Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 374 views

    Labao JR v. Comelec

    Uploaded by

    Clrz
    The Supreme Court ruled that (1) the petition against Labao Jr. was for disqualification as a candidate and not a pre-proclamation controversy, and (2) Labao Jr. was not a fugitive from justice and thus not disqualified from running for mayor. The COMELEC found Labao Jr. was a fugitive based on leaving the hospital when his arrest was sought, but the Court found no evidence he intended to evade prosecution given his participation in legal proceedings, presence in the locality, and lack of proof of evasion efforts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Labao JR v. Comelec

    Uploaded by

    Clrz
    374 views5 pages
    The Supreme Court ruled that (1) the petition against Labao Jr. was for disqualification as a candidate and not a pre-proclamation controversy, and (2) Labao Jr. was not a fugitive from justice and thus not disqualified from running for mayor. The COMELEC found Labao Jr. was a fugitive based on leaving the hospital when his arrest was sought, but the Court found no evidence he intended to evade prosecution given his participation in legal proceedings, presence in the locality, and lack of proof of evasion efforts.

    Original Description:

    Case digest

    Original Title

    Labao Jr v. Comelec

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The Supreme Court ruled that (1) the petition against Labao Jr. was for disqualification as a candidate and not a pre-proclamation controversy, and (2) Labao Jr. was not a fugitive from justice and thus not disqualified from running for mayor. The COMELEC found Labao Jr. was a fugitive based on leaving the hospital when his arrest was sought, but the Court found no evidence he intended to evade prosecution given his participation in legal proceedings, presence in the locality, and lack of proof of evasion efforts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    374 views5 pages

    Labao JR v. Comelec

    Uploaded by

    Clrz
    The Supreme Court ruled that (1) the petition against Labao Jr. was for disqualification as a candidate and not a pre-proclamation controversy, and (2) Labao Jr. was not a fugitive from justice and thus not disqualified from running for mayor. The COMELEC found Labao Jr. was a fugitive based on leaving the hospital when his arrest was sought, but the Court found no evidence he intended to evade prosecution given his participation in legal proceedings, presence in the locality, and lack of proof of evasion efforts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 5
    At a glance
    Powered by AI
    The key takeaways from the passage are that it discusses a case regarding whether a political candidate, Leodegario A. Labao Jr., was disqualified from running for mayor due to being considered a 'fugitive from justice'. It analyzes the definition of a fugitive from justice and whether the evidence was sufficient to establish Labao Jr.'s intent to evade prosecution.

    The petition for disqualification against Labao Jr. was based on Section 40(e) of the Local Government Code, which disqualifies fugitives from justice in criminal or non-political cases from running for elective local position.

    The two issues in the case were 1) whether the petition against Labao Jr. was one for disqualification or a pre-proclamation controversy, and 2) whether Labao Jr. was a fugitive from justice at the time he was running for mayor.

    POLITICAL LAW Clarice Questin

    DRAFT NO. 2

    LEODEGARIO A. LABAO, JR. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET AL.

    G.R. No. 212615, 19 July 2016, EN BANC (Leonardo-De Castro, J.)

    DOCTRINE OF THE CASE

    The definition of fugitive from justice, thus indicates that the intent to evade is

    the compelling factor that animates one's flight from a particular jurisdiction. Obviously,

    there can only be an intent to evade prosecution or punishment when there is

    knowledge by the fleeing subject of an already instituted indictment, or of a promulgated

    judgment of conviction.

    FACTS

    Ludovico L. Martelino, Jr. (Ludovico) filed a petition for disqualification before the

    Commission on Elections (COMELEC), seeking the disqualification of Leodegario A.

    Labao, Jr. (Labao, Jr.) as candidate for Mayor of the Municipality of Mambusao, Capiz in

    the May 13, 2013 elections, on the ground that Labao, Jr. was a fugitive from justice.

    Ludovico essentially averred that there was an outstanding warrant for Labao, Jr.'s

    arrest in connection with the filing of an Information for Murder against him and four

    other persons, which stemmed from the assassination of Vice-Mayor Abel P. Martinez;

    and that he had eluded arrest, thus, was at large.

    Labao, Jr. denied the assertion that he was a fugitive from justice. He countered

    that there was no charge against him when he filed his Certificate of Candidacy (COC);

    and that he was only implicated in the crime when one Roger D. Loredo filed his
    extrajudicial confession. Further, Labao, Jr. asserted that he was confined at St. Pauls

    Hospital in Iloilo City due to constant chest pains occasioned by an enlarged heart; and

    that he learned from his staff that police authorities had surrounded the hospital and

    they personally heard a police officer say Shoot to kill si Labao. Instinctively, without

    any intent to elude arrest, but for the singular purpose of preserving his life, he was

    forced to leave the hospital. Finally, Labao, Jr. puts emphasis on the fact that he had

    already been proclaimed as the duly elected Municipal Mayor of Mambusao, Capiz on

    May 14, 2013.

