, Melbourne, Australia, for many helpful
insights during the development of these Guidelines.
Introduction 2
High intraocular pressure (IOP) is a major risk factor for loss of sight from both open and closed angle
glaucoma, and the only one that is modifiable. The risk of blindness depends on the height of the
intraocular pressure, severity of disease, age of onset, and other determinants of susceptibility, such as
family history of glaucoma. Epidemiological studies and clinical trials have shown that optimal control
of IOP reduces the risk of optic nerve damage and slows disease progression. Lowering IOP is the only
intervention proven to prevent the loss of sight from glaucoma.
Glaucoma should be ruled out as part of every regular eye examination, since complaints of vision
loss may not be present. Differentiating open from closed angle glaucoma is essential from a
therapeutic standpoint, because each form of the disease has unique management considerations
and interventions. Once the correct diagnosis of open or closed angle glaucoma has been made,
appropriate steps can be taken through medications, laser, and microsurgery. This approach can
prevent severe vision loss and disability from sight threatening glaucoma.
In low resource settings, managing patients with glaucoma has unique challenges. Inability to pay,
treatment rejection, poor compliance, and lack of education and awareness, are all barriers to good
glaucoma care. Most patients are unaware of glaucoma disease, and by the time they present,
many have lost significant vision. Long distances from healthcare facilities, and insufficient medical
professionals and equipment, add to the difficulty in treating glaucoma. A diagnosis of open or closed
angle glaucoma requires medical and surgical interventions to prevent vision loss and to preserve
quality of life. Preventing glaucoma blindness in underserved regions requires heightened attention to
local educational needs, availability of expertise, and basic infrastructure requirements.
There is strong support to integrate glaucoma care within comprehensive eye care programs and to
consider rehabilitation aspects of care. Persistent efforts to support effective and accessible care for
glaucoma are needed.1
1. Universal Eye Health: A Global Action Plan 2014-2019, WHO, 2013 www.who.int/blindness/
actionplan/en/.
In open angle glaucoma, there is characteristic In closed angle glaucoma, optic nerve damage
optic nerve damage and loss of visual function and vision loss may occur in the presence of an
in the presence of an open angle with no anatomical block of the anterior chamber angle
identifying pathology. The disease is chronic by the iris. This may lead to elevated intraocular
and progressive. Although elevated IOP is pressure and optic nerve damage. In acute
often associated with the disease, elevated angle closure glaucoma, the disease may be
IOP is not necessary to make the diagnosis. painful, needing emergency care. More often
Risk factors for the disease include elevated the disease is chronic, progressive, and without
intraocular pressure, increasing age, positive symptoms. Risk factors for the disease include
family history, racial background, myopia, thin racial background, increasing age, female
corneas, hypertension, and diabetes. Patients gender, positive family history, and hyperopia.
with elevated IOP or other risk factors should Patients with these risk factors should be
be followed regularly for the development of followed regularly for the development of
glaucoma. closed angle glaucoma.
Most patients with open and closed angle forms of glaucoma are unaware they have sight-
threatening disease. Mass population screening is not currently recommended. However, all
patients presenting for eye care should be reviewed for glaucoma risk factors and undergo clinical
examination to rule out glaucoma. Patients with glaucoma should be told to alert brothers, sisters,
parents, sons, and daughters that they have a higher risk of developing disease, and that they also
need to be checked regularly for glaucoma. The ability to make an accurate diagnosis of glaucoma,
to determine whether it is an open or closed form, and to assess disease severity and stability, are
essential to glaucoma care strategies and blindness prevention.
Chief Complaint
Age, Race, Occupation
Social History
Possibility of Pregnancy
Family History of Glaucoma
Past Eye Disease, Surgery, or Trauma
Corticosteroid Use
Eye Medications
Systemic Medications
Drug Allergies
Tobacco, Alcohol, Drug Use
Diabetes
Lung Disease
Heart Disease
Cerebrovascular Disease
Hypertension/Hypotension
Renal Stones
Migraine
Raynaud's Disease
Review of Systems
Optional Equipment
Minimal Equipment
Clinical Assessment (Intermediate /
(Low Resource Settings)
High Resource Settings)
Fundus photography
Direct ophthalmoscope Optic nerve image analyzers
Optic Nerve Confocal scanning laser
(dilated if angle open) Slit lamp biomicroscopy with hand
ophthalmoscopy
held 78 or 90 diopter lens Optical coherence tomography
Scanning laser polarimetry
Direct ophthalmoscope
Head mounted indirect
ophthalmoscope with
Fundus 12 and 30 diopter lenses
20 or 25 diopter lens
Slit lamp biomicroscopy with
60 and 90 diopter lenses
78 diopter lens
Cornea
The cornea should be examined for
edema, which may be seen in acute or
chronic high IOP. Note that IOP readings
are underestimated in the presence of
corneal edema. Corneal precipitates may
indicate inflammation.
