FINAL Report of Lightning Protection Survey
FINAL Report of Lightning Protection Survey
FINAL Report of Lightning Protection Survey
:- GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
LIGHTNING PROTECTION
SURVEY
PREPARED FOR
REGD.OFFICE: Green Empire (Anupushpam), Beside Canara Bank, Nr. Yash Complex,
Above Axis Bank, Gotri Main Road, VADODARA 390 021, (Gujarat), India
Tel:- 0265- 2371028 / 2371269
www.greencircleinc.com E: info@greencircleinc.com
ALSO AT
NEW DELHI MUMBAI PUNE BANGALORE HYDERABAD
OVERSEAS: AUSTRALIA OMAN DUBAI NIGERIA
CHAMBAL FERTILIZERS & CHEMICALS LIMITED
LIGHTNING PROTECTION SURVEY AS PER IS 2309:1989
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
DC : DEVANG CHAUHAN
AS : ANIL SHAH
PJ : PRADEEP JOSHI
Signature
Signature
Signature
Signature
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
IS HIGHLY APPRECIATED.
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
INDEX
Page
Sr. No. Content No.
1 Organization Profile 2
2 Credits 3
Section-1
2 Introduction 4
3 Need of Protection 8
6 Weighing Factors 12
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
1. ORGANIZATION PROFILE
Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited (CFCL) is a fertilizers manufacturing company. It is one
of the largest and most respected companies in India's private sector. It is one of the companies
of Birla group. Expansion is already under progress.
Customer-focused approach and the continuous quest for world-class quality have enabled it
to attain and sustain leadership in its major lines of business.
CFCL believes that progress must be achieved in harmony with the environment. A commitment
to community welfare and environmental protection are an integral part of the corporate vision.
This can be seen by any visitor, from the lush green landscaping maintained in the plant and the
township. The company has high standard of safety not only for their employees, but also for
the contract personnel working in the plant.
The company's businesses are supported by a wide marketing and distribution network, and
have established a reputation for strong customer support.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
CREDITS
M/S. Chambal Fertilizers & chemicals limited appointed M/S. GREEN CIRCLE INC., VADODARA to
conduct LIGHTNING PROTECTION SURVEY. An audit team to plant site comprising Mr. N.N Parekh
Asso -VP - Electrical & Sanat Pandya, Asso -GM- Electrical from M/S GREEN CIRCLE INC.
The auditors from M/S. Green Circle Inc. conducted LIGHTNING PROTECTION SURVEY from 07th to
15th February 2013 with standard (Reference Std. IS 2309:1989 Protection of Building and Allied
Structure against Lightning Code of Practice)
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
SECTION-1 (Chapter-2 to 9)
2. ABOUT LIGHTNING
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Lightning is a natural hazard, generally experienced during monsoon season. Some lightning
strokes may result in damage to the buildings, structures, equipments, etc., and few strokes even
kill or injure people and animals, as we normally come across during monsoon season. The
damage caused to the property and equipments may run into substantial amount depending
on the intensity of lightning stroke.
There are various theories explaining the phenomena of lightning. The most logical and
understandable is Precipitation Theory. During monsoon, clouds in the sky have water particles
of two types heavy particles (mist) & light particles (water droplets). As the cloud travels, heavy
particles, which are negatively charged settles in the bottom part of the cloud and Light
particles remain in the top portion of the cloud.
When the negative charge becomes very heavy, it will try to find its way to earth. The air
between bottom part of the cloud and the earth breaks down which results in LIGHTNING. We
see streak of lightning for fraction of second.
Ironically, damage due to lightning can be reasonably prevented by providing suitable lightning
protection system. The protection methods to prevent damage due to lightning are simple,
reasonably reliable and rather inexpensive, particularly when compared to the cost of
equipment repair and replacement, as well as possible consequences of harm to the people.
Lightning is the visible discharge of static electricity within a cloud, between clouds, or between
the earth and a cloud". Thunderstorms occur when warm and cold air masses meet. Charges of
electrical energy build up within the air masses and periodically discharge as energy flows from
one area to another. Air moving upwards in the churning causes a separation and movement of
positively charged ions or particles to the top of clouds, where the cold and warm fronts meet,
leaving negative charges at the bottom of clouds. The lightning strokes may pass vertically or
horizontally between clouds or may move between the air and the ground where energy is
finally dissipated.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
The magnitude of the cloud-to-ground lightning hazard is understood better today than had
been in earlier days. In this part of India, the lightning strokes are generally experienced during
monsoon season of around 4 months. Since lightning strikes the ground not in a large numbers
and is not exceedingly widespread, the data collection for arriving at thunderstorm days is also
limited. For this reason, lightning can be considered the most dangerous weather hazard that
many industries and people encounter each year. Lightning-specific warnings systems have not
been in existence in our country so far.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
microsecond voltage reduces to 85 kV. The lightning current rises steeply to its crest valve, at
the rate of 10,000 Amps per microsecond. It may produce around the earth electrodes, a
high potential gradient dangerous to persons and animals.
(b) Mechanical effect is exerted due to sudden high temperature. The space between the
thundercloud & the lighting conductor suddenly gests heated up to very high temperature.
This results in a strong pressure wave, which can damage structures & buildings. It is not
possible to provide protection against such an effect.
Considerable mechanical stresses are developed at sharp bends. Therefore, bends should
be minimized as far as possible. If this is unavoidable, secure (fix) the bends and strip or
conductor tightly.
(c) Thermal effects, during stroke, air temperature reaches as high as 30,000 K. This creates a
very big shock wave. Thermal effect is also there on the conductor, through which lighting
current passes. Because, time is very short, thermal effect on of lightning protective system is
negligible. In practice, the cross sectional area of a lightning conductor is decided primarily
by mechanical consideration.
4. TYPES OF LIGHTNING
There are total five types of Lightning. Based on clouds & ground discharge direction, these are
divided into three groups
(a) Negative Downward Discharge: Negative charge of cloud goes downward to the earth to
meet the Positive charge. 90% of lightning is of this type.
(b) Positive Downward Discharge: Positive charge of cloud goes downward to the earth to meet
the Negative charge.
(c) Negative Upward Discharge: Negative charge of the earth goes upward to meet the
Positive charge of cloud.
(d) Positive Upward Discharge: Positive charge of the earth goes upward to meet the Negative
charge of cloud.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
(e) Positive charge of on cloud meets Negative charge of the other cloud. Such discharge does
not reach ground. It is in the sky only.