    In a resolution dated September 24, 2013, the COMELEC First Division resolved

    to disqualify Labao, Jr.; and held that Labao, Jr. was a fugitive from justice, i.e., that his

    acts subsequent to the filing of the Information for murder and the issuance of a warrant

    of arrest indicate an unmistakable intent to evade prosecution. Labao, Jr. sought for the

    reconsideration of said resolution.

    In the meantime, the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Capiz issued an order on

    November 4, 2013 temporarily suspending the proceedings in consideration of a July

    15, 2013 DOJ Resolution issued by Undersecretary Francisco F. Baraan III (Baraan

    Resolution) excluding Labao, Jr. from the Information for murder of Vice-Mayor

    Martinez. On November 14, 2013, however, DOJ Secretary Leila De Lima reversed the

    Baraan Resolution, effectively reinstating Labao, Jr. as an accused in the criminal case

    filed before the RTC. In yet another twist of events, on May 21, 2014, the RTC issued

    another order, this time dismissing altogether the criminal complaint against Labao, Jr.

    on the ground of lack of probable cause.


    In a Resolution dated May 21, 2014, the same day as the issuance of the above-

    mentioned RTC order, the COMELEC En Banc denied Labao, Jr.'s motion for

    reconsideration, affirmed his disqualification, and declared null and void his

    proclamation as mayor.

    Hence, this petition for certiorari and prohibition.

    ISSUES

    1. Was the petition against Labao, Jr. one for disqualification, or a pre-

    proclamation controversy?

    2. Was Labao, Jr. a fugitive from justice at the time that he was a candidate for

    Mayor of Mambusao, Capiz?

    RULING

    1. YES. The petition against Labao, Jr. was one for disqualification, and not a pre-

    proclamation controversy.
    The Omnibus Election Code (OEC) clearly defines the term pre-proclamation

    controversy. Pertinently, Section 241 thereof provides as follows:

    Sec. 241. Definition. A pre-proclamation controversy refers to any question pertaining

    to or affecting the proceedings of the board of canvassers which may be raised by any

    candidate or by any registered political party or coalition of political parties before the

    board or directly with the Commission, or any matter raised under Sections 233, 234,

    235 and 236 in relation to the preparation, transmission, receipt, custody and

    appreciation of the election returns.


    From the foregoing provisions of the OEC, it is quite clear that the petition for

    disqualification filed by Ludovico docketed as SPA Case No. 13-294 (DC) in no way

    qualifies as a pre-proclamation controversy, having absolutely nothing to do with any

    matter or ground pertaining to or affecting the proceedings of the board of canvassers

    or any matter raised under Sections 233, 234, 235 and 236 in relation to the

    preparation, transmission, receipt, custody and appreciation of the election returns.

    Thus, in this case, the petition filed against Labao, Jr. does not come within the

    scope of a pre-proclamation controversy under the aforequoted OEC provision.

    The grounds to file a petition for disqualification are provided for in Section 12 or

    68 of the OEC, or under Section 40 of the Local Government Code. In the case at bar,

    the petition for disqualification against Labao, Jr. was based on Section 40(e) of the

    Local Government Code, disqualifying [f]ugitives from justice in criminal or non-political

    cases here or abroad from running for any elective local position.

    2. NO. Labao, Jr. was not a fugitive from justice at the time that he was a candidate for

    Mayor of Mamhusao, Capiz during the May 13, 2013 Elections.

    Based on settled jurisprudence, the term fugitive from justice includes not only

    those who flee after conviction to avoid punishment but likewise those who, after being

    charged, flee to avoid prosecution.

    In Rodriguez v. Commission on Elections, the Court held that: The definition

    thus indicates that the intent to evade is the compelling factor that animates one's flight

    from a particular jurisdiction. And obviously, there can only be an intent to evade
    prosecution or punishment when there is knowledge by the fleeing subject of an already

    instituted indictment, or of a promulgated judgment of conviction.

    The COMELEC anchored its finding that Labao, Jr. was a fugitive from justice

    from the fact that he was missed at the hospital when the warrant for his arrest was

    being served. No other substantial evidence was presented to prove that Labao, Jr, tried

    to hide from the authorities or that he left Mambusao, Capiz to avoid being arrested and

    prosecuted. On the part of Labao, Jr., he was able to show his presence in Mambusao,

    and his desire to participate in the proceedings before the DOJ and the RTC. Moreover,

    there was no proof to show the efforts exerted by the police to locate Labao, Jr. and that

    despite such efforts, the warrant of arrest against him could not be served.

    Given the foregoing, the Court finds that the pieces of evidence on record do not

    sufficiently establish Labao, Jr.'s intention to evade being prosecuted for a criminal

    charge that will warrant a sweeping conclusion that Labao, Jr., at the time, was evading

    prosecution so as to disqualify him as a fugitive from justice from running for public

    office.

    You might also like