20052015KGP8PLATEIAREPORT

EIA REPORT
FOR
CAPACITY EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL TERMINAL

AT PIYALA, NEAR FARIDABAD, HARYANA
Submitted by
BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD

FEBRUARY 2014
Prepared by
DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.

An ISO 9001 : 2008 COMPANY &
NABET / QCI ACCREDITED EIA CONSULTANT ORGANIZATION
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
KOLKATA  MUMBAI  DELHI  CHENNAI
Page 1 of 2
EIA / EMP Declaration
Declaration by Experts Contributing to the EIA/ EMP Studies
Project : ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

Name FOR PROPOSED CAPACITY EXPANSION OF PIYALA
POL TERMINAL AT PIYALA, NEAR FARIDABAD,
HARYANA.
We, hereby certify that we were a part of the mentioned EIA/EMP report team in the following
capacity that developed the above EIA.
1. EIA Coordinator
Sl. No. Name Signature

1. Mr. Arindam Das
2. Functional Area Experts
Type Functional
Sl.
Name of Expert Area(s) Signature
No.
Covered
1. Mr. Swapan Chakrabarti In-House NV
2. Dr. Rothin Kr. Chakraverty In-House EB
AP
3. Mr. Arindam Das In-House
AQ
4. Mr. Sahabuddin Ahmed In-House RH
LU
WP
5. Mr. Suman Chattaraj In-House
Noise
SHW
6. Ms. Kuhu Banerjee In-House SE
NABET - QCI
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
PAGE NO/
SECTION DESCRIPTION
REMARKS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E-1 to E-10
SECTION - 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 to 1-9
1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 1-1
1.2 IDENTIFICATION O F P ROJECT & THE

1-1
PROJECT PROPONENT
1.3 NATURE, S IZE, L OCATION OF THE

PROJECT A ND I TS IMPORTANCE T O T HE 1-3
COUNTRY, REGION
1.4 METHODOLOGY O F E NVIRONMENTAL

1-4
IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY (EIAS)
1.5 PRESCRIBED T ERMS OF REFERENCE O F

1-5
EIA STUDY
SECTION - 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1 to 2-15
2.1 TYPE OF PROJECT 2-1
2.2 NEED FOR THE PROJECT 2-1
2.3 PLANT LOCATION 2-1
2.4 PLANT CAPACITY & SIZE OF OPERATION 2-2
2.5 TECHNOLOGY A ND P ROCESS 2-2

DESCRIPTION
2.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-3
2.7 DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION MEASURES 2-12
FIG.NO. 2.1 SITE LOCATION MAP 2-15
SECTION - 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 3-1 TO 3-45
3.1 INTRODUCTION 3-1
i
CONTENTS...Contd
PAGE NO/
SECTION DESCRIPTION
REMARKS
3.2 STUDY A REA, PERIOD, C OMPONENTS & 3-1
METHODOLOGY
TABLE 3.1 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA 3-22 to 3-27
TABLE 3.2 SUMMARY OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA 3-28
TABLE 3.3 NATIONAL AM BIENT AI R QUALITY 3-29 to 3-31

STANDARDS (CPCB)- 3 SHEETS
TABLE 3.4 GROUND WATER QUALITY 3-32 to 3-33
TABLE 3.5 SURFACE WATER QUALITY 3-34 to 3-35
TABLE 3.6 NOISE LEVEL DATA 3-36 to 3-41
TABLE 3.7 SOIL QUALITY 3-42 to 3-43
FIG. NO. 3.1 AIR Q UALITY M ONITORING S TATION 3-44

LOCATION MAP
FIG. NO. 3.2 WINDROSE DIAGRAM 3-45
SECTION - 4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION

4-1 to 4-30
MEASURES
4.1 IDENTIFICATION OF IMPACTS 4-1
4.2 MEASURES F OR MINIMIZING AD VERSE 4-8

IMPACTS
4.3 IRREVERSIBLE AN DI RRETRIEVABLE 4-14

COMMITMENTS O F ENVIRONMENTAL
COMPONENTS
4.4 ASSESSMENT O F SI GNIFICANCE O F 4-17

IMPACTS
4.5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MATRIX 4-22
4.6 MITIGATION MEASURES 4-24
TABLE 4.1 GENERAL STANDARDS FOR DISCHARGE OF 4-27

EFFLUENTS
ii
CONTENTS...Contd
PAGE NO/
SECTION DESCRIPTION
REMARKS
TABLE 4.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MATRIX 4-30
SECTION - 5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 5-1 to 5-2
5.1 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 5-1
SECTION - 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 6-1 to 6-3
6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 6-1
SECTION - 7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES 7-1
7.1 RISK ASSESSMENT 7-1
7.2 R & R ACTION PLANS 7-1
7.3 PUBLIC CONSULTATION 7-1
SECTION - 8 PROJECT BENEFITS 8-1 to 8-2
8.1 PROJECT BENEFITS 8-1
SECTION - 9 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 9-1 to 9-17
9.1 INTRODUCTION 9-1
FIG. NO. TASKS UNDE RE NVIRONMENTAL 9-17

9.1 MANAGEMENT PLAN
SECTION - 10 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION 10-1 to 10-10
OVERALL JUSTIFICATION F OR
10.1 10-1
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT
SUMMARY O F E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACTS

10.2 10-3
AND MITIGATION MEASURES
SECTION - 11 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS 11-1 to 11-2
11.1 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED 11-1
iii
CONTENTS...Contd
PAGE NO/
SECTION DESCRIPTION
REMARKS
ANNEXURE A-1 TO A-13
ANNEXURE-1 BROAD LIST OF FLORA WITHIN STUDY AREA A -1 TO A -6
ANNEXURE- 2 BROAD LIST OF FAUNA FOUND IN HARYANA A -7 TO A -12
ANNEXURE- 2A ENDANGERED & THREATENED FAUNA IN HARYANA A -13
EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT- 1.1 APPROVED TERMS OF RERFERENCE OF EIA STUDY
EXHIBIT- 2.1 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
EXHIBIT- 3.1(A) MICRO M ETEOROLOGICAL DATA – GURGAON

OBSERVATORY
SITE M ONITORED MICRO METEOROLOGICAL DATA

EXHIBIT – 3.1(B)
(DECEMBER 2013 – JANUARY 2014)
EXHIBIT- 3.2 SATELLITE IMAGERY
EXHIBIT- 7.1 RISK ANALYSIS REPORT
EXHIBIT- 9.1 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM
EXHIBIT-11.1 ACCREDITATION OF NABET / QCI
ENCLOSURES
PLATE 2.1 PLOT PLAN IN DRAWING

JACKET
PLATE 4.1 OWS LAYOUT IN DRAWING

JACKET
DWG. NO. IN DRAWING

MAP SHOWING 10 KM RADIUS AROUND THE SITE
13302 - DWG - JACKET
INDICATING MAIN FEATURES
EV- 0001- 0
iv
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE EIA REPORT FOR
PROPOSED CAPACITY EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL TERMINAL
AT PIYALA, NEAR FARIDABAD, HARYANA DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANTS
___________________________________________________________________________
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) is a fortune 500 oil refining, exploration
and marketing PSU with Navratna status. BPCL has multiple refinery units in Mumbai,
Kochi, Numaligarh and Bina.
Moreover, Bharat O man Refineries Limited ( BORL), a company promoted by Bharat

Petroleum C orporation L imited ( BPCL) and O man O il Company L imited ( OOCL), has
set up a 6 MMTPA grass root refinery at Bina, Madhya Pradesh along with crude supply
system consisting of a Single Point Mooring system (SPM), Crude Oil Storage Terminal
(COT) at V adinar, D istrict – Jamnagar, Gujrat a nd 935 K m long c ross c ountry c rude
pipeline from Vadinar to Bina.
BPCL has also many POL Terminals spread across the country. BPCL now proposes to
expand the capacity of the existing POL Terminal at Piyala, near Faridabad by adding
additional tanks.
 Project Capacity
The proposed project is an expansion project of the existing POL terminal with existing
storage capacity 1,62,790 kl. After expansion, the capacity of the POL Terminal will be
2,27,360 kl.
 Location
The Project Site is located at Piyala which is in the south side of Faridabad town in the
state of Haryana. The distance between Piyala and Faridabad is around 20 km. The
nearest railway station is Ballabgarh on the Delhi-Mathura triple track broad-gauge
line. Nearest do mestic and i nternational ai rport i s at N ew D elhi. The appr oximate
longitude and latitude of the centroid of the proposed site are 77 o 18' 3 9”E (approx.)
and 28 o16' 33” N (approx.).
 Land Requirement
The total land area available in Piyala POL Terminal is around 61 acres. The total land
is under possession of BPCL.
 Water Requirement and Source
The maximum w ater c onsumption du ring ope ration of the ex isting pl ant is 7 m3/day.
The w ater r equirement i s m et from out side r eceived at s ite t hrough t ank l orry. No
additional water will be required for the proposed expansion.
 Technology & Process Description
The POL Terminal mainly has handling and storage facilities of different petroleum
products. The brief process description is as follows:
o The Product is received through pipeline from BPCL Mumbai & Bina Refineries
o Routing of different products in their designated tanks.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
E-1 BPCL
CONSULTANTS
___________________________________________________________________________
o Storage in Tanks
o Dispatch o f p roducts : a) t hrough Tank l orries t o R etail out lets, b ) t hrough
Railway Wagons to N orthern I ndia D epots/installations, c ) to B PCL B ijwasan
Installation through pipeline
 Tank Farm
The POL terminal of BPCL at Piyala is provided with storage tanks for Class A & B
petroleum products. The classification of the products are summarized below for
ready reference :
Name of Product Full Name Class*

MS Motor Spirit A
HSD High Speed Diesel B
SKO Superior Kerosene Oil B
ATF Aviation Turbine Fuel B
* Petroleum Class ‘A’ - means petroleum having a flash point below 230 C
Petroleum Cla ss ‘B ’ - means pe troleum hav ing a flash poi nt o f 23 0C and
above but below 650C
Petroleum Cla ss ‘C’ - means pet roleum hav ing a flash poi nt o f 65 0C and
above but below 930C
The tanks for C lass A p etroleum ar e i nternal floating roof t anks w hile t he t anks for
Class B petroleum products are fixed roof tanks.
The des ign o f the i nstallation i s i n ac cordance w ith I ndian s tandards O ISD
117,118,141 and as c ontained i n P etroleum R ules and appr oved b y The C hief
Controller of Explosives. The details of product storage / tank firm are as follows:
Details of Existing Tanks
Tank Tank Tank Gross Pumpable

Tank
Product Roof Diameter Height Capacity Capacity
No.
Type (m) (m) (kl) (kl)
Above Ground Tanks
TK-2 MS FR 43.0 20.0 26750 25400
TK-3 MS FR 43.0 20.0 26750 25400
TK-4 MS FR 43.0 20.0 26750 25400
TK-5 HSD FR 33.0 20.0 15600 14950
TK-6 HSD FR 33.0 20.0 15600 14950
TK-7 HSD FR 33.0 20.0 15600 14950
TK-8 HSD FR 33.0 20.0 15600 14950
TK-9 SKO FR 26.0 17.0 8200 7700
TK-10 SKO FR 26.0 17.0 8200 7700
TK-11 SLOP CR 9.0 13.5 890 858
TK-12 SLOP CR 9.0 13.5 890 858
TK-13 HSD CR 9.0 13.5 890 858
Under Ground Tanks
UT-1 MS U.G 4.0 16.2 200 200
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
E-2 BPCL
CONSULTANTS
___________________________________________________________________________

Tank
No.
UT-2 MS U.G 4.0 16.2 200 200
UT-3 HSD U.G 4.0 16.2 200 200
UT-4 SKO U.G 4.0 16.2 200 200
UT-5 MS / U.G 4.0 16.2 200 200
ETHAN
OL
UT-6 HSD U.G 2.012 5.0 15 15
UT-7 HSD U.G 2.012 5.0 15 15
UT-8 SLOP U.G 2.012 6.75 20 20
UT-9 SLOP U.G 2.012 6.75 20 20
Details of Proposed Tanks

Tank
No.
Above Ground Tanks
TK-1 MS FR 43.0 20.0 26750 25400
TK-14 ATF CR 24.0 20.0 9000 9000
TK-15 ATF CR 24.0 20.0 9000 9000
TK-16 ATF CR 24.0 20.0 9000 9000
TK-17 ATF CR 24.0 20.0 9000 9000
TK-18 HSD CR 9.0 13.5 890 858
TK-19 MS CR 9.0 13.5 890 858
Under Ground Tanks
UT-10 SLOP U.G 2.012 6.75 20 20
ATF
UT-11 SLOP U.G 2.012 6.75 20 20
ATF
The underground MS/HSD/SKO tanks shall be used for unloading products from sick
tank trucks and removal of excess loaded products from the tank trucks.
All the tanks shall be installed in separate dyked enclosures as per OISD standards.
 Details of Preventive Measures for Leakages & Accident
The fire pr otection and det ection s ystem a re i n ac cordance w ith O ISD 117. Fire
detection and pr otection system, f ire al arm s ystem, fire ex tinguishers, f ire water t ank,
Hydrcarbon Detectors and Emergency Shutdown System are installed within the POL
terminal. High V olume Long R ange ( HVLR) m onitors a re bei ng i nstalled as per
recommendations of M B Lal Committee.
 Project Cost
The total project cost for the proposed expansion is around Rs 3798 lakh.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
E-3 BPCL
CONSULTANTS
___________________________________________________________________________
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
2.1 Physical Environment
Faridabad distric has predominantly plain topography and is located 205 m above sea
level. It has North-East to South-West gradient. The district is mainly drained by the
rivers Yamuna, which is a per ennial beside this a number of small streams originates
from the hil ranges of the central parts of the dist rict , which do not meet any major
stream or r ivers but di sappears i n t he per meable depos its of al luvial pl ains af ter
traversing some distance.
The climate of Faridabad district can be classified as tropical steppe, semiarid and hot
which i s m ainly c haracterized by the ex treme dr yness o f t he A ir except dur ing
monsoon months.
Soils of Faridabad district are classified as tropical and brown sails, existing in major
parts of the district.
2.2 Ecological Environment
Haryana is primarily an agriculture state with almost 80% of its land under cultivation.
The geographical area of the state is 44212 sq. km which is 1.3% of India’s
geographical ar ea. H aryana i s not bes towed with bount y of nat ural forests and onl y
3.52% of its geographical area is under notified forests. As per India State of Forest
Report, FSI, 2011, the Forest Cover in the state is 1608 s q.km which is 3.64% of the
state's geographical area. The Tree Cover in the state is 1395 s q. km which is 3.16%
of the geographical ar ea. T hus t he forest and T ree C over of the H aryana s tate i s
6.80% of its geographical area.
There is no Wildlife Sanctuary, National Park and Biosphere Reserve in the entire
Study Area. No Endemic, Threatened or Endangered species are found or sited in the
Study Area.
2.3 Socio-Economic Environment
Study of socio economic profile around the proposed project site has been carried out
based on the Census of India 2011 & 2001 document for the part of district Faridabad,
Gurgaon and Palwal of Haryana. The Study Area has been considered to be an ar ea
covered within a radius of 10 km around the proposed project site beyond which no
appreciable impact due to the project is envisaged.
The salient features of socioeconomic profile of the Study Area are as follows:
• The population i n t he study a rea i s 285489 w ith a population d ensity o f 909

persons per square kilometer.
• The Sex Ratio (Female per 1000 Male) is 871.
• Scheduled Castes (SC) as percentage of total population is 20.01%. There is no

Scheduled Tribes (ST) population in the Study Area.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
E-4 BPCL
CONSULTANTS
___________________________________________________________________________
• In t he R ural P art o f S tudy ar ea m ale l iteracy rate i s 72. 26% w hile f emale
literacy is 50.12%.
• Percentage o f main w orks i n t he R ural P art of S tudy ar ea i s 22. 09%.

Percentage o f m arginal workers i s l ow ( 5.94 % ). The per centage o f non
workers is as high as 71.97%.
2.4 Air Environment
Ambient ai r q uality was m onitored for one ( 1) month ( December 2013 t o J anuary
2014) in and ar ound t he pr oposed Project s ite at six (6) m onitoring s tations. T he
summarized r esult of ambient ai r q uality m onitoring, as obt ained from al l t he
monitoring stations are as follows:
POLLUTANT MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE

RPM2.5 58.2 38.2 46.0
RPM 10 108.2 73.2 88.1
SO2 7.89 7.0 7.3
NO2 32.56 20.50 24.40
NOTE : All the values of VOC and Non-Methane Hydrocarbon are below 1.0 ppb (i.e. BDL). All
the values of Methane Hydrocarbon are also below 1.0 ppm (i.e. BDL).
2.5 Water Environment
To assess the background water quality, two (2) surface water samples and three (3)
ground water samples were collected and analyzed.
The results of analysis of surface water samples generally conform to Class-C, which
means the water is suitable for industrial use as well as for drinking water source after
conventional treatment and disinfection. Analyses of ground water samples reveal that
the water is acceptable and can be considered as safe sources o f Drinking Water
without disinfection.
2.6 Background Noise Level Data
Noise levels were measured (in dBA) for one month in and around the proposed site.
From the monitoring data i t can be inferred that the noise level in and around the
proposed site meets ambient standard for noise levels.
2.7 Background Soil Quality
To assess the background soil quality, top soil samples from different locations of the
site were collected and analysed subsequently conforming to IS:2720 and ASTM Part-
XI.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
E-5 BPCL
CONSULTANTS
___________________________________________________________________________
3.0 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
3.1 Impact During Construction Phase
Appropriate e nvironmental m itigative m easures will be ens ured dur ing construction
phase t o el iminate/minimize det rimental i mpacts dur ing this phas e. These m easures
include dus t s uppression by ar ranging mobile w ater s prinklers; providing
accommodations to the construction workers in the nearby villages by contractor, etc.
3.2 Impact during Operation Phase
Main aspects and activities during operation phase of the proposed project having
potential for inducing environmental and/or social impacts are as follows:
• Hydrology
Required c onsumptive water f or t he existing plant is met f rom outside through t ank
lorry. No additional water requirement is envisaged for the proposed expansion. It is
therefore expected that this drawl of water for the proposed project is not expected to
cause any impact of concern on ground water regime.
• Air Environment
As no new emergency DG set is proposed for the expansion, emission from the stacks
of em ergency D G sets i s not appl icable for the pr oposed ex pansion pr oject. S ome
hydrocarbon em ission w ill t ake pl ace as f ugitive em ission from l eakages of gland,
seals etc
• Water Environment
Only oily wastewater and domestic effluents will be generated during operation phase.
The same will be treated suitably. T he wastewater treatment philosophy is based on
maximum recycling and re-use.
• Physical Environment
For t he proposed ex pansion no new l and will be ac quired s ince t he t otal l and
(including the land required for proposed expansion) is under possession of BPCL. So
the pr oposed ex pansion does no t hav e any s ignificant i mpact on the phy sical
environment.
• Impact of Solid Wastes
The quantum of solid waste generated from the proposed plant is meager. Total tank
bottom sludge generated during cleaning of oil storage tanks is kept i n secured,
covered impermeable sludge pit located within POL terminal at a central place
earmarked for the purpose prior to safe disposal through MoEF/ State PCB approved
registered recycler.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
E-6 BPCL
CONSULTANTS
___________________________________________________________________________
• Human Environment
With further development of the area due to capacity expansion of the existing project,
it is expected that civic services in the locality will further improve. The project will have
a positive beneficial effect on socioeconomic environment. For the present project,
there is no R & R issues involved since the Project is an ex pansion project for which
the total land is under possession of BPCL
3.3 Measures for Minimizing Adverse Impacts
a) Construction Phase
• Compensatory afforestation
The total land including the land required for expansion is under possession of BPCL.
Hence the question of compensatory afforestation does not exist.
• Dust Suppression
The main and visible pollution during construction phase is fugitive dus t generated
during excavation and ot her earthmoving activities. This problem will be mitigated by
introducing du st s uppression m easure through s prinkling o f w ater i n dus t pr one
activities.
• Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R & R)
For the present project, there is no R & R issues involved since the Project is an
expansion project for which the entire land is under possession of BPCL
• Workers’ Colony
Around 50-80 c onstruction w orkers w ill b e r equired du ring construction phas e. They
will be pr ovided accommodations in the nearby village b y contractors with temporary
infrastructures like site offices, site stores for construction materials and equipments,
rest room etc.
b) Operation Phase
• Air Pollution Control
Following steps will be taken to control air pollution:
- The emergency DG has stack of adequate height as specified by CPCB.

