Bible Compared to Quran

Based on transcripts of various lectures given by Yusuf Estes & Dr. Gary Miller

Introduction by Yusuf Estes -

It should be stated at the outset of this work, that Muslims do not seek to put down or

desecrate the Holy Bible. It is a matter critical matter of faith for Muslims to believe in the

original revelations that came down to Moses, David, Solomon and Jesus, just as it is is

important for Muslims to believe in the revelation of the Quran that came to Muhammad,

peace be upon him. The key word here however, is "original." As we all know the origin of

the Bible is clouded with centuries of copying, translating and passing down information, now

long lost with only copies of manuscripts remaining to remind us of what once was the Bible.

Additionally, it should be noted that Muslims do not seek to destroy the Christians or

Jews belief in the Word of God, rather it is an obligation for Muslims to call to what is right

and to halt that which is evil. Certainly, causing the "People of the Book" (as the Quran refers

to Christians and Jews) to fall into disbelief and leave off any faith in God at all, is the very

opposite of the direction Muslims should take in presenting any comparison between Islam

and what has come down in the past from the Almighty God. We only seek to bring about

more light to the people seeking guidance and pray for all of us to be successful with our Lord

in this life and in the Next life and we ask His Guidance and Support in doing so, ameen.

THE BIBLE

Old Testament

There exists today a number of different versions in the ancient Hebrew language of

the Jewish Book called the Torah [Law] and this is usually referred to in Christianity as The

Old Testament. Naturally, there have been many different translations to a great number of

languages over the centuries and one could not expect them to be identical in text or meaning.
What we have in English today still remains somewhat similar to large amounts of these older

documents.

New Testament

There are also different versions of the Gospel or what is commonly called The New

Testament in the Koine Greek language and Latin and these also have many translations to

even other languages. Even amongst the English translations there are great differences. To

mention two very clear differences for example; the Catholic Bible [c. 325 A.D] contains 73

books in total, while the Protestant Bible contains only 66 books, and although the newer

(Protestant version) was taken from the Catholic Bible even then these books do not match

completely with each other. There is no common denominator for any of the many different

versions of the Bible.

Dead Sea Scrolls

There have been a number of scrolls and parchments found in places surrounding what

we call the "Holy Land" over the centuries, not the least of which are those often referred to

as the "Dead Sea Scrolls" or as they are known to the scholars "Wadi Qumran Scrolls." These

were discovered in the last century around 1930 and have been proven to be very ancient and

could well be older than any other extant manuscripts. Much of what has been translated from

these scrolls is similar to some of the oldest manuscripts, but there are still very important

differences worthy of note. We would like to recommend some important reading on this

topic at the end of this paper.

THE QURAN

Quran Means "Recitation"

The word "Quran" means "that which is recited; or that which is dictated in memory

form." As such, it is not a book, nor is it something that reaches us only in written form. The

documentation in writting about the Quran has been preserved in museums thoughout the
world, including the Topekopi Palace in Istanbul, Turkey, the museum in Tashkent,

Uzbekistanand also in England. Keep in mind also, the Quran is only considered "Quran"

while it is in the recitation form, not in the written or the book form. The word for what is

written and held in the hand to be read by the eye is called "mus-haf" (meaning script or that

which is written down).

Only One Version - Arabic

There are no different versions of the Quran in the Arabic language, only different

translations and of course, none of these would be considered to hold the value and

authenticity of the original Arabic Recitation. The Quran is divided up into 30 equal parts,

called "Juz'" (parts) in the Arabic language. These are learned by Muslims from their very

early beginnings as children.

Memorized by Millions - Entirely

The important thing to keep in mind about the Quran is the memorization and

transmission of the actual "Recitation" just as it came to Muhammad, peace be upon him,

from the Angel Gabriel and was learned and memorized by his companions and they in turn,

passed it down to their followers and continued in this way until we see today, over

10,000,000 (ten million) Muslims who have committed the entire Quran to memory. This is

not a small feat. After all, how many other works of literary value have been memorized and

passed down through so many generations, in the original language, without a single change

in even one sentence?

