Speed Control of Multilevel Inverter-Based Induction Motor Using V/F Method
Speed Control of Multilevel Inverter-Based Induction Motor Using V/F Method
Speed Control of Multilevel Inverter-Based Induction Motor Using V/F Method
1 Introduction
Adjustable speed drives (ASDs) are the essential and endless demand of the industries
and researchers. They are widely used in the industries to control the speed of con-
veyor systems, blower speeds, machine tool speeds, and other applications. In many
industrial applications, traditionally, DC motors were the workhorses for the ASDs
due to their tremendous speed and torque response. But, they have the inherent
inconvenience of commutator and mechanical brushes, which undergo wear and tear
with the passage of time. In most cases, AC motors are preferred to DC motors, in
particular an induction motor due to its low cost, low maintenance, lower weight,
higher efficiency, improved ruggedness, and reliability. All these features make the
use of induction motors mandatory in many areas of industrial applications [1–5].
The advancement in power electronics and semiconductor technology has trig-
gered the development of high-power and high-speed semiconductor devices in
order to achieve a smooth, continuous, and step-less variation in motor speed.
Applications of solid-state converters/inverters for adjustable speed induction motor
drive are widespread in electromechanical systems for a large spectrum of industrial
systems. Voltage or current converters, as they generate discrete output waveforms,
force the use of machines with special isolation and in some applications large
inductances connected in series with the respective load. Also, it is well known that
distorted voltages and current waveforms produce harmonic contamination, addi-
tional power losses, and high-frequency noise that can affect not only the power
load but also the associated controllers. All these unwanted operating characteristics
associated with pulse-width modulation (PWM) converters could be overcome with
multilevel converters. Nowadays, multilevel inverters are the promising alternative
and cost-effective solution for high-voltage and high-power applications including
power quality and motor drive problems. Multilevel structure allows raising the
power-handling capability of the system in a powerful and systematic way.
In this paper, three-level and a modified cascaded five-level inverter Simulink
models are developed for induction motor drives. A modified cascaded five-level
inverter has less number of switches as compared to conventional five-level
H-bridge inverter. THD of this inverter has been compared with the conventional
three-level inverter and gives a reduced amount of THD. The simulation of three-
level and modified cascaded five-level inverter-fed induction motor models is
carried out in MATLAB. The FFT spectrums for the outputs are analyzed to study
the reduction in the harmonics.
2 Multilevel Inverter
Multilevel voltage source converters are emerging as a new breed of power con-
verter options for high-power applications. The multilevel voltage source converters
typically synthesize the staircase voltage wave from several levels of dc voltages.
There are some multilevel voltage source converters which are
1. Diode clamp
2. Flying capacitors
3. Cascaded inverters
Speed Control of Multilevel Inverter-Based Induction Motor … 233
Increasing the number of voltage levels in the inverter without requiring higher
rating on individual devices can increase power rating. The unique structure of
multilevel voltage source inverters allows them to reach high voltages with low
harmonics without the use of transformers or series-connected synchronized
switching devices. The harmonic content of the output voltage waveform decreases
significantly. Ac loads require constant or adjustable voltages at their input termi-
nals. When such loads are fed by inverters, it is essential that output voltage of the
inverters is so controlled as to fulfill the requirements of AC loads. This involves
coping with the variation of DC input voltage, for voltage regulation of inverters and
for the constant volts/frequency control requirement. There are various techniques to
vary the inverter gain. The most efficient method of controlling the gain (and output
voltage) is to incorporate PWM control within the inverters. The carrier-based PWM
schemes used for multilevel inverters are one of the most straightforward methods of
describing voltage source modulation realized by the intersection of a modulating
signal (duty cycle) with triangular carrier waveform [6, 7].
Figure 2 shows the pulse width modulation for generating gate pulses of single-
phase MCFLI. To obtain the five-level PWM, reference sine wave is compared with
two triangular carrier waves of high frequency (about 1.6–2 kHz). First, Vref is
compared with the carrier 1 as Vref [ Vc1 up to Φ1. After Φ2, Vref is compared with
Vc2 and similar outputs received. If modulating index is (Ma) > 0.5, the output will
be a five level. Modulating index is Ma = Am/2Ac, where Am is amplitude of
modulating (reference) signal and Ac is the amplitude of carrier signal.