- 80% o f hydrocarbon is s tored in Floating Roof ( FR) t ank t o m inimize vapour
loses.
- A g reenery i s already dev eloped around t he ai r pol lution s ources an d al so

along plant boundary to restrict air pollution.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
E-7 BPCL
CONSULTANTS
___________________________________________________________________________
• Water Pollution Control
The wastewater management philosophy is based on “ Minimum Discharge” concept. All

oily ef fluents a re di verted t o Oil Water S eparator ( OWS). The w aste w ater from OWS
after removal of oil & after testing is used for greenery development at the facility. The
collected slop oil shall be disposed off to third party for off-site recovery or recycling. The
domestic effluent is treated in septic tank followed by soak pit.
• Solid Waste Management
Tank bottom sludge is generated while cleaning of oil storage tanks. The cleaning of
oil storage tanks is done once in five years as per practice of Oil Industry. Total tank
bottom s ludge t hus generated is kept i n s ecured, c overed i mpermeable s ludge pi t
located within POL Terminal at a central place earmarked for the purpose prior to safe
disposal through MoEF/ State PCB approved registered recycler.
Other hazardous wastes like spent batteries, waste oil, empty drums of oil/chemicals,
fluorescent tubing etc. is disposed off in accordance with approved safe procedures.
All biodegradable waste (food and kitchen waste) at the POL Terminal is collected and
disposed off as per well established practice.
• Noise Mitigation
All g eneral e quipment is procured w ith bui lt-in n oise abat ement measures t o r estrict
noise level not exceeding 85 dB(A) when measured 1 m away from the source
surface.
The en tire pl ant is so installed s o t hat t he r esultant noi se l evel w ithin t he pl ant
premises remains w ithin 75 dB(A) dur ing day t ime and 70 dB(A) during night time
respectively.
3.4 Assessment of Significant Impacts
 Land
No additional land is being acquired. Existing industrial land is going to be utilized

for the capacity expansion. Hence, no impact on land is envisaged
 Water Source
As no additional water requirement is envisaged for the proposed expansion and

recycling and r e-use of effluent w ater h ave al so been envisaged, this i s n ot
expected to be a problem of concern.
 Water Quality
Wastewater management is based on “Minimum Discharge” approach. Suitable

treatment philosophy has been envisaged for washing and domestic effluents. No
detrimental impact on the surface water quality is expected.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
E-8 BPCL
CONSULTANTS
___________________________________________________________________________
 Air Quality
The ambient air quality of the surrounding of the proposed site represents the
expected scenario. The proposed project with the conceived pollution control
measures are not expected to induce any impact beyond tolerable limit.
 Ecology
All emission and discharges from the proposed plant will be conforming to norms.
Hence no detrimental impact on ecology is envisaged.
 Rehabilitation
No Resettlement and Rehabilitation ( R & R) issue i s i nvolved with t he

proposed project, as the entire land including the land required for expansion
is under possession of BPCL. It is barren and non-agricultural land free from
human habitation.
 Employment/Occupation
Non-workers and m arginal workers c onstitute about 77.91% of t he t otal

population in the study area. The proposed project will generate further indirect
employment opportunity and further development of the area.
 Housing
The manpower required in the operation phase of the project is not high. The
local housing will not be affected at all.
 Education and Health
Local literacy rate and educational facilities are fair. Wards of migrating personnel
(during construction phase) should not have any problem of schooling.
Reasonable medical facility is available for immediate attention. It is expected that
existing medical and educational facilities will improve due to implementation of
the project.
 Services
The l ocal v illages hav e reasonable c ivic s ervices. The i mmigration o f p eople
will not strain existing facilities.
Thus the overall impact assessed has been found to be appreciably beneficial
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
To ensure the environmental quality in the post project scenario, a m onitoring system
is pr oposed. The components o f pr oposed e nvironmental monitoring pr ogramme
include i ) Water monitoring, i i) Land m onitoring; i ii) A ir and noi se m onitoring; iv )
Process and w aste monitoring v) People and c ommunity monitoring and vi) Biological
monitoring.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
E-9 BPCL
CONSULTANTS
___________________________________________________________________________
An Environmental Management Cell (EMC) is overall responsible for co-ordination of

the ac tions required for env ironmental monitoring programme and environmental
management plan.
5.0 ADDITIONAL STUDIES
In the proposed project scenario of emergency may arise due to the accidental release of
chemicals like MS, HSD, SKO and ATF. All safeguard measures as recommended by
OISD, Dept of Explosive & statutory authorities are envisaged.
No Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R & R) issue is involved with the proposed

project.
For the present project, Public Consultation is not recommended by SEAC, Haryana
while prescribing the Terms of Reference of the EIA study
6.0 PROJECT BENEFITS
The pr oposed pr oject i s ex pected t o br ing s ignificant s ocio-economic and

environmental bene fits both at l ocal and nat ional l evel. T he phy sical and s ocial
infrastructure w ill i mprove i n a s ignificant manner. The p roject w ill a lso create s ome
long term and short-term direct / indirect employment. Thus, the proposed project has
ushered in the social and economic up-liftment of the persons living in the vicinity of
the Project i.e. of society at large.
7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
The EMP has been designed within the framework of various legislative and regulatory
requirements on environmental and socio-economic aspects of different national and
international bodies. EMP includes the following components:
1) Impact Mitigation Measures during Construction Phase
2) Impact Mitigation Measures during Operation Phase
Impact Mitigation Measures during Construction Phase includes Air Q uality

Management, Noise Level Management, Water Resource Management, Water Quality
Management, Soil Quality Management, Land Use Pattern and Ecology Management,
Traffic Movement, Socio-economic etc.
Impact Mitigation Measures during Operation Phase includes Solid W aste

Management, A ir P ollution C ontrol M easure, Water P ollution C ontrol M easure, No ise
Pollution C ontrol M easure, Greenery Development, S ocio – Economic M easures,
Occupational Safety and Health, Emergency Preparedness (Disaster management Plan)
and Audit.
--------- 0 ----------
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
E - 10 BPCL
SECTION – 1
INTRODUCTION
EIA REPORT FOR
PROPOSED CAPACITY EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT
AT PIYALA, NEAR FARIDABAD, HARYANA CONSULTANTS
SECTION – 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT
Environmental impact assessment is, in its simplest form, a planning tool that is
now generally regarded as an integral component of sound decision making. As
a planning tool i t has bot h i nformation g athering and dec ision m aking
component w hich pr ovides t he dec ision m aker w ith an obj ective bas is for
granting or denying approval for a proposed development.
The purpose of this Environmental Impact Assessment Study (the `EIAS') is to

study the present background environmental scenario, study the likely activities
related t o pr oposed c onstruction and oper ation, i dentification of the probable
environmental i mpacts due t o t hose ac tivities, r eview of the proposed
environmental c ontrol m easures i ncluding recommendation f or ac ceptable
alternative where necessary and finally assessment of the impacts of the Project
on environmental parameters. T he E IAS i s t hus a c omprehensive s tudy on
environmental impacts due t o the Project and al so a t ool to assess and identify
means to mitigate the detrimental impacts on environment due to the Project.
1.2 IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT & THE PROJECT PROPONENT
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) is a f ortune 500 oi l refining,

exploration and m arketing P SU w ith Navratna s tatus. B PCL has multiple
refinery units in Mumbai, Kochi, Numaligarh and Bina.
Bharat Petroleum’s Mumbai Refinery is one of the most versatile Refineries in

India. With successful implementation of v arious pr ojects and de -
bottlenecking, our Refineries currently process about 12 Million Metric Tons of
SECTION-1 1-1 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
crude oil per annum.
Kochi Refinery, a unit of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, commissioned

in 1966 with a capacity of 50,000 barrels per day. Formerly known as Cochin
Refineries Limited and renamed as Kochi Refineries Limited, the refinery was
originally es tablished i n c ollaboration w ith P hillips P etroleum Corporation,
USA. T oday i t i s a f rontline ent ity as t he unit of t he F ortune 500 C ompany,
BPCL.
Numaligarh Refinery Limited is a publ ic sector oil company set up i n the year
1993, with its 3 M MT refinery situated in Numaligarh, Assam. The Refinery is
one of the most technologically advanced and env ironment friendly refineries
in the country. BPCL is the major share holder with 61.65% of the Company’s
paid up equity capital.
Moreover, Bharat Oman Refineries Limited (BORL), a c ompany promoted by

Bharat Petroleum C orporation Li mited ( BPCL) and O man O il C ompany
Limited (OOCL), has set up a 6 M MTPA grass root refinery at Bina, Madhya
Pradesh along with crude supply system consisting of a S ingle Point Mooring
system ( SPM), C rude O il S torage T erminal ( COT) at V adinar, D istrict –
Jamnagar, Gujrat and 935 Km long cross country crude pipeline from Vadinar
to Bina.
BPCL has also many common user POL Terminals spread across the country.
BPCL now wants to ex pand t he c apacity of t he ex isting P OL T erminal at
Piyala, near Faridabad, Haryana by adding additional tankage.
SECTION-1 1-2 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
1.3 NATURE, SIZE, LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND ITS IMPORTANCE TO

THE COUNTRY, REGION
The proposed project is an expansion project of the existing POL terminal with
existing storage capacity 1,62,790 kl. After expansion, the capacity of the POL
Terminal will be 2,27,360 kl.
The P roject S ite i s l ocated at P iyala w hich i s i n the south side of F aridabad
town i n t he s tate of H aryana. T he di stance between Piyala and Faridabad is
around 20 km. The nearest railway station is Ballabgarh on the Delhi-Mathura
triple t rack br oad-gauge l ine. Nearest dom estic and i nternational ai rport is at
New Delhi.
The importance of the project are identified as follows:
- The project will create a common user terminal for BPCL and this is vital
for economic growth as w ell as i mproving t he q uality of l ife. T he
improved pet roleum s upply w ill hav e s trong l ogistical s upport f or
delivering the products to customers without interruption.
- The project w ill di rectly g enerate s ome em ployment bot h dur ing
construction and operation phas e and s ome i ndirect em ployment i s
also likely to be generated due to this project. This will help to enhance
the economic condition of this region.
- The project will help for further development of infrastructure facilities in
the region.
SECTION-1 1-3 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
1.4 METHODOLOGY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY

(EIAS)
Assessment of t he bac kground environmental scenario has been par tly based
on the latest published census document of the area and the maps published by
various Government agencies as well as information collected through site visits
and data/information obtained f rom v arious G overnmental of fices.
Meteorological data of Gurgaon Meteorological Observatory published by India
Meteorological Department was used for reference.
To assess the status of the background environment, ambient air quality, water
quality, noi se l evel and s oil q uality were m onitored and anal yzed i n
accordance w ith standard pr ocedures ( For am bient ai r m onitoring - IS:5182,
Part-II, P art-IV, P art-VI, f or W ater S ampling and anal ysis - "Standard Methods
for Examination of Water and Waste Water" prepared and published by APHA,
AWWA and W PCF, I S:3025 and f or s oil s ample c ollection and analysis -
IS:2720 and ASTM Part-XI).
As r egards so cio-economic pr ofile, t he s tudy has been c arried out based on

Census of I ndia 2001. T he dem ographic and socioeconomic profile has not
undergone any sensible change except for decadal population growth and rural
electrification, educational institutions etc.
Details of t he pr oposed pr oject ac tivities hav e been des cribed pr imarily based
on information furnished in the Technical Project Report. To specify the effluent
qualities, the statutory requirements of various prevailing Acts have been t aken
into account. The pollution c ontrol m easures have been s uggested t o ac hieve
the desired environmental quality. Monitoring schemes are suggested to ensure
that the Project meets environmental stipulations.
SECTION-1 1-4 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
The impacts have been quantified based on objective and subjective judgments.
The findings have been given as Environmental Impact Assessment.
The s tudy has been di vided under the following 11 Sections as s uggested i n
notification no. S.O.1533 dated 14 th September, 2006 ( 'EIA Notification - 2006')
published by Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India:
Section 1 : Introduction
Section 2 : Project Description
Section 3 : Description of the Environment
Section 4 : Anticipated Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Measures
Section 5 : Analysis of Alternatives
Section 6 : Environmental Monitoring Program
Section 7 : Additional Studies
Section 8 : Project Benefits
Section 9 : Environmental Management Plan
Section 10 : Summary and Conclusion
Section 11 : Disclosure of Consultants Engaged
1.5 PRESCRIBED TERMS OF REFERENCE OF EIA STUDY
State Expert A ppraisal C ommittee ( SEAC), Haryana vide t heir F .No.

HR/SEAC/2012/464/869 dat ed N ovember 26, 2013 forwarded the prescribed
TOR of t he E IA S tudy f or t he pr oposed pr oject. A c opy of the same is also
enclosed as EXHIBIT 1.1. While preparing the EIA Report, all the points of the
approved T OR ar e addr essed i n t he E IA R eport. T he following table
summarizes all the T OR Conditions and vis-à-vis their compliance in the EIA
Report:
SECTION-1 1-5 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
Sl. Description Compliance in the Draft

No. EIA report
TOR Conditions
1. Executive summary of the project Executive S ummary i s
formulated as per
Appendix IIIA of E IA
Notification dat ed
September 14, 2006 and
the same is f urnished at
the beg inning of EIA
Report.
2. Land us ed det ails of t he s ite bas ed on Addressed i n pag e 3 -21
satellite imagery. of Section 3 and EXHIBIT
3.2.
3. Project Description and Project Benefits Addressed in page 2-3 of
Section 2 and Section 8.
4. Proposal for s afety buf fer z one ar ound t he Addressed i n pag e 2 -11
proposed site with map. of Section 2
5. Detailed l ayout plan with provision of trucks Addressed in page 2 -3 of
parking area. Section 2
6. Details of t he s torage and t echnical Addressed i n pag e 2-5
specifications w ith s afety as pects & and 2-6 of Section 2
standards.
7. Site details including satellite imagery from 5 Addressed i n pag e 3 -21
km around the s ite by del ineating l and us e of S ection – 3 and
pattern. EXHIBIT 3.2
8. Land us e al ong w ith m aps ( By using latest Addressed i n pag e 3 -21
satellite imagery data) & c ropping pat tern, of S ection – 3 and
vegetation, Flora & Fauna. EXHIBIT 3.2
SECTION-1 1-6 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR

No. EIA report
9. Details w ithin 500m w ith r espect to all Addressed in page 3 -3 of
establishments/railway line/habitation etc. Section 3
10. Demography & Socio-economics of the area. Addressed in pa ge 3 -7 of

Section 3
11. Baseline one m onth ( Post-monsoon) dat a
collection for air, water and soil for:
i. Ambient ai r q uality m onitoring for Addressed i n pag e 3 -14

PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NOx. to 3-17 of Section 3
ii. Background l evels of hydrocarbons Addressed i n pag e 3 -18
(methane & non -methane HC) and of Section 3
VOCs
iii. Soil sample analysis Addressed i n pag e 3 -21
of Section 3
iv. Base line under ground and s urface Addressed i n pag e 3 -18
water quality in the vicinity of project of Section 3
v. Climatology and m eteorology Addressed i n pag e 3 -15
including w ind s peed, wind of Section 3 and EXHIBIT
direction, temperature, rainfall etc. 3.1(B).
vi. Measurement of noise levels Addressed i n pag e 3 -20
of Section 3
12. Details of w ater c onsumption a nd s ource of Addressed in page 2-4 of
water s upply, w aste w ater g eneration, Section 2 and page 4-11
treatment and utilization of t reated w ater of Section 4
generated f rom t he f acilities and effluent
disposal
SECTION-1 1-7 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR

No. EIA report
13. Detailed solid w aste g eneration, c ollection, Addressed i n pag e 4 -13
segregation, its r ecycling and r euse, of Section 4
treatment and disposal
14. Assessment of i mpact on ai r, w ater, soil, Addressed i n pag e 4 -17
solid/hazardous waste and noise levels. of Section 4
15. Details of pr oposed pr eventive measures f or Addressed in page 2-7 of

leakages and accident. Section 2
16. Adequate width of approach r oad t o av oid Addressed i n pag e 2-3 of
congestion and t o hav e s afe exit in Section 2 and Plate 2.1.
emergencies.
17. Environmental Management Plan. Addressed in Section 9
18. Risk A ssessment & D isaster Management

Plan
i. Identification of hazards Addressed in page 7 -1 of
ii. Consequence Analysis Section 7 and EXHIBIT
iii. Risk A ssessment & proposed 7.1.
measures for Risk Reduction
iv. Action pl an f or f irefighting f acility as Addressed in page 2 -7 of
per OISD 117 norms Section 2
19. Details of pr oposed oc cupational H ealth Furnished as EXHIBIT
9.1.
Surveillance pr ogram f or t he em ployees and
other labour.
20. Environmental Monitoring Programme. Addressed in of Section 6
SECTION-1 1-8 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR

No. EIA report
21. Any litigation pending against the project and/ Addressed i n pag e 2 -12
or any direction/order passed by any Court of of Section 2
Law against the project, if so, details thereof.
22. A tabular chart i ndicating po int-wise Addressed i n pag e 1 -5 to
compliance of the TOR. 1-9 of Section 1
----------- o ----------
SECTION-1 1-9 BPCL

SECTION – 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
SECTION – 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 TYPE OF PROJECT
The proposed pr oject i s a n ex pansion pr oject o f t he ex isting POL t erminal

which will m ainly hav e ha ndling a nd s torage facilities of different pet roleum
products.
2.2 NEED FOR THE PROJECT
The proposed expansion project in Haryana will improve supply position of the
petroleum products which is vital for economic growth as well as improving the
quality of l ife. The i mproved p etroleum s upply w ill hav e s trong l ogistical
support f or del ivering the pr oducts to c ustomers w ithout i nterruption. The
project w ill al so pr ovide i ndirect e mployment t o uns killed, s emiskilled and
skilled categories.
Studying al l t he ab ove factors, Bharat P etroleum C orporation Li mited ( BPCL)

have be en planning t o expand the existing POL r eceipt an d di spatch t erminal
close to high consumption center at Piyala, near Faridabad.
2.3 PLANT LOCATION
The P roject S ite i s l ocated a t P iyala which i s i n t he s outh s ide o f F aridabad

town i n t he s tate o f Haryana. T he di stance between P iyala and F aridabad i s
around 20 km. The nearest railway station is Ballabgarh on the Delhi-Mathura
triple track br oad-gauge l ine. Nearest do mestic and international ai rport is at
New Delhi.
SECTION-2 2-1 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
The approximate longitude-latitude of the centroid of the proposed site are as

follows :
Longitude : 77 o 18' 39”E (approx.)