Each Muslim Has "Quran" Memorized

All Muslims have memorized a portion of the Quran in the Arabic language, as this is

an important part of their daily prayers. Many Muslims have memorized large portions of the

Quran from one tenth to one half to all of the entire Quran, and all in the original Arabic

language. It should be noted, there are over one and a half billion (1,500,000,000) Muslims
worldwide and only about 10% are Arab, all the rest are learing the Quran in Arabic as a

second language.

God Speaks in First Person to Mankind in Quran

The Quran contains clear statements from Almighty God (Allah) and it is Him

speaking to all of us in the first person. He tells of us our own creation, the creation of all that

is the universe and what has happened to those before us and what is to become of us if we do

not take heed of the warnings clearly spelled out in His Revelation. He speaks also to

Muhammad, peace be upon him, to show that Muhammad, peace be upon him, is not making

this up himself and even chastises Muhammad, peace be upon him, for making human

assumptions rather than waiting for revelation in matters (ie.; surah At-Tahreem and surah

Abasa).

Quran Mentions Itself

The Quran refers to itself as "The Quran" (The Recitation) and mentions that it is to all

mankind and jinn (another creation of Allah, similar to humans in that they could make

choices as to whether or not they would obey God's Commandments, and they existed before

humans).

Quran Describes God's Nature Exactly

The Quran is clear on who God is and who He is not. There is no room left for doubt

after reading the Quran in the Arabic language: God is One. He is the only Creator, Sustainer

and Owner of the Universe. He has no partners. He has no relatives; wives, children or

offspring. He is not like His creation and He does not need it for His existence, while all the

time the creation is totally dependent on Him. His attributes are clearly spelled out as the

epitome of each and every one. He is for instance, the All-Knowing; the All-Hearing; the All-

Seeing; the All-Forgiving; the All- Loving; the All-Merciful; the Only One God. There is

never a contradiction to this found anywhere in the Quran.

The Quran makes the clear challenge, that if you are in doubt about it - then bring a

book like it. Also, to bring ten chapters like it and then finally, to bring one single chapter like

it. 1,400 years - and no one has been able to duplicate it's beauty, recitation, miracles and ease

of memorization. Another challenge for the unbelievers to consider; "If this (Quran) were

from other than Allah, you would find within it many contradictions." And yet, another

challenge offered by Allah in the Quran is for the unbelievers to look around for evidences.

Allah says He will show them His signs within themselves and on the farthest horizons.

Scientific Miracles in Quran

The scientific miracles of the Quran could not have been understood at that time, yet

today we take for granted the many things included in the revelation of the Quran. Some

include mentioning: The formation of embryo in the womb of the mother (surah 98); deep

seas partitions; waters that do not mix; clouds and how they make rain and how lightning is

caused by ice crystals; formation of the earth's mountains deep underground; orbits of planets

and stars and moons - and even the mention of space travel (surah 55:33).

[Watch videos of world's top scientists commenting on the "Miracle of Science in Quran"]

http://islamyesterday.com/videos/science/

- COMPARISON of BIBLE & QURAN-

[Dr. Gary Miller- with Commentary by Yusuf Estes]

Bible is Collection of Writings -

Quran is Recitation from God to Muhammad (p)

Whereas, The Bible is a collection of writings by many different authors, the Quran is

a dictation (or recitation). The speaker in the Quran - in the first person - is God Almighty

(Allah) talking directly to man. In the Bible you have many men writing about God and you

have in some places the word of God speaking to men and still in other places you have some
men simply writing about history or personal exchanges of information to one another (ex:

Epistle of John 3). The Bible in the English King James Version consists of 66 small books.

About 18 of them begin by saying: This is the revelation God gave to so and so… The rest

make no claim as to their origin. You have for example the beginning of the book of Jonah

which begins by saying: The word of the Lord came to Jonah the son of Elmitaeh saying…

quote and then it continues for two or three pages.