To maintain the torque capability of the motor close to the rated torque at any
frequency, the air gap flux, uag , is maintained constant. Any reduction in the supply
frequency without changing the supple voltage will increase the air gap flux, and
the motor may go to saturation. This will increase the magnetizing current, distort the
line current and voltage, and increase the core loss and copper loss, and it makes the
system noisy.
The air gap voltage is related to uag and the frequency f as
Vs K1 uag f ð2Þ
or
Vs
uag ¼ constant ð3Þ
f
where K1 is a constant.
The synchronous speed, obtained by adding actual speed xr and slip speed xsl ,
determines the inverter frequency. The reference signals for the closed-loop control
of the machine terminal voltage Vs are generated from frequency f using a function
generator. It ensures nearly a constant flux operation up to the base speed and the
operation at a constant terminal voltage above the base speed. A step increased in
speed command xm produces a positive speed error. The slip speed command xsl is
set at a maximum value. The drive accelerated at a maximum permissible inverter
current and producing the maximum available torque until the speed error is
reduced.
7 Simulation Results
12.38
Constant2 Tm
g
+ <Rotor speed (wm)>
A
A <Electromagnetic torque Te (N*m)>
Vdc m
B B <Stator current is_a (A)>
- <Stator current is_b (A)>
C
C <Stator current is_c (A)> Scope2
Universal Bridge
3 HP - 220 V
60 Hz - 1725 rpm
gate pulses
actual speed
Subsystem
-K- >
PI f(u)
157
NOT
V/f Relational
Saturation Fcn1
Constant1 Discrete 1
Operator Logical
PI Controller f(u) > gate pulses
Operator2
1
Fcn2 Relational
actual speed
NOT
Operator1
f(u)
Clock Logical
Fcn3 >
Operator4
Relational
NOT
Operator2
Repeating
Sequence Logical
Operator5
Now, the simulation circuit is run with closed-loop control that shows speed of the
induction motor. Here, a subsystem shows the generation of gate pulses, and a uni-
versal bridge is used as a three-phase inverter. Figure 6 shows the Simulink model for
generating the pulses.
Figures 7, 8 and 9 show the motor speed, torque, and stator current of a three-
phase inverter-fed induction motor. Reference speed is set at 157 rad/s. It reaches
the steady state at 0.3 s.
Figure 10 shows the PWM generation for a modified cascaded five-level inverter
for one phase. PWM generation is considered the more important in the inverter
design, and several multicarrier techniques have been developed to reduce the
distortion in multilevel inverters, based on the classical (SPWM) with triangular
carriers.
The PWM pattern adopted in modified cascaded five-level inverter makes the
inverter producing output voltage with three levels (zero and half supply dc voltage
positive and negative, respectively) at modulation index (Ma ≤ 0.5) and five levels
(zero, half, and full supply voltage positive and negative, respectively) at modu-
lation index (Ma > 0.5).
Figure 11 shows the modified cascaded five-level inverter for a single phase.
Here, only six controlled switches are used to get five levels which reduced the
complexity of the circuit and the total harmonic distortion as compared to con-
ventional inverter.
Sine Wave
Divide
AND 1
OR Out1
Sine Wave1 Logical
Add1
Operator Logical
NOT
Pulse Operator5
Divide1 2
Generator1 Logical
NOT Out2
Operator7
Logical
Operator9 AND
>=
Logical
Scope2
Relational Operator1
OR 3
Operator
Out3
Repeating Logical
Sequence Operator6
AND NOT 4
Interpolated
Out4
Logical Logical
>= Operator2 Operator8
15 Add
Relational
Constant
Operator1
AND
Logical
Operator3
5
Pulse Out5
Generator NOT
Logical
6
Operator4
Out6
iout
To Workspace3
i
+
-
+ Current Measurement1
C
g
C
Vdc
m g s1 s2
E C
m
m
E
i s5 Connection
+ Diode1
- Port
Current Measurement2 1
g m
Connection
C E Port1
s6 2
Diode2
C
Vdc1
s3 s4
m
E
E
Out1
Out2
Out3
Out4
Out5
Out6
sinusoidal PWM
generator
Figure 12 shows Simulink model for the open-loop V/f control of the modified
cascaded five-level inverter-fed induction motor. Here, remaining two phases have
been obtained by giving a 120° phase shift in modulating signal. The scope is
connected through bus selector that shows speed, torque, and stator current of the
induction motor.