Latitude : 28 o16' 33” N (approx.)
The pl ant l ocation i s furnished i n Fig. No. 2.1: Site Location Map and S ite
Photographs are attached as EXHIBIT 2.1.
2.4 PLANT CAPACITY & SIZE OF OPERATION
The existing as well as pr oposed expansion c apacity of t he P OL Terminal i s

furnished below :
Name of Existing Proposed Total Capacity after

Product Capacity (kl) Capacity Expansion (kl)
Expansion (kl)
HSD 63,520 890 64,410
MS 82,670 27,640 1,10,310
SKO 16,600 0 16,600
ATF 0 36,040 36,040
TOTAL 1,62,790 64,570 2,27,360
2.5 TECHNOLOGY AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The P OL t erminal mainly has han dling and s torage facilities of di fferent
petroleum products. The brief process description is as follows:
o The P roduct is received through pi peline f rom B PCL Mumbai & B ina
Refineries
o Routing of different products in their designated tanks.
o Storage in Tanks
SECTION-2 2-2 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
o Dispatch of products : a) through T ank l orries t o R etail o utlets, b)

through R ailway Wagons t o N orthern India D epots/installations, c ) to
BPCL Bijwasan Installation through pipeline
2.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
• Plant Layout
The layout showing existing as well as proposed expansion is furnished

as Plate 2.1 : Layout of POL Terminal at Piyala.
The layout plan shows the various facilities of the POL terminal including
truck parking area. It can be mentioned here that the truck parking area is
kept near the main entry of the plant in such a way that congestion can be
avoided. Similarly, width of the approach road as well as internal road is
also planned in such a way that traffic congestion can be avoided within
the terminal.
• Land Requirement
The t otal l and ( including t he l and r equired for pr oposed ex pansion) i s

under pos session o f BPCL. T he br eakup o f l and und er pos session o f
BPCL is furnished below :
Description Land (Acres)

Plant Area : 48
Approach Road : 3
Siding for Trucks : 6
Railway siding : 4
Total 61
SECTION-2 2-3 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
• Water Requirement and Source
The m aximum w ater c onsumption ( m3/day) dur ing oper ation

(considering capacity expansion) of the plant is as follows:
Sl. No. Particulars Quantity (m3/day)

1 Cooling 5.0
2 Domestic Use 1.0
3 Greenery / landscape Development 0.5
4 Losses in fire hydrants 0.5
Total 7.0
The water requirement is met from outside received at site through tank
lorry. N o addi tional w ater r equirement i s envisaged f or the proposed
expansion.
• Power Requirement
Power i s r eceived f rom S EB, H aryana. P ower i s bei ng s upplied to t he

POL Terminal by 11 kV line.
• DG Set
There is emergency DG sets as detailed below :
Capacity (KVA) Nos
1750 1
625 1
250 1
125 2
25 1
The em ergency D G have t all s tack as s pecified by C PCB. A ll t he D G

sets are provided with acoustic enclosures.
SECTION-2 2-4 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
• Details of Storage
The POL terminal of BPCL at Piyala is provided with storage tanks f or

Class A & B petroleum products. The classification of the products are
summarized below for ready reference :
Name of Product Full Name Class*

MS Motor Spirit A
HSD High Speed Diesel B
SKO Superior Kerosene Oil B
ATF Aviation Turbine Fuel B
* Petroleum Class ‘A’ - means petroleum having a flash point below 230 C
0
Petroleum Class ‘B’ - means petroleum having a flash point of 23 C and above but
0
below 65 C
0
Petroleum Class ‘C’ - means petroleum having a flash point of 65 C and above but
0
below 93 C
The des ign o f t he i nstallation i s i n ac cordance w ith I ndian s tandards

OISD 117,118,141 and as contained in Petroleum Rules and approved
by T he C hief C ontroller o f E xplosives, N agpur ( CCOE). T he de tails of
product storage / tank firm are as follows :

Tank
Product Roof Diamet Height Capacity Capacity
No.
Type er (m) (m) (kl) (kl)
Above Ground Tanks
TK-2 MS FR 43.0 20.0 26750 25400
TK-3 MS FR 43.0 20.0 26750 25400
TK-4 MS FR 43.0 20.0 26750 25400
TK-5 HSD FR 33.0 20.0 15600 14950
TK-6 HSD FR 33.0 20.0 15600 14950
TK-7 HSD FR 33.0 20.0 15600 14950
TK-8 HSD FR 33.0 20.0 15600 14950
TK-9 SKO FR 26.0 17.0 8200 7700
TK-10 SKO FR 26.0 17.0 8200 7700
TK-11 SLOP CR 9.0 13.5 890 858
TK-12 SLOP CR 9.0 13.5 890 858
SECTION-2 2-5 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT

Tank
No.
TK-13 HSD CR 9.0 13.5 890 858
Under Ground Tanks
UT-1 MS U.G 4.0 16.2 200 200
UT-2 MS U.G 4.0 16.2 200 200
UT-3 HSD U.G 4.0 16.2 200 200
UT-4 SKO U.G 4.0 16.2 200 200
UT-5 MS / U.G 4.0 16.2 200 200
ETHAN
OL
UT-6 HSD U.G 2.012 5.0 15 15
UT-7 HSD U.G 2.012 5.0 15 15
UT-8 SLOP U.G 2.012 6.75 20 20
UT-9 SLOP U.G 2.012 6.75 20 20
Details of Proposed Tanks

Tank
No.
Above Ground Tanks
TK-1 MS FR 43.0 20.0 26750 25400
TK-14 ATF CR 24.0 20.0 9000 9000
TK-15 ATF CR 24.0 20.0 9000 9000
TK-16 ATF CR 24.0 20.0 9000 9000
TK-17 ATF CR 24.0 20.0 9000 9000
TK-18 HSD CR 9.0 13.5 890 858
TK-19 MS CR 9.0 13.5 890 858
Under Ground Tanks
UT-10 SLOP U.G 2.012 6.75 20 20
ATF
UT-11 SLOP U.G 2.012 6.75 20 20
ATF
• Technical Specifications of Storage Tanks
The design and construction of storage tanks will be according to Indian

regulations I S 803 a nd / or A PI 6 50. The floating r oof and fixed roof
tanks will be designed for atmospheric pressure.
SECTION-2 2-6 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
The design o f t he i nstallation i s i n ac cordance w ith I ndian s tandards

OISD 117,118,141 and as contained in Petroleum Rules and approved
by The Chief Controller of Explosives.
All t he t anks ar e i nstalled i n s eparate dy ked enc losures as per O ISD

standards.
• Details of Proposed Preventive Measures for Leakages & Accident
All routine exercises are carried on the basis of standard SOP as a part
of pr eventive m easures t o m inimize l eakage and ac cident. P reventive
maintenance of equipments is being done as per OISD guidelines. The
following s afety m easures ar e al so c onceived t o c ombat w ith
emergency s cenario that may ar ise w ithin t he pl ant d ue t o ac cidental
release of petroleum products through leakages / spillages :
Fire Detection and Protection System
The s alient features o f t he ex isting f ire f ighting s ystem ar e furnished

below :
√ The capacity of the existing fire fighting water tank is 2 x 2950 kl.
√ Diesel dr iven 615 k lph c apacity 03 pu mps a re available f or fire
fighting.
√ Fire net work i s l aid al l ov er t he pl ant as per O ISD 117
guidelines.
√ Sprinklers are available in TWL gantry.
√ All t anks ar e provided w ith c ooling r ing and foam p ourer
arrangement as per guidelines of OISD 117.
SECTION-2 2-7 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
The ex isting f ire f ighting f acility will be upg raded dur ing t he pr oposed
expansion of the Piyala Terminal. The salient features of the proposed
expansion of the fire fighting system are furnished below :
√ A new fire water tank of 1 x 4600 kl capacity is envisaged.

√ 6 x 615 k lph diesel driven pumps will be pr ovided for additional
requirement of fire water.
√ Medium Expansion Foam Generators (MEFG) already provided
in class A tank farms.
√ HVLRs (2x1000 G PM) & U L/FM a pproved monitors were
already installed in hydrant line.
√ All F R M S t anks w ould b e pr ovided w ith r im s eal protection
system as per OISD 117 guidelines.
√ SIL 2 P LC would be i nstalled to monitor the safety in operation
and ESD would be activated in case of any eventuality.
Fire Alarm System
Conventional F ire al arm s ystem ( Electric S iren) i s pr ovided i n t he

following areas:
o Security Gate (1 no. Electric Siren – Range 3 km)

o Fire Water Pump House (1 no. Electric Siren – Range 1.6 km)
o Railway Wagon Loading Siding (1 no. Electric Siren – Range 1.6
km)
Moreover, hand operated siren is provided in the following areas:
o Tank Lorry Filling Gantry (1 no.)

o Tank Lorry Filling Pump House (1 no.)
o MMBPL Pump House (1 no.)
o Railway Wagon Loading Siding (2 nos.)
SECTION-2 2-8 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
Fire Extinguishers
Details o f fire ex tinguishers i nstalled w ithin P iyala Terminal ar e

furnished below :
o Double Hydrant – 66 nos.

o Water Monitor – 40 nos.
o Water cum Foam Monitor – 30 nos.
o Foam Tank (1 Kl) – 1 no.
o Foam Tank (2 kl) – 2 no.
o Foam Tank (2.5 kl) – 1 no.
o Foam Tank (3 kl) – 1 no.
Hydrocarbon Detectors
The Class-A tankfarm and pump house manifold shall be equipped with
Hydrocarbon detectors. These detectors shall sense any leakages and
communicate t he s ame t o t he c ontrol r oom w ith audi ble al arm at t wo
locations. Total s even ( 7) H ydrocarbon D etectors ar e pr oposed t o be
installed in Piyala Terminal, as detailed below :
Open Type Hydrocarbon Detectors
i) Dyke no 01 with AG tanks with class A product

ii) Dyke no 02 with AG tanks with class A product
iii) Pump House no 1 with class A product (TLF)
iv) Pump House no 2 with class A product (TWL)
v) Pump House no 3 with class A product (SICK WAGON P/H)
Point Type Hydrocarbon Detectors
vi) Dyke no 01 with AG tanks with class A product

vii) Dyke no 02 with AG tanks with class A product
SECTION-2 2-9 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
Main obj ective of t he H ydrocarbon D etectors i s t o det ect hy drocarbon

gas concentrations in the POL Terminal and initiate alarm or shutdown
system as t he c ase may be, at pr e-defined l evels t o pr event any
hazardous events and act as independent safety layers for mitigation of
consequences t o ac hieve ov erall pr ocess s afety r equirements o f t he
plant. Hydrocarbon Detection system is designed to perform its function
during normal, abnormal and design basis conditions. Control system is
based on open architecture system topology with fault tolerant network
capabilities.
HVLR System
High V olume L ong R ange ( HVLR) monitors are b eing i nstalled as per
recommendations of M B Lal Committee.
Emergency Shutdown (ESD) System
The salient features of the ESD system is furnished below :
- The t erminal has em ergency s hutdown s ystem. T he s ystem i s

manually activated in any contingency.
- Emergency s hutdown pus h-button i s l ocated o utside t he

tankfields, the pump house, truck loading areas, rail loading area,
control Room and terminal Manager’s room etc.
- The ESD is activated by a dedi cated hard wire system enabling

shutdown of all operations.
SECTION-2 2-10 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
Fire Water Storage
Existing fire water storage capacity is 2x2950 kl. The estimated addition
of fire water quantity considering the expansion is 4600 kl.
Plant Automation System
Piyala I nstallation i s a fully aut omated plant w ith au tomated g antry /

Pump House and Tank Farm Management System (TFMS). All product
tanks are equipped w ith t ank l evel i ndicators ( incl. hi gh/high-high l evel
as w ell a s lo w/low-low l evel) al arm and t emperature i ndicators. A
computer operated installation is built which supervises these functions
and prints all tank data. The TFMS is connected with a "supervisory" in
the logistic department.
Product receipt (which is through MMBPL / BKPL pipeline) is also fully

automated.
CCTV C ameras i s i nstalled for s upervision o f k ey ac tivities i n t he

terminal (e.g. pum p stations, truck loading facilities and ot her strategic
areas) as well as for the supervision of security of the terminal.
The f ire water pu mps are ac tivated aut omatically, when the f ire-water
header pr essure is l ow. T he j ockey pum p m aintains t he pr essure
automatically. T he foam p umps h ave l ocal c ontrol as w ell as i n t he
control room.
• Safety Buffer Zone
The layout of the POL Depot is in accordance with OISD 118. Thus the
separation distances between tanks and equipments / offsite facilities are
as p er O ISD s tandard. M oreover, outside plant b oundary t here i s no
SECTION-2 2-11 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
habitation within 200 meter of plant periphery and the same acts as the
Safety Buffer Zone.
• Manpower Requirement
At present total 42 permanent staffs are available for the total operation
of Piyala Terminal. In addition to that around 140 c ontract persons are
also eng aged for t he r egular m aintenance and o peration o f t he
Terminal. Since the expansion work is not a m ajor one, it is envisaged
that the existing manpower will also cater the proposed expansion.
• Project Cost
The t otal pr oject c ost f or t he pr oposed ex pansion i s ar ound R s 3 798

lakh.
• Litigation pending against the project
No litigation is pending against the project or the project proponent
2.7 DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION MEASURES
Following mitigation measures ar e c onceived i n the d esign t o meet the

environmental standards and environmental operating conditions:
Air Pollution Mitigation Measures
The air pollution mitigative measures conceived for the project is summarized
below:
- Water spraying is conceived to minimize dust pollution during excavation

and earth work (during construction phase).
SECTION-2 2-12 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
- 80% of hydrocarbon i s s tored i n F loating R oof ( FR) t ank to m inimize

vapour loses.
- The emergency DG sets have tall stack as specified by CPCB
- A greenery is also developed along plant boundary to restrict air pollution.
Water Pollution Mitigation Measures
Wastewater Management philosophy is based on following:
- The w astewater management philosophy i s based o n “ Zero Discharge”

concept.
- All oily effluents are diverted to Oil Water Separator (OWS).
- The waste water from OWS after removal of oil & after testing is used for
greenery development within the POL terminal.
- The collected slop oil is disposed off to third party for off-site recovery or
recycling.
- Waste w ater f rom c anteen at t he P OL t erminal i s t reated i n oil an d

grease trap followed by septic tank and soak pit.
- Separate storm water drainage system is provided at the facility.
- The no n-contaminated r ain w ater i s di scharged di rectly t o r ain w ater

harvesting pit within the facility. However, particularly during the monsoon,
any oi l-contaminated r ain water i s l ed to the OWS for t reatment prior t o
discharge.
SECTION-2 2-13 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
Noise Pollution Mitigation Measures
The following n oise ab atement m easures are pr acticed f or t he P iyala P OL

terminal:
- The eq uipment, which is the source o f no ise, hav e bui lt-in type n oise
control abatement technology.
- A g reenery i s al ready dev eloped ar ound plant boundary an d other
strategic locations to reduce noise pollution.
Solid Waste Management
Following m easure i s f ollowed f or m anagement o f s olid w aste i n Piyala P OL

terminal:
- Tank bottom sludge is generated while cleaning of oil storage tanks.

The cleaning of oil storage tanks is done on ce in f ive years as per
practice of Oil Industry.
- Total tank bottom sludge thus generated is kept in secured, covered

impermeable s ludge pi t l ocated w ithin P OL t erminal at a c entral
place ear marked f or t he pur pose pr ior to s afe di sposal through
MoEF / State PCB approved registered recycler.
Other h azardous w astes l ike s pent b atteries, w aste oi l, e mpty dr ums of

oil/chemicals, fluorescent tubing etc. i s di sposed o ff i n ac cordance w ith
approved safe procedures
------- 0 -------
SECTION-2 2-14 BPCL

77°20' E
77°17.5' E

28°17.5' N
AGRA CANAL
NH-2
PROJECT SITE
77°18'39" E
28°15' N
NORTHERN RAILWAY MAINLINE

SITE LOCATION MAP DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANTS
PROPOSED CAPACITY PVT. LTD.
EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL Consulting Engineers
TERMINAL
SC AD SA SDR For EIA Report Rev.0 0 12.02.14 AT PIYALA, NEAR Job No.13302 Scale : None
FARIDABAD, HARYANA
RELEASE REV BHARAT PETROLEUM
APPROVED REVIEWED CHECKED DRAWN DESCRIPTION DATE Dwg No. Fig 2.1 Rev.0
STATUS CORPORATION LIMITED
2‐15
SECTION – 3
DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SECTION – 3
DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The pr oposed pr oject i s a c apacity expansion of the existing Piyala P OL

Terminal which is located in the south side of Faridabad town at a distance of
around 20 km from Faridabad.
Faridabad district of H aryana is located on s outh eas tern par t of H aryana

state. In the north, it is bordered by the Union Territory of Delhi, in the east by
Uttar Pradesh, in the West by Mewat and Gurgaon districts of Haryana and in
the south by Palwal district of Haryana . Total geographical area of the district
is 2151 sq. km.
Faridabad district is divided in to f ive B locks, nam ely, Faridabad, B allabgarh,

Palwal, Hodel and H assanpur and f our s ubdivisions, F aridabad, B allabgarh,
Palwal, Hodel. Faridabad town is the headquarter of the district .
3.2 STUDY AREA, PERIOD, COMPONENTS & METHODOLOGY
The Study Area has been c onsidered to be an ar ea covered within a radius of

10 k m ar ound t he pr oposed pr oject s ite beyond which no appreciable impact
due t o t he pr oject i s env isaged. T he env ironment i s s ub-divided i nto f ollowing
components:
a) Physical E nvironment, b) E cological E nvironment c ) S ocio-economic

Environment, d) A ir E nvironment e) W ater E nvironment, f ) N oise Environment
g) Soil Environment.
SECTION-3 3-1 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
A c lear pi cture of the study area is shown in DWG. No. 13302 - DWG - EV-
0001 - 0 (Map covering 1 0 km around t he s ite). The S tudy A rea i s c onfined
within district Faridabad , Gurgaon and Palwal of Haryana.
The methodology of analysis of each of these components of the environment is

described in the subsequent sub-clauses.
3.2.1 Physical Environment
• Topography and Drainage
The di strict has pr edominantly pl ain t opography and i s l ocated 205 m

above sea level. It has North-East to South-West gradient.
The district is mainly drained by the river Yamuna, which is a perennial.

Beside this a number of small streams originates from the hill ranges of
the central parts of the district , which do not meet any major stream or
rivers but di sappears i n t he per meable depos its of alluvial p lains af ter
traversing some distance.
• Climate
The c limate of F aridabad di strict c an be c lassified as tropical steppe,

semiarid and hot which is mainly characterized by the extreme dryness
of the air except during monsoon months. During three months of south
west monsoon (from last week of June to September), the moist air of
oceanic penetrate into the district and causes high humidity, cloudiness
and m onsoon r ainfall. T he per iod f rom O ctober t o December
constitutes pos t m onsoon s eason. T he c old w eather s eason pr evails
from January to the beginning of March and followed by the hot weather
or summer season which prevails up to the last week of June.
SECTION-3 3-2 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
• Soil
Soils of Faridabad district are c lassified as t ropical and br own s ails,

existing in major parts of the district. In Hathin block the organic content
of soils ranging from 0.41 to 0.75 percent which is of medium category.
In rest of the area organic contents is 0.2 to 0.4 percent and falls in low
category. T he av erage c onductivity of t he s oil i s not m ore t han 0.80
μmhos /cm and the average pH of the soil is between 6.5 and 8.7.
• Details of Establishments within 500m of POL Terminal
No m ajor es tablishment, hum an habi tation, et c, does not ex ist within

500 m r adius of P OL D epot at Piyala. O nly a t emple ( within a r adial
distance of 200m from plant’s m ain g ate) and t wo br ick k ilns are
located.
3.2.2 Ecological Environment
Haryana i s pr imarily an ag riculture s tate w ith al most 80% of i ts land under

cultivation. The geographical area of the state is 44212 sq. km which is 1.3%
of I ndia’s g eographical ar ea. Haryana is not bestowed with bounty of nat ural
forests and only 3. 52% of i ts g eographical ar ea i s under not ified f orests. A s
per India State of F orest R eport, F SI, 2011, t he F orest C over i n t he s tate i s
1608 sq.km which is 3.64% of the state's geographical area. In terms of forest
canopy dens ity c lasses, t he br eakup of t he f orest l and of t he state is as
follows:
Forest Type Area ( in km2)
Very dense Forest : 27
Moderately Dense Forest : 457
Open Forest : 1124
Total : 1608
SECTION-3 3-3 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
The tree cover in the state is 1395 sq. km which is 3.16% of the geographical
area. T hus t he f orest and tree cover of t he H aryana s tate i s 6. 80% of its
geographical area.
Forestry ac tivities i n t he s tate ar e di spersed ov er rugged Shiwalik Hills in

north, Aravalli hi lls i n s outh, s and dunes i n w est and w astelands, s aline-
alkaline l ands and w aterlogged s ites i n t he c entral par t of t he s tate. The
vegetation and f orest t ypes of S tudy A rea f all under t he phyto – ecological
region demarcated as Sub-montane Terai region and the adjacent plain.
The primary objectives of the biological environment study are:
• Assess the vegetation types