Compare this to the beginning of the Book of "Luke" begins by saying: “In as much

as many have taken in hand to set in order a narrative of those things which have been

fulfilled among us, (2) Just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers

of the word delivered them to us, (3) It seemed good to me also, having had perfect

understanding of all things from the very first, to write to you an orderly account, most

excellent Theophilus, (4) That you may know the certainty of those things in which you were

instructed.

We see the author of the Book of "Luke" saying essentially, "Many people have

written about things, it seems fitting for me to do so too.” "Luke" says it seems to him that as

long as others are taking in hand to write something about it, even though they were eye

witnesses to the whole thing, he feels that even though he was not, he still has "perfect

understanding of all things from the very first."

Therefore this is only a letter from one person to another, neither of whom knew Jesus,

peace be upon him, nor were eyewitnesses to any of what had taken place. [Y. Estes]

If you compare that to one of the four accounts of the life of Jesus, Luke begins by

saying: “many people have written about this man, it seems fitting for me to do so too”. That

is all… no claim of saying “ these words were given to me by God here they are for you it is a

revelation”, there is no mention of this.

"Bible" is NOT in the Bible

Nowhere does the Bible talk about itself. Some scriptures are sometimes pointed to in the

Bible, say: Here where it talks about itself, but we have to look closely. 2nd Timothy 3:16 is

the favourite which reads: “All scripture is inspired of God” and there are those who would

say, here is where the Bible it talks about itself, it says it is inspired of God, all of it. But if

you read the whole sentence, you read that this was a letter wrote by Paul to Timothy and the

entire sentence says to Timothy: “Since you were a young man you have studied the Holy

Scriptures, all scriptures inspired by God” and so on… When Timothy was a young man the

New Testament did not exist, the only thing that stems he was talking about are scriptures –

which are only a portion of the Bible - from before that time. It could not have meant the

whole Bible.

Bible Curses ChurchFathers Who REMOVED Book of Revelations

There is at the end of the Bible a verse which says:

Rev 22:18 "For I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book

(Revelations): if anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues that are

written in this book:

19. And if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, god shall take

away his part from the Book of Life, from the holy city, and from the things which are

written in this book. [Y. Estes]

“Let anyone who takes away from this book or adds to this book be cursed”. This to is

sometimes pointed to me saying: Here is where it sums itself as a whole. But look again and

you will see that when it says: Let no one change this book, it is talking about that last book,

#66 (or is it #73 in the Catholic Bible?), the Book of Revelation. It has too, because any

reference will tell you that the Book of Revelation was written before certain other parts of
the Bible were written. It happens today to be stacked at the end, but there are other parts that

came after, so it can not be referring to the entire book.

(Incidentally, according to different manuscripts much older than the King James

Version, there are different words at the end of the Book of Revelation, so how would we

resolve that matter? - Y.E.)

Note: The Book of Revelation was taken out of the Bible several times and then

replaced and then taken out and replaced according to various Church Councils throughout

Church history. Guess the Church Fathers didn't read the curse at the end of the book?

Whose Word Is It?

It is an extreme position held only by some Christian groups that the Bible – in its

entirety - cover to cover is the revealed word of God in every word, but they do a clever thing

when they mention this, or make this claim. They will say that the Bible in its entirety is the

word of God; inerrant (no mistakes) in the original writings.

So if you go to the Bible and point out some mistakes that are in it you are going to be

told: Those mistakes were not there in the original manuscript, they have crept in so that we

see them there today.

They are going on problem in that position. There is a verse in the Bible Isaiah 40:8

which in fact is so well known that some Bibles printed it on the inside front cover as an

introduction and it says : “ The grass weathers, the flower fades, but the word of our God

stands forever”. Here is a claim in the Bible that the word of God will stand forever, it will not

be corrupted, it won't be lost. So if today you find a mistake in the Bible you have two

choices. Either that promise was false that when God said my word wont fade away, he was

mistaken, or the portion which has the mistake in it was not a part of the word of God in the

first place, because the promise was that it would be safeguarded, it would not be corrupted.
 Are There Mistakes?