The necessity for systems offering protection against the effects of lightning is becoming ever
greater. The increased use to domestic and industrial electronic components, tall buildings and
high-risk or dangerous sites within city limits have led legislators to include lightning risk
assessment in their safety regulations and to lay down guidelines for appropriate protection
systems.
Despite their best efforts, instances of material damage and human casualties still prevail.
Abbreviations used
IS Indian Standard
DC Down Conductors
EP Earthing Pits
LA Lightning Arrestor
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
3. NEED OF PROTECTION
Before proceeding to design a detailed lightning protection system, one should carefully
consider, do the structure needs protection. In many causes, it is observed that some form of
protection is required. High-risk structures i.e. explosives factories, oil refineries etc will require the
highest possible class of lightning protection to be provided. In many cases, the need for
protection is not so evident.
IS: 2309-1989 provides a simple mathematical overall risk factor (ORF) analysis. Calculation
assesses whether a structure needs protection or not. An acceptable lightning strike risk factor is
taken as 10-5 per year, i.e. 1 in 100,000 per year. If risk factor is less than 10-5 (1 in 100,000), for
example 0.8 in 100,000, then protection is deemed unnecessary. If risk factor is greater than 1 in
100,000, for example 5 in 10,000, then protection would be required.
For structures requiring protection, various data (like dimension, criticality, type of service, type of
terrain etc.) are required.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
1.CURRENT
2. VOLTAGE
The charge potential before stroke is based on 100oC and 1 km radius of an equivalent spherical
cell, which is considered about 10-7 F(farad) and the estimated potential is assumed 100 MV
from relation Q = CV.
Average thunderstorm days given in IS: 2309:1989 (Sr. no.30 on page 5) for Kota is 27
As the distance from the seacoast increases, the probability of thunderstorm has been found
increasing and the number of thunderstorm days has been observed generally increasing.
Data for number of thunderstorm days is translated in terms of estimated average annual density
Ng, i.e. Lightning flash per km2 per year, in referred IS as follow. Data for Thunderstorm days /
year and Lightning flashes / km2 / year is reproduced from IS 2309:1989 for information.
Average thunderstorm days given in IS: 2309:1989 (Page 5, Sr no.30) for Kota is 27.
Table-2 (at the end of this section) shows ESTIMATED AVERAGE ANNUAL LIGHTNING FLASH
DENSITY IN TERMS OF LIGHTNING FLASHES PER KM2 PER YEAR. (This table is from IS 2309:1989)
Lightning flash density considered in the assessment of lightning protection based on data
provided in IS 2309:1989, is worked out from the above table. It comes to 1.66 per KM2 per year
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
The determination of collection area of buildings, structures, etc. required in the engineering
calculations for assessment of the lightning protection depends on length, width and height as
well as on the shape of individual building and structure.
The method of calculating collection area based on the shape of building and type of roof as
described in IS 2309. The formula for calculating Area for particular shape is also mentioned in IS
2309:1989
Further to above, the type of construction of building, i.e. steel structure, RCC or mix of both,
type of roof over building, i.e. RCC slab, metallic roof or asbestos sheet roof, etc are considered
in the engineering, wherever required. Table-1 (attached at the end of this section) shows the
details of buildings and structures considered for lightning protection system at CFCL, Kota.
Uncovered storage areas are considered for assessment based on various risk weighing factors
applied in accordance with the nature of goods stored, i.e. normal goods, inflammable and
explosive materials. The collection area is derived applying simple L x W formula.
(A) Sample Calculation of Collection Area (A0) For All Building Structures of Rectangular Shape
with Metallic Sloping Roof
(B) Sample Calculation of Collection Area (A0) For Tall Structure like Overhead Tank / Chimney /
Structural Tower / Lighting Mast
Ao = 3.14 X Height2
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
(C) Sample Calculation of Collection Area (A0) For Open Yard without Roof
(D) Sample Calculation of Collection Area (A0) For All Building Structures of Rectangular Shape
with RCC Flat Roof
Thus, for all buildings/ structures / Areas, Collection Area (A0) was worked out, which are shown
in Table-3 to Table-6. (Refer the Annexure)
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
6. WEIGHING FACTORS
The weighing factors denote a relative degree of importance or risk in each case. These factors
are to be applied when assessing the overall assessment of risk due to the lighting stroke. Data
for Weighing Factors, which is as provided in, IS 2309:1989
TABLE.1
WEIGHING FACTOR A FOR ACTIVITY IN BUILDING OR USAGE OF STRUCTURE
VALUE OF
SR. NO USE TO WHICH STRUCTURE IS PUT WEIGHING
FACTOR A
1 Houses and other buildings of comparable size 0.3
2 Houses and other buildings of comparable size with outside aerials 0.7
TABLE.2
WEIGHING FACTOR B FOR TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
VALUE OF
SR. NO TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION WEIGHING
FACTOR B
Steel framed encased, with roof made of any material other than
1 0.2
metal*
Reinforced concrete with roof made of any material other than
2 0.4
metal
3 Steel framed encased or reinforced concrete with metal roof 0.8
4 Brick, plain concrete or masonry with roof made of any materials 1.0
other than metal
5 Timber framed or clad with roof made of any materials other than 1.4
metal or thatch
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
6 Brick, plain concrete or masonry, timber framed with metal roof 1.7
TABLE.3
WEIGHING FACTOR C FOR CONTENTS OR CONSEQUENTIAL EFFECTS
VALUE OF
SR
CONTENTS OR TYPE OF BUILDING OR CONSEQUENTIAL EFFECTS WEIGHING
No.
FACTOR C
1 Ordinary domestic or office buildings, factories and workshops not 0.3
containing valuable or specially susceptible contents
2 Industrial and agricultural buildings with specially susceptible* contents 0.8
TABLE.4
WEIGHING FACTOR D FOR DEGREE OF ISOLATION
VALUE OF
SR.
DEGREE OF ISOLATION* WEIGHING
NO
FACTOR D
1 Structure located in a large area of structures or trees of the same or 0.4
greater height, for example, in a large town or forest
2 Structure located in an area with few other structures or trees of similar 1.0
heights
3 Structure completely isolated or exceeding at least twice the height of 2.0
surrounding structures or trees
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
TABLE.5
WEIGHING FACTOR E FOR TYPE OF COUNTRY
Value of
Sr. No Type of Country Weighing
Factor E
1 Flat country at any level 0.3
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
After deriving the probable number of lightning strikes per year on a building / structure under
assessment, the Risk Weighing Factors are applied as shown in the sample method of
calculation provided and Overall Risk Factor (ORF) is found out and necessarily or otherwise of
the lightning protection is considered on following basis.
