Cirugia Ambulatoria
Cirugia Ambulatoria
Cirugia Ambulatoria
www.elsevier.com/locate/sempedsurg
PII: S1055-8586(18)30003-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2018.02.003
Reference: YSPSU50734
To appear in: Seminars in Pediatric Surgery
Cite this article as: Andrew B. Nordin, Sohail R. Shah and Brian D. Kenney,
Ambulatory Pediatric Surgery, Seminars in Pediatric Surgery,
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2018.02.003
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for
publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of
the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and
review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form.
Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which
could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Ambulatory Pediatric Surgery
Andrew B Nordin MD a,b, Sohail R Shah MD, MSHA c,d, Brian D Kenney MD, MPH a,e
a
Nationwide Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, 700 Children’s Drive,
Brian Kenney, MD
Email: Brian.Kenney@nationwidechildrens.org
Ambulatory pediatric surgery has become increasingly common in recent years, with
greater numbers of procedures being performed on an outpatient basis. This practice has clear
benefits for hospitals and healthcare providers, but patients and families also often prefer
outpatient surgery for a variety of reasons. However, maximizing the potential opportunities
requires critical attention to patient and procedure selection, as well as anesthetic choice. A
subset of outpatient procedures can be performed as single visit procedures, further simplifying
Introduction
The performance of ambulatory surgery offers significant benefits for patients and their
families, as well as healthcare providers and the systems in which they practice. The growing
trend of increasing numbers of pediatric surgical operations to the outpatient arena is hardly a
new practice, and was first established at the Royal Glasgow Hospital for Children in 1909 due
to a lack of inpatient resources [1, 2]. The concept slowly gained traction over the following
decades, finally picking up steam in the 1960s with the development of the first outpatient
surgical center in 1968 [2]. In recent years, concerns over rising healthcare costs have stimulated
In exploring the topic of ambulatory pediatric surgery, this review will describe its
potential benefits, define the scope of appropriate surgical procedures and patient selection, and
highlight crucial anesthetic considerations. Special attention will be devoted to the practice of
single visit surgery, a practice which attempts to capitalize on and magnify the advantages of the
ambulatory surgery experience. Finally, practical considerations and advice from the literature
While the shift of surgical procedures to the outpatient realm has advantages for both the
provider and the system in which he/she practices, the primary goal is to improve patient care.
By definition, outpatient surgery precludes the need for the patient to remain in the hospital,
thereby minimizing potential exposure to nosocomial pathogens and iatrogenic injuries [1].
Furthermore, patients and families often prefer more focused and personalized care that
minimizes time and distance away from the home [3]. In the ambulatory setting, wait times are
typically decreased both before and after surgery, with decreased stress and disruption for the
patient and their family [1]. Even among patients with appendicitis, same day discharge
[4]. Finally, minimizing time spent in a hospital away from home decreases any potential
economic impacts on the family such as lost wages, or payments for child care and transportation
[5]. In general, pediatric patients and their parents and family members prefer to recuperate at
home when possible. Equally importantly, several studies have demonstrated the safety of same-
day discharge after routine operations such as laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy,
To the Provider
Based on the nature of the procedures typically performed in the outpatient setting,
providers are often able to accommodate up to 50-100% more cases within a set time period [9].
This increased efficiency can be attributed to a focus on streamlined throughput that permeates
the very concept of ambulatory surgery. Furthermore, moving these procedures out of an
inpatient operating room has the potential to relieve scheduling burdens, reserving larger, more
Multiple studies have demonstrated that outpatient surgery reduces the costs of providing
surgical care as compared against inpatient surgery [2, 3, 9-11]. This reduction in cost can be
attributed primarily to a decrease in inpatient length of stay, but may also be related to a lower
Appropriate patient and procedure selection are paramount for patients and providers to
reap the full benefits of ambulatory surgery while minimizing the potential risk of any
complications. This begins with careful examination and evaluation of patients in the
preoperative clinic to ensure that appropriate cases are done in the outpatient setting. Each
hospital should develop its own criteria for outpatient cases, especially to exclude patients that
are not eligible. In addition, some patients are only considered for outpatient surgery after
preoperative clearance; these patients can be subdivided into those who can be cared for at the
free-standing surgery center and those whose operations should be performed at a surgery center
gestational and post-natal age is utilized to determine the relative risk for apnea, and therefore
the need for continued monitoring, following general anesthesia. Specific age criteria vary by
institution, but otherwise healthy patients ranging from 50 to 60 weeks post conception are
generally eligible for ambulatory procedures [12]. Before this age, infants have higher risks of
apnea and other respiratory complications after undergoing general anesthesia. Full term infants
are typically candidates for outpatient surgery after 54 weeks post-conception age [12].
