Reflection On Disaster
Reflection On Disaster
Reflection On Disaster
VI AS MAEd SCIENCE
Disasters continue to cause thousands of deaths and injuries and billions of dollars of
economic losses each year. Disasters can be natural, accidents and man-made. Natural
disaster is a major adverse event resulting from natural processes of the Earth; examples
include floods, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, tsunamis and other geologic processes.
Accidents are incidental and unplanned event that could have been prevented had
circumstances leading to the accident been recognized, and acted upon, prior to its
occurrence; examples include shipwreck, structural failures and collapses. Man-made
disasters are made by people rather than by nature; examples are terrorists incidents,
wars, and massacres. Disasters can cause loss of life or property damage, and typically
leaves some economic damage in its wake, the severity of which depends on the affected
populations resilience or ability to recover.
To prevent or reduce the disruptive impacts of a disaster on community, certain
measures/actions can be taken such as awareness, education, preparedness, and prediction
and warning systems. How can these help the community?
Awareness - media has a very significant role in information dissemination.
Everyone rely on media for information. In developing populations disaster awareness,
media is a powerful tool to do it.
Education - The role of education for disaster risk reduction strategies can be
presented according to three types of activities: 1) save lives and prevent injuries should a
hazardous event occur, 2) prevent interruptions to the provisions of education, or ensure
its swift resumption in the event of an interruption, and 3) develop a resilient population
that is able to reduce the economic, social, and cultural impacts should a hazardous event
occur.
Prediction and Warning System - advances in technology are providing decision-
makers with increasingly accurate and useful information on the potential impacts of
natural disasters on society. The challenge is to apply this information and translate
current understanding of natural hazards into meaningful action at the community level.
The aim of these measures is to reduce socio-economic vulnerabilities to disaster as
well as dealing with the environmental and other hazards that trigger them and this is a
responsibility of development and relief agencies alike. It should be an integral part of the
way such organizations do their work, not an add-on or one-off action. Equally important
is the human side of mitigation; programs should reflect the needs of an urban, aging,
technologically oriented society.
Despite increasing vulnerability to natural disasters, many communities resist
adopting mitigation programs. The barriers are economic, social and political and
mitigation is often perceived as restrictive, costly and incompatible with the communitys
economic development goals.