If Overall Risk Factor P < P0, i.e. less than 1 x 10-5, Lightning protection may not be necessary in
absence of other overriding considerations.
If Overall Risk Factor P > P0, i.e. greater than 1 x 10-5, Lightning protection will be necessary.
In case the ORF is found marginally greater or lower, it would be essential to provide sound
reasons for either providing or not providing the lightning protection.
The buildings / structures having chemical process of explosive or flammable nature and
covered / open storages containing explosive or flammable substances are to be provided with
the lightning protection irrespective of the estimated ORF more or less than acceptable risk of 1
x 10-5.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Where
PA = Ao X Ng X 10-6
= 11378.1096 X 0.2 X 10-6
= 2275.62192 X 10-6
From Table-7 it can be seen that protection against lightning is required for all structures /
buildings, because ORF in all cases are more than 1 in 1, 00,000.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
For protection of tanks, in NFPA780, there are guidelines which are as under:
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
of flexible Type 302, 28-gauge [1/64 in. 2 in. (0.4 mm 51 mm)] wide stainless steel straps or
the equivalent in current-carrying capacity and corrosion resistance. The metallic shoe shall be
maintained in contact with the shell and without openings (such as corrosion holes) through the
shoe. Tanks without a vapor space at the seal shall not require shunts at the seal. Where metallic
weather shields cover the seal, they shall maintain contact with the shell.
Where a floating roof is equipped with both primary and secondary seals, the space
between the two seals could contain a vapor-air mixture within the flammable range; therefore,
if the design of such a seal system incorporates electrically conductive materials and a spark
gap exists within that space or could be created by roof movement, shunts shall be installed so
that they directly contact the tank shell above the secondary seal. The shunts shall be spaced at
intervals not greater than 10 ft (3 m) and shall be constructed so that metallic contact is
maintained between the floating roof and the tank shell in all operational positions of the
floating roof.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Structure with base area not exceeding 100 01 no. down conductor
m2
Structure with base area exceeding 100 m2 At least smaller of the following options:
Based on the perimeter and Base area of the structures, down comer, earth pits & spikes are
decided. Summary of the recommendation is given in the tabular form of next five pages. Last
three columns indicate additional hardware Air terminals (AT), down conductor (DC) and
earth pits (EP) required.
Ammonia-1
Compr. House 0 1 1 In the protection zone of F301
Substation 0 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2
G-1 control room 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6
F301 HP Tower 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
F302 CO2 Abso. 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Urea
U. Prilling Tower-1 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0
Urea-11 substation 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3
Urea-21 substation 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 3
Ammo. Sto.tank-1 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0
Ammo. Sto. tank-2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0
Urea Product Handling
Main bldg. 1 & 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 4 4 4
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Main bldg. 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1
Silo No change in the existing system - All existing earth pits shall be renovated
and continuity of DC with earth pit shall be ensured.
Screen house
2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 0
(consider one blg)
Wagon loading
0 0 0 7 22 22 7 22 22
Area (left) 300 Mt
Wagon loading
0 0 0 9 28 28 9 28 28
Area (rt.)- 400 Mt.
Non Plant
Maint. Workshop 10 10 8 10 10 10 0 0 2
Store 0 0 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
Offsite -SPG
HRSG 1 (& stack) 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
HRSG 2 (& stack) 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
Aux Boiler 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 2
Aux Boiler 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 2
Aux Boiler 1 stack 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
Aux Boiler 2 stack 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0
IAPA (Comp Hs.) 1 4 4 4 4 4 3 0 0
Emerg. DG-1 0 4 0 2 2 2 2 0 2
O&U CR building. 8 7 7 8 9 9 0 2 2
Offsite 1
DM-1 substation 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
DM-2 substation 1 2 0 2 2 2 1 0 2
Cooling towers
0 8 8 12 8 8 12 0 0
(12)
Naphtha Storage This tank is located on west side of SPG unit. It is inherently Self protected as
tanks per NFPA (check earth pits)
Naphtha Daily This tank is located on west side of SPG unit. It is inherently Self protected as
tank per NFPA (check earth pits)
Water pre treated
& Clarified filtered
Inherently protected (check earth pits)
water storage tanks
(T-912A)
Water pre treated
& Clarified filtered
water storage tanks Inherently protected (check earth pits)
(T-912B)
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Compr. house
0 0 0 Covered under protection zone of Prilling Tower-2
carbonate
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
Solution tank
urea solution tank 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
Guard pond bldg
0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
(remote location)
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
EDG exhaust
1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chimney.
Cooling Tower (11 1
1 per 1 per
per 11 8 8 0 0 0
nos.) cell cell
cell
G2-Flare Stack
0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1
Tower
Utility /CW substn. 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
Single Super Phosphate
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Above table shows only three hardware Air terminal (spike), down conductor and earth pit. In
addition to these, on sloping roofs and flat roofs, earth mesh (of max 20 Mt x 10 Mt. size) is to be
laid. The details of this protection (wherever required) can be referred from Table-8 (Final
recommendations.
