Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 187 views

    8D Format

    Uploaded by

    George Suba
    aaa

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    8D Format

    Uploaded by

    George Suba
    187 views6 pages
    aaa

    Original Title

    8D format

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    aaa

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    187 views6 pages

    8D Format

    Uploaded by

    George Suba
    aaa

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    of 6
    At a glance
    Powered by AI
    The documents discuss an investigation into a non-conformity in the manufacturing process and the corrective actions taken. Key aspects covered include identifying the root cause through a 5 Why analysis, implementing temporary and permanent countermeasures, and confirming the effectiveness of the countermeasures.

    The documents discuss an investigation into a non-conformity or defect found during the manufacturing process of an unspecified part or product.

    Through a 5 Why analysis, the root cause was determined to be related to the extrusion, autoclave, or finishing stages of manufacturing or potential issues with suppliers or quality controls.

    Validation of corrective actions

    Exit rules:
    Reference Evaluation of 10 shifts per autoclave
    Defect: No customer claims (0 PPM/30 days)
    Open date Other:

    Customer ref.:
    Source / Motivatio
    Number:
    Customer:
    Plant:

    Description:

    Root cause occurence: Root cause not detection:

    Actions occurence: Due date Action not detection:

    Collected data

    NOK for
    Evaluate root Total evaluated
    Date Where d Qty cause Defect rate Note Total qty Total def.

    Conclusion:Has the countermeasure been confirmed as effective?


    per autoclave
    PPM/30 days)

    detection:

    Due date

    tal evaluated
    Def. Rate
    Collected data
    NOK for
    Evaluate root Defect Total evaluated
    Date Where d Qty cause rate Note Total qty Total def.
    CIKAUTXO

    8D CONCERN & COUNTERMEASURE REPORT SUMMARY

    Problem source: Issue no.: Completed by: Responsible:


    Customer No.: Customer: Position: Position:
    Part No.: Plant: Date: Date:
    Team:
    1. Concern Details
    Description (include photograph or sketch): Report No.:
    Rank: -
    Incident Date:
    Work post:
    Defect code occurence: Quantity Affected:
    Defect code non detection: Affected Lot No's.:
    First warranty delivery:
    Shipping date:

    Recurrence: Y N

    2. Similar Part Consideration


    Can the concern appear on other parts?
    Consider: Yes No
    Comment / Result
    - Other references:

    3. Initial Analysis
    Where should the non-conforming parts have been detected? Yes No Reason for non-detection
    - During process / manufacture?
    - After manufacture (e.g. Final Inspection)
    - Other (please state): leak tester

    Initial analyses replies - QRQC Comments


    What:
    Why:
    When:
    Where:
    How:
    How much:

    4. Temporary Countermeasures - Immediate Action


    Consider: Actions Taken Qty. OK Qty. NG % Effective
    - Work in progress 0 0
    - Stores stock 0
    - Warehouse stock 0 0
    - Other (please state): 0 0
    0 0
    Temporary Countermeasure: Responsible Due date % Effective

    5. Final Analysis
    5 WHY Analysis to identify root cause:
    Consider: Man, Material, Machine, Method, Who, Where When Why, How, Process settings, Rework, Maintenance etc. Attach extra detail sheets where necessary

    Why was the non conformity Why was the non conformity
    1 2
    made? not detected?
    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

    Why?
    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

    Why?
    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

    Why?
    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

    Why?
    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

    Why?

    Root Cause:
    Resp. Resp. Resp. Resp. Resp.

    1 2 3 4 5
    Dept. Dept. Dept. Dept. Dept.

    6. Permanent Countermeasures
    What actions have been taken to prevent the manufacture of reject parts in the future?
    Consider: Error proofing, Testing, Process Control etc.
    Actions Resp. Dept. Timing
    OCCURENCE:

    NOT DETECTION:

    7. Countermeasure Confirmation
    Have the countermeasures implemented been confirmed as effective?
    Countermeasure Action Confirmation method

    8. Follow-up Actions (Lessons Learned / Recurrence Prevention Activities)


    Review the following documentation and update as a result of this concern.
    Please attach relevant data, e.g. Dimensional Report, Capability study, Attribute data, Fault tree analysis etc.
    Consider: Updated? Details Resp. Dept. Timing
    - PFMEA
    - Process Flow Chart
    - Control Plan / Chart
    - In house Work / Inspection Instructions
    - Gauges / MSA
    - Sub-supplier Follow-up
    - Production documentation (e.g. WI, Layout,...)
    - Other
    Have the countermeasures taken been horizontally deployed to similar parts, processes and other plants?
    Deployment? (Yes / No) Details

    Acceptance of the report:


    Responsible: Emil Dordai, Supervisor Date: Quality Responsible: George Suba, Qualityengineer Date:
    Copyright 2016 Cikautxo SK
    FRR 001/2015 report number - Fast response report 001/2015

    Rank: 1 Extrusion
    2 Autoclave
    3 Finishing
    4 Supplier
    5 Control
    6 Logistic

    You might also like