• Identify common flora and fauna in the Study Area
• Find out rare and endangered plant species (if any)
• Evaluate wildlife habitat of t he ar ea and as sess i mpact of t he pr oposed
project on wildlife and their habitats.
• Assess impact of the proposed project on agriculture and domestic livestock.
Flora
The v egetation of F aridabad di strict f alls under t he c ategory of s ub-tropical

deciduous type, though at present the Study Area does not have any extent of
natural f orests. C ommonly enc ountered flora i ncludes Amla ( Emblica
officinalis), Siris (Albizzia sp.), Babul (Acacia sp.), Neem (Azadirachta indica),
Aam (Mangifera indica), Sisham (Dalbergia Sisoo), Jamun (Syzygium cumini),
Imli ( Tamarindus indica) as t he dom inant s pecies i n t he non -forest ar ea.
Besides t hat, G ulmohar ( Delonix regia), A shok ( Polyalthia longifolia),
Eucalyptus ( Eucalyptus sp.) and C hameli ( Millingtonia hortensis) et c. ar e
found abundant ly, m ost of w hich ar e pl anted. A mongst s hrubs Arua, Hina,
Panwar, Madar, Mako are very commonly encountered.
SECTION-3 3-4 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
A large number of these plants have socio-economic importance, besides their

role in nat ural ec osystem f unctions. S ince t here i s no dens e or m oderately
dense f orest ar eas i n t he v icinity, f uel f rom f orest w oods i s t otally not in
practice, as in most of the village areas. Villagers depend on c ow-dung cakes
and some conventional fossil fuel for cooking purpose.
The broad listing of f loral s pecies r ecorded i n t he c ore and Study Area is
included in Annexure 1.
Fauna
There i s no W ildlife S anctuary, N ational P ark and B iosphere R eserve i n t he

entire S tudy A rea. As al ready s tated, t he t otal f orest ar ea of the s tate i s onl y
3.53% of the total l and and t he r eal f orest l ies m ostly i n t he ex treme nor th
position bordering Himachal Pradesh, few hundred km from Study Area. Some
moderate forest exists in northern part of Faridabad District bordering Gurgaon
and Delhi. The wildlife habitat in the f orest i s al ready di sturbed due c ertain
anthropogenic pressure. The big carnivorous mammals have not been recorded
in recent times in the district and also not in the Study Area. Only some small to
medium mammalian species have been r ecorded in the Study Area and this is
also confirmed by the Forest Department and local people.
Mammals
During field surveys the diversity of the mammalian species recorded was noted
to be moderate. Among the mammalian species, small animals are represented
by Neel Gaai, small mongoose, jackal, jungle cat, squirrel, rodents and bats etc.
The broad checklist of mammalian species in the state of Haryana is presented
in Annexure 2.
SECTION-3 3-5 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Avifauna
The avifauna includes Parakeet, Owls, Nightjar, Pigeon, Bulbul, Myna, Babblers,
Bee eater, Barbets, Dove, Indian r oller, O riole, R obin, F ly c atcher, C row
pheasant, Crows, Drongos etc. The survey result shows that 96 species of birds
were r ecorded f rom t he ent ire S tudy A rea and t he s ame i s furnished as
Annexure 2.
Reptiles
The c ommon s nakes f ound i n t he state are G eko ( Heamidactylus brooki),

Cobra (Naja naja), Indian Krait, Indian Python, W olf Snake, Rat Snake, e.t.c.
Reptiles of the state is furnished as Annexure 2.
Endemic, Endangered & Threatened Fauna
Some endangered and threatened species which are listed in the Schedule II
of the Indian Wildlife (Protection) A ct, 1972 and am endment i n 1991. A
detailed list of such species recorded from this area is given in Annexure 2A.
Aquatic Fauna
a) Fishes
The c ommon fishes of t he ar ea i nclude R ohu, C atla, B ata, P unti, K hoira,

Magur, S inghi, B oal et c. T hese t ypes of f ishes ar e c ommonly pr esent in the
river and ponds. Checklist of the Fishes is given in Annexure 2.
b) Amphibia
Out of the 206 am phibian s pecies known i n I ndia, 5 c ommon s pecies ar e

recorded in this area during the study and t he s ame i s f urnished as
Annexure 2.
SECTION-3 3-6 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Domesticated Animals
Domesticated animals l ike c attle, buf faloes and g oats ar e r eared by t he

villagers. The l ivestock us e g razing l and as w ell as t he ag ricultural f ields
(during off-seasons) as seasonal grazing fields. The proposed project site has
no demarcated grazing land.
Migratory Species
No migratory bird species or habitat for the migratory bird species was recorded
from the Study Area. There is no established migratory route and corridor for the
daily/ seasonal movement of the migratory wild animals within the Study Area.
3.2.3 Socio-economic Environment
Study Area
Study of socio economic pr ofile ar ound t he pr oposed pr oject s ite has been
carried out based on t he Census of India 2011 & 2001 doc ument for the part
of district Faridabad, Gurgaon and Palwal of Haryana.
It c an be m entioned her e t hat O ccupational Structure, E ducational F acilities,

Drinking Water Facilities, Medical Facilities and Power Supply, as reported in
the subsequent paragraphs, are based on C ensus of India 2001 dat a and all
the information for these par ameters ar e bas ed on R ural A rea onl y, as t he
data for the Urban Area of the Study Area are not available.
A site visit was al so c onducted by D CPL t eam t o c ollect s ome pr imary data.
The study encompasses population, c ivic and ot her am enities, oc cupational
structure, land use pattern etc.
SECTION-3 3-7 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
The project site area measures only 61 Acres. The immediate surroundings of
the plant site are basically rural in nature.
Population
The Study Area is m ostly r ural i n nature. The ov erall popul ation of t he Study
Area is 285489 w ith a popul ation density of 909 persons per square kilometer.
Population structure in Study Area has been furnished in the following table :
Male Female Total Population

Description
Study Area 152569 132920 285489
Rural Area 131296 114651 245947
Urban Area 21273 18269 39542
The above es tablishes t hat t he ar ea w here t he P roject i s pr oposed i s

moderately populated.
Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe
Scheduled Castes (SC) as percentage of total population is 20.01% . There is

no Schedule Tribe (ST) population in the Study Area. SC & ST Percentage of
classified popul ation i n t he S tudy Area has been r epresented i n t he f ollowing
table
Description Male Female TOTAL
SC Population 30466 26855 57321

ST Population Nil Nil Nil
SECTION-3 3-8 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Sex Ratio
Sex Ratio (female per 1000 Male) considering the total population in the Study
Area is 871.Sex ratio of Scheduled Castes (SC) population is 881.
Description Sex Ratio

Study Area 871
Rural Area 873
Urban Area 859
SC Population 881
ST Population -
Literacy Status
Literacy data of Urban Area is not available. Thus the literacy rate is calculated
only for the Rural Part of the Study Area. In the Rural Part of Study area male
literacy r ate i s 72.26% while f emale literacy is 50.12%. Literacy status of t he
Study Area is furnished below:
Description Total Male Literates Female Literates Overall

Literates Total % Total % %
Rural
152340 94881 72.26 57459 50.12 61.94
Population
SECTION-3 3-9 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Occupational Structure
Occupational s tructure i n Rural P art of Study ar ea ar e pr esented i n

following t able and al so r epresented t hrough a pie c hart. P ercentage of
main works is 22.09%. Percentage of marginal workers is low (5.94 %). The
percentage of non workers is as high as 71.97%.
Occupation Number of People % of Total population

Main Workers 54327 22.09
Marginal Workers 14600 5.94
Non Workers 177020 71.97
Educational Facilities
In the Rural Part of the Study Area, there are 85 Primary schools, 41 m iddle
schools, 25 Secondary S chool and 9 Senior S econdary S chools are
available.
Educational Institutions Number of Institutions within

Core Area
Primary School 85
Middle School 41
Secondary School 25
Senior Secondary School 9
SECTION-3 3-10 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Educational Institutions Number of Institutions within

Core Area
College 0
Industrial School 0
Adult Literacy Centre 4
Training School 4
Others 3
Educational f acilities i n t he S tudy A rea are not s atisfactory and need

improvement.
Drinking Water Facilities
In the Rural Part of the Study Area, at least one form of drinking water facilities
is available in all the villages as furnished below:
Description Number of Villages

Tap 89
Well 72
Tank 0
Tube Well 73
Hand Pump 75
Canal 0
Medical Facilities
The medical f acilities av ailable i n t he Rural P art of t he S tudy A rea are

furnished below:
Medical Facilities Number

Ayurvedic ,Allopathic, Unani Hospital 0
Homeopathic Hospital 1
Community Health Worker 2
Maternity Home 0
Maternity and Child Welfare Centre 2
Health Centre 0
Primary Health Centre 2
Primary Health Sub-centre 25
SECTION-3 3-11 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Medical Facilities Number

Nursing Home 0
Registered Medical Practitioner (RMP) 42
Note : All villages avail the above facilities within 5 to 10 km from the village
The above data reveals that the medical facilities in the Rural Part of the Study
Area are not satisfactory and need improvement.
Power Supply
The pow er s upply s cenario av ailable i n t he Rural P art of t he S tudy A rea is

furnished below:
Electricity for Electricity for Electricity for Electricity for All

Domestic Use Agricultural Other Purpose Purpose
Consumption
16 13 9 70
Main Festivals
Dassera & di wali i n O ctober ar e m ost popul ar f estivals i n t his ar ea. H oli,
Raksha bandhan, ID are the other major festivals of this area.
List of Major Industries (10 km radius)
a) Balmer Lawrie container (around 4 km)

b) NTPC ( around 10 km)
c) Indian Oil – Blending plant (around 4 km)
d) Pepsico storage (4-5 km)
e) Organic firms
f) Hardware Industries
g) Brick fields
h) JCB Storage ( about 8 km)
SECTION-3 3-12 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
3.2.4 Air Environment (Meteorology and Air Quality)
The per manent m eteorological s tation, c losest t o t he proposed site, is at

Gurgaon. Thirty years (1971-2000) climatological dat a f or Gurgaon
observatory, as published by India Meteorological Department is furnished as
EXHIBIT 3.1(A). S ummary of t he s alient m eteorological conditions observed
from the table are presented as follows:
Predominant : Annual overall : North West

wind direction Summer : North West
(Wind from) Post Monsoon : North West
Winter : North West
Mean w ind : : 4.1 kmph.
speed
Temperature : Maximum (average) : 44.9o C
Maximum (recorded) : 49.0o C
Minimum (average) : 1.9o C
Minimum (recorded) : -0.4o C
Rainfall : Rainy Season (June to September)
Annual R ainfall : 712.0 mm
(avg.)
Highest Rainfall in a : 617.4 mm
month
Highest Rainfall in 24 : 282.2 mm
hours
Monthly R elative : Maximum : 81 percent
Humidity Minimum : 26 percent
It i s s een f rom t he c limatological t able t hat t he ar ea ex periences moderately

hot and humid summer, v ery c old and dr y w inter, r easonable r ainfall. Wind
speed is moderate throughout the year.
SECTION-3 3-13 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
3.2.4.1 Ambient Air Quality
Selection of Monitoring Stations
Ambient ai r q uality w as m onitored dur ing the month of December 2013 –

January 2014 in and ar ound t he pr oposed P roject S ite. T his i s in conformity
with the representative months of f or t he s easons as s pecified i n C PCB’s
publication P ROBES/70/1997-98. The primary selection of monitoring stations
were done as per t he “ Environmental G uidelines f or S itting of Industry”
(published by the MoEF), depending on the predominant wind direction.
The f irst A mbient A ir Q uality (AAQ) m onitoring station ( A1) is selected at

Project S ite. T he s econd m onitoring s tation ( A2 : Kaligaon) is located at t he
annual pr edominant upw ind s ide i.e. t owards North W est with respect t o t he
Project Site. Two more stations viz. A3 : Ladpur r & A 4 : B rick K iln near
Asawati ar e s elected i n dow nwind di rection i.e. towards S outh E ast w ith
respect to the Project Site. .
Two more monitoring stations are also located at Asawati (A5) and Dhig (A6)
in such a way that if a s traight line is drawn joining stations A1 and A 2, both
0
straight lines A1-A5 and A1-A6 form an angle of about 120 with A1-A2.
Monitoring Station Locations
Name of monitoring stations along with their locations are furnished below:
Name of Village / Site Distance from Direction w.r.t.

Project Site(km) Project site
Project Site (A1) - -
Kaligaon (A2) 1.8 NW
Ladpur (A3) 4.5 SE
Brick Kiln near Asawati (A4) 3.2 SE
Asawati (A5) 3.0 SSE
Dhig (A6) 3.75 EES
SECTION-3 3-14 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Location of AAQ monitoring stations is furnished as Fig. 3.1.
Micro-meteorological dat a, w hich c omprise w ind s peed, w ind di rection, air

temperature, r elative hum idity, c loud c over and rainfall, ar e furnished as
Exhibit – 3.1(B).
The windrose diagram based on m icrometeorological data collected at site is

given i n Fig. 3.2. It i s evident f rom t he di agram t hat t he pr edominant w ind
direction during the period of ambient air quality as well as micro-meteorology
monitoring was f rom North. This is generally in conformity with the wind rose
pattern of Gurgaon observatory.
Parameters Monitored during Ambient Air Monitoring
The following parameters have been m onitored dur ing am bient ai r q uality
monitoring, w hich i s i n ac cordance w ith t he r equirement prescribed by the
State Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC), Haryana :
 Respirable Particulate Matter (Size less than 10 µm) or PM10

 Respirable Particulate Matter (Size less than 2.5 µm) or PM2.5
 Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)
 Nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
 Hydrocarbon as methane
 Non-methane hydrocarbon
 VOC
Methods of Measurement
Air s amplings ar e done by de ploying Respirable Dust Samplers. A nalytical

methods for measurement of concentrations of SO2, NOx, and PM10 have been
SECTION-3 3-15 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
adopted f rom IS: 5182 published by B ureau of I ndian S tandards w hile t he

same for PM2.5 is as per USEPA 1997a 40CFR Part – 50.
VOC is measured by USEPA TO-14A. Methane is measured by IS 5182 (Part

XVII) 1979 and N on-Methane HC is m easured by IS 5182 ( Part 21) 2001 as
described in the “Guidelines for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring” of CPCB.
Frequency and duration of Monitoring
The frequency of monitoring in each station was twice a week for a period of
one (1) month. PM2.5, PM10, SO2 and NO2, HC as methane and H C as non-
methane reading were of 24-hour average value.
Observations on Ambient Air Quality
The r esults of am bient air quality monitoring, as obt ained f rom al l t he

monitoring stations for the different months of monitoring have been furnished
in Table 3.1.
Summary of the Ambient Air Q uality dat a has been f urnished i n Table 3.2.
The table shows maximum, minimum and av erage v alues corresponding t o
each of the pollutants viz. PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO 2, HC as methane and HC as
non-methane for the individual monitoring stations.
The following observations are made from Table 3.2:
Particulate Matter2.5 (PM2.5)
The 24 -hour v alues of P articulate M atters 2.5 (PM2.5) varied bet ween
3 3
58.2 µg/m and 38.2 µg/m during monitoring. The average value of PM2.5 is
46 µg/m3. These m easured v alues ar e within the l imit s et f or Industrial,
Residential, Rural and O ther areas ( 60 µg/m3) as w ell a s E cologically
Sensitive Area (60 µg/m3) as per the Ambient Air Quality Standards based on
CPCB notification, 18th November, 2009 (Schedule-VII).
SECTION-3 3-16 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Particulate Matter10 (PM10)
The 24 -hour v alues of P articulate M atters10 (PM10) v aried bet ween 108.2
3 3
µg/m and 73.2 µg/m during monitoring. The average value of PM10 is 88.1
µg/m3. These average value is within the l imit s et f or I ndustrial, Residential,
Rural and Other areas (100 µg/m3) as well as Ecologically Sensitive Area (100
µg/m3) as per the Ambient Air Quality Standards based on C PCB notification,
18th November, 2009 ( Schedule-VII). However, t he m aximum v alue i s
marginally higher t han t he s pecified C PCB l imit, as m entioned abov e. T he
same can be at tributed to the nearby brick kilns and unmetalled road around
the plant site
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
The 24-hour values of Sulfur-di-Oxides (SO2) reveals that the maximum value
as 7.89 µg/m3 and m inimum i s 7.0 µg/m3 during monitoring. The av erage
value of SO2 is 7.3 µg/m3. These measured values are within the limit set for
Industrial, Residential, Rural and O ther ar eas (80 µg/m3) as w ell as
Ecologically S ensitive A rea ( 80 µg/m3) as per t he A mbient A ir Q uality
Standards based on CPCB notification, 18th November, 2009 (Schedule-VII).
Nitrogen Oxides (NO2)
The 24-hour values of Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) varied between 32.56 µg/m3 and
20.50 µg/m3. The Average value of Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) is 24.4 µg/m3. These
measured values are within the limit set f or Industrial, Residential, Rural and
3 3
Other ar eas (80 µg/m ) as we ll as E cologically S ensitive A rea ( 80 µg/m ) as
per t he A mbient A ir Q uality S tandards bas ed on CPCB notification, 18th
November, 2009 (Schedule-VII).
SECTION-3 3-17 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Hydrocarbon as Methane, Non Methane Hydrocarbon & VOC
All the measured values of V OC, N on-Methane H ydrocarbon and M ethane

Hydrocarbon are at BDL limit.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards prescribed by Central Pollution Control

Board (CPCB) is furnished in Table 3.3.
3.2.5 Water Environment
Ground Water sampling locations were selected in close vicinity of the existing
POL Terminal.
The w astewater m anagement phi losophy of t he ex isting P OL Terminal is

based on “ Minimum D ischarge A pproach”. H owever, near by s urface w ater
sources may be af fected due t o s ome unc ontrolled discharge f rom t he pl ant
outfall. Sampling locations for surface water are thus selected in close vicinity
of the existing POL Terminal.
Sampling Locations
To assess the background water quality, three (3) ground water sample and
two (2) surface water samples were collected.
• Ground water sampling location is identified as follows:
Sl. No. Sampling Location

GW1 : Tube well water, From Project site
GW2 : Tube well water – From Pabladpur
GW3 : Well water – From Asawati
SECTION-3 3-18 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
• Surface water sampling points are identified as follows:
Sl. No. Sampling Location

SW1 : Pond Water, Aswati Village
SW2 : Agra Nahar, Dhig Village
Methodology and Results
Methodology adopted for sampling and analysis of the two (2) ground and two
(2) s urface w ater s amples, to es tablish t he bac kground w ater q uality f or t his
study, was as per IS: 3026, A PHA, A WWA and W PCF. P arameters
recommended by the Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India
were analyzed.
The results of ground water and surface water are furnished in Table 3.4 and
Table 3.5 respectively.
Observations on the Surface Water and Ground Water Quality
a) Ground Water Quality
Analyses of al l g round w ater s amples r eveal t hat t he w ater i s ac ceptable.

Water of t hese t ube w ells / w ells c an be c onsidered as safe sources of
Drinking Water.
b) Surface Water Quality
The results of analysis of water Samples collected from Surface water sources
generally conform to Class-C of the Indian Standards for Inland Surface water
subject to Pollution, which means the water is suitable for outdoor bathing as
drinking water source after conventional treatment and disinfection.
SECTION-3 3-19 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
3.2.6 Noise Level Data
Noise l evel w as m easured ( in dB A) i n and ar ound t he pr oposed site at t he

following locations:
Name of Village / Site Distance from Direction w.r.t.