Following tables (attached with the report) show the various details:
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
3 Ammonia1 G-1 Control room 72 20 6.8 -- Rectangular shape with RCC flat roof
6 Urea Urea -11 Substation 40.5 14.55 8.5 -- Rectangular shape with RCC flat roof
7 Urea Urea -21 Substation 40.5 14.55 8.5 -- Rectangular shape with RCC flat roof
12 UPHS Main building 1 and 2 60 15.3 35 -- Rectangular shape with RCC flat roof
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Off site
26 SPG O&U control room building. 72 12 14 -- Rectangular shape with RCC flat roof
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
36 Raw water Raw/CW water substation 45 25 10 -- Rectangular shape with RCC flat roof
Holding
37 MCC Room 5 5 5 -- Rectangular shape with RCC flat roof
Pond
Onsite-2
Ammonia-
38 G2 substation Building 61 12 11 -- Rectangular shape with RCC flat roof
II/Urea II
39 Ammonia-II Auxiliary Boiler no 3 20 15 25 -- Metallic slopping roof.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
SSP
64 SSP SSP substation 14 8.5 6 -- Rectangular/L shape with RCC flat roof
65 SSP SSP Control room 22 6 6 -- Rectangular/L shape with RCC flat roof
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Estimated Average Annual Lightning Flash Density in terms of Lightning Flashes per km2
per year
PLACE KOTA(RAJASTHAN)
In IS 2309 for specific place Kota thunder storm days mentioned are 27.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Table-3 Collection Area for all buildings / structures of Rectangular shape with Metallic sloping Roof
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Table-4 Collection Area for tall structures like overhead tank / chimney /tower / lighting mast etc
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Onsite -1
1. Urea Storage Tanks (2 no.) -- -- 21.6 25 490.625
2. Urea Storage Tanks (2 no.) -- -- 21.6 25 490.625
Off site
3. CW Cooling tower 12 nos 135 16 24 -- 2160
4. Naphtha New Tanks -- -- 11.58 16.8 221.5584
Storage
5. New Tanks Tank no-- -- -- 11.58 16.8 221.5584
6. Water pre treated & Clarified -- -- 18 38 1133.54
filtered water storage tanks no 1
7. Water pre treated & Clarified -- -- 18 38 1133.54
filtered water storage tanks No 2
8. Water pre treated & Clarified -- -- 18 38 1133.54
filtered water storage tanks No 3
Onsite-2
9. Naphtha Naphtha storage tank-A-FB -101 -- -- 11.58 16.8 221.5584
Storage
10. Naphtha Naphtha storage tank-A-FB -102 -- -- 11.58 16.8 221.5584
Storage
11. CW Cooling tower 11 nos 135 16 24 -- 2160
SSP
12. SSP H2SO4 tank no 1 -- -- 8 8.2 52.7834
13. SSP H2SO4 tank no 2 -- -- 8 8.2 52.7834
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Table-6 Collection Area for buildings / structures of Rectangular shape with RCC flat roof
Dimension in meters
Sr no Unit Plant Description of building structure. collection area in SQ Meters
Length width - Height AO=(LXW)+2(LXH)+2(WXH)+3.14H2
-L W -H
1. Onsite -1 Ammonia 1 Amm -1 Substation 48 9 8.5 1627.865
2. Onsite -1 Ammonia1 G-1 Control room 72 20 6.8 2836.3936
3. Onsite -1 Urea Urea -11 Substation 40.5 14.55 8.5 1751.99
4. Onsite -1 Urea Urea -21 Substation 40.5 14.55 8.5 1751.99
5. UPHS UPHS Main building 1 and 2 60 15.3 35 10035.5
6. UPHS UPHS Main building 3 55 15 35 9571.5
7. UPHS UPHS Screen house (consider one building) 20 16.5 21 3247.74
8. Off site SPG Emergency DG set -1 EDG-1 18 18 16 2279.84
9. Off site SPG O&U control room building. 72 12 14 3831.44
10. Off site DM-1 DM-1 substation 5 5 6 258.04
11. Off site DM-2 DM-2 substation 24 12 10 1322
12. Off site Fire Pump Fire water pump house 39 10 9 1526.34
13. Off site Raw water Raw/CW water substation 45 25 10 2839
Holding
14. Off site MCC Room 5 5 5 203.5
Pond
Ammonia-
15. Onsite-2 G2 substation Building 61 12 11 2717.94
II/Urea II
16. Onsite-2 Ammonia-II Ammonia 2 control room L shape -1 25 20 6 1153.04
17. Onsite-2 Ammonia-II Ammonia 2 control room L shape -2 10 10 6 453.04
18. Onsite-2 Guard Pond Guard pond building (remote location) 5 4 5 188.5
19. Onsite-2 EDG Emergency Diesel Set Building 30 10 15 2206.5
20. Onsite-2 G2 Utility /CW substation 22 10 11 1303.94
21. SSP SSP SSP substation 14 8.5 6 502.04
22. SSP SSP SSP Control room 22 6 6 581.04
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Table-7 To find out Overall Risk Factor to decide - Protection required or not (for each structure/ building)
Weighing Factors for Assessment of Lightning Protection for Buildings/Structures having normal Processes and Covered/Open Storage
as provided in IS:2309 1989
Value of Weighing Factor
Sr No Use to which structure is put
A
1 Houses and other buildings of comparable size 0.3
2 Houses and other buildings of comparable size with outside aerials 0.7
3 Small and medium size factories, workshops and laboratories 1
Big industrial plants, telephone exchanges, office blocks, hotels, blocks of flats and other
4 1.2
residential buildings other than those included in Item No. 5 and 6 below
Places of assembly, for example churches, halls, theatres, museums, exhibition halls,
5 1.3
department stores, stations, airports and stadium structures
6 Schools, hospitals, children's and other such homes 1.7
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Calculated Weighing Factor for Plant Area = Multiplying Factor = A * B * C * D *E = 1 * 0.8 * 0.8 * 0.4 * 0. 3 = 0.0768
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
B. Overall Risk Factor to decide - Protection required or not (for each structure/ building)
Overall Assessed
Collection Assessed Risk
Description of building Risk for structure/
Sr no Plant Area AO IN PA = A0 *Ng P*105 REQ/NOT REQ
structure. building P=Pa*MF
Sq Meter (1.66) * 10(-6)
(0.768)
AO PA P=Pa*MF
Onsite -1
Compressor House
1 Ammonia1 2504.865 0.004158076 0.00031934 31.934023 Protection required
(Ammonia comp)
2 Ammonia 1 Amm -1 Substation 1627.865 0.002702256 0.000207533 20.753325 Protection required
3 Ammonia1 G-1 Control room 2836.3936 0.004708413 0.000361606 36.160615 Protection required
4 Urea Urea Prilling Tower -1 37994 0.06307004 0.004843779 484.37791 Protection required
5 Ammonia Ammonia 1 Reformer 3962.5 0.00657775 0.000505171 50.51712 Protection required
6 Urea Urea -11 Substation 1751.99 0.002908303 0.000223358 22.33577 Protection required
7 Urea Urea -21 Substation 1751.99 0.002908303 0.000223358 22.33577 Protection required
8 Ammonia 1 Storage Tanks (2 no.) 490.625 0.000814438 6.25488E-05 6.25488 Protection required
9 Ammonia 1 Storage Tanks (2 no.) 490.625 0.000814438 6.25488E-05 6.25488 Protection required
UPHS
10 UPHS Main building 1 and 2 10035.5 0.01665893 0.001279406 127.94058 Protection required
11 UPHS Main building 3 9571.5 0.01588869 0.001220251 122.02514 Protection required
12 UPHS Silo 0 0 0
Screen house
13 UPHS (consider one 3247.74 0.005391248 0.000414048 41.404788 Protection required
building)
14 UPHS Wagon Area left 5983.385 0.009932419 0.00076281 76.280979 Protection required
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Overall Assessed
Collection Assessed Risk
Description of building Risk for structure/
Sr no Plant Area AO IN PA = A0 *Ng P*105 REQ/NOT REQ
structure. building P=Pa*MF
Sq Meter (1.66) * 10(-6)
(0.768)
AO PA P=Pa*MF
15 UPHS Wagon Area right 7883.385 0.013086419 0.001005037 100.5037 Protection required
16 Ammonia F301 HP TOWER 15386 0.02554076 0.00196153 196.15304 Protection required
17 Ammonia F302 CO2 Absorber 13266.5 0.02202239 0.00169132 169.13196 Protection required
Off Site
18 SPG HRSG 1 STACK 547.1136 0.000908209 6.97504E-05 6.9750419 Protection required
19 SPG HRSG 2 STACK 547.1136 0.000908209 6.97504E-05 6.9750419 Protection required
20 SPG Aux Boiler 1 1856 0.00308096 0.000236618 23.661773 Protection required
21 SPG Aux Boiler 2 1856 0.00308096 0.000236618 23.661773 Protection required
22 SPG Aux Boiler 1 STACK 1256 0.00208496 0.000160125 16.012493 Protection required
23 SPG Aux Boiler 2 Stack 1256 0.00208496 0.000160125 16.012493 Protection required
Inst Air comp &Plant
24 SPG 1303.94 0.00216454 0.000166237 16.62367 Protection required
Air Comp IAPA
Emergency DG set -1
25 SPG 2279.84 0.003784534 0.000290652 29.065224 Protection required
EDG-1
O&U control room
26 SPG 3831.44 0.00636019 0.000488463 48.846262 Protection required
building.