I have suggested many times that there are mistakes in the Bible and the accusation

comes back very quickly: Show me one. Well there are hundreds. If you want to be specific I

can mention few. You have for example at 2nd Samuel 10:18 a description of a war fought by

David saying that he killed 7000 men and that he also killed 40000 men on horsebacks. In 1st

Chronicles 19 it mentions the same episode saying that he killed 70000 men and the 40000

men were not on horsebacks, they were on foot. The point be what is the difference between

the pedestrian and not is very fundamental.

How Did Judas Die?

Matthew 27:5 says that Judas Iscariot when he died he hung himself. Acts 1 says that,

no he jumped off a cliff head first. If you study Logic very soon you will come in your course

to what they call an “undecidable propositions” or “meaningless sentences” or statements that

cannot be decided because there is no contextual false. One of the classic examples sited is

something called the Effeminites paradox. This man was Cretan and he said “Cretans always

lie”, now was that statement true or false? If he was a Cretan and he says that they always lie

is he lying? If he is not lying then he is telling the truth then the Cretans don’t always lie !

You see it cannot be true and it cannot be false, the statement turns back on itself. It is like

saying “What I am telling you right now is a lie” would you believe that or not? You see the

statement has no true content. It cannot be true and it cannot be false. If it is true it is always

false. If it is false it is also true.

Well in the Bible at Titus 1:12 the writer is Paul and he is talking about the Cretans.

He says that one of their own men – a prophet - said “Cretans always lie” and he says that

what this man says is true. It is a small mistake, but the point is that it is a human mistake; you

don’t find that if you carefully examine the true content of that statement. It cannot be a true

statement.
 Who is the Author?

Now I come back to the Quran, and as I mentioned the speaker in the Quran is - in the

first person - is God. The book claims throughout that it is the word of God. It names itself 70

times as the Quran. It talks about its own contents. It has self-reference. The Quran states in

the first Sura after Fatiha that “This is the book, there is no doubt in it, it is a guidance for

those who are conscious of God” and so on and so on… It begins that way and continues that

way stressing that. And there is one very amazing statement in the Quran when you come to

the fourth Sura 82nd Ayah which says to those who say Quran is something else than the

word of God. It challenges them saying: “Have they not considered the Quran, if it came from

someone other than God they will find in it many mistakes”. Some of you are students, would

you dare to hand in a paper after you completed a research work or something at the bottom

you put down there “You wont find mistakes in this”. Would you dare to challenge your

professor that way?. Well the Quran does that. It is telling: If you really think you know

where this came from then starts looking for mistakes because you wont find any. Another

interesting thing the Quran does is that it quotes all its critics. There has never - in hundreds of

years - ever been some suggestion as to where that book came from but that the Quran does

not already mention that objection and reply to it. Many times you will find the Ayah saying

something like: Do they say such and such and so, say to them such and such and so. In every

case there is a reply. More than that the Quran claims that the evidence of its origin is in itself,

and that if you look at this book you will be convinced.

Difference of Authority

So the difference in Christianity and Islam comes down to a difference of authority

and appeal to authority. The Christian wants to appeal to the Bible and the Muslim wants to

appeal to the Quran. You can not stop by saying: This is true because me book say it is, and

somebody else would say something else is true because my book says differently, you can
not stop at that point, and the Quran does not. The Christians may point to some words that it

is recorded Jesus said and say this proves my point. But the Muslim does not simply open his

book and say: No, no the Quran says this, because the Quran does not simply deny something

the Bible says and say something else instead. The Quran takes the form of a rebuttal, it is a

guidance as the opening says (Huda lil mutakeen). So that for every suggestion that the

Christian may say: My Bible say such and such, the Quran will not simply say: No that is not

true, it will say: Do they say such and such then ask them such and such. You have for

example the Ayah that compares Jesus and Adam. There are those who may say that Jesus

must have been God (Son of God) because he had no father. He had a woman who was his

mother, but there was no human father. It was God that gave him life, so he must have been

God’s son. The Quran reminds the Christian in one short sentence to remember Adam - who

was his father ? - and in fact, who was his mother ? He did not have a father either and in fact

he did not have a mother, but what does that make him? So that the likeness of Adam is the

likeness of Jesus, they were nothing and then they became something; that they worship God.