Project Site(km) Project site
Project Site (N1) - -
Kaligaon (N2) 1.8 NW
Ladpur (N3) 4.5 SE
Brick Kiln near Asawati (N4) 3.2 SE
Asawati Hospital (N5) 3.0 SSE
Dhig Primary School (N6) 3.75 EES
Aswati H ospital and P rimary S chool at D hig were selected considering the
same as Sensitive Receptor.
Results
The r esults of noi se l evel m onitoring hav e been f urnished in Table 3.6
representing the background noise level data.
It was observed that the day time as well as night time ambient noise levels in
residential and s ensitive ar eas w ithin t he Study Area, were m ostly within t he
prescribed standards.
SECTION-3 3-20 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
3.2.7 Background Soil Quality
To assess the background s oil q uality, t op s oil s amples w ere c ollected f rom
the P roject s ite as w ell as ag ricultural f ields / r oad s ide l ocations around the
project site and were analyzed subsequently.
Results
The results have been furnished in Table 3.7 representing the background soil
quality of the project site and its surroundings.
The important physico-chemical characteristics and nutrient levels of the soils

in the study area presented in Table 3.7. The soil samples are sandy loamy.
3.2.8 Satellite Imagery
A report on site details covering 10 km radius around the proposed site based
on S atellite I magery & G eographic I nformation System (GIS) is f urnished as
EXHIBIT – 3.2.
--------Ω--------
SECTION-3 3-21 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SHEET 1 OF 6
TABLE – 3.1
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA
STATION A1 : PROJECT SITE

3
CONCENTRATION IN µg/m (24 hrs) CONCENTRATION IN (24 hrs)
Respirable Respirable Sulphur Oxides Methane Non
SL. DATE OF VOC
Particulate Particulate Di- of HC MethaneHC
NO. SAMPLING
Matter Matter Oxide Nitrogen
(ppb) (ppm) (ppb)
(RPM2.5) (RPM10) (SO2) (NOx)
1 04.12.13 46.20 108.20 7.89 30.03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
2 08.12.13 48.50 103.50 7.61 28.51 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3 12.12.13 46.20 91.50 7.21 25.05 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
4 16.12.13 48.60 93.50 7.21 23.79 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5 20.12.13 43.80 92.60 7.34 23.11 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6 24.12.13 51.20 85.20 7.07 25.05 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7 28.12.13 47.50 81.20 7.07 23.11 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8 01.01.14 41.20 86.30 7.07 22.52 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
NOTE: PM 2.5: Respirable Particulate Matter (Size less than 2.5 µm)
PM 10: Respirable Particulate Matter (Size less than 10 µm)
SO2: Sulphur di Oxide
NOx: Oxides of Nitrogen
VOC Volatile Organic Carbon
Methane HC Methane Hydro Carbon
Non Methane HC Non Methane Hydro Carbon
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SECTION - 3 3-22 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SHEET 2 OF 6
TABLE – 3.1
STATION A2 : KALIGAON
3
SL. DATE OF VOC
NO. SAMPLING
(ppb) (ppm) (ppb)
(RPM2.5) (RPM10) (SO2) (NOx)
1 04.12.13 46.20 81.50 7.21 26.23 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
2 08.12.13 41.80 86.20 7.07 21.51 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3 12.12.13 38.50 78.50 7.07 23.87 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
4 16.12.13 42.80 73.20 7.34 23.11 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5 20.12.13 46.50 81.20 7.21 21.85 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6 24.12.13 41.20 96.50 7.61 25.05 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7 28.12.13 48.50 89.20 7.21 21.85 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8 01.01.14 42.80 76.50 7.00 21.51 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SHEET 3 OF 6
TABLE – 3.1
STATION A3 : LADPUR
3
SL. DATE OF VOC
NO. SAMPLING
(ppb) (ppm) (ppb)
(RPM2.5) (RPM10) (SO2) (NOx)
1 04.12.13 51.20 105.60 7.89 32.56 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
2 08.12.13 48.50 91.20 7.61 30.03 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3 12.12.13 43.20 90.80 7.21 25.05 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
4 16.12.13 46.80 82.50 7.75 26.82 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5 20.12.13 43.80 86.20 7.21 25.05 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6 24.12.13 51.20 93.50 7.48 26.23 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7 28.12.13 46.50 91.20 7.34 23.79 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8 01.01.14 51.20 90.20 7.48 28.51 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SHEET 4 OF 6
TABLE – 3.1
STATION A4 : BRICK KILN NEAR ASAWATI

3

SL. DATE OF VOC
NO. SAMPLING
(ppb) (ppm) (ppb)
(RPM2.5) (RPM10) (SO2) (NOx)
1 06.12.13 58.20 106.50 7.89 26.23 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
2 10.12.13 46.20 91.50 7.21 25.05 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3 14.12.13 52.80 102.60 7.48 23.79 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
4 18.12.13 51.60 91.20 7.61 26.82 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5 22.12.13 47.60 86.50 7.21 23.53 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6 26.12.13 46.50 86.50 7.21 21.85 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7 30.12.13 42.80 82.50 7.07 21.85 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8 03.01.14 43.80 81.60 7.07 21.59 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SHEET 5 OF 6
TABLE – 3.1
STATION A5 : ASAWATI
3
SL. DATE OF VOC
NO. SAMPLING
(ppb) (ppm) (ppb)
(RPM2.5) (RPM10) (SO2) (NOx)
1 06.12.13 46.32 93.50 7.48 26.23 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
2 10.12.13 43.20 91.20 7.21 25.05 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3 14.12.13 41.80 76.50 7.07 23.11 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
4 18.12.13 42.50 81.50 7.07 21.85 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5 22.12.13 38.20 76.20 7.07 21.51 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6 26.12.13 48.50 82.60 7.34 23.11 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7 30.12.13 52.80 91.20 7.61 24.80 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8 03.01.14 46.20 91.50 7.34 23.53 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SHEET 6 OF 6
TABLE – 3.1
STATION A6 : DHIG
3
SL. DATE OF Respirable Respirable Sulphur Oxides Methane Non

VOC
NO. SAMPLING Particulate Particulate Di- of HC MethaneHC
(ppb) (ppm) (ppb)
(RPM2.5) (RPM10) (SO2) (NOx)
1 06.12.13 46.20 78.20 7.48 25.05 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
2 10.12.13 38.50 76.50 7.07 20.50 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
3 14.12.13 45.20 85.30 7.34 23.11 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
4 18.12.13 42.60 86.50 7.21 21.85 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
5 22.12.13 47.50 92.50 7.48 25.05 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
6 26.12.13 43.50 85.60 7.61 23.53 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
7 30.12.13 43.50 91.60 7.21 23.53 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
8 03.01.14 46.20 81.50 7.34 25.00 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
________________________________________________________________________________________________________

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
Sheet 1 of 1
TABLE – 3.2
SUMMARY OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY
POLLUTANT MAXIMUM MINIMUM AVERAGE

RPM2.5 58.2 38.2 46.0
RPM 10 108.2 73.2 88.1
SO2 7.89 7.0 7.3
NO2 32.56 20.50 24.40
NOTE
 All t he v alues of VOC and N on-Methane H ydrocarbon ar e bel ow 1. 0 ppb ( i.e.
BDL). Hence the same is not included in the above table.
 All the values of Methane Hydrocarbon are below 1.0 ppm (i.e. BDL). Hence the
same is not included in the above table.
SECTION-3 3-28 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
SHEET 1 OF 3
TABLE - 3.3
NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS

CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTIFICATION
NEW DELHI, THE 18TH NOVEMBER, 2009
SCHEDULE – VII
CONCENTRATION IN AMBIENT AIR

ECOLOGICALLY
INDUSTRIAL,
TIME SENSITIVE AREA
RESIDENTIAL, METHODS OF
POLLUTANT WEIGHTED (NOTIFIED BY
RURAL AND MEASUREMENT
AVERAGE CENTRAL
OTHER AREA
GOVERNMENT)
- Improved West
Annual* 50 20
Sulphur Dioxide and Gaeke
(SO2), µg/m3 - Ultraviolet
24 hours** 80 80
fluoroscence
- Modified Jacob &
Hochheiser (Na-
Annual* 40 30
Nitrogen Dioxide Arsenite) .
(NO2), µg/m3 -
24 hours** 80 80
Chemiluminescenc
e.
Particulate Matter Annual* 60 60 - Gravimetric
(Size less than 10 - TOEM
µm) or PM10 µg/m3 24 hours** 100 100 - Beta attenuation
Particulate Matter
Annual* 40 40 - Gravimetric
(Size less than 2.5
- TOEM
µm) or PM2.5
24 hours** 60 60 - Beta attenuation
µg/m3
- UV photometric
-
8 hours** 100 100
Ozone (O3) Chemiluminesce
µg/m3 nce.
1 hour** 180 180
- Chemical
Method
- AAS/ICP method
after sampling
Annual* 0.50 0.50 on EPM 2000 or
Lead (Pb) equivalent filter
µg/m3 paper
24 hours** 1.0 1.0
- ED-XRF using
Teflon filter
Carbon Monoxide 8 hours** 02 02 - Non Dispersive
(CO) Infra Red (NDIR)
mg/m3 1 hour** 04 04 spectroscopy
SECTION-3 3-29 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
SHEET 2 OF 3
TABLE - 3.3

NOTIFICATION
SCHEDULE – VII
CONCENTRATION IN AMBIENT AIR

ECOLOGICALLY
TIME INDUSTRIAL,
SENSITIVE AREA
WEIGHTED RESIDENTIAL, METHODS OF
(NOTIFIED BY
POLLUTANT AVERAGE RURAL AND MEASUREMENT
CENTRAL
OTHER AREA
GOVERNMENT)
-Chemiluminescence
Ammonia Annual* 100 100
- Indophenol blue
(NH3)
method
µg/m3 24 hours** 400 400
- Gas chromatography
based continuous
Benzene Annual* analyzer
05 05
(C6H6) µg/m3 - Adsorption and
Desorption followed
by GC analysis
Benzo (a)
Pyrene (BaP) – - Solvent Extraction
Annual*
Particulate 01 01 followed by HPLC/
phase only, GC analysis
ng/m3
- AAS/ICP method
after sampling on
Arsenic (As), Annual* EPM 2000 or
06 06 equivalent filter
ng/m3
paper
- AAS/ICP method
after sampling on
Nickel (Ni), Annual* EPM 2000 or
20 20 equivalent filter
ng/m3
paper
SECTION-3 3-30 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
TABLE - 3.3
SHEET 3 OF 3

NOTIFICATION
SCHEDULE – VII
* Annual ar ithmetic mean o f m inimum 1 04 measurements i n a y ear at a par ticular

site taken ** twice a week 24 hourly at uniform intervals.
** 24 hourly 08 hourly or 01 hourly monitored values, as applicable, shall be

complied with 98% of the time in a year. 2% of the time, they may exceed the limits
but not on two consecutive days on monitoring.
Note : Whenever and wherever monitoring results on two consecutive days of monitoring
exceed the limits specified above for the respective category, it shall be considered
adequate r eason t o i nstitute r egular or c ontinuous m onitoring and further
investigation.
SECTION-3 3-31 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
SHEET 1 of 2
TABLE – 3.4
GROUND WATER QUALITY
LOCATION OF SAMPLING DATE OF SAMPLING : 24.12.2014

GW1 : Tube well water, From Project Site
GW2 : Tube well water – From Pabladpur
GW3 : Well water – From Asawati
SL.NO. PARAMETERS GW – 1 GW – 2 GW – 3
1 pH 7.06 7.40 6.47
2 Temperature (°C) 12.50 12.0 12.50
3 Turbidity ( NTU) 1.20 3.50 12.80
4 Total Alkalinity, as CaCO3 (ppm) 780.0 600.0 540.0
5 Total Dissolved solid ( ppm) 1421.0 1735.0 2272.0
6 Total Hardness, as CaCO3 (ppm) 380.0 448.0 880.0
7 Calcium Hardness, as CaCO3 (ppm) 88.18 112.22 196.39
8 Magnesium Hardness, as CaCO3 (ppm) 38.40 40.32 93.6
9 Chloride, as Cl (ppm) 148.99 196.14 480.91
10 Sulphate , as SO4 (ppm) 27.50 55.0 45.0
11 Nitrate , as NO3 (ppm) 10.52 15.01 23.50
12 Fluoride , as F (ppm) <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
13 Sodium , as Na (ppm) 180.0 230.0 270.0
14 Potassium , as K (ppm) 28.25 55.50 62.00
15 Total Nitrogen , as N (ppm), Kjeldahl <0.2 <0.2 12.50
16 Total Phosphorous , as PO4 (ppm) 3.20 4.80 8.25
17 Phenol , (ppm) <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
18 Boron (ppm) <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
19 Arsenic, as As (ppm) <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
20 Selenium (ppm) <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
SECTION - 3 3 - 32 BPCL
EIA REPORT FOR
SL.NO. PARAMETERS GW – 1 GW – 2 GW – 3
21 Oil & Grease (ppm) <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
22 Cadmium , as Cd (ppm) <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
23 Lead , as Pb (ppm) <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
24 Copper , as Cu (ppm) <0.04 <0.04 <0.04
25 Chromium , as Cr (ppm) <0.06 <0.06 <0.06
26 Murcury , as Hg (ppm) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
27 Nickel , as Ni (ppm) <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
28 Zinc , as Zn (ppm) 0.15 0.15 0.60
29 Iron , as Fe (ppm) 0.67 1.47 0.69
30 Total Coliforms / 100ml <1,<10,<1 <1,<10,<1
800
00 00
31 Fecal Coliform/ 100 ml <1,<10, <1,<10,
260
<100 <100
<1 indicate No Colony developed in 1 ml. Sample.

<10 indicate No Colony developed in 0.1 ml. Sample.
<100 indicate No Colony developed in 0.01 ml. Sample.
EIA REPORT FOR
SHEET 1 of 2
TABLE – 3.5
SURFACE WATER QUALITY
LOCATION OF SAMPLING : DATE OF SAMPLING : 24.12.2013

SW1 – Pond Water, Aswati Village
SW2 – Agra Nahar, Dhig Village
Sl. No. Parameters SW1 SW2
1. Colour (Hazen) Slightly hazy Slightly hazy

2. PH 7.26 7.30
3. Temperature (0C) 16.0 15.5
4. Total Dissolved Solid (mg./l) 286.0 325.0
5. Total Suspended Solid (mg./l) 23.50 28.0
6. Dissolved Oxygen (mg./l) 5.6 5.6
0
7. BOD, 3 days at 27 C (mg./l) 7.0 8.0
8. COD (mg./l) 30.0 35.0
9. Oil & Grease (mg./l) <1.0 <1.0
10. Chlorides as Cl (mg./l) 32.06 35.83
11. Alkalinity (mg/l) 124.00 132.00
12. Total Hardness (mg/l) 92.0 112.0
13. Calcium (mg/l) 20.84 32.06
14. Magnesium (mg/l) 9.6 7.68
15. Phenolic Compounds (mg/l) <0.1 <0.1
16. Cyanides as CN (mg/l) <0.05 <0.05
17. Sulphides as S (mg/l) <1.0 <1.0
18. Sulphates as SO4 (mg/l) 8.50 7.20
19. Total Nitrogen as N (mg/l) 6.22 6.83

EIA REPORT FOR
Sl. No. Parameters SW1 SW2
20. Ammonical Nitrogen (mg/l) 2.50 2.32

21. Total Phosphate (mg/l) 3.50 3.80
22. Fluorides as F (mg/l) <0.1 <0.1
23. Boron as B (mg/l) <0.1 <0.1
24. Arsenic as As (mg/l) <0.001 <0.001
25 Sodium as Na (mg/l) 26.50 25.0
26. Cadmium as Cd (mg./l) <0.01 <0.01
27. Lead as Pb (mg/l) <0.088 <0.088
28. Copper as Cu (mg/l) <0.04 <0.04
29. Chromium as Cr (mg/l) <0.06 <0.06
30. Mercury as Hg (mg/l) <0.001 <0.001
31. Nickel as Ni (mg/l) <0.2 <0.2
32. Zinc as Zn (mg/l) 0.56 0.68
33. Iron as Fe (mg/l) 0.68 0.78
34. Coliform Organism (M.P.N/100 ml) 680 680
35. Fecal Coliform (M.P.N/100 ml) 280 360

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
SHEET 1 OF 6
TABLE – 3.6
NOISE LEVEL MONITORING
STATION N1 : PROJECT SITE
Date Time Lmin dB(A) Lmax dB(A) Leq dB(A)

Day 51.2 62.5 58.23
04.12.13 – 05.12.13
Night 43.5 53.2 47.12
Day 50.8 61.5 56.20
08.12.13 – 09.12.13
Night 41.8 52.5 45.23
Day 52.8 62.5 56.80
12.12.13 – 13.12.13
Night 43.5 51.6 45.28
Day 56.2 63.5 58.10
16.12.13 – 17.12.13
Night 42.5 50.2 43.20
Day 56.2 60.1 58.18
20.12.13 – 21.12.13
Night 41.8 52.6 42.16
Day 53.2 62.5 57.10
24.12.13 – 25.12.13
Night 42.8 46.5 43.50
Day 51.8 56.2 53.28
28.12.13 – 29.12.13
Night 41.8 45.2 42.50
Day 54.8 61.5 56.20
01.01.14 – 02.01.14
Night 41.2 53.8 42.68
Lmin : Minimum Noise level Lmax :Maximum Noise level Leq :Equivalent sound energy
Day Time : Between 06:00 am to 09:00 pm; Night Time : Between 09:00 pm to 06:00 am.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
SHEET 2 OF 6
TABLE – 3.6
STATION N2 : KALIGAON

Day 56.2 68.5 65.20
04.12.13 – 05.12.13
Night 57.5 65.3 63.28
Day 61.5 68.8 65.12
08.12.13 – 09.12.13
Night 56.2 64.2 63.80
Day 62.5 72.3 68.58
12.12.13 – 13.12.13
Night 53.8 62.8 60.20
Day 57.2 71.5 68.26
16.12.13 – 17.12.13
Night 53.6 65.2 61.50
Day 63.5 68.5 65.28
20.12.13 – 21.12.13
Night 53.6 67.5 61.23
Day 58.2 73.5 71.48
24.12.13 – 25.12.13
Night 46.2 68.5 64.50
Day 63.5 73.2 70.12
28.12.13 – 29.12.13
Night 53.8 68.5 62.18
Day 62.5 68.3 65.20
01.01.14 – 02.01.14
Night 56.2 65.8 63.28
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
SHEET 3 OF 6
TABLE – 3.6
STATION N3 : LADPUR VILLAGE

Day 52.8 56.2 53.78
04.12.13 – 05.12.13
Night 46.4 51.8 48.23
Day 51.9 58.6 53.12
08.12.13 – 09.12.13
Night 41.2 45.8 43.18
Day 48.5 56.8 53.48
12.12.13 – 13.12.13
Night 42.6 48.5 45.12
Day 51.2 56.8 52.26
16.12.13 – 17.12.13
Night 43.8 48.6 46.50
Day 52.8 56.3 53.18
20.12.13 – 21.12.13
Night 42.5 46.8 43.10
Day 48.2 52.3 50.26
24.12.13 – 25.12.13
Night 38.5 46.2 42.50
Day 51.2 53.8 52.16
28.12.13 – 29.12.13
Night 37.5 42.8 41.20
Day 52.6 56.8 53.68
01.01.14 – 02.01.14
Night 41.4 52.8 45.12
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
SHEET 4 OF 6
TABLE – 3.6
STATION A4 : BRICK KILN NEAR ASAWATI

Day 56.5 63.8 61.76
06.12.13 – 07.12.13
Night 46.2 51.8 50.18
Day 53.8 62.5 61.28
10.12.13 – 11.12.13
Night 47.5 53.2 51.20
Day 56.2 63.5 61.74
14.12.13 – 15.12.13
Night 49.8 51.6 50.12
Day 56.5 67.5 63.18
18.12.13 – 19.12.13
Night 46.1 53.8 52.80
Day 51.2 72.5 62.10
22.12.13 – 23.12.13
Night 42.8 53.6 45.28
Day 56.8 68.5 61.50
26.12.13 – 27.12.13
Night 43.8 53.5 52.89
Day 56.2 65.4 63.18
30.12.13 – 31.12.13
Night 43.8 51.5 48.20
Day 58.6 68.5 65.18
03.01.14 – 04.01.14
Night 46.5 53.2 48.50
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
SHEET 5 OF 6
TABLE – 3.6
STATION N5 : ASWATI HOSPITAL

Day 56.5 61.5 58.23
06.12.13 – 07.12.13
Night 43.1 57.3 53.80
Day 56.4 62.5 58.28
10.12.13 – 11.12.13
Night 48.6 58.3 51.26
Day 58.5 65.2 62.67
14.12.13 – 15.12.13
Night 48.6 61.8 50.26
Day 56.1 67.3 62.18
18.12.13 – 19.12.13
Night 48.6 53.2 51.26
Day 58.5 62.5 60.10
22.12.13 – 23.12.13
Night 43.2 52.6 48.50
Day 58.1 63.5 61.28
26.12.13 – 27.12.13
Night 48.2 53.6 52.18
Day 56.8 64.6 63.50
30.12.13 – 31.12.13
Night 43.2 51.6 48.38
Day 58.5 65.8 63.16
03.01.14 – 04.01.14
Night 43.5 51.2 48.50
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
SHEET 6 OF 6
TABLE – 3.6
STATION N6 : DHIG PRIMARY SCHOOL