Angle Structures
The angle should be examined for the
presence of iris contact with the trabecular
meshwork in a dark room setting. The
location and extent, and whether it is due to
appositional or synechial closure, should be
determined by indentation gonioscopy.
The presence of inflammation,
pseudoexfoliation, neovascularization, and
other pathology should be noted.
Open angle on gonioscopy
Iris
The iris should be examined for mobility
and irregularity, the presence of anterior
and posterior synechiae, and
pseudoexfoliation at the pupil margin.
Forward bowing, peripheral angle crowding,
and iris insertion should be noted in
addition to the presence of inflammation,
neovascularization, and other pathology.
Lens
The lens should be examined for
cataract, size, position, posterior synechiae,
pseudoexfoliation material, and evidence of
Closed angle on gonioscopy with no structures visible
inflammation.
Pseudoexfoliation deposits at the pupil margin Plateau iris with peripheral iris roll
Optic Nerve
The optic nerve should be evaluated for characteristic signs of glaucoma. The degree of optic
nerve damage helps to guide initial treatment goals.
Early optic nerve damage may include a cup 0.5, focal retinal nerve fiber layer defects, focal
rim thinning, vertical cupping, cup/disc asymmetry, focal excavation, disc hemorrhage, and
departure from the ISNT rule (rim thickest inferiorly, then superiorly, nasally and temporally).
Moderate to advanced optic nerve damage may include a large cup 0.7, diffuse retinal nerve
fiber defects, diffuse rim thinning, optic nerve excavation, acquired pit of the optic nerve, and
disc hemorrhage.
Fundus
The posterior pole should be evaluated for the presence of diabetic retinopathy, macular
degeneration, and other retinal disorders. See the ICO Guidelines for Diabetic Eye Care at:
www.icoph.org/downloads/ICOGuidelinesforDiabeticEyeCare.pdf.
The financial, physical, social, emotional, and occupational burdens of glaucoma treatment options should be
carefully considered for each patient. Recommendations, risks, options, and consequences of no treatment,
should be discussed with all patients in language that is understandable to the patient or caregiver. Classifying
glaucoma disease as early, or moderate to advanced, can help to guide IOP treatment goals and approaches.
A simplified approach to initiating care in glaucoma patients is summarized below in Table 3.
Medication or
Laser trabeculoplasty or
Optic Nerve Damage
Moderate/ Lower IOP Trabeculectomy Mitomycin C
+ or Tube ( cataract removal and
Advanced 25 50%
Visual Field Loss intraocular lens [IOL]) and/or
Cyclophotocoagulation
(or cryotherapy)
Medication and/or
End-stage Blind Eye Lower IOP
25 50% Cyclophotocoagulation
(Refractory
(or cryotherapy) and
glaucoma) Pain (If painful)
Rehabilitation Services
Low resource settings pose unique challenges depending on the region. Particular attention should be
given to compliance with treatments and the capacity of the patient to obtain and use medication.
If a patient cannot afford the cost of drugs, initial laser trabeculoplasty would be favored wherever
equipment and expertise are available. If resources to manage glaucoma are insufficient, referral
is indicated.
Fluorescein 1%
Diagnostic
Tropicamide 0.5%
Prostaglandin analogs
Intraocular Pressure Lowering Other beta blockers
Latanoprost 50g/mL
(Topical) Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors
Timolol 0.25% or 0.5%
Alpha agonists
Fixed combination drops
See the 19th WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (April 2015), by going to:
www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/en/.
An ethical approach is indispensable to quality clinical care. Download the ICO Code of Ethics at:
www.icoph.org/downloads/icoethicalcode.pdf.
Number of Burns ~ 50 spots per 180 degrees ~ 50 spots per 180 degrees
Number of Sittings 1 or 2 1 or 2
Application Site 1.0 to 2.0 mm from limbus 1.0 to 2.0 mm from limbus
Treated
180 360 degrees 180 360 degrees
Circumference
Number of Burns ~ 15 20 spots per 180 degrees ~ 12 20 spots per 180 degrees
Number of Sittings 1 or 2 1 or 2
History: Ask about changes to general health and medications, visual changes, glaucoma drug
compliance, difficulty with drops, and possible side effects.
Clinical Assessment: Assess for changes in visual acuity or refractive error, IOP, new anterior
segment pathology, and changes to the angle anatomy, changes to the optic nerve, and changes
to the visual field.