Quran Invites - Not Demands

So that the Quran does not demand belief - the Quran invites belief, and here is the

fundamental difference. It is not simply delivered as: Here is what you are to believe, but

throughout the Quran the statements are always: Have you O man thought of such and such,

have you considered so and so. It is always an invitation for you to look at the evidence; now

what do you believe ?

Special Pleading of the Bible

The citation of the Bible very often takes the form of what is called in Argumentation:

Special Pleading. Special Pleading is when implications are not consistent. When you take

something and you say: Well that must mean this, but you don’t use the same argument to

apply it to something else. To give an example, I have seen it in publications many times,
stating that Jesus must have been God because he worked miracles. In other hand we know

very well that there is no miracle ever worked by Jesus that is not also recorded in the Old

Testament as worked by one of the prophets. You had amongst others, Elijah, who is reported

to have cured the leper, raise the dead boy to life and to have multiplied bread for the people

to eat - three of the most favorite miracles cited by Jesus. If the miracles worked by Jesus

proved he was God, why don’t they prove Elijah was God ? This is Special Pleading, if you

see what I mean. The implications are not consistent. If this implies that then in that case it

must also imply the same thing. We have those who would say Jesus was God because he was

taken up in the heaven. But the Bible also says the certain Einah did not die he was taken up

into the heaven by God. Whether it is true or not, who knows, but the point is if Jesus being

taken up proves he is God, why does not it prove Einah was God? The same thing happened

to him.

Clear Parts & Difficult Parts of Bible

I wrote to a man one time, who wrote a book about Christianity and I had some of the

objections I mentioned to you now. And his reply to me was that I am making matters

difficult to myself, that there are portions in the Bible that are crystal clear and that there are

portions that are difficult, and that my problem was that I am looking at the difficult part

instead of the clear parts. The problem is that this is an exercise in self deception - why are

some parts clear and some parts difficult? It is because somebody decided what this clearly

means, now that makes this very difficult. To give you an example, John Chapter 14 a certain

man said to Jesus: Show us God, and Jesus said: If you have seen me you have seen God.

Now without reading on the Christian will say: See Jesus claimed to be God, he said if you

have seen me you have seen God. If that is crystal clear then you have a difficult portion when

you go back just a few pages to Chapter 5 when another man came to Jesus and said show us

God and he said you have never seen God you have never heard his voice. Now what did he
mean there if on the other occasion he meant that he was God? Obviously you have made

matters difficult by deciding what the first one meant. If you read on in Chapter 14 you will

see what he went on to say. He was saying the closest you are going to seeing God are the

works you see me doing.

Bible Does Not Claim Jesus Claimed to Be Son of God

It is a fact that the words “son of God” are not found on the lips of Jesus anywhere in

the first three Gospel accounts, he was always calling himself the Son of Man. And it is a

curious form of reasoning that I have seen so often that it is established from Bible that he

claimed to be God because - look how the Jews reacted. They will say for example he said

such and such and the Jews said he is blaspheming, he claimed to be God and they tried to

stone him. So they argue that he must have been claiming to be God because look ! - the Jews

tried to kill him. They said that’s what he was claiming. But the interesting thing is that all the

evidence is then built on the fact that a person is saying: I believed that Jesus was the son of

God because the Jews who killed him said that’s what he used to say ! His enemies used to

say that, so he must have said it, this is what it amounts to. In other hand we have the words

of Jesus saying he would keep the law, the law of Moses and we have the statement in the

Bible, why did the Jews kill him ? Because he broke the law of Moses. Obviously the Jews

misunderstood him, if he promised he would keep the law, but they killed him because he

broke the law, they must have misunderstood him, or lied about him.