Day 56.1 63.5 62.16
06.12.13 – 07.12.13
Night 43.9 51.2 48.50
Day 56.2 63.5 60.10
10.12.13 – 11.12.13
Night 46.2 58.6 51.28
Day 58.1 65.8 62.50
14.12.13 – 15.12.13
Night 58.6 67.3 61.58
Day 56.7 56.2 53.20
18.12.13 – 19.12.13
Night 42.5 52.5 48.12
Day 53.8 62.8 58.23
22.12.13 – 23.12.13
Night 41.2 52.6 46.26
Day 58.6 67.5 61.80
26.12.13 – 27.12.13
Night 43.5 53.8 50.12
Day 58.6 62.5 61.78
30.12.13 – 31.12.13
Night 45.2 51.8 48.50
Day 53.5 62.5 60.18
03.01.14 – 04.01.14
Night 47.5 56.5 52.68
Day Time : Between 06:00 am to 09:00 pm; Night Time : Between 09:00pm to 06:00 am.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANTS
TABLE – 3.7
SOIL QUALITY
Date of Sampling : 28.12.2013
Parameters Project Road Agricultural Road Side Agricultural

Site Side Field (Near Field (Dhig
(Aswati) (Pahladpur Kaligaon) Village)
village)
PHYSICAL
Grain size* * * * * *
pH (1:2.5) 7.10 6.90 7.68 6.92 7.68
EC (us/cm) 582.0 618.0 785.0 580.0 820.0
CHEMICAL
Sodium as Na (mg/kg) 780.0 820.0 950.0 862.0 816.0
Potassium as K (mg/kg) 738.0 785.0 1258.0 750.0 1120.0
Calcium as Ca (mg/kg) 1685.0 1680.0 2528.0 1865.0 21.50.0
Magnesium as Mg
2080.0 2150.0 2430.0 1952.0 2365.0
(mg/kg)
Chloride (mg/kg) 538.50 450.0 520.0 685.0 752.0
Sulphate (mg/kg) 780.0 1020.0 780.0 1028.0 860.0
Sodium Absorption
2.98 2.72 3.14 3.31 2.87
Ratio
Organic Matter (%) 5.80 4.50 9.50 4.18 9.25.0
Nitrogen as N (mg/kg) 368.0 320.0 860.0 285.0 825.0
Phosphorous as P
65.20 58.20 112.50 36.50 120.0
(mg/kg)
Carbonate(mg/kg) 680.0 752.0 856.0 718.0 950.0
Water holding
26.5 23.8 25.0 24.2 25.8
capacity(%)
Iron as Fe (mg/kg) 950.0 1285.0 852.0 980.0 758.0
EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANTS
Parameters Project Road Agricultural Road Side Agricultural

Site Side Field (Near Field (Dhig
village)
Boron as B (mg/kg) 8.60 6.50 7.20 4.82.0 8.56
Arsenic as As (mg/kg) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
Mercury as Hg (mg/kg) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
Lead as Pb (mg/kg) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
Nickel as Ni (mg/kg) BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
Cadmium as Cd
BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
(mg/kg)
Chromium as Cr
BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL
(mg/kg)
Zinc as Zn. (mg/kg) 85.60 120.50 80.50 68.50 76.20
CEC(meq of N a/100
3.39 3.56 4.13 3.74 3.54
gm)
* Grain Size
Sl. Parameters
Project Road Agricultural Road Side Agricultural
No. Site Side Field (Near Field (Dhig
village)
Soil Texture Sandy Sandy Sandy loam Sandy Sandy loam
loam loam loam
1 Sand (%) 60 75 65 75 60
2 Silt (%) 30 10 20 10 25
3 Clay (%) 10 15 15 15 15
Diameter :
Sand – 0.05 mm – 2.0 mm

Silt – 0.05 mm – 0.002 mmlay - <0.002 mm
Predominant Wind Direction
A2
A1
A6
A4
A5
A3

‐ AAQ MONITORING STATION LOCATIONS
A1 ► PIYALA (PROJECT SITE)
A2 ► KALIGAON
A3 ► LADPUR
A4 ► BRICK KILN NEAR ASAWATI
A5 ► ASAWATI
A6 ► DHIG
AAQ MONITORING DEVELOPMENT

STATION MAP CONSULTANTS
PROPOSED CAPACITY PVT. LTD.
EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL Consulting Engineers
TERMINAL
SC AD SA SDR For EIA Report Rev.0 0 12.2.14 AT PIYALA, NEAR Job No.13302 Scale : None
FARIDABAD, HARYANA
RELEASE REV BHARAT PETROLEUM
APPROVED REVIEWED CHECKED DRAWN DESCRIPTION DATE Dwg No. Fig 3.1 Rev.0
STATUS CORPORATION LIMITED
3‐44
SECTION – 4
ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
& MITIGATION MEASURES
EIA REPORT FOR
SECTION - 4
ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &
MITIGATION MEASURES
4.1 IDENTIFICATION OF IMPACTS
This s ection de als w ith i dentification o f t he pr oposed pr oject's potential i n

inducing environmental, social and ecological impacts both during construction
and operation phases:
• Impact on land
• Impacts on air environment
• Impacts on water environment
• Impact of disposal of solid wastes
• Impact on human environment
• Ecological impacts
Environmental and social impacts can be induced during both construction and
operation phase. S ome i mpacts are s hort t erm a nd s ome l ong t erm. The
various probable impacts are discussed below:
4.1.1 Impact during Construction Phase
Salient ac tivities dur ing t he c onstruction phase h aving pot ential for i nducing
either environmental or social impacts are described below. Incidentally, most
of the activities during construction phase induce only short-term / temporary
environmental impact. However, social impacts arising out of land oustees and
loss/change i n occupational s tructure, i f a pplicable, o ften bec ome l ong-term
affairs.
SECTION-4 4-1 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
• Possession of Land
Land pos session i s t he first ac tivity bef ore c ommencement o f any

project c onstruction. This ac tivity nat urally has p otential o f i nducing
socio-economic impact from minor to severe nature.
Land ac quisition for any l arge s cale pr oject i s of ten i nvolved w ith
creating land oustees i.e. rendering a number of people homeless. Also,
in many cases, number of homestead losers may be less but acquisition
of good agricultural land may render scores of people jobless and place
those affected people and their families into uncertainties so far as their
earning and sustenance is concerned.
For the pr oposed expansion project, the t otal l and ( including t he land
required for proposed expansion) is under possession of BPCL.
• Site Development
This i s on e o f t he pr ime ac tivities f or any pr oject. This ac tivity mainly

involves clearing of the land from all hindrances including dismantling /
demolition o f ho uses (if any), r emoval o f v egetation an d i n many a
cases l and l eveling / grading t o br ing t he s ite t o a c ondition o f s tarting
construction work.
For t he pr oposed ex pansion pr oject, t he total l and which i s under

possession o f B PCL, is bar ren & f lat and h ence onl y l eveling / grading
has to be d one. N o demolition o f ho used, r emoval o f v egetation or
cutting and filling work is envisaged.
SECTION-4 4-2 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
• Civil & Structural Work
This w ork c an b e d ivided i nto t wo g roups, foundation w ork and

superstructure w ork. C ertain foundation w ork m ay i nvolve ex cavation
using m achinery et c. T hese ac tivities m ay g enerate n oise pollution.
Besides, foundation work will involve t rench c utting, ex cavation and
concreting work. Dust pollution, especially during dry season, will be the
major pr oblem unl ess appr opriate measures ar e a dapted t o
contain/minimise t he dust nui sance. T he super structural w ork will
involve steel and concrete work, masonry work etc. and will involve use
of equipment like cranes, mixers, welding sets etc. There may be dus t,
noise an d g aseous pollution from t his w ork. C oncreting w ork will
demand considerable amount of water. This may induce impact on local
hydrology also in specific cases, if not taken care of specifically.
• Mechanical and Electrical Erection
The mechanical erection work involves use of mechanical equipment for

storage, r etrieval and er ection, s ite fabrication et c. l eading t o some
noise pol lution an d s ome ai r pol lution. E lectrical work, how ever, has
less pollution potential.
• Sources of Construction Materials
For any project of this nature the requirement of stone and sand for the
construction work will not be a large in quantity. First of all, sources of
these t wo pr ime c onstruction materials, w hich ar e av ailable i n na ture,
are ab undantly av ailable nearby. H ence, t ransportation o f t hese
materials from distant s ources w ill c ause m inimal s hort-term l ocal
impact spread over transportation route.
SECTION-4 4-3 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
• Housing and Other Human Requirement
This activity covers the arrangement for housing and living requirements
for the construction workers. Most of the work in construction phase is
labour- intensive. I n fact t he s ite w ill be hav ing m ore w orkers d uring
construction ph ase t han dur ing op erating p hase. A l arge num ber of
them w ill be c oming f rom bey ond i mmediate neighbor hood. Un less
steps ar e t aken i n advance t o meet t he c onstruction s tage d emand,
short term large scale immigration may have immense impact on local
housing, civic facilities, education, health and culture.
Requirement of w orkers dur ing c onstruction ph ase w ill b e 50-80.

Accommodations can be ar ranged i n ne arby villages. Most o f th e
unskilled an d s emi s killed l abour s hall be f rom n earby v illages and
towns. R esponsibility of br inging l abours t o s ite w ill l ie with t he
respective contractor.
• Local Infrastructure
National H ighway r uns i n c lose pr oximity of t he pr oposed pl ant area.

The existing plant has already all the infrastructures.
From t he ab ove di scussion, i t i s c lear t hat t he i mpacts d uring c onstruction

phase would be short-term in nature and would be limited to the construction
period onl y. Moreover, BPCL will t ake ap propriate m easure b efore s tart of
construction activities to eliminate/minimise potential impacts.
4.1.2 Impact during Operation Phase
Main as pects and ac tivities dur ing oper ation phas e o f t he pr oposed pr oject
having pot ential for i nducing env ironmental an d/or s ocial i mpacts ar e
discussed below:
SECTION-4 4-4 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
• Hydrology
The water requirement is met from outside received at site through tank
lorry. No addi tional w ater r equirement i s envisaged for t he pr oposed
expansion.
Since water requirement is meager quantity, it is therefore expected that

this drawl of water for the proposed project is not expected to cause any
impact of concern on the ground water source.
• Air Environment
The main source of air pollution due to operation of the proposed plant
will be par ticulate e mission an d c ombustion g ases em itted d ue t o
vehicular movement. It can be m entioned here that no n ew emergency
DG set is proposed for the expansion. Thus emission from the stacks of
emergency D G s ets is not ap plicable for t he pr oposed ex pansion
project.
In ad dition to that, s ome hydrocarbon emission will al so t ake pl ace as

fugitive emission from leakages of gland, seals, etc.
Depending upon the increase in Ground Level Concentration (GLC) of

these pollutants a nd the r esultants t hereof, det rimental i mpacts on
human being, flora & fauna may be induced.
• Water Environment
The as sessment o f i mpact o f the proposed pr oject o n water

environment is as follows:
SECTION-4 4-5 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
 Water r equirement for oper ating t he pl ant i s v ery l ow, which is

met from ou tside r eceived at s ite t hrough t ank l orry. A s water
requirement is negligible and additional water requirement due to
proposed project is nil, no a dverse impact on water environment
is anticipated.
 As no w astewater w ill be discharged from t he Terminal, any

impact on the surface water is ruled out.
 As no solid waste is generated / disposed off, adverse impact on

the q uality o f t he w ater b odies due t o carry o ver of t oxic
substances is ruled out.
 Sewage from toilets is disposed off in Soak Pits, where bacterial

action reduces the BOD content. Thus, no i mpact on t he quality
of ground water is envisaged.
It i s, t herefore, c oncluded that t he proposed r eceipt m ode a nd

storage of P OL pr oducts will not hav e any adverse i mpact o n
water environment.
• Physical Environment
Any project constructed on plain land (whether agricultural or otherwise)

will change the land-use pattern and general aesthetics and sight of the
area. T his, in one w ay induces s ome impact on t he phy sical
environment.
For the proposed expansion no new land will be acquired since the total
land ( including t he l and r equired for proposed expansion) i s u nder
SECTION-4 4-6 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
possession of B PCL. S o the proposed expansion does not hav e any

significant impact on the physical environment.
• Impact of solid wastes
During operation, solid waste and H azardous waste will be g enerated.

Safe and scientific arrangement for handling, storage and disposal of all
used oil, bottom sludge has been planned. Those wastes are recycled
by t he S tate P CB a uthorized r ecyclers. There w ill be s olid waste
generation during five (5) yearly cleaning of Tanks, but will be managed
in the proper manner. This will ensure that there will not be any impact
on s oil q uality due to t he di sposal or d eposition of s olid/hazardous
waste.
• Human Environment
Unless there are a large number of land oustees and not much people
are r endered j obless, ot her i mpacts o f such pr oject o n hu man
environment ar e g enerally pos itive or b eneficial w hen al l pr obable
adverse and be neficial i mpacts ar e analysed and equated together on
overall bas is. I n c ase of l and l osers a nd homestead l osers t he i mpact
may be s evere unl ess appr opriate m itigation t hrough Rehabilitation &
Resettlement Plan is ensured for the Project Affected People (PAP).
For t he pr esent project, t here i s n o R & R i ssues i nvolved since t he

Project i s a n expansion pr oject for w hich t he t otal l and i s under
possession of BPCL.
SECTION-4 4-7 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
• Ecological impacts
Ecological i mpacts from t his type o f pr oject w ill be i nsignificant.

Potential primary and s econdary impacts from the proposed project on
the biological env ironment h ave bee n i dentified and t he s ignificant
ecological impact is evaluated based on:
 Habitat Quality
 Species affected
 Size/abundance of habits/organisms affected
 Duration of Impacts
 Magnitude of environmental changes
There ar e n o r eserved f orests, w ildlife s anctuary l ocated i n t he c lose

proximity to the plant. The project will not have adverse impacts on the
existing flora and fauna. As the forest is far from the proposed project,
the impact will be nil. Hence there will not be any impact whatsoever on
biodiversity.
4.2 MEASURES FOR MINIMZING ADVERSE IMPACTS
4.2.1 Construction Phase
This c lause d escribes the control technologies a dopted / recommended f or

mitigating the probable environmental impacts during construction phase of the
project.
• Compensatory afforestation
The total l and i ncluding t he l and r equired for ex pansion i s u nder

possession of BPCL. Hence the question of compensatory afforestation
does not ex ist. H owever, BPCL is implementing intensive g reenery
SECTION-4 4-8 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
development program from initial days of plant construction to mitigate

adverse impact, if any.
• Dust Suppression
The main and visible pollution during construction phase is fugitive dust
generated dur ing ex cavation an d o ther earthmoving ac tivities an d
during c oncreting w ork. T his pr oblem, t hough t emporary, has t o be
mitigated by introducing dust suppression measure through sprinkling of
water i n dus t pr one activities l ike m ovement o f v ehicles es pecially on
unmetalled roads, digging work, raw material handling etc.
To ensure t his, BPCL will u se water sprinklers t o minimize/ el iminate

fugitive dus t nui sance. T his w ill pr imarily c over r equirements from t he
point of v iew of O ccupational S afety and H ealth and broadly m itigate
the aspect of mitigation of environmental pollution.
• Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R & R)
For t he pr esent project, t here i s n o R & R i ssues i nvolved s ince t he

Project i s an ex pansion pr oject for w hich t he entire land i s u nder
possession of BPCL.
• Workers' Colony
There will be immigration of people during construction phase there will

be a n i nflux o f a bout 50 - 80 p ersons. M ost o f t he unskilled an d semi
skilled labour shall be from nearby villages and t owns. The site being
easily accessible from the nearby areas that also have a g ood number
of housing facilities, local housing will not be stressed to any degree of
concern.
SECTION-4 4-9 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
4.2.2 Operation Phase
This c lause describes t he c ontrol t echnologies adopted / r ecommended for

mitigating the p robable e nvironmental impacts du ring op eration ph ase of t he
project.
Air Pollution Control Measures
The other air pollution control measures are described below:
a) DG Stack
DG stack of a dequate height as r ecommended by M oEF w ill hel p i n

better di spersion of p ollutants ( NOx, HC, P M) resulting i n l ess G LC of
pollutants.
For DG Sets, the minimum height of the stack should be computed by

using the formula;
H = h + 0.2 * Sq root of (Capacity of DG set)

where, h= Height of the building housing the DG Set
The m inimum r equired hei ghts an d ac tual heights pr ovided t o t he D G

Sets ( height o f t he s hed 3 meters above t he g round l evel) ar e a s
follows:
SECTION-4 4-10 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DG Set Capacity Height Actual Height

Required (m) provided (m)
1750 kVA 11.4 30

625 kVA 8.0 10
250 kVA 6.2 7.9
125 kVA 5.2 7
25 kVA 4.0 7
Thus, i t may be s afely c oncluded t hat heights pr ovided t o t he D G S ets

exhausts ar e i n g ood c ompliance w ith t he s pecified s tandards, w ith
adequate safety margin.
b) DS System
To control fugitive dust, Dust Suppression system is envisaged.
c) Greenery
A gr eenery is also conceived ar ound t he ai r pollution s ources a nd al so

along plant boundary to restrict air pollution.
Water Pollution Control
The w astewater m anagement philosophy w ill be bas ed on “ Minimum

Discharge” concept. All oily effluents are diverted to Oily Water Separator
(OWS). The waste water from OWS after removal of oil & after testing is
used for g reenery dev elopment at t he facility. T he c ollected s lop oi l is
disposed off to third party for off-site recovery or recycling. The domestic
effluent is treated in septic tank followed by soak pit.
SECTION-4 4-11 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
Oily Water Drainage system
OWS network i s pr ovided i n t he t erminal t o c ollect t he oily w ater from

tank farm ar ea, t ank wagon s iding, P ump s hed an d m anifold & T LF
gantry. During rainfall, the oil spilled within the tank farm, pump sheds etc
flows al ong w ith r ainwater. A lso, from t he dr ains pr ovided al ong t he r ail
gantry and within the grade slab for pump sheds the oily water is diverted
to the Oily Water network.
The O ily water net work i s t erminated t o a n O ily water s ump. The O ily
water from the sump is pu mped to a n O ily water s eparator ( OWS). T he
OWS e nsures t hat t he m aximum a mount o f oi l i n t he di scharged w ater
from the p lant does no t e xceed 10 ppm. In c ase of of f-spec, t he w ater
would be re-circulated for further separation and led again to OWS.
Each tank farm is fitted with drains, sumps, U/G pipelines and Dyke Block
Valves by which the accumulated water is led off into the main Oil water
system or to the outside surface drain depending upon the contamination
level of t he w ater. T he dyke v alves s hall be pr ovided w ith pos ition
indicator, which will show the open/close status of the valve at the control
room. Pumps manifolds and other leak –prone area including tank wagon
siding drain shall be connected to the OWS network.
The OWS layout on the Plot plan is furnished as PLATE 4.1
Storm Water Drainage system
Storm Water drainage system has been considered for the tank farm for
various pet roleum pr oducts, r ail s iding, p ump s heds, TLF gantry, T ruck
parking area, Fire water network, fire water tanks, Admin and utilities area
SECTION-4 4-12 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
etc. The r ainfall da ta i s c onsidered for d esigning t he s torm w ater dr ain

network f or t he en tire pl ot. The s torm w ater dr ains ar e c onsidered o n
either sides of the plant roads and routed so as to avoid water logging in
the plot & hume pipes will be used at road crossings to carry water on the
other side of road. The discharges from the storm water drains are taken
to v arious g round w ater r e-charge bor es. T he ov erflow f rom t he ground
water r echarge bore is discharged out side t he pl ot a fter passed routed
through oil interceptors
Characteristics of Waste Water
The c haracteristics of w aste w ater af ter passing t hrough oi ly water

separator (spillage from hydrants and wastewater from mock fire drills) are
the s ame as t hat of ground w ater ex cept the s uspended s olids, w hich
remain in the range of 10 to 100 mg/l.
General s tandard f or di scharge o f e ffluents is furnished as TABLE- 4.1

with this report.
Tank bottom sludge will be generated while cleaning of oil storage tanks.
The c leaning o f oi l s torage t anks will be done onc e i n five years as per
practice of Oil Industry. Total tank bottom sludge thus generated is kept in
secured, covered impermeable sludge pit located within POL terminal at
a central place earmarked for the purpose prior to safe disposal through
MoEF/ State PCB approved registered recycler.
Other h azardous w astes l ike s pent b atteries, w aste oi l, e mpty dr ums of

oil/chemicals, fluorescent t ubing et c. is disposed o ff in ac cordance with
approved safe procedures.
SECTION-4 4-13 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
All biodegradable waste (food and kitchen waste) at the POL terminal is
collected and disposed off as per well established practice.
Noise Mitigation
All g eneral eq uipment is procured w ith b uilt-in noi se ab atement

measures to restrict noise level not exceeding 85 dB (A) when measured
1 m away from the source surface.
For eq uipment w here t his c annot be ac hieved, t he noise g enerating

equipment is housed i n s uitable ac oustic c over and bui lding s o t hat t he
noise level outside the building will be 75 dB (A). The aspect of noise in
such ca ses is dealt from t he point o f v iew of oc cupational s afety an d
health. P ersonnel w orking i n t hose areas is provided w ith noi se
plugs/noise m uffs t o protect t hemselves f rom t he ev ils of pr olonged
exposure to high noise levels.
The entire terminal is so installed so that the resultant noise level within
the plant premises remains within 75 dB(A) during day time and 70 dB(A)
during night time respectively.
4.3 IREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS OF