In addition to age, other specific aspects of the patient’s personal or family medical
history may preclude the safe performance of an outpatient surgical procedure. Patients with a
known difficult airway should not be treated in an ambulatory setting, in which the requisite
resources or expertise to manage such patients may be limited. Examples of airway concerns
include a history of prolonged intubation or ventilation, and patients with known tracheal
stenosis or airway malacia. Other respiratory diagnoses which may preclude the safe
Patients with certain chronic medical conditions such as poorly controlled diabetes
mellitus should not be cared for in an outpatient surgery center. Patients with a Body Mass
Index greater than the 95th percentile are considered obese and are not candidates for outpatient
surgery. Uncontrolled or new onset seizure patients are also excluded. Patients with congenital
heart disease (hypoplastic heart, septal defects, Eisenmenger syndrome, cyanosis, etc.) must be
repaired and stable prior to consideration for care in the outpatient surgery center. However, the
location of the ambulatory surgical center must be considered in these decisions, in that those
attached to adjacent inpatient facilities may be able to adequately manage medically complex
patients.
Certain patients may only be considered candidates for outpatient surgery after evaluation
and examination by anesthesiology (see Tobias paper on this topic in this issue of Seminars in
Pediatric Surgery). Included are patients with implantable devices, repaired congenital heart
defects and complicated medical histories, including a personal or family history of malignant
hyperthermia. Patients with malignant hyperthermia may safely undergo outpatient surgery, even
the ventilator circuit of any volatile anesthetics [14]. Outpatient surgery centers should also be
prepared for the possibility of patients developing malignant hyperthermia for the first time. This
requires having an adequate and available supply of dantrolene, appropriate support staff, and
rapidly transferring the patient to an intensive care setting [14].Patients with an acute illness such
surgery; recent hospitalizations or emergency room visits must be reviewed for cardiopulmonary
issues which may preclude an anesthetic. Patients with bleeding disorders should be reviewed to
ensure that their particular disorder will not pose a risk for outpatient surgery. Candidates with a
BMI >95% but below 99% may be eligible for outpatient surgery after review. Some
adenoidectomy patients under that age of two years may be eligible for outpatient surgery after
review. Craniofacial syndromes (Pierre-Robin, Trisomy 21, others) can at times pose airway
difficulties and must be reviewed. Finally, patients with recent vaccinations within one week of
whether patients who are not eligible for outpatient surgery at the free-standing surgery center
The ideal procedure is one which can be rapidly performed, limiting the anesthetic time,
and with minimal risk of major complications. Examples of procedures commonly performed on
detected by parents or other caregivers, precluding the need for prolonged inpatient observation.
In an effort to continue to enhance efficiency and decrease hospital length of stay, several
institutions have evaluated the safety of extending the types of procedures that may be treated
with ambulatory surgery. Two of the most commonly evaluated procedures in pediatric surgery
for simple appendicitis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy can safely be performed as outpatient
procedures without overnight hospital observation [4, 17, 18]. Additional follow-up studies have
compared to 1 or 2-day hospital stays [6, 7]. The majority of studies demonstrating successful
implementation of a same-day discharge protocol discuss the need for a multidisciplinary effort
including nursing staff and providers across multiple hospital areas (emergency center, surgical
services, anesthesiology, and the post-anesthesia care unit). Additionally, a clear designation of
inclusion criteria (i.e., time of day, patient selection, diagnoses, and intra-operative findings)
should be disseminated and revisited through the implementation process. With appropriate
patient selection and process implementation these efforts also result in excellent patient and
provider satisfaction.
Given the many relative contraindications, it is clear that the outpatient surgery patients
represent a select group of the healthiest patients. The strict outpatient anesthetic criteria help
ensure that there will not be any need for conversion of a patient from the outpatient setting to
Since a variety of different procedures can be safely performed in the outpatient setting,
the anesthetic approach can also vary widely. Monitored anesthesia care can be utilized as the
sole anesthetic technique for brief procedures, and the use of local and regional therapies can
Regardless of the anesthetic route utilized, it is critical for providers to manage the
preoperative expectations of both the child and the parents, and to also provide adequate control
of postoperative pain and nausea and/or vomiting. Preoperative preparation can help both the
child and the parent acknowledge and address their fears, and set their expectations for the
operation and recovery. Such practices are routine among inpatient procedures in children’s
hospitals, but less common in the outpatient setting [19]. A recent study described the
development a web-based tool designed to guide families through this process for outpatient
operations, with the potential to improve the patient’s and the parents’ anxiety, as well as
Postoperative symptoms, especially pain, can be difficult to manage even for children
strategies to mitigate postoperative pain, most commonly utilizing multimodal therapy. Non-
pharmacologic therapies, such as breathing techniques for anxiety control, form a solid backbone
on which to incorporate medications [19]. In addition, some reports suggest that listening to
music in the postoperative period can decrease pain and anxiety in accordance with the gate
resulted in a smoother induction of analgesia, decreased Post Anesthesia Care Unit recovery
times and improved rates of discharge to home [21]. Other reports recommend perioperative
Some centers have streamlined the ambulatory surgery experience even further into “one-
stop” surgery, or single visit surgery (SVS). Such strategies were first described in the late
1990s, but much like outpatient surgery itself have yet to gain significant momentum among a
majority of centers. In this model of ambulatory surgery, the preoperative visit is performed on
the same day as the operation. Referrals from community physicians are reviewed by clinic
nurses to select specific diagnoses that are appropriate to SVS [15, 24]. The selection of specific
diagnoses is crucial to successful implementation: not only they should be appropriate for
surgical repair in the ambulatory setting, but they must also be easily recognizable by community
physicians to minimize incorrect diagnoses, and should not require prior insurance company
authorization. Patients are pre-screened via telephone by experienced clinic nurses, and
instructed about when to stop taking anything by mouth (NPO) for their appointment date.