Increased IOP
Additional IOP 1 4 months
and/or
lowering needed (depending on
Unstable
Increased Optic Nerve Damage by 25% disease severity,
Glaucoma
and/or risk factors and
(Refer to Table 3) resources)
Increased Visual Field Damage
More frequent follow-up is suggested in the presence of advanced disease, multiple risk factors,
or progression within a short period. In low resource settings, compliance with treatment and the
capacity of the patient to obtain and use medication should be considered. Surgical options may be
favored earlier, wherever equipment and expertise are available. If resources to manage glaucoma
are insufficient, referral is indicated.
Once a diagnosis of closed angle glaucoma is made, patients should be educated regarding the nature
of the disease and required treatment to help prevent vision loss. The cause of angle closure will
determine the clinical care pathway, and as pupil block is the most common cause, laser iridotomy
is recommended as the first line treatment for all patients. A simplified approach to initiating care in
closed angle glaucoma patients is summarized below.
Acute angle closure with red eye Slit lamp beam shows very shallow
and forward iris bowing anterior chamber depth
In addition to pupil block, progressive and irreversible angle closure may be due to plateau iris and
other causes. The chamber angle should be carefully reviewed after laser iridotomy to look for
other mechanisms of a closed angle needing treatment.
History: Ask about changes to general health and medications, visual changes, glaucoma drug
compliance, difficult with drops, and possible side effects.
Clinical Assessment: Assess for changes in visual acuity or refractive error, assess IOP, with
careful attention to the angle and changes to angle closure status, changes to the optic nerve,
and the visual field.
~ 6 months 1 year
(depending on
Stable No Change to Angle,
Continue disease severity,
Glaucoma IOP, Optic Nerve, and Visual Field
risk factors, and
resources)
More frequent follow-up is suggested in the presence of advanced disease, multiple risk factors,
or progression within a short period. In low resource settings, compliance with treatment and the
capacity of the patient to obtain and use medication should be considered. Surgical options may be
favored earlier, wherever equipment and expertise are available. If resources to manage glaucoma
are insufficient, referral is indicated.
Glaucoma Suggested
Findings Treatment Considerations
Severity IOP Reduction
Medication and/or
Trabeculectomy or tube (with
Persistent Angle Closure or without goniosynechiolysis,
+ cataract removal, and IOL)
Moderate / Optic Nerve Damage Lower IOP
Advanced 25 50% and/or
+
Cyclophotocoagulation
Visual Field Loss
(or cryotherapy)
Rehabilitation Services
Medication and/or
End-stage Blind Eye Lower IOP
25 50% Cyclophotocoagulation
(Refractory
(or cryotherapy)
glaucoma) Pain (If painful)
Rehabilitation Services
Intraocular pressure goals should be adjusted according to individual risk factors. Financial,
physical, and psychosocial burdens of each treatment option should also be considered. In low
resource settings, surgical options may be favored. End-stage disease treatment is similar to that
of open angle glaucoma. If resources or expertise to manage angle closure glaucoma are insufficient,
referral is indicated.
13 24 months ago
d. Number of patients who were examined for glaucoma during last year.
e. Number of patients who received laser trabeculoplasty, iridotomy, trabeculectomy, or tube
surgery during last year.
Define ratios such as:
f. Number of patients who received laser or trabeculectomy per million general population
per year (equivalent to cataract surgical rate [CSR]).
g. Number of patients who received laser, trabeculectomy, or tube treatments per number of
patients with glaucoma in a given area (hospital catchment area, health district, region, country).
Numerator: number of laser, trabeculectomy, or tube treatments during the last year
h. Number of patients who received laser, trabeculectomy, or tube treatments per number of
persons with vision-threatening glaucoma in a given area (hospital catchment area,
health district, region, country).
Numerator: number of laser, trabeculectomy, or tube treatments during the last year
In addition to creating a consensus on technical guidelines, this resource will also be used to:
Stimulate improved training and continuing professional development to meet public needs.
Develop a framework to evaluate, stimulate, and to monitor relevant public health systems.
Design Credit
The ICO Guidelines for Glaucoma Eye Care were designed in collaboration with Marcelo Silles and
Yuri Markarov (photo, page 1), Medical Media, St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Learn more at: www.stmichaelshospital.com.
Photo Credit
All photos that appear in the ICO Guidelines for Glaucoma Eye Care were provided by Prof. Neeru Gupta,
St. Michaels Hospital, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences, University of
Toronto, with the exception of the images on page 7, provided by Prof. Ningli Wang, Beijing Institute of
Ophthalmology. These may not be used for commercial purposes. If the photos are used, appropriate
credit must be given.
The ICO welcomes any feedback, comments, or suggestions. Please email us at info@icoph.org.
ICO Headquarters:
San Francisco, California
United States
Fax: +1 (415) 409-8411
Email: info@icoph.org
Web: www.icoph.org