Risk Management Is The Identification, Assessment, and Prioritization of
Risk Management Is The Identification, Assessment, and Prioritization of
Risk Management Is The Identification, Assessment, and Prioritization of
Risk management is the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks (defined in ISO
31000 as the effect of uncertainty on objectives) followed by coordinated and economical application
of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability and/or impact of unfortunate events[1] or
to maximize the realization of opportunities. Risk managements objective is to
assure uncertainty does not deflect the endeavor from the business goals.[2]
Risks can come from various sources including uncertainty in financial markets, threats from project
failures (at any phase in design, development, production, or sustainment life-cycles), legal liabilities,
credit risk, accidents, natural causes and disasters, deliberate attack from an adversary, or events of
uncertain or unpredictable root-cause. There are two types of events i.e. negative events can be
classified as risks while positive events are classified as opportunities. Several risk
management standards have been developed including the Project Management Institute,
the National Institute of Standards and Technology, actuarial societies, and ISO
standards.[3][4] Methods, definitions and goals vary widely according to whether the risk management
method is in the context of project management, security, engineering, industrial processes, financial
portfolios, actuarial assessments, or public health and safety.
Strategies to manage threats (uncertainties with negative consequences) typically include avoiding
the threat, reducing the negative effect or probability of the threat, transferring all or part of the threat
to another party, and even retaining some or all of the potential or actual consequences of a
particular threat, and the opposites for opportunities (uncertain future states with benefits).
Certain aspects of many of the risk management standards have come under criticism for having no
measurable improvement on risk; whereas the confidence in estimates and decisions seem to
increase.[1]For example, it has been shown that one in six IT projects experience cost overruns of
200% on average, and schedule overruns of 70%.[5]