An 8D report was created to address an incident where a worker fell from a ladder while installing wall angles. The worker suffered minor ligament fractures. As a short term corrective action, work was stopped and the injured worker received first aid and was taken to the hospital. The root causes were identified as a lack of ladder safety procedures and improper ladder use. Permanent corrective actions included revising work methods, updating risk assessments, designating ladder attendants, conducting ladder safety training, and orienting workers. Methods for verifying the effectiveness of the corrective actions include ongoing close monitoring and checks by safety personnel.
An 8D report was created to address an incident where a worker fell from a ladder while installing wall angles. The worker suffered minor ligament fractures. As a short term corrective action, work was stopped and the injured worker received first aid and was taken to the hospital. The root causes were identified as a lack of ladder safety procedures and improper ladder use. Permanent corrective actions included revising work methods, updating risk assessments, designating ladder attendants, conducting ladder safety training, and orienting workers. Methods for verifying the effectiveness of the corrective actions include ongoing close monitoring and checks by safety personnel.
An 8D report was created to address an incident where a worker fell from a ladder while installing wall angles. The worker suffered minor ligament fractures. As a short term corrective action, work was stopped and the injured worker received first aid and was taken to the hospital. The root causes were identified as a lack of ladder safety procedures and improper ladder use. Permanent corrective actions included revising work methods, updating risk assessments, designating ladder attendants, conducting ladder safety training, and orienting workers. Methods for verifying the effectiveness of the corrective actions include ongoing close monitoring and checks by safety personnel.
An 8D report was created to address an incident where a worker fell from a ladder while installing wall angles. The worker suffered minor ligament fractures. As a short term corrective action, work was stopped and the injured worker received first aid and was taken to the hospital. The root causes were identified as a lack of ladder safety procedures and improper ladder use. Permanent corrective actions included revising work methods, updating risk assessments, designating ladder attendants, conducting ladder safety training, and orienting workers. Methods for verifying the effectiveness of the corrective actions include ongoing close monitoring and checks by safety personnel.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
8D REPORT
Discipline 1: Team Approach
Team Champion: Team Leader: Members: Discipline 2: Problem Description Oct 25, 2019 Wenceslao Martin 34 y/o suffered minor fracture to the ligaments due to fall from a 4 ft ladder, (3 rd rung), while installing wall angles on the 2nd floor of the proposed 2 storey classroom and marketing building @ SIAEP Clark.
Discipline 3: Containment / Short Term Corrective Action
WHAT: Stop the work and attended the injured, called the attention of SIAEP clinic attending physician and nurse for proper first aid procedure then immediately advised to go to the nearest hospital for proper treatment. @ the The Medical City Clark attended by Dra. Patricia Flores Tiotuico, adviced to have it covered with arthroplasty. And gave complete medication good for 1 week. WHO: Dennis Kabigting & Douglas Kabigting as supevisors acted upon for immediate assistance and rushed the injured to the nearest hospital. Alelie Bienes also rush to the scene to give support. WHEN: Oct 25, 2019 STATUS: Done, on the way to recovery, Oca the Contractor which Wenceslao was under, will continue to support Wenceslao will be needing
Discipline 4: Define Root Cause
Why 1: Why the worker fell? Answer 1: There was no standby ladder attendant at the time, all are pretty busy of their designated works. Answer 1.2: The ladder is not designed to the activity intended. (Must have used a taller ladder. Answer 1.3: Worker overreached to the wall making the ladder tilt to sides. Answer1.4: Worker awkwardly walk down the ladder facing against. Answer 1.5: Not all the workers are aware of the basic ladder attendant procedure. Why 2: Why the worker used the wrong type of ladder? Answer 2.1: There was no available ladder at the time, all of the ladders on site are in use. Answer 2.2: Workers are aware of the basic ladder design for various activity and capacities. Answer 2.3: They do not know how to use the ladder properly. Why 3: Why did the worker overreached? Answer 3.1: Inadequate instructions from his immediate superior (Douglas Kabigting). Answer 3.2: Late reaction from the Superior, the Superior and the worker are partners at the time of the incident. Answer 3.3: Worker underestimated the distance and stance of the ladder. Why 4: Why worker got down facing against ladder? Answer 4.1: Inappropriate ladder orientation, Placed towards the wall. Answer 4.2: Because worker is holding the wall angle for the other corner. Why 5: Why the ladder tilt against the worker? Answer 5.1: Because he overreached for the wall angle the momentum of the ladder towards the worker is to slide against, Answer 5.2: There was no designated ladder attendant. 8D REPORT Discipline 5: Permanent Corrective Action WHAT:
1.) Revision of the methodology.
2.) Update Risk assessment (JHA) 3.) Designate manpower for ladder attendant. 4.) Defined work instructions for the workers and proper awareness of the processes and procedures encountered. 5.) Variation of different procedures and work process that suits up the activity. 6.) Complete ladder safety inductions to all workers at site 7.) Re orientation of all workers.
WHO: JULIUS ERLANO / DENNIS KABIGTING / DOUGLAS KABIGTING / ALDREN FELIPE /OSCAR TIOZON. WHEN: October 25, 2019 STATUS: Done
Discipline 6: Define Methods to Verify Effectiveness of Corrective Actions
WHAT: Close Monitoring of the area & verifying to the EHS and Engr in charge. WHO: Unitec PIC and safety officer in charge WHEN: On going STATUS: On going
Discipline 7: Prevent Occurrence
Note: Where the corrective action identifies new or changed hazards or the need for new or changed controls, the proposed action shall undergo HIRAC process to implementation. Is there a need for Risk Assessment __YES __ NO? Release ECN (Y/N/NA) Y When: (include the specs of the ref.) Affected specs: N/A Identify other areas affected: N/A