Class Notes On IOS
Class Notes On IOS
Class Notes On IOS
Enacted laws, specially the modern acts and rules, are drafted by legal experts
and it could be expected that the language used will leave little room for
interpretation or construction. But the experience of all those who have to bear
and share the task of application of the law, has been different.
Interpretation means the art of finding out the true sense of an enactment by
giving the words of the enactment their natural and ordinary meaning. It is the
process of ascertaining the true meaning of the words used in a statute. The Court
is not expected to interpret arbitrarily and therefore there have been certain
principles which have evolved out of the continuous exercise by the Courts.
These principles are sometimes called rules of interpretation.
Elaborate rules of interpretation were evolved even at a very early stage of Hindu
civilization and culture. The rules given by Jaimini, the author of Mimamsat
Sutras, originally meant for srutis were employed for the interpretation of Smritis
also.
In the process of interpretation, several aids are used. They may be statutory or
non-statutory. Statutory aids may be illustrated by the General Clauses Act, 1897
and by specific definitions contained in individuals Acts whereas non-statutory
aids is illustrated by common law rules of interpretation (including certain
presumptions relating to interpretation) and also by case-laws relating to the
interpretation of statutes.
It has been said that there is a distinction between the two expressions.
As explained by Cooley: Interpretation differs from construction in sense that
the former is the art of finding out the true sense of any form of words; i.e. the
sense that their author intended to convey. Construction on the other hand, is the
drawing of conclusions, respecting the subjects that lie beyond the direct
expression of the text. This distinction has been widely criticized.
The process of construction combines both the literal and purposive approaches.
The purposive construction rule highlights that you should shift from literal
construction when it leads to absurdity.
2.If the language is clear and unambiguous, no need of interpretation would arise.
In this regard, a Constitution Bench of five Judges of the Supreme Court in R.S.
Nayak v A.R. Antulay,[5] has held:
3. If the words of the Statute are clear and unambiguous, it is the plainest duty
of the Court to give effect to the natural meaning of the words used in the
provision. The question of construction arises only in the event of an ambiguity
or the plain meaning of the words used in the Statute would be self-defeating.
Where the words are clear and there is no obscurity, and there is no ambiguity
and the intention of the legislature is clearly conveyed, there is no scope for court
to take upon itself the task of amending or altering the statutory provisions.
6.The correct is one that best harmonises the words with the object of statute.As
stated by Iyer J. to be literal in meaning is to see the skin and miss the soul. The
judicial key of construction is the composite perception of the deha and the dehi
of the provision.
According to Blackstone the most fair and rational method for interpreting a
statute is by exploring the intention of the Legislature through the most natural
and probable signs which are either the words, the context, the subject-matter,
the effects and consequence, or the spirit and reason of the law
MEANING AND CLASSIFICATION OF STATUTES
Therefore, a Statute is the will of the legislature and Indian Statute is an Act of
the Central or State Legislature. Statutes include Acts passed by the Imperial or
Provincial Legislature in Pre-Independence days as well as Regulations. Statutes
generally refer to the laws and regulations of every sort, every provision of law
which permits or prohibit anything.
(i) Perpetual statutes - It is perpetual when no time is fixed for its duration
and such a statute remains in force until its repeal which may be
express or implied.
(ii) Temporary statutes - A statute is temporary when its duration is only for
(i) Prospective statutes A statute which operates upon acts and transactions
which have not occurred when the statutes takes effect, that is which
regulates the future is a Prospective statute.
(ii) Retrospective statutes Every statute takes away or impairs vested rights
acquired under the existing laws or creates a new obligation into a new
duty or attaches a new disability in respect of transactions or
considerations already passed are deemed retrospective or retroactive
statute.
(ii) Disabling statutes These statutes restrict or cut down rights existing at
common law.
(iii) Permissive statute This type of statute allows certain acts to be done
without commanding that they be performed.
(iv) Prohibitory statute This type of statute which forbids the doing of certain
things.
(v) Codifying Statute It presents and orderly and authoritative statement of the
leading rules of law on a given subject, whether those rules are to be found in
statute law or common law.
(vii) Curative or validating Statute - It is passed to cure defects in the prior law
and too validate legal proceedings, instruments or acts of public and private
administrative powers which in the absence of such statute would be void for
want of conformity with existing legal requirements but which would have been
valid if the statute has so provided at the time of enacting.