27 DM-1 DM-1 substation 258.04 0.000428346 3.2897E-05 3.2897004 Protection required
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Overall Assessed
Collection Assessed Risk
Description of building Risk for structure/
Sr no Plant Area AO IN PA = A0 *Ng P*105 REQ/NOT REQ
structure. building P=Pa*MF
Sq Meter (1.66) * 10(-6)
(0.768)
AO PA P=Pa*MF
31 New Tanks Tank no-- 221.5584 0.000367787 2.8246E-05 2.8246037 Protection required
Water pre treated &
32 Clarified filtered water 1133.54 0.001881676 0.000144513 14.451275 Protection required
storage tanks no 1
Water pre treated &
33 Clarified filtered water 1133.54 0.001881676 0.000144513 14.451275 Protection required
storage tanks No 2
Water pre treated &
34 Clarified filtered water 1133.54 0.001881676 0.000144513 14.451275 Protection required
storage tanks No 3
Fire water pump
35 Fire Pump 1526.34 0.002533724 0.00019459 19.459003 Protection required
house
Raw/CW water
36 Raw water 2839 0.00471274 0.000361938 36.193843 Protection required
substation
37 ETP ETP 0 0 0
NG Receiving
38 NG 0 0 0
station
39 Holding Pond MCC Room 203.5 0.00033781 2.59438E-05 2.5943808 Protection required
Onsite - 2
Ammonia-
40 G2 substation Building 2717.94 0.00451178 0.000346505 34.650473 Protection required
II/Urea II
41 Ammonia-II Auxiliary Boiler no 3 2962.5 0.00491775 0.000377683 37.76832 Protection required
42 Ammonia-II Auxiliary Boiler 3 stack 3846.5 0.00638519 0.000490383 49.038259 Protection required
43 Ammonia-II I.A.comp shed 293.04 0.000486446 3.73591E-05 3.7359084 Protection required
Ammonia 2 control
44 Ammonia-II 1153.04 0.001914046 0.000146999 14.699876 Protection required
room L shape -1
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Overall Assessed
Collection Assessed Risk
Description of building Risk for structure/
Sr no Plant Area AO IN PA = A0 *Ng P*105 REQ/NOT REQ
structure. building P=Pa*MF
Sq Meter (1.66) * 10(-6)
(0.768)
AO PA P=Pa*MF
Ammonia 2 control
45 Ammonia-II 453.04 0.000752046 5.77572E-05 5.7757164 Protection required
room L shape -2
Ammonia 2
46 Ammonia-II 4306.64 0.007149022 0.000549045 54.904492 Protection required
compressor House.
CO 2 Stripper tag no
47 Ammonia-II 15386 0.02554076 0.00196153 196.15304 Protection required
402in Ammonia ii
CO2 absorber in
48 Ammonia-II 11304 0.01876464 0.001441124 144.11244 Protection required
Ammonia 2
49 Urea 2 Prilling tower 2 43610.27465 0.072393056 0.005559787 555.97867 Protection required
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Overall Assessed
Collection Assessed Risk
Description of building Risk for structure/
Sr no Plant Area AO IN PA = A0 *Ng P*105 REQ/NOT REQ
structure. building P=Pa*MF
Sq Meter (1.66) * 10(-6)
(0.768)
AO PA P=Pa*MF
Guard pond building
58 Guard Pond 188.5 0.00031291 2.40315E-05 2.4031488 Protection required
(remote location)
Naphtha Naphtha storage
59 221.5584 0.000367787 2.8246E-05 2.8246037 Protection required
Storage tank-A-FB -101
Naphtha Naphtha storage
60 221.5584 0.000367787 2.8246E-05 2.8246037 Protection required
Storage tank-A-FB -102
Emergency Diesel Set
61 EDG 2206.5 0.00366279 0.000281302 28.130227 Protection required
Building
EDG exhaust
62 EDG 1962.5 0.00325775 0.000250195 25.01952 Protection required
Chimney.