The SVS day begins with four or five patients for the first hour of the morning who have
all been pre-screened by telephone by experienced nurses. Only patients with obvious inguinal or
umbilical hernias or other ambulatory diagnoses are brought in for this SVS clinic. Other
diagnoses include skin lesions such as dermal inclusion cysts, sebaceous cysts, skin tags or
uncomplicated pilonidal disease. Circumcisions over four months of age are also included;
under four months, these infants may be circumcised in the pediatric surgery office under local
anesthetic. Provided that the referred diagnosis is correct, the patient has remained NPO, and has
no anesthetic concerns, surgery is typically performed in the afternoon, with discharge home
from the recovery unit. Follow up typically occurs via telephone, with the option to return to
SVS has a clear advantage over traditional models of ambulatory surgery, saving a great
deal of time for the families who do not need to take additional days out of their schedules to be
evaluated preoperatively in a clinic on a day other than the surgery day [15]. One study even
found that the total operating room time, including anesthesia, was decreased in SVS patients
undergoing umbilical hernia repairs or circumcisions [24]. Another program scheduled all their
SVS cases on Fridays, so as to minimize disruptions to the patients’ school week [13].
Scheduling patients for SVS however does require a degree of confidence in the correct
selection and the presence of respiratory symptoms can result in cancellation rates from 16- 20%
Many factors make SVS especially efficient for the surgeon in addition to limiting the
types of procedures. The telephone review by experienced nurses helps with patient selection by
only including patients who are amenable to this setting: eager for surgery with convenient
access to the surgery center and also those who agree that surgery is needed after diagnosis by
their primary care physician. In addition, nurse review helps to avoid patients who may be
reluctant to have surgery, especially without discussion with the operating surgeon. Sometimes
the screening will detect other social issues such as limited transportation that make a particular
patient more likely to cancel or to require the expanded resources of the hospital. The
prescreening is very effective at converting office consultations to actual surgery cases. Review
of our individual institutional data shows that the rate of confirmation of the SVS patients ranges
from 80 – 90%, which is two to three times higher than the rate for our standard general surgery
clinic.
Ambulatory or outpatient surgery for common low risk pediatric surgical conditions has
clear benefits for all parties involved and has therefore been widely adopted. Designing an
ambulatory surgery program, however, requires careful attention to all the aforementioned
details regarding patient and procedure selection. Compliment et al described their experiences
in establishing an ambulatory surgery center solely for tympanostomy tube insertion [9]. They
representatives for the recovery and operating rooms), anesthesiologists, and various
administrators to repurpose a partially unused area of their facility into an outpatient surgery
suite. In doing so, they increased their number of tympanostomy tube insertions and decreased
direct and indirect operating room costs while generating additional net revenue from the
follow up. Traditionally, postoperative patients are evaluated by the surgeon in the clinic but, for
many patients, the postoperative visit is unnecessary because any problems or complications
usually become obvious prior to that visit and are dealt with as needed. In addition, families do
not wish to return for a visit that often includes waiting and lost time from work or other
activities [26, 27]. The postoperative visit can be associated with significant costs, primarily for
lower income patients [5]. As such, telephone follow up has emerged as a viable alternative,
which allows for the majority of postoperative questions and concerns to be addressed at
decreased cost and time to the clinic staff and improved convenience to patients and their
families. Studies have generally reported improved satisfaction with phone follow up among
The efficiency of the ambulatory care setting is due in part to patient selection but also to
the much lower cost of the outpatient surgery center compared to the general hospital setting.
