Finite Element Analysis of Automobile Chassis
Finite Element Analysis of Automobile Chassis
Finite Element Analysis of Automobile Chassis
ISSN: 2455-5703
Abstract
Chassis is one of the vital parts that used in automobile engineering. It is a firm structure that forms a skeleton to hold all the major
parts together. Chassis frames are made of steel section so that they are strong enough to withstand the load and shock. Chassis
must be light in weight to decrease dead mass on the vehicles. Major challenge in todays automobile vehicle industry is to
overcome the increasing demands for higher performance, lower weight in order to satisfy fuel economy requirements, and longer
life of components, all this at a reasonable cost and in a short period of time. The study is to produce results to rectify problems
associated with structures of a commercial vehicle such as strength, stiffness and fatigue properties along with stress, bending
moment and vibrations. This can be achieved by static and dynamic analysis, combining existing theoretical knowledge and
advanced analytical methods. Design of a Chassis is carried by using CATIA .And finite element analysis will be carried out by
using ANSYS.
Keywords- Chassis, CATIA, ANSYS
I. INTRODUCTION
The chassis structure is the superior component in the any auto vehicle. The vehicle shape dependent on this chassis, it provides a
means of absorbing energy from frontal, side and rollover impacts. The better the energy absorbed by the chassis on control the
lower the energy levels transferred to a vehicles occupiers and surrounds, so that dropping the chances of injury. The main function
of the chassis is not only support the components and payload mounted upon it including engine, body, passengers and luggage,
but also to maintain the desired relationship between the suspension and steering mechanism mounting points. Along with a vehicle
chassis provides safety to occupants of the vehicle and outside parties. The chassis is subjected to stress, bending moment and
vibrations due to road roughness and components that mounted on it. When the truck movements along the highway, Stress acting
on chassis is differs with the movement, the performance of the chassis that always exposed to stress overcome this failure chassis
requires appropriate strength, stiffness and fatigue properties of the components to be able to stand these loads or stresses. Modal
updating technique also important in order to create a good model for analysis. From the global torsion analysis, it has been found
that the torsion load is more severe than bending load. In order to overcome this problem, a cross bar and material selection are
very important to consider during design stage.
II. OBJECTIVE
The objective of the study is to produce results which may help to rectify problems associated with structures of a commercial
vehicle and which also may be of significance during design of chassis body structure of the vehicle after carrying out static and
dynamic analysis, combining existing theoretical knowledge and advanced analytical methods. Identify points and sections which
are highly loaded (stressed) due to the loads by means of which the overall intensity of loading in the structures is assessed. Shape
optimization or weight reduction of chassis.
For the analysis of the chassis used truck model of TATA 1612. It gives the Continuous investigation and growth and pounding
efforts to meet the customers must has created this marvel. More power, more torque, more reliability and of course more
Productivity. There is a choice of body size, type as well as wheel base for different application. Data for the vehicle:
1) Suspension type: Parabolic spring at front and semi elliptical leaf spring at rear. Option 2: semi elliptical spring at front and
rear.
2) Number of gears: 6 forward , 1 reverse gears
3) Maximum engine output: 135 Kw181 Hp@2500 rpm.
4) Maximum engine Torque: 685 Nm @ 1400 rpm
A. Performance of Vehicle
_ Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW): 25000kg.
_ Gross Combined Weight (GVW + Payload):26200kg.
_ Maximum Gear speed: 78 km/hr.
_ Frame: Ladder type heavy duty frame, Depth- 285mm, width-65mm, frame width- 884mm.
_ Weights (kg): Max. Permissible GVW = 25000 Max. Permissible FAW = 6000 Max. Permissible RAW = 19000
Stress generated M max = 72022530.91N-mm, Moment of inertia around the x-x axis = 1266840 mm4, Section of modulus
about X-X axis = 21842.06897mm3
Stress produced on the beam = 3297.422 N/mm2
C. Material used
For the analysis of chassis used Mild steel. Mild steel has a comparatively little tensile strength, but it is cheap and malleable;
surface rigidity can be improved through carburizing.
Fig. 3: Meshing and Loading and Boundary Condition for chassis without load
Fig. 6: Total Deformations and Equivalent Stress for with chassis load
3805.2
SHEAR 13.33
(MPa) 3297.4(MPa)
STRESS (%)
VI. CONCLUSION
As conclusion, this study has achieved its core objectives. In Static Analysis, we can control extremely stressed area of truck
chassis due to applied load, and analytical shear stress is 13.33% less than FEA values.
REFERENCES
[1] RoslanAbdRahman, MohdNasir Stress Analysis of Heavy Duty Truck Chassis As a Preliminary Data Using FEM, Tamin , Journal Mekanikal, December
2008, No.26, 76 85.
[2] Teo Han Fui, RoslanAbd. Rahman Statics and Dynamics Structural Analysis of a 4.5 Ton Truck Chassis, Mechanical Engineering Dept.,
UniversitiTeknologi Malaysia, December 2007, No. 24, 56 6756
[3] Zhanwang, Y., and Zongyu, C., Dynamic Response Analysis of MinicarChangan Star 6350, Proceedings of 2nd MSC worldwide automotive conference,
MSC, 2000
[4] Kim, H. S., Hwang, Y. S., Yoon, H. S., Dynamic Stress Analysis of a Bus Systems, Proceedings of 2nd MSC worldwide automotive conference, MSC,
2000.
[5] Fermer, M., McInally, G., Sandin, G., Fatigue Life Analysis of Volvo S80 Bi-fuel, Proceedings of 1st= MSC worldwide automotive conference, MSC,
1999
[6] Johansson, I., and Gustavsson, M., FE-based Vehicle Analysis of Heavy Trucks Part I Proceedings of 2nd MSC worldwide automotive conference, MSC,
2000
[7] Oijer, F., FE-based Vehicle Analysis of Heavy Trucks Part II, Proceedings of 2nd MSC worldwide automotive conference, MSC, 2000
[8] Parnell, T., White, C., and Day, S., Finite Element Simulation of 180o Rollover for Heavy Truck Vehicles, ASCE Engineering mechanics conference,
Baltimore, 1999.