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPONENTS
Some impacts of activities on the environment are reversible, while others are
irreversible, ev en w ith hu man i ntervention. A c ommitment of e nvironmental
component i s irreversible when i ts pr imary and s econdary i mpacts l imit t he
future options or limit those factors that are renewable only over long periods
of time. I n ot her w ords, irreversible commitment o f e nvironmental
components i s t hat c ommitment w hich c annot be r estored or r eturned to t he
SECTION-4 4-14 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
original condition, despite mitigation efforts. Reversibility of an environmental

component means the ability of the environmental component to recover their
value af ter a di sturbance h as oc curred. A c ommitment of en vironmental
component i s s aid t o be irretrievable which i s nei ther r enewable nor
recoverable for use in the future.
The environmental components are identified below:
- Air
- Water (ground water and surface water),
- Noise
- Land / soil
- Ecology and
- Socio economics
The i rreversible and i rretrievable c ommitments o f a bove en vironmental

components are listed below:
a) Project Construction Stage
The construction phase of the project usually involves environmental impacts

that will cease at completion of construction. Components like air, water, noise,
ecology and s ocio economics are reversible. On the other hand some effects
on the ecology will be irreversible (due to removal of some vegetation etc from
the project s ite dur ing s ite c learing op eration) but they ar e r etrievable as t he
proposed g reen b elt and c ompensatory af forestration i f, any w ill r estore /
improve the ecology of the surroundings.
SECTION-4 4-15 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
b) Project Operation Stage
The op eration p hase o f t he pr oject w ill m ake s ome i rreversible an d

irretrievable commitments on environmental components as identified below:
- As a v ery m eager per centage o f available w ater is used for the plant
operation an d r ecycling and r e-use o f e ffluent w ater hav e al so bee n
conceived, this is not expected to have any impact.
- The am bient ai r q uality of t he s urrounding of t he pr oposed s ite

represents t he expected s cenario. The pr oposed pr oject w ith the
conceived p ollution c ontrol m easures ar e not ex pected t o i nduce any
impact b eyond t olerable l imit. H ence, t he e nvironmental c ommitments
to air will be reversible in nature.
- The noi se env ironment s urrounding t he ar ea i s not ex pected t o have

any s ignificant i mpact as al l g eneral eq uipment w ill be pr ocured w ith
built-in noise abatement measures to restrict noise level not exceeding
85 dB(A) when measured 1 m away from the source surface and some
of these noise generating equipments without this facility will be housed
in s uitable acoustic c over and bui lding. S o i t i s ex pected t hat t he
environmental c ommitments t o noi se w ill be r eversible as well as
retrievable in nature.
- Total land including the land required for expansion is under possession
of BPC L. Hence, t he l and env ironment w ill not u ndergo any m ajor
irreversible and irretrievable change.
- During the plant operation phase, the ecology is not expected to have
any impact.
SECTION-4 4-16 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
- The i mpacts on s ocio ec onomics w ill have no i rreversible an d

irretrievable impact.
4.4 ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACTS
The impacts on each environmental parameter are summarized in the following

manner:
A. Pre-project status
B. Project activities likely to induce impact
C. Assessment of the impact
Land
A. Total land including the land required for expansion is under possession
of BPCL.
B. The expansion of POL terminal will be confined within the land which is
already under possession of BPCL.
C. There will be a per manent change in the land use pattern. Conversion
of bar ren l and i nto i ndustrial l and w ill i mpart neg ligible det rimental
impact. S ince t he ac quired l and d oes not i nclude f orest ar ea, the
impact due to loss of forest will not be t here at all. The greenery to be
developed w ithin t he POL t erminal w ill c ertainly hel p t o i mprove t he
local ec ology as well as aes thetics o f t he area. Thus t here will be no
significant impact on land as such.
SECTION-4 4-17 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
Water Source
A. The water requirement is met from outside through tank lorry.
B. Total w ater r equirement for do mestic us e, pr ocess, g reenery

development and f irefighting is about 7 m3/day. No a dditional w ater
requirement is envisaged for the proposed expansion.
C. After execution of t he pr oposed expansion, w ater c onsumption w ill

remain unaltered. H ence, i t may be mentioned t hat the w ater
consumption for t he proposed POL terminal w ill hav e pr actically no
impact on the local surface water hydrology and ground water.
Water Quality
A. The w ater r equirement for pr ocess, domestic us e and other pur poses
will be m et from out side t hrough t ank l orry. Water q uality will be
maintained within the norms.
B. The project will reuse wastewater to the maximum extent with “Minimum
Discharge” approach. For washing effluents, suitable OWS is being used
and domestic effluents is being treated in septic tank followed by soak pit.
The waste water from OWS after removal of oil & after testing is used
for g reenery de velopment at t he facility. Excess t reated e ffluents,
especially dur ing m onsoon s eason is disposed i nto r ain water
harvesting within the plant area after meeting the norms.
C. Controlled minimum discharge conforming to norms of SPCB / MOEF is

also not expected to induce any impact on the surface water quality.
SECTION-4 4-18 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
Air Quality
A. The values of P M10, PM 2.5, SO2 and NOx are generally well within t he
limit for Industrial, Residential and Rural areas.
B. The proposed project with the conceived pollution control measures are
not expected to induce any impact beyond tolerable limit .
C The impact on air quality will be insignificant.
Ecology
A. The preparatory and construction activities at the project site will result in
vehicular m ovement. T he primary influence of such activities will be in
terms o f pol lution o f ope n drinking water sources, ex isting flora and
fauna. I ncrease i n v ehicular m ovement i n percentage o f t he pr esent
traffic load will be negligible. However, these are short term impacts and
will remain restricted to early phases of construction.
The construction activities will also promote inward migration of l abour

force a nd t emporary infrastructures. These evidently impart bur den on
the trees around the project area unless safe guards are arranged.
B. There will be h ardly any increase in gaseous emissions like SO2, NOx,
and the resultant levels of these pollutants will remain within permissible
limits and t olerable. Wastewater w ill be t reated c onforming t o relevant
standards and will be recycled / reused to the extent feasible.
C. Oily wastewater will be treated conforming to norm using OWS and will
be recycled. T he do mestic e ffluents w ill be t reated i n S eptic t ank
SECTION-4 4-19 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
followed by s oak pi t. Even i n c ase of s ome di scharge o f t reated liquid

effluent, the same will be di scharged conforming to norms. Hence, the
aquatic life of the receiving water body will not be di sturbed. Increased
traffic load will be experienced in the area but the same is not expected
to be of any concern that may have to be taken into consideration.
Rehabilitation
A. The e ntire l and including t he l and r equired for ex pansion is under

possession o f B PCL. It i s barren and non-agricultural land free f rom
human habitation.
B. No Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R & R) issue is involved.
C. The l ocals w ill be bene ficiated t hrough i ndirect em ployment du ring

project implementation period and operation period and thus will enjoy
the fruit o f ec onomic growth due t o s etting up of the pl ant. Adverse
impact w ill t hus b e mitigated and most l ikely bene ficial i mpact w ill be
induced.
Employment/Occupation
A. The p ercentage o f main w orkers i s 22.09% of total pop ulation and t he

percentage of marginal workers is 5.94%. The percentage of non-workers
is 71.97%.
B. Implementation of t he pr oposed pr oject w ill require c ontract labourers

during c onstruction p hase. They w ill be m ainly of s emi-skilled a nd un -
skilled c ategory. A vailability of s izeable m anpower r equired f or
construction activity in the surrounding area is bright. A s the labourers
are generally un-skilled, local unemployed job seekers would get ample
SECTION-4 4-20 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
opportunity for e mployment d uring c onstruction ac tivity. I n addi tion t o

the o pportunity o f g etting em ployment as c onstruction l abourers, t he
local pop ulation w ould al so hav e em ployment op portunities i n r elated
service activities like small commercial establishments, small contracts,
sub-contracts, supply of construction material etc.
C. The construction of proposed project will also have its impact on s ocial
relations that ex ists p resently i n t he populations of t he pr oject a rea.
Influx of migrant labourers may cause social conflict between guest and
the host community at initial stages of development. B ut, this normally
gets s tabilized i n a s hort per iod. I ncreased i ndirect e mployment
opportunities w ill lead t o ec onomic upl iftment o f t he ar ea. T his i n t urn
will enhance the social status of local inhabitants, increased expenditure
in festivals and s ocial oc casions, i ncreased i ntra and i nter v illage
relations and cultural ties.
Housing
A. The manpower r equired i n t he operation p hase o f t he project i s no t

high.
B. There w ill be i mmigration of p eople i n t wo phas es. A t emporary

immigration of people will be there during construction phase.
C. Contractors w ill be m ade t o pr ovide s uitable accommodation for t heir

personnel in the nearby villages. Existing 42 O & M personnel will cater
the proposed expansion also.
SECTION-4 4-21 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
Education and Health
A. Local l iteracy an d e ducational facilities i n s tudy ar ea ar e fair. M edical

facility in the study area is not satisfactory.
B. School a nd h ospital facilities f or t he e mployees who w ill m igrate f rom

other places for the units will be made available.
C. Existing m edical and educ ational facilities ar e not expected t o be

strained.
Services
A. The local villages have moderate civic services.
B. Residential facilities for the operation/maintenance and general staff for

the proposed plant will be available in the nearby town.
C. The im migration of people will not strain existing f acilities. With further
development of the area, it is expected that civic services in the locality
will further improve.
4.5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MATRIX
The overall e nvironmental impact o f the project can b e q uantitatively a ssessed

through E nvironmental I mpact Matrix ( EIM). H ere the a ctivities are concised to
fewer i n number. The env ironmental p arameters ar e g iven s ome w eightage
based o n consultant's experience t otaling t o 10 0. T he weighted values ar e
subjective o nes but arrived a fter c onsidering i nter di sciplinary j udgments,
keeping in view the type and specifications of the project.
SECTION-4 4-22 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
Impact of the activities have been marked positive (+) or negative (-) depending
on its beneficial or adverse effects respectively on t he environment. The degree
of impact has been assessed by the following scale:
Insignificant - 0
Appreciable - 1
Considerable - 2
Significant - 3
Major - 4
All environmental control m easures h ave b een c onsidered while assessing the
impacts. The EIM is presented in Table – 4.2. A summarised table is presented
below:
ENVIRONMENT
PHYSICAL BIOLOGICAL HUMAN TOTAL
Weightage 45 20 35 100
Impact value -30 +30 +97 +97
Degree of Impact -0.67 +1.5 +2.77 +0.97
Remarks Adverse Beneficial Beneficial Beneficial
Insignificant Appreciable Significant Appreciable
So t he ov erall env ironmental impact will be be neficial. T his is bec ause t hough
there will be insignificant adverse impact on physical environment and no impact
on biological environment, there will be considerable beneficial impact in human
environment. T his m eans by environmental control m easures an d
implementation of the same, the adverse impacts can be mitigated and overall
beneficial impact c an b e af fected. The overall i mpact, as a ssessed, w ill b e
Beneficial Appreciable.
SECTION-4 4-23 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
4.6 MITIGATION MEASURES
Following mitigation measures ar e c onceived i n t he d esign p hase t o m eet t he

environmental standards and environmental operating conditions :
Air Pollution Mitigation Measures
The air pollution mitigative measures conceived for the project is summarized
below:
- Water s praying i s conceived t o m inimize dus t pol lution d uring

excavation and earth work (during construction phase).
- 80% o f hy drocarbon is stored i n F loating R oof ( FR) t ank to m inimize

vapour loses.
- A g reenery i s al so dev eloped al ong pl ant bou ndary t o r estrict ai r

pollution.
Water Pollution Mitigation Measures
 The w astewater m anagement phi losophy is based on “ Minimum

Discharge” c oncept. All oi ly ef fluents are di verted t o O ily Water
Separator ( OWS). The w aste w ater f rom OWS after r emoval o f oi l &
after t esting i s us ed f or g reenery dev elopment at t he facility. T he
collected s lop oi l is disposed o ff to t hird pa rty f or o ff-site r ecovery or
recycling.
SECTION-4 4-24 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
 The domestic effluent is treated in septic tank followed by soak pit.
 Separate s torm w ater dr ainage s ystem is provided at t he facility. T he

non-contaminated r ain w ater is discharged di rectly i nto r ain w ater
harvesting pit within the proposed facility.
 However, par ticularly during t he m onsoon, any oi l-contaminated r ain

water is led to the OWS for treatment prior to discharge
 Total tank bottom sludge generated during cleaning of oil storage tanks
is kept in secured, covered impermeable sludge pit located within POL
terminal at a central pl ace ear marked f or t he pur pose pr ior to safe
disposal through MoEF/ State PCB approved registered recycler.
 Other hazardous wastes like spent batteries, waste oil, empty drums of
oil/chemicals, fluorescent tubing etc. is disposed off in accordance with
 All biodegradable waste (food and kitchen waste) at the POL terminal is
disposed off in accordance with approved safe procedures
Noise Pollution Mitigation Measures
 All general eq uipment is procured w ith bui lt-in noi se abatement

measures to restrict noise level not exceeding 85 dB(A) when measured
1 m away from the source surface.
SECTION-4 4-25 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
 Some o f the equipments w ithout h aving t his is housed i n s uitable

acoustic cover and b uilding so that the noise level outside the building
is 75 dB (A).
 Personnel w orking in t hose ar eas is provided w ith noi se pl ugs/noise

muffs t o protect t hemselves f rom t he ev ils o f pr olonged ex posure t o
high noise levels.
 The entire plant is so installed so that the resultant noise level within the
plant premises r emains within 75 dB (A) dur ing day t ime a nd 7 0 d B(A)
during night time respectively.
SECTION-4 4-26 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
TABLE - 4.1
GENERAL STANDARDS FOR DISCHARGE OF EFFLUENTS
[The Gazette of India – Extraordinary {Part II- Sec. 3(i)} Ministry of Environment and
Forests Notification New Delhi, 19th May, 1993]
S. Parameters Standards
No. Inland Public Land for Marine
Surface Sewers irrigation coastal
Water areas
(a) (b) (c) (d)
1 Colour and odour Note-1 Note-1 Note-1 Note-1
2 Suspended solids, mg/l max. 100 600 200 Note-2
3 Particle size of suspended Note-3 - - Note-4
solids.
4 Dissolved solids (inorganic) 2100 - 2100 -
mg/l max.
5 pH value 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0
6 Temperature, OC Note-5 - - Note-5
7 Oil & grease, mg/l max. 10 20 10 20
8 Total residual chlorine, mg/l 1.0 - - 1.0
max.
9 Ammonical Nitrogen (as N), 50 50 - 50
mg/l. max.
10 Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (as 100 - - 100
NH3), mg/l max.
11 Free ammonia (as N), mg/l 5 - - 5
max.
12 Biochemical oxygen demand (3 30 350 100 100
days at 27oC), max.
13 Chemical oxygen demand, mg/l 250 - - 250
max.
14 Arsenic (as As.), mg/l max. 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
15 Mercury (as Hg.), mg/l max. 0.01 0.01 - 0.01
16 Lead (as Pb), mg/l max. 0.1 1.0 - 2.0
17 Cadmium (as Cd.), mg/l max. 2.0 1.0 - 2.0
18 Hexavalent chromium (as 0.1 2.0 - 1.0
Cr+6), mg/l. max.
19 Total Chromium (as Cr), mg/l 2.0 2.0 - 2.0
max.
20 Copper (as Cu), mg/l max. 3.0 3.0 - 3.0
21 Zinc (as Zn), mg/l max. 5.0 15 - 15
SECTION-4 4-27 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
Water areas
(a) (b) (c) (d)
22 Selenium (as Se), mg/l max. 0.05 0.05 - 0.05
23 Nickel (as Ni), mg/l max. 3.0 3.0 - 5.0
24 Boron (as B), mg/l max. 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
25 Percent Sodium, max. - - 60 -
26 Residual sodium carbonate, - - 5.0 -
mg/l max.
27 Cyanide (as CN) mg/l max. 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2
28 Chloride (as Cl) mg/l max. 1000 1000 600 -
29 Fluoride (as F) mg/l max. 2.0 15 - 15
30 Dissolved Phosphate (as P), 5.0 - - -
mg/l max.
31 Sulphate (SO4) mg/l max. 1000 1000 1000 -
32 Sulphide (as S), mg/l max. 2.0 - - 5.0
33 Phenolic Compound (C6 H6 1.0 5.0 - 5.0
OH), mg/l max.
34 Radioactive materials:
(a) Alpha emitters, μc/ml max. 10-7 10-7 10-7 10-7
(b) Beta emitters, μc/ml 10-6 10-7 10-6 10-7
max.
35 Bio-assay test Note-6 Note-6 Note-6 Note-6
36 Manganese (as Mn) mg/l max. 2.0 2.0 - 2.0
37 Iron (as Fe) mg/l max. 2 3 - 3
38 Vanadium (as V), mg/l max. 0.2 0.2 - 0.2
39 Nitrate Nitrogen, mg/l max. 10 - - 20
40 Pesticides, microgram/l max.
(i) Benzene Hexachloride
(ii) Carboryl 10 - 10 10
(iii) DDT 10 - 10 10
(iv) Endosulfan 10 - 450 450
(v) Diamethoate 10 - 10 10
(vi) Penitrothion 10 - 10 10
(vii) Melathion 10 - 10 10
(viii) Phorate 10 - 10 10
(ix) Mehyl Parathion 10 - 10 10
(x) Phenthoate 10 - 10 10
(xi) Pyrethrums 10 - 10 10
(xii) Copper oxychloride 9600 - 9600 9600
(xiii) Copper sulphate 50 - 50 50
(xiv) Ziram 1000 - 1000 1000
SECTION-4 4-28 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
Water areas
(a) (b) (c) (d)
(xv) Sulphur 30 - 30 30
(xvi) Paraquat 2300 - 2300 2300
(xvii) Proponil 7300 - 7300 7300
(xviii) Nitrogen 780 - 780 780
Note-1: All efforts should be made to remove colour and unpleasant odour as far as practicable.
Note-2: (a) For process water – 100, For cooling water effluent, 10% above total suspended matter in
influent.
Note-3: Shall pass 850 micron IS sieve.
Note-4: (a) Floatable solids-max. 3 mm. (b) Settleable solids-max. 850microns.
Note-5: Shall not exceed 50C above the receiving water temperature.
Note-6: 90% survivals of fish after 96 hours in 100% effluent.
SECTION-4 4-29 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
TABLE – 4.2
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MATRIX
PHYSICAL BIOLOGICAL HUMAN
ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT
( 45 ) ( 20 ) ( 35 )
FOREST & VEGETATION (10)
HEALTH & EDUCATION (3)

ENVIRONNMENTAL
PARAMETERS
WATER QUALITY (10)
COMPENSATION (10)
NOISE & ODOUR (5)
TOPOGRAPHY (10)
EMPLOYMENT (10)
AGRICULTURE (3)
REHABILITATION /
AQUATIC LIFE (5)
HYDROLOGY (10)
AIR QUALITY (10)
OCCUPATION /
SERVICES (4)
HOUSING (5)
FAUNA (5)
OVERALL
ACTIVITIES
POSSESSION OF LAND
SITE DEVELOPMENT (+) (-) (+) (-) (-)
CONSTRUCTION
TRANSPORT (-) (+)
PLANT CONSTRUCTION (-) (-) (+) (+)
GREENERY (+) (+) (+) (+) (+) (+) (+) (+)
IMMIGRATION (+) (-)
WORKERS’ COLONY (-)
WATER REQUIREMENT (-)
REHABILITATION
ROADS & RAILWAYS (+)
CONSTRUCTION +3 -1 -1 -1 +1 +1 +5 0 0 -1
COMMISSIONING (-) (-) (-) (+)