Cooling
63 Cooling Tower 11 nos 2160 0.0035856 0.000275374 27.537408 Protection required
Tower
64 G2 G2-Flare Stack Tower 15386 0.02554076 0.00196153 196.15304 Protection required
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Overall Assessed
Collection Assessed Risk
Description of building Risk for structure/
Sr no Plant Area AO IN PA = A0 *Ng P*105 REQ/NOT REQ
structure. building P=Pa*MF
Sq Meter (1.66) * 10(-6)
(0.768)
AO PA P=Pa*MF
72 SSP H2SO4 tank no 2 52.7834 8.76204E-05 6.72925E-06 0.672925 Not Required
73 SSP Rock phosphate shed 1456.5 0.00241779 0.000185686 18.568627 Protection required
Rock phosphate
74 SSP 714 0.00118524 9.10264E-05 9.1026432 Protection required
storage shed
GSSP Based Storage
75 SSP 840.96 0.001395994 0.000107212 10.721231 Protection required
&Plant building
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
1.0 In the Section 7 of the list furnished for lightning protection system, the buildings can
be divided into two groups Buildings outside the township and buildings located
inside the township. These are as under:
(A) Buildings outside the township
1 Canteen
2 Lab Tech Bldg.
3 IT Bldg
4 Health centre
5 Admin Block
6 Store
7 Maintenance workshop block
8 Fire station & Extension Building
9 Contractors shed
10 Security office
2.0 Based on the available data of dimensions and Area of conduction for all buildings,
probability was worked out for each of the above buildings. Findings are tabulated in
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Table-1. Except the Security office, for all other buildings in the above list need the
lightning protection. Details of working out probability (higher or lower than 1 in
100000) are shown in Table-1 attached.
3.0 For the buildings requiring the protection, various details of protection hardware were
worked out. Mainly number of down comers, (based on base area and perimeter of
each structure), were worked out. As per guidelines of IS 2309:1989, lower number is
taken for protection. These calculations results are tabulated in Table-2.
4.0 For some structure, protection is provided. However, in township, it was observed that
except (single lightning arrester) for water tank, none of the structures/buildings has
been provided lightning protection. Table-3 shows the summary of additional
hardware required.
5.0 Majority of the buildings are flat roof structures. Therefore, GI strip (25 mm x 3 mm) is
to be cleated on the parapet wall. Down comers are taken on the outer wall and
are terminated to respective earth pit.
In many cases mesh grid is required on the terrace /roof top. It will be ensured that all
cross points and T-points are properly connected to have p1989.roper/good contact.
Any member of mesh should not be larger than 20 Mt x 10 Mt. Other hardware details
are given in IS 2309:1989
6.0 Area of conduction for all the buildings, have not been calculated, but it has been
taken from the earlier records, which was calculated from CAD system. At present,
protection is required for all structures in township. In the following sections, wherever
details were available, sketch is made. For Lab Tech building, where full size drawings
were sent, down comers, mesh (on the terrace/parapet) are shown in the drawings.
This drawing is sent back to CFCL, along with other drawings in which radius of
protection zone were marked.
Nomenclatures are as below
For the club building, because the base shape is of irregular type, down comers
quantity is worked out based on perimeter only. As such also, out of two basis (base
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
7.3 IT Building:
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Fig.3 IT Building
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
(b) On the flat terrace on north side mesh will be laid and connected as shown in Fig.7.
(c) Where ever earth pits are not traceable, new pits will be provided and connected to
the respective down comer.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
7.8Contractors shed
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Fig.8Contractors shed
8.1Club.
Fig. 9 Club
8.2 Hostel
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Fig. 10 Hostel
This hall has a trapezoidal dome having metallic top. There is a space between dome
and parapet wall. The earth strip will be cleated on the parapet. Bottom (four) corners of
the hall shall be connected with the earth strip running on the parapet. Because the
dome itself is of metal sheet, the strip need not be laid on the dome.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
In each types of these blocks, there are two spikes and two earth pits, as shown in Fig.14
above.
Fig.13
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Fig.15
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Fig.18
Fig. 19
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Fig.20
There are total six sheds. On each shed there will be two spikes as shown in the fig.
21 below
Fig. 21
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Fig. 22
Fig.23
8. 16 Petrol Pump
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
There are total six sheds. Fig 27 is shown on the next page
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Fig. 26
Sheds 4 & 6 have two spikes each. Remaining sheds have one spike each.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
22 A type s/s 395 1.0 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.096 1.66 0.66x10-3 6.3 x 10-5 Required
23 B type s/s 395 1.0 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.096 1.66 0.66x10-3 6.3 x 10-5 Required
24 D type s/s & Tel. Excha. 306 1.2 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.3 0.144 1.66 0.51x10-3 2.2 x 10-5 Required
25 Security Barracks (data 400 1.2 0.4 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.0432 1.66 0.66x10-3 2.9x 10-5 Required
for each of six sheds)
26 LPG Godown 393 1.2 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.1152 1.66 0.65x10-3 7.5 x 10-5 Required
27 Post Office 513 1. 0.4 1.0 1.0 0.3 0.156 1.66 8.5x 10-3 13.3 x 10-5 Required
3
28 Petrol pump (Strcture-1) 183 1.2 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.1152 1.66 0.3 x 10-3 3.5 x 10-5 Required
Petrol pump (Strcture-2) 251 1.2 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.1152 1.66 0.4 x 10-3 4.8 x 10-5 Required
29 ANS Office 524 1.0 0.4 0.8 1.0 0.3 0.096 1.66 0.87x 10-3 3.8 x 10-5 Required
30 Fire Barracks
Shed-1 233 1.2 0.4 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.0432 1.66 0.39 x 10-3 1.7 x 10-5 Required
Shed -2 328 1.2 0.4 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.0432 1.66 0.54 x 10-3 2.4 x 10-5 Required
Shed -3 233 1.2 0.4 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.0432 1.66 0.39 x 10-3 1.7 x 10-5 Required
Shed -4 580 1.2 0.4 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.0432 1.66 0.98 x 10-3 4.2 x 10-5 Required
Shed -5 310 1.2 0.4 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.0432 1.66 0.51 x 10-3 2.2 x 10-5 Required
Shed -6 580 1.2 0.4 0.3 1.0 0.3 0.0432 1.66 0.98 x 10-3 4.2 x 10-5 Required
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Table 2 A - No. of Down Comers (D/C) for Non-plant buildings outside the township