Figures 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 show the phase voltage, line voltage, motor
speed, torque, stator current, and THD of a modified cascaded five-level inverter.
By comparing the three-phase inverter and a modified cascaded five-level inverter,
we can say that the distortion in five-level inverter voltage is less. The current
12.38
Phase A
Constant2 Tm
waveforms are closed to sinusoidal. The speed and torque ripples are very less as
compared to three-phase inverter. Dynamic response is also better for five-level
inverter, which can be observed from the speed and torque waveforms. Figures 18
and 19 represent the harmonic spectrum analysis of a five-level inverter. In this
case, the total harmonic distortion is 12.30 % in phase voltage and 1.55 % in line
voltage. Table 2 shows the comparison of THD in three-level inverter and modified
cascaded five-level inverter.
Speed Control of Multilevel Inverter-Based Induction Motor … 241
Speed in rad/sec
100
50
-50
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Time in sec
100
-100
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Time in sec
50
-50
-100
-150
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Time in Sec
242 S. Singh et al.
Table 2 Comparison of
THD Parameter THD (%) in THD (%) in
three-level modified cascaded
inverter five-level inverter
Phase voltage 22.50 12.30
Line voltage 4.27 1.55
8 Conclusion
A three-level and a modified cascaded five-level inverters have been simulated. The
following features of the system have been demonstrated in the simulation study.
The less total harmonic distortion has been achieved in phase voltage and line
voltage with modified cascaded five-level inverter. Speed of the induction motor
has been controlled and achieved the steady-state response in 3 s in the case of
three-level inverter and in 25 s in the case of modified five-level inverter.
Speed Control of Multilevel Inverter-Based Induction Motor … 243
Appendix
Parameter Values
References
1. Rashid, M.H.: Power Electronics: Circuits, Devices and Applications, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall
Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1993)
2. Bose, B.K.: Power Electronics and Motor Drives. Academic Press, an imprint of Elsevier,
Massachusetts (2006)
3. Rodriguez, J., Lai, J.S., Peng, F.Z.: Multilevel inverters: survey of topologies, controls, and
applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 49(4), 724–738 (2002)
4. Ogbuka, C.U., Agu, M.U.: A modified closed loop V/F controlled induction motor drive. Pac.
J. Sci. Technol. 10(1) (2009)
5. FloraViji Rose, S., Manikandan, B.V.: Simulation and implementation of multilevel inverter
based induction motor drive. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. IA-9(3) (2009)
6. Tolbert, L.M., Peng, F.Z., Habetler, T.G.: Multilevel converters for large electric drives. IEEE
Trans. Ind. Appl. 35, 36–44 (1999)
7. Stemmler, H.: Power electronics in electric traction applications. In: IEEE Conference of
Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation, IECON’93, Vol. 2, No. 7, pp 07–713
(1993)
8. Selvaraj J., Rahim, N.A.: Multilevel inverter for grid-connected PV system. IEEE Trans. Ind.
Electron. 56(1) (2009)
9. Manasa, S., Balaji Ramakrishana, S., Madhura, S. Mohan, H.M.: Design and simulation of
three phase five level and seven level inverter fed induction motor drive with two cascaded H-
bridge configuration. Int. J. Electri. Electron. Eng. (IJEEE) 1(4), 25–30 (2012)
10. Murugesan, M., Sivaranjani, S., Asokkumar, G., Sivakumar, R.: Seven level modified
cascaded inverter for induction motor drive applications. J. Inf. Eng. Appl. 1(1), 36–45 2011
11. Tembhekar, T.D.: Improvement and analysis of speed control of three phase induction motor
drive including two methods. In: Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in
Engineering and Technology, ICETET-09 (2009)
12. Holmes, D.G., McGrath, B.P.: Multicarrier PWM strategies for multilevel inverters. IEEE
Trans. Ind. Electron. 49(4), 858–867 (2002)
13. Sundararajan, K., Nachiappan, A., Veerapathiran, G.: Comparison of current controllers for a
five-level cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Res. (ijceronline.com) 2
(6), 55–62 (2012)
14. Rose, S.F.V., Manikandan, B.V.: Simulation and implementation of multilevel inverter based
induction motor drive. INCACEC 2009, 1–8 (2009)
15. Pravin, S.E., Starbell, R.N.: Induction motor drive using seven level multilevel inverter for
energy saving in variable torque load application. ICCET 2011, 352–357 (2011)