Freestanding surgery centers have much lower overhead than hospitals [9]. If the centers are able
to obtain reimbursements similar to the main hospital then the savings are considerable. These
Conclusion
Ambulatory surgery offers similar surgical outcomes compared to hospitalization for
pediatric patients undergoing common, low-risk procedures, and extends benefits to both
providers and healthcare systems including improved patient satisfaction, reduced complications
and more efficient care. The efficiencies are experienced both in the increased numbers of
patients that can be treated with similar costs and the decreased time commitment for both
families and providers. Within the scope of outpatient surgery practice, new trends continue to
emerge, changing the scope of practice from its inception out of necessity over a hundred years
ago. As perioperative care as a whole continues to evolve and improve, increasing numbers of
procedures may become eligible for ambulatory surgery, transitioning more children to
outpatient recovery and minimizing morbidity for both patients and their families.
References
1. Stanwick RS, Horne JM, Peabody DM, Postuma R. Day-care versus inpatient pediatric
surgery: a comparison of costs incurred by parents. Can Med Assoc J. 1987; 137(1): 21-26.
2. Marks SD, Greenlick MR, Hurtado AV, Johnson JD, Henderson J. Ambulatory Surgery in an
HMO: A Study of Costs, Quality of Care and Satisfaction. Med Care. 1980; 18(2): 127-146.
3. Fabricant PD, Seeley MA, Rozell JC, et al. Cost Savings from Utilization of an Ambulatory
Surgery Center for Orthopaedic Day Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 24: 865-871.
4. Aguayo P, Alemayehu H, Desai AA, Fraser JD, St. Peter SD. Initial experience with same
day discharge after laparoscopic appendectomy for nonperforated appendicitis. J Surg Res.
5. Scott AR, Rush AJ, Naik AD, Berger DH, Suliburk JW. Surgical follow-up costs
7. Litz CN, Stone L, Alessi R, Walford NE, Danielson PD, Chandler NM. Impact of outpatient
8. Cairo SB, Raval MV, Browne M, Meyers H, Rothstein DH. Association of Same-Day
Discharge with Hospital Readmission After Appendectomy in Pediatric Patients. JAMA Surg.
9. Compliment JM, Genderlman MS, Allera JF, et al. Outpatient treatment suite: a safe and
cost-effective venue to perform myringotomy and tubes placement in children. Int J Pediatr
10. Shepard B, Hensle TW, Burbige KA, Lieberman I. Outpatient surgery in pediatric urology
11. Owens PL, Barrett ML, Raetzman S, Maggard-Gibbons M, Steiner CA. Surgical Site
12. Coté CJ, Zaslavsky A, Downes JJ, et al. Postoperative Apnea in Former Preterm Infants after
13. Barnett SJ, Frischer JS, Gaskey JA, Ryckman FC, von Allmen D. Pediatric hernia repair: 1-
14. Litman RS, Joshi GP. Malignant Hyperthermia in the Ambulatory Surgery Center: How
15. Olson JK, Deming LA, King DR, et al. Single visit surgery for pediatric ambulatory surgical
procedures: a satisfaction and cost analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2017; article in press.
16. Williams G, Bell G, Buys J, et al. The prevalence of pain at home and its consequences in
children following two types of short stay surgery: a multicenter observational cohort study.
17. Yu YR, Smith CM, Ceyanes KK, et al. A prospective same day discharge protocol for
pediatric appendicitis: Adding value to a common surgical condition. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;
article in press.
18. Gould JL, Poola AS, St. Peter SD, Aguayo P. Same day discharge protocol implementation
1936-1938.
19. Kain ZN, Fortier MA, Chorney JM, Mayes L. Web-based Tailored Intervention for
20. Calcaterra V, Ostuni S, Bonomelli I, et al. Music benefits on postoperative distress and pain
22. Apfel CC, Turan A, Souza K, Pergolizzi J, Hornuss C. Intravenous acetaminophen reduces
postoperative nausea and vomiting: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 2015;
154(5): 677-689.
23. Gandhi R, Sunder R. Postoperative analgesic efficacy of single high dose and low dose rectal
460-464.
24. Overdyk FJ, Burt N, Tagge EP, et al. “One-Stop” Surgery: Implications for Anesthesiologists
25. Tagge EP, Hebra A, Overdyk F, et al. One-Stop Surgery: Evolving Approach to Pediatric
26. Kassmann BP, Docherty SL, Rice HE, Bailey DE, Schweitzer M. Telephone Follow-up for
Pediatric Ambulatory Surgery: Parent and Provider Satisfaction. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012; 27(6):
715-724.
27. Fischer K, Hogan V, Jager A, von Allmen D. Efficacy and Utility of Phone Call Follow-up
after Pediatric General Surgery versus Traditional Clinic Follow-up. Perm J. 2015; 19(1):
11-14.