Sr. Structure Dimensions (Meters) Base Perimeter No. of D/C based on Recommended
no L W H Area Base Perimeter No. of D/C
(Sq. Mt) Area
1 Canteen 26 25 5.0 650 113 3 4 3
2 Lab Tech Bldg. 112 33.0 4.7 1632 402 7 14 7
3 IT Bldg 14.26 13.9 5.0 188 67 2 3 2
4 Health centre 26.14 13.8 4.4 336 84 2 3 2
5 Admin Block 47.2 50.8 6.3 2500 212 9 7 7
6 Store 84.23 54.23 9.4 4568 277 16 10 10
7 Maint. workshop block 125 18.0 12.6 2250 271 9 9 9
8 Fire station & Extn. Bldg 21.4 14.4 6.0 376 85 2 3 2
9 Contractors shed 100 8.0 3.0 800 214 4 7 4
10 Security office Not Required
Table 2 B - No. of Down Comers (D/C) for buildings inside the township
11 Club Irregular -odd shape 1800 225 7 8 8
12 Hostel 50.0 18.7 8.0 1000 164 4 6 4
13 M.P. Hall 30.9 18.5 11 575 130 3 4 3
14 A type blocks 22 13.2 4.17 276 75 2 3 2
15 B type blocks 17 11 4.17 170 68 2 3 2
16 C type blocks 48 12 7.3 480 204 3 7 3
17 D type blocks 27.04 12.55 9.42 350 127 2 5 2
18 VIP Guest House 37.0 27.0 5.0 785 124 3 4 3
19 OH tank Dia of top-11.6 27.8 105 (top) 37 2 2 2
20 Primary school 55 50 5 2750 257 10 9 9
21 Shopping centre 17 20.6 4.4 350 97 3 4 3
22 A type s/s 12.75 11.3 4.5 144 48 2 2 2
23 B type s/s 12.75 11.3 4.5 144 48 2 2 2
24 D type s/s & Tel. Excha. 9.5 13 5 86 46 1 2 1
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Sr. Structure Dimensions (Meters) Base Perimeter No. of D/C based on Recommended
no L W H Area Base Perimeter No. of D/C
(Sq. Mt) Area
25 Security Barracks (6 17 6.8 5 115.6 47.6 2 2 2
nos.) each shed
26 LPG Godown 10 8 8 80 36 1 2 2
27 Post Office 18.1 13.6 5 149 63.5 2 3 2
28 Petrol pump
Structure-1 (LHS) 6.2 3.8 5 23.5 20 1 1 1
Structure-2 (RHS) 7.6 7.6 5 58 30.4 1 1 1
29 ANS Office 20 11 5 220 62 2 2 2
30 Fire Barracks
Shed-1 7 7 5 49 28 1 1 1
Shed -2 12.6 7 5 88.2 39.2 1 1 1
Shed -3 7 7 5 49 28 1 1 1
Shed -4 24 9 5 216 66 2 3 2
Shed -5 12.7 6 5 76.2 37.4 1 2 1
Shed -6 24 9 5 216 66 2 3 2
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Table-3 Summary of Hardware required for Lightning Protection for Non-Plant Buildings
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
2.0 As described in 12.2.2 (Pattern of Down Conductors), for a steel framed buildings, no
added down comers are required.
For metallic stack/ chimney, continuity should be there from top to bottom. If there
are ant flanges with / without gaskets, minimum four bonding shall be provided
across the flanges. These will be spaced equally. Gor metal columns also same
guidelines are applicable. However, it was observed that many of the columns
/stacks have been provided separate down comers.
In all such cases, one should not forget to provide earth pits (preferably 2 nos.) near
the bottom part on the ground.
As shown in fig.1, recommended mesh size shall not exceed 20 x 10 Mt. If the roof is of
50 Mt x 20 Mt, mesh dimensions can be as Fig.1 or each mesh of 16.66 Mt x 10 Mt. or
as shown in Fig.2.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Wherever earth mesh is to be laid on the roof or terrace, this point will be observed.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
As shown in Fig. 4, GI strip will be running on both side of conveyer duct. At every 20 Mt.
both sides mesh will be interconnected to make mesh on the top. At every 40 Mt, spike
will be installed on the ducting. (It is shown in the above drawing at 20 Mt. distances. But,
spikes will be installed at every alternate cross member. )
Because the drawings of these conveyers were not available, sample for small length is
shown. For spikes and earth pits, average spacing is shown for each. Down comer will be
on the top end location of earth pit.
These hardware are not included in Table-8 (XL sheets) and Table in Section-1
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Type 2 - An SPD permanently mounted on the load side of the services main over
current protection device. This type of SPD is also referred to as a transient
voltage surge suppressor or TVSS.
Type 3 - A point-of-use SPD. This type of SPD is also referred to as a transient voltage
surge suppressor or TVSS. Point-of-use SPDs are discussed later in this course.
Type 4 - An SPD component or assembly. This includes MOVs (Metal Oxide Varistors)
and assemblies containing MOVs and related components.
It may be checked with the supplier of Radio signal transmission panels, whether they
have provided Surge Protecting Devices (SPDs) or not. (Refer Fig.5). Based on the
reply, further line of action shall be decided.
(b) Earthing:
Proper earthing and bonding at various points is very important. Locations are shown
in Fig.5
9.0 ETP
(a) On the NW side of the ETP, cable trays are located which come to the plant. On the
turning point location of the trays, spike shall be installed and DC/Earth pit shall be
provided.
(b) On the street light poles top part, spikes shall be fixed and earthing pits shall be
provided near the base of respective pole.
(c) On MCC Room RCC Terrace, GI strip mesh will be laid; One spike shall be provided
on south west corner. It will be connected with down comer. At the base, new earth
pit will be provided and down comer will be terminated to the E-pit.
The hardware referred in (a), (b) & (c) are not included in Table-8 (XL sheets) and Table in
Section-1
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
(b) There is no uniform practice adopted about earth pits of Electrical system and
those of Lightning protection system. In section 12.3.3 (of IS 2309:1989), it is very
clearly mentioned that common earth termination network is recommended for
lightning system and all other devices.
In CFCL, somewhere pits are numbered as L EP (which means this is for lightning
protection) and some pits are EP (which indicates it is the pit for Electrical system).
However, may of the pits connected with DCs are numbered with prefix EP. This
means that there is no uniform practice. Also, in absence of composite Earthing
layout, this point could not be concluded.
(c) All earth pits shall be with chamber of 500 mm x 500 mm. This size is convenient for
opening the earth strip before testing.
(d) SS hardware shall be used for ease of opening.
(e) Earthing network layout plan shall be prepared area-wise.
(f) Nearby earth pits shall be interconnected.
(g) It will be ensured that all tanks are properly provided earthing at minimum two
points circumferentially.
(h) Earth pits shall be regularly tested and results shall be recorded.
(i) The resistance to earth for each earth electrode integrated with the lightning
protection should be measured after isolating the electrode from the lightning
protection system from the test joint. The earth electrode showing resistance of
more than 10 ohm should be revamped to reduce the resistance to the extent
feasible.
(j) It may be noted that the pits of earthing electrodes integrated with lightning
protection should not be provided alternate layers of charcoal and salt (as done
in equipment earthing and grounding system) to avoid effect of corrosion on the
buried earth electrodes. Moreover, the earth resistance value to be maintained is
also maximum 10 ohms against 01 ohm for normal earthing system.