Writers of Bible - Out of Context

When I talk about the Bible and quote various verses here and there I am often

accused of putting things out of context, to say you have lifted something out of what it was

talking about and given it a meaning. I don’t want to respond to the accusation as such, but it

doesn’t seem to occur to many people that perhaps those who wrote portions of the Bible in

the first place were guilty of the same thing. Maybe they – some of those writers - believed a
certain thing and in order to prove it quoted from their scriptures – the Old Testament, the

Hebrew writings - quoted out of context to prove their point. There are examples of that kind

of thing. In Matthew 2 it said that a king wanted to kill the young child Jesus so he with his

family went to Egypt, and they stayed there until that king died, and then they came back.

When the writer of Matthew, whoever he was, because the name Matthew won't be

found in the book of Matthew; when he described this event saying that he came back out of

Egypt, he said: “ This was to fulfil a prophecy which is written” and then he quotes Hosea

Chapter 11 “Out of Egypt I called my Son”. So he said because Jesus went to Egypt and then

came back out of Egypt and we have this passage in the Hebrew scriptures “out of Egypt I

called my son” Jesus must have been the son of God. If you look and see what he was

quoting, Hosea 11:1 he quotes the second half of a complete sentence, the complete sentence

reads: “When Israel was young I loved him and out of Egypt I called my son”. Israelthe

nation was considered as the son of God. Moses was told to go to Pharaoh and say to him: If

you touch that nation of people, you touch my son; warning him, warning Pharaoh: don’t

touch that nation, calling the nation “the son of God”. So that this is the only thing talked

about in Hosea 11:1. “Out of Egypt I called my son” can only refer to the nation of Israel. I

mentioned this point some months ago here in another talk, to which a young lady with us

objected that Israel is a symbolic name for Jesus. You will have a hard time finding that

anywhere in the Bible because it isn’t there. You can take an index of the Bible and lookup

the word “Israel” everywhere the word occurs and you will find no where in any place that

you can connect the word Israel with Jesus. But never mind - suppose it is true, read on, the

second verse says “and after that he kept on worshipping Bal”, because this is what the

Israelites were guilty of, very often they kept falling back into Idol worshipping. So if that

“Israel” really meant Jesus and it means that Jesus is the son of God that came out of Egypt

they must also mean that Jesus from time to time used to bow down to that idol Bal. You have
to be consistent, and follow through on what it says. So the point is whoever wrote Matthew

and Chapter 2 was trying to prove a point by quoting something out of context, and he undid

himself, because if you follow through on it, it can not be so.

Quran Has Internal Evidences

Now I can come back to the claim the Quran makes that it has internal evidence of its

origin. There are many ways that you can look at this. As one example, if I single out

somebody here and say: You know, I know your father - he is going to doubt that, he has

never seen me with his father. He would say, how does he look like, is he tall short does he

wear glasses? and so on, and if I give him the right answers pretty soon he will get convinced,

“Oh yes, you did meet him”. If you apply the same kind of thinking when you look at the

Quran, here is a book that says it came from the one who was there when the universe began.

So you should be asking that one: So tell me something that proves it. Tell me something that

shows me you must have been there when the universe was beginning. You will find in two

different Ayahs the statement that all the creation began from a single point, and from this

point it is expanding. In 1978 they gave the Noble prize to two people who proved that that’s

the case. It is the big bang origin of the universe. It was determined by the large radio

receivers that they have for the telephone companies which were sensitive enough to pick up

the transmissions from satellites and it kept finding background noise that they could not

account for. Until the only explanation came to be, it is the left over energy from that original

explosion which fits in exactly as would be predicted by the mathematical calculation of what

would be this thing if the universe began from a single point and exploded outwards. So they

confirmed that, but in 1978. Centuries before that here is the Quran saying the heavens and

the earth in the beginning they were one piece and split and says in another Ayah : “of the

heavens we are expanding it”.