(k) The resistance of earth of lightning protection system including integrated
earthing system installed for each building / structure should be measured at 2 3
points at an interval no exceeding 12 months. If the resistance is found more than
10 ohms, necessary revamping of the system should be carried out and the
resistance should be brought back to less than 10 ohms.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
principle areas, i.e. lightning protection system equipments and equipments of earthing
system integrated with the lightning protection.
(a) Visual inspection of system for looseness of fixing arrangements of vertical air
terminations, clamping of horizontal air terminations and down conductors should
be carried out at least once a year in areas with prevalent dry weather conditions.
Such checks should be carried out every six months in case the area is situated
nearer to the seacoast and plant surroundings with prevalent with corrosive fumes
and vapors.
(b) Wherever lightning air termination or down conductor is bonded with the metallic
structure, the inspection of bonding connection should be carried out for proper
bonding at least once a year or once every six months depending on the situation
of area.
(c) In addition, the mechanical conditions of all air terminations, conductors, bonding,
test joints, etc. should be carried out for effect of corrosion and observations should
be noted for future reference.
(d) The testing for electrical continuity of all the conductors, bonding and joints should
be carried out at least once a year and the observations should be recorded.
The assessment for the lightning protection is carried out for entire plant and requirement
of provision of lightning protection is worked out in accordance with the procedure laid
down in the applicable Indian Standard. Based on assessment of type of lightning system
required to be installed and possible utilization of the existing system, the
recommendation for individual plant area is provided in the succeeding section.
The suggestions for the improvements of the existing lightning protection system are also
made so as to make the system having adequacy coupled with better reliability. The
suggestions are placed in the report based on the observations for the existing system
made during the plant visit.
Taking into consideration the existing system, the proposal for provision of lightning
protection system for individual building, structure and tall structure is worked out and the
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
details are presented in recommended lightning system part in the report. The proposal
can be broadly divided into following manner.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
Tall structures such as Chimneys and other structures provided with Vertical Air
Termination to be strengthened by revamping down conductors system.
(a) The air terminations shall be made of electrolytic, high-density, solid, and copper.
The horizontal air terminations shall be hard drawn copper strips having material
properties as above. The vertical air terminations shall be of solid copper, round,
pointed, 3/8 or larger in diameter, project at least 250 mm above the object or
building section to be protected.
AREA
SIZE
COMPONENT MATERIAL OF CONSTRUCTION (MM2)
(MM)
Fixed Air
Copper, Aluminum, GI 20 x 3 mm 60
Terminations
Down
Copper, Aluminum, GI 20 x 3 mm 60
Conductors
600 x 600 x 6
Copper, Aluminum, GI plate
mm
Hard-drawn copper rods for direct
12 Diameter 115
Earth driving into soft soil
Terminations Hard-drawn annealed copper rods
10 Diameter 78.54
for direct driving into soft soil
Copper clad or GI steel rods for
10 Diameter 78.54
direct driving into hard ground
Fixed Bonding Copper, Aluminum, GI Strip 20 x 3 mm 60
Connections Copper, Aluminum, GI rods 10 Diameter 78.54
(b) The air terminations shall be made of electrolytic, high-density, solid, and copper.
The horizontal air terminations shall be hard drawn copper strips having material
properties as above. The vertical air terminations shall be of solid copper, round,
pointed, 3/8 or larger in diameter, project at least 250 mm above the object or
building section to be protected.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
(c) Vertical air terminal bases shall be made of cast bronze and shall be securely
mounted using pressure bolt or crimp connectors and stainless steel screws, nails,
or bolts.
(d) Other hardware such as miscellaneous bolts, nuts, nails, screws, shall be of stainless
steel.
(e) Each down conductor must have a separate earth termination as far as possible.
(f) Moreover, provision should be made in each down conductor for disconnection
from the earthing electrode for the testing purposes. This is achieved with a test joint
made at convenient height from ground level.
(g) It is stipulated in the standard that the resistance to earth of the lightning protection
system, measured at any point, should not exceed 10 ohms.
(h) With the test joint disconnected, the resistance of each individual earth electrode
should not be more than ten times the number of down conductors in the
complete system, e.g. for a system with 15 down conductors, the individual earth
readings should not be more than 10 x 15 = 150 ohms.
When the lightning strike takes place on lightning protection system, its electrical
potential with respect to earth is raised, and unless suitable precautions are considered,
the discharge may divert to alternate available path to the earth by side flashing to the
metal in the structure.
To prevent the side flashing, two alternatives are implemented, i.e. either bonding of
lightning protection system with metallic structure or isolation of the lightning protection
system from the metallic structure.
Isolation requires generally large clearance between lightning protection system and
other metallic structures in the vicinity. Major drawback of isolation is difficulty in
maintaining necessary safe clearance and ensuring that the isolated metallic structure
has no connection with the earth such as through water or other service metallic
pipelines.
In view of difficulty discussed in foregoing point, the bonding is commonly used method
to prevent the side flashing.
Method is provided in the Indian Standard for deriving the clearance required to be
maintained form practicing isolation, which requires consideration of technical data as
follows. This method is used in the engineering for the assessment.
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
REPORT NO.:-GCI/V/CFCL/LPS/2012-13/MARCH/RMS-106/R00
The consulting services conducted by Green Circle Inc. (the Company) were
performed using generally accepted guidelines, standards, and/or practices, which the
Company considers reliable. Although the Company performed its consulting services
pursuant to reliable and generally accepted practices in the industry, the Company
does not guarantee or provide any representations or warranties with respect to Clients
use, interpretation or application of the findings, conclusions, and/or suggestions of the
consulting services provided by the Company. Moreover, the findings, conclusions, and
the suggestions resulting from the consulting service are based upon certain assumptions,
information, documents, and procedures provided by the Customer. AS SUCH, IN NO
EVENT AND UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL THE COMPANY BE LIABLE FOR SPECIAL,
INDIRECT, PUNITIVE OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMGES OF ANY NATURE WHATSOEVER,
INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY LOST REVENUE OR PROFITS OF THE CUSTOMER OR
ITS CUSTOMERS, AGENTS AND DISTRIBUTORS, RESULTING FROM, ARISING OUT OF OR IN
CONNECTION WITH, THE SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE COMPANY. The Customer agrees
that the Company shall have no liability for damages, which may result from Clients use,
interpretation or application of the consulting services provided by the Company.