Quran Has Exact Accuracy

number of things you can find in the Quran that give evidence to its origin – internal

evidence. If the Quran is dictated from a perfect individual; it originates with God, then there

should not be any wasted space, it should be very meaningful. There should be nothing that

we don’t need that you can cut off, and it should not be missing anything. And so that

everything in there should really be there for a specific purpose. And I got to thinking about

the Ayah which I mentioned before, it says, the likeness of Jesus is the likeness of Adam. It an

equation, it uses the Arabic word (mithel), it says Jesus, Adam, equal. You go to the index of

the Quran, you look up the name ISA it is in the Quran 25 times, you look up the name Adam

it is there 25 times. They are equal, through scattered references but 25 of each. Follow that

through and you will find that in the Quran there are 8 places were an Ayah says something is

like something else, using this (Mithel), you will find in every case and take both sides of it

whatever that word is look it up in the index and it will be let’s say 110 times and lookup the

other word and it will be said to be equal to the same 110. That is quite a project of co-

ordination if you try to write a book that way yourself. So that everywhere you happened to

mention that such and such is like such and such that then you check your index, filing

system, or your IBM punch cards or whatever, to make sure that in this whole book you

mentioned them both the same number of times. But that’s what you will find in the Quran.

Quran Provides Reason

What I am talking about is built on a thing that is called in Logic: Use and Mention of

a Word. When you use a word, you are using its meaning. When you mention a word, you are

talking about the symbol without the meaning. For example, if I say Toronto is a big city - I

used the word Toronto as I meant this place Toronto is a big city. But if I say to you

Torontohas 7 letters, I am not talking about this place Toronto, I am talking about this word -

Toronto. So, the revelation is above reasoning, but it is not above reason. That is to say we are
more apt not to find in the Quran something that is unreasonable, but we may find something

that we would have never figured out for ourselves.

Unique Word Refers to Itself in Quran

The author of this sentence said if this book came from someone besides God then you

will find in it many Ikhtalafan (inconsistencies). The word Ikhtilaf is found many times in the

Quran. But the word Ikhtalafan is only found once in the Quran. So there are not many

Ikhtilafan in the Quran, there is only one - where the sentence is mentioned. So you see how

things are put together perfectly. It has been suggested to mankind: Find a mistake. Man could

not get hold of a mistake, and he is very clever, because this sentence could also mean: Find

many Iktilafan and so he quickly goes to the index to see if he can find many of them and

there is only one... Sorry clever person.

[end of Dr. Gary Miller and Yusuf Estes]

Bible And Quran - Originally Both From Allah

Conclusion: Both the Bible and the Quran have come to us by way of Almighty God,

then through His angel Gabriel and then to the prophets, peace be upon them. However, when

the next step comes into play (that of the human beings faithfully transmitting it on to others

and future generations) we find out that Allah has only perserved His Last and Final

Revelation for all times. And He certainly did not need the humans to do that.

Respect For Holly Books

Muslims should respect the Bible because it does still contain some of the original

teachings of Allah. But there is no need to go to Bible classes or purchase one to read to try to

learn about what our purpose is here in this life. The Quran makes it clear that Allah has

indeed, perfected our "way of life" for us and has conferred on us His favor and has chosen

for us to submit to Him in Islam.

free through our site if you like) and then investigate for themselves what the Quran is really

all about and what it might mean to them in their lives.

[Free Quran available at: http://islamtomorrow.com/free ]

Final comment from Yusuf Estes:

I would like to state that after years of studying the Bible and then learning the Arabic

language to read the Quran as it was originally recited to Muhammad, peace be upon him, by

the angel Gabriel, I have come to an amazing conclusion. It seems to me that the Bible and

the Quran are most definitely from the exact same source and they complement each other

very nicely. In fact, it appears that the Bible does not contradict the Quran, except in the very

same places where the Bible contradicts itself.

Read "Son of Who?" - "Sons of God?" - "That Prophet?" and more about the Bible -

Scholars of Bible Discuss Secret Gospel of Mark - [click here]

For more about the Quran -

For Audio Discussions Concerning Quran & Bible

 http://www.islamtomorrow.com/articles/Bible_vs_Quran.asp