WATER REQUIREMENT (-)
LIQUID EFFLUENT (-)
SOLID WASTE
GASEOUS EFFLUENT (-)
RAW MATERIAL
OPERATION
HANDLING
OPERATIONAL DIN
TRANSPORT (-) (-)
IMIGRATION (+)
COLONY (+)
HOSPITAL / SCHOOL (+)
EFFL. MANAGEMENT /
(+) (+) (+) (+) (+) (+) (+)
GREEN BELT
OPERATION 0 -1 -2 -1 +1 +1 +5
OVERALL +30 -10 -10 -30 -10 +20 +10 100 -3 +97
NOTE : (-) NEGATIVE IMPACT, (+) POSITIVE IMPACT
-------- O --------
SECTION-4 4-30 BPCL

SECTION – 5
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
SECTION – 5
ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
5.1 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
This section analyses various alternatives to meet the objective of the project from
certain identified angles as recommended by MOEF. These are:
• Siting of the project
• Technology/Process
5.1.1 Siting of the Project
No al ternative s ite i s c onsidered, as i t i s an ex pansion of an existing POL

Terminal in w hich a ll in frastructure f acilities e xist. The s ite has been s elected
mainly with the following considerations:
• Availability of existing infrastructural facilities for a POL Terminal

• No additional land acquisition is required f or the expansion project. T he t otal
land is under possession of BPCL.
• Availability of Raw water
Conformance with Siting Criteria of MOEF
The site satisfies the following basic requirements laid down by the MoEF :
1) The following do not exist within 10 km of the site :
• Metropolitan city
SECTION-5 5-1 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
• National Park and Wildlife sanctuary

• Ecologically sensitive target
2) The site is more than 500 m away from the flood plain of river
3) The site is more than 500 m away from National or State Highway
Moreover, the following are also satisfied:
i) No ar chaeological, hi storical, c ultural or def ense i nstallation ex ists

with 10 km radius of the site.
ii) No forest or prime agricultural land will be u tilised for the setting up
of the project.
5.1.2 Technology / Process
The project s ite w ill onl y deal w ith r eceipt, s torage and transfer of petroleum
product ( viz. M S, H SD, S KO and ATF). No boi ler, no heat er or no c hemical
process i s i nvolved i n t he operation of P OL T erminal. Thus f rom t echnology /
process point of view, there is no scope of consideration for alternatives.
------ O ------
SECTION-5 5-2 BPCL

SECTION – 6
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
PROGRAM
EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANTS
SECTION - 6
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
Environmental Monitoring provides the information f or per iodic r eview and

alteration of the environmental management plan as necessary, ensuring that
environmental pr otection i s o ptimized at al l s tages of t he pr oject. It i nforms
management of what is going on, what t he s tate of t he env ironment i s, and
how oper ations ar e pr oceeding w ithin t he s ite. E nvironmental M onitoring is
also required t o obt ain bas e line i nformation about env ironmental q uality
before operations begin, and t o ex amine per iodically t he i mpact of t he
operation on w ater q uality ( surface and g roundwater), native species,
chemical contamination of soils, and human health (both at the workplace and
outside it, if necessary).
Plant monitoring measures the actual operating and di scharge parameters of

the plant on an ong oing basis. Monitoring must be done ac cording to a formal
schedule, using standard sampling and anal ytical procedures, and carried out
by t rained per sonnel. Without such protocols, t he c onsiderable ex pense of
monitoring programmes may be rendered completely futile by invalid results.
The pr otocols m ust c learly state t he bas is f or s ubsequent i nterpretation,

especially i f s tatistical anal ysis i s t o be us ed, or if the results are likely t o be
used to dem onstrate c ompliance i n a c ourt of l aw. M onitoring r esults will be
interpreted by an appropriate expert and passed on to higher management for
information. Where compliance w ith r egulations i s one of t he obj ects o f
monitoring, the anal ytical r equirements m ay be l aid dow n i n det ail by t he
authorities.
SECTION-6 6-1 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANTS
Through proper monitoring, undesirable env ironmental i mpacts c an be

detected at an ear ly s tage and r emedial m easures t aken. M onitoring al so
serves t o i dentify ec onomic l oss of r aw or r efined m aterial, and general
operating inefficiencies.
A proper environmental monitoring programme for an industry would have the

following key components:
• Air and noise monitoring
• Water monitoring;
• Process and waste monitoring;

• Land / Soil monitoring;
• People and community monitoring; and
• Biological monitoring.
Monitoring programmes will differ f rom s ite t o s ite g iven t he di versity of

climates, ecosystems, l and us es, t opographies and s ocial f actors. T he
monitoring pr ogramme will identify which ac tions need t o be taken to ensure
acceptable environmental performance at each site. Environmental monitoring
of different parameters will be done regularly and the activity will be coordinated
by the Environmental Management Cell (EMC).
Monitoring Schedule and Parameters
A monitoring system for the following parameters will be installed to ensure the
environmental quality in the post project scenario. Monitoring results will also
form the basis for adoption of appropriate treatment process and upg radation
of t reatment f acilities dev eloped i n due c ourse of time. Monitoring Schedule
along with parameters to be monitored is furnished below:
SECTION-6 6-2 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANTS
Sl . Description of Parameters Schedule of Monitoring

No.
A. Air Quality [RPM2.5, RPM10, SO2, NOx, Hydrocarbons (methane &
non-methane HC) and VOCs ]
1. In the s urrounding ar eas of t he One s ample ov er 24 hour s
0
plant c overing 120 apart, c lose continuous duration, twice in a week
to the nearest habitation throughout the year or as
recommended by SPCB or MoEF
2. Within the plant One s ample ov er 24 hour s
continuous duration, twice in a week
throughout the year or as
B. Water Quality
1. Treated effluent water Twice a w eek f or s elected
parameters l ike pH , T SS, T DS,
COD, B OD, Oil & G rease et c or
parameters as r ecommended by
SPCB or M oEF T he det ailed
analysis will be c arried out onc e i n
three months.
2. Surface and G round W ater Once in three m onths and
quality i n t he v icinity of the plant parameters as r ecommended by
for water potability conforming to SPCB or MoEF
drinking w ater s tandard IS:
10500: 1991.
C. Ambient Noise Level
1. In and around the plant Once i n t hree m onths or as
D. Inventory of Flora
1. In and around the plant Once in two years
E. Soil Quality
1. In and around plant area Once in a year on all reclaimed area
and adjoining villages
F. Socioeconomic condition of local population (physical door to
door survey)
1. In and around the plant Once in two years
------- 0 -------
SECTION-6 6-3 BPCL

SECTION – 7
ADDITIONAL STUDIES
EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SECTION - 7
ADDITIONAL STUDIES
7.1 RISK ANALYSIS STUDY
A separate Risk Assessment Report for the proposed project is prepared and the
same is enclosed as EXHIBIT 7.1.
7.2 R & R ACTION PLANS
For the present project, there is no R & R issues involved since the Project is an
expansion project for which the total land is under possession of BPCL.
7.3 PUBLIC CONSULTATION
State E xpert A ppraisal C ommittee ( SEAC), H aryana v ide t heir F .No.

HR/SEAC/2012/464/869 da ted N ovember 26, 2 013 forwarded t he pr escribed
TOR o f t he E IA S tudy f or t he pr oposed pr oject. A c opy of t he s ame i s al so
enclosed as EXHIBIT 1.1.
For t he present pr oject, P ublic C onsultation i s not r ecommended by S EAC,

Haryana while prescribing the Terms of Reference of the EIA study.
----------- o ----------
SECTION-7 7-1 BPCL

SECTION – 8
PROJECT BENEFITS
EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SECTION - 8
PROJECT BENEFITS
8.1 PROJECT BENEFITS
The proposed expansion project is expected to bring significant socio-economic

and environmental benefits both at local and global level as listed below:
Physical Infrastructure
Establishment of pr ojects of t his c ategory w ill i mprove t he av ailability of t he

physical infrastructures l ike dr ainage, c ommunication and t ransportation
facilities etc.
Social Infrastructure
Implementation of the project will indirectly boost up t he social infrastructure of

the surrounding, like local education, m edical and communication of the whole
surrounding area.
Employment Potential
The pr oject w ill al so pr ovide i ndirect em ployment to unskilled, semiskilled and

skilled c ategories. During operation phas e t here w ill be employment
opportunities, mainly in service s ector, as per t he r equirement. I n addi tion t o
this, addi tional jobs will b e generated by local business in the supply of goods
and services.
SECTION- 8 8 -1 BPCL
EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Other Benefits
Besides above, indirect benefits are also expected to be accrued to the region
by w ay of reduction of delivery distance by t ankers w hich i n t urn w ill r educe
trucks on the road reducing the v ehicular l oad on t he publ ic r oads. T his w ill
result in reduced air pollution and reduced probability of accidents on the roads
due to less movement of tank trucks.
Moreover, t he pr oposed ex pansion pr oject i n H aryana w ill improve supply

position of the petroleum products which is vital for economic growth as well as
improving t he q uality of l ife. T he i mproved pet roleum supply w ill hav e s trong
logistical support for delivering the products to customers without interruption.
Thus, the proposed project has ushered in the social and economic up-liftment
of the persons living in the vicinity of the Project i.e. of society at large.
------- 0 -------
SECTION- 8 8 -2 BPCL
SECTION – 9
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
SECTION - 9
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
9.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP)
9.1.1 Preamble
This section des cribes t he c ontrol t echnologies adopt ed / r ecommended f or

mitigating the probable env ironmental i mpacts bot h dur ing c onstruction and
operation phases of t he pr oject as i dentified and des cribed i n Section 4 :
Anticipated Environmental Impacts & Mitigation Measures .
To m aintain t he ec ological bal ance and t o c heck har mful ef fects due to the
proposed expansion of t he POL Terminal, environmental m itigative m easures
have been i ntegrated i nto t he pr ocess of pl anning. This s ection di scusses t he
management pl an f or m itigation/abatement of adv erse env ironmental impacts
and enhancement of beneficial impacts. The EMP has been designed within the
framework of various legislative and r egulatory r equirements on env ironmental
and socio-economic aspects of different national and international bodies. EMP
includes the following components:
1) Impact Mitigation Measures during Construction Phase

2) Impact Mitigation Measures during Operation Phase
9.1.2 Impact Mitigation Measures During Construction Phase
The i mpacts dur ing t he c onstruction phas e on t he env ironment would be

basically of temporary in nature and ar e ex pected t o r educe g radually on
completion of construction activities.
SECTION-9 9-1 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
Air Quality Management
During construction phas e, a c ertain am ount of dus t s hall be g enerated due t o

the transportation of men, machinery and materials, land clearing and leveling of
land, oper ation of c onstruction m achinery/ equipment, c onstruction of
foundations, bui ldings and ot her r equisite i nfrastructure et c. c lose t o the
construction site. Gaseous emissions like SOx, NOx, CO and hydrocarbons are
also ant icipated as a r esult of bur ning of fuel due to operation of machinery/
equipment. T he i mpacts s hall be t emporary i n nat ure and s hall m arginally
deteriorate the ambient air quality. However, the following measures shall further
reduce the dust generation:
- Construction materials shall be transportation to the site in covered trucks,

where necessary
- Land c learing f or c onstruction s ite w ill be kept at the absolute minimum
practicable
- Plant Layout would be designed t o m inimize t he r emoval of s oil and
vegetation
- Topsoil removed w ill be pr eserved f or l ater r einstatement pur poses by
piling it along a boundary of the site
- Dust suppression systems (water spray) shall be used as per requirement
at the construction site
- Earth m oving eq uipment, t ypically a bul ldozer w ith a grader blade and
ripper shall be used for excavation work.
Noise Level Management
Noise shall be generated mainly due to operation of machinery/ equipment used

for construction and t ransportation of m aterials t o t he s ite. T he g eneral noi se
levels due to construction activities may sometimes go up to 90 dB(A) at the work
SECTION-9 9-2 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
sites during day t ime. T he w orkers i n g eneral ar e l ikely t o be ex posed t o an
equivalent noi se l evel of 80 -90 dB (A) i n an 8 hour s hift f or w hich al l s tatutory
precautions as per l aw s hall be i mplemented. The measures described below
shall be able to mitigate the noise levels generated at site:
- Provision of silencers to modulate the noise generated by machines

- Provision of protective devices like ear muff/ plugs to the workers who will
be working in the noise prone areas.
Water Resource Management
During the construction phase of the proposed expansion of the plant, t he t otal
3
water r equirement i s es timated as 10 to 20 m per day dependi ng on t he
construction ac tivities at s ite. T his r equirement of water will be drawn through
bore w ell w ater, identified as the source of w ater f or t he pl ant. T he f ollowing
measures shall be adopted for water resource management :
- Continuous attempt shall be made to optimize/ reduce the use of water

- Continuous attempt shall be made to avoid wastage and leakage of water
- Regular record of water table of wells in the vicinity
Water Quality Management
During t he c onstruction phas e, t he waste water s hall be mainly generated from

domestic activities. The strength of total skilled, semiskilled and uns killed labour
required for construction is estimated at 150 (peak) and 100 (average). Most of
the workers will be f rom l ocal ar ea, w astewater g eneration s hall be m inimal. A
proper drainage system shall be constructed at site on a t emporary basis at an
early stage. The salient features of water quality management shall comprise of
the following:
SECTION-9 9-3 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
- Raw water quality shall be c hecked on r egular bas is f or es sential

parameters
- All sanitary waste from the site shall be treated in the septic tanks
- All the debris resulting from the site shall be isolated from the waste water
and disposed off separately to the extent feasible
- An oil trap shall be provided in the drainage line to prevent contamination
by accidental spillage of oil / grease
- Wash dow n ar ea f or c leaning of v ehicles w heels s hall be pr ovided and
wheel wash waste shall be dr ained properly. Here also a baf fled oil-water
separator will be provided
- To pr event c ontamination f rom ac cidental s pillage of oi l, t he oi l s torage
areas w ill be bunded and w ill be inspected and c leaned at r egular
intervals.
Soil Quality Management
Construction related activities could have an adverse impact on the soil resulting
from c learing, ex cavation, t opsoil r emoval, s oil disposal, road construction and
refuse/ waste di sposal. T he f ollowing m easures s hall be adopt ed t o pr event/
reduce soil contamination:
- Litter, fuel, oil drums, used g rease c artridges s hall be c ollected and
removed properly
- Dustbins / litter bins shall be placed at strategic locations
- Lubrication w aste oi l shall be c ollected s eparately i n dr ums and shall be
disposed of f as per s tandard pr actice ac cepted by the statutory
authorities.
SECTION-9 9-4 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
Land Use Pattern and Ecology Management
Disturbance dur ing c onstruction phas e s hall be c onfined t o the land earmarked
for the pr oposed expansion of t he plant only. To keep t he di sturbance at a
minimum, the following measures are recommended:
- Land c learing f or c onstruction s ite w ill be kept at the absolute minimum

practicable
- Plant Lay out w ould be des igned to minimize the removal of s oil and
vegetation
- Topsoil w ill be c leared and s tored f or l ater r einstatement pur poses by
piling it along a boundary of the site.
Traffic Movement
Traffic to and from the site would become more intensive and much heavier than
at pr esent i n normal c onditions. T his w ould s ubject t he ex isting roads to more
vehicular m ovements. S ince t he s ite i s adj acent to Heavy dut y c lass S tate
Highway, which is capable of taking this extra, load easily. However, the following
measures are proposed for traffic control during construction phase :
- Minimize use of roads by planning vehicle movements

- Advise traffic police of activities
- Road crossings to be used shall be well marked
- Water Spray down to dirt roads if the same is too dusty
SECTION-9 9-5 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
Socio-economic
In addition to the permanent staff, around 100 to 150 persons shall be eng aged
in c onstruction ac tivities. M ost of t he uns killed and s emi s killed l abour s hall be
from nearby villages and towns. BPCL shall also ensure :
- Adequate dialogue with the local bodies / local population
- Protection of traditional water structures
- Provision of health and education services
- No displacement is applicable.
- Provide t emporary em ployment g eneration oppor tunities t o l ocal peoples,
especially in unskilled categories.
9.1.3 Impact Mitigation Measures during Operation Phase
The impacts during the operation phase on t he environment would be basically

of per manent nat ure and ar e ex pected t o last long. Environment protection
measures/ precautions s hall b e adopt ed t o m inimize t he i mpacts due t o
operation of pl ant and t his i ncludes all env ironmental and s ocio-economic
mitigative measures as proposed and discussed below :
1. Solid Waste Management

2. Air Pollution Control Measure
3. Water Pollution Control Measure
4. Noise Pollution Control Measure
5. Greenery Development
6. Corporate Environmental Responsibility
7. Occupational safety and health
8. Emergency Preparedness (Disaster management Plan)
9. Audit
SECTION-9 9-6 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
The different tasks under Environmental Management Plan (EMP) are furnished in
Fig. – 9.1.
Following m easure ar e c onceived f or m anagement of s olid w aste t hat will be

generated from the POL terminal:
- Tank bot tom s ludge is generated w hile c leaning of oi l s torage t anks.

The c leaning of oi l s torage t anks is done onc e i n f ive y ears as per
practice of Oil Industry.
- Total t ank bot tom s ludge t hus g enerated is kept in s ecured, c overed
impermeable sludge pit located within POL terminal at a central place
earmarked for the purpose prior to safe disposal through MoEF/ State
PCB approved registered recycler.
- Other hazardous wastes like spent batteries, waste oil, empty drums of
oil/chemicals, fluorescent tubing etc. is disposed off in accordance with
- All biodegradable waste (food and k itchen waste) at the POL terminal
is collected and disposed off as per well established practice.
Air Pollution Control Measure
- Water spraying is conceived to m inimize dus t pol lution dur ing ex cavation
and earth work (during construction phase).
- 80% of hydrocarbon is stored in F loating R oof ( FR) t ank t o m inimize

vapour loses.
SECTION-9 9-7 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
- A greenery is also developed along plant boundary to restrict air pollution.
Water Pollution Mitigative Measure
Wastewater Management philosophy is based on following:
- The w astewater m anagement phi losophy i s bas ed on “ Zero Discharge”

concept.
- All oily effluents are diverted to Oil Water Separator (OWS).
- The waste water f rom OWS af ter removal of oil & after testing is used f or
greenery development within the POL terminal.
- The collected slop oil is disposed of f t o t hird par ty f or of f-site r ecovery or

recycling.
- Waste water from canteen at the POL terminal is treated in oil and grease
trap followed by septic tank and soak pit.
- Separate storm water drainage system is provided at the facility.
- The non -contaminated r ain w ater w ill be di scharged di rectly t o r ain w ater
harvesting pi t w ithin t he existing facility. However, particularly dur ing t he
monsoon, any oi l-contaminated rain water s hall be l ed t o t he O WS f or
treatment prior to discharge.
SECTION-9 9-8 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
Noise Pollution Control
The f ollowing noi se abat ement m easures ar e pr acticed for the Piyala POL
terminal:
- The equipment, which is the source of noise, have built-in type noise control
abatement technology.
- A g reenery i s al ready dev eloped ar ound pl ant boundar y and other
strategic locations to reduce noise pollution.
Greenery Development
Greenery is al ready developed ar ound t he t erminal i n t he v acant l and s pace t o

check the fugitive dust emission.
Corporate Environmental Responsibility
As BPCL strongly believes that it is a par t of t he l arger c ommunity w here i t

operates, t he c ompany has , t herefore, t aken cognizance of the cultural et hos
and socio economic environment of the locality where its plants are located. With
this approach, BPCL shall consider the following general measures for the socio
– economic upl iftment of t he near by v illages under C orporate E nvironmental
Responsibilty :
- Providing Job Opportunity
The pr oposed expansion project dur ing c onstruction phas e w ill c ertainly
have to employ a f air number of persons in the unskilled and semiskilled
categories. It may be more cost effective t o em ploy t he l ocals i n t hese
positions t han pr oviding em ployment t o t he per sons out side t he locality.
Hence it is proposed to em ploy as m uch as pos sible t he l ocal peopl e,
SECTION-9 9-9 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
especially in the category of unskilled and s emi skilled labourers, subject
to the rules and regulations of BPCL.
- Vocational Training to Local Youth
A section of local youth shall be trained in phases so that they can take up
some jobs such as contractorship, supplying of materials and al so small-
scale rural business (self employment) development.
- Education
BPCL shall extend support to existing primary educational institutions.
- Providing Medical Assistance
BPCL will arrange eye checkup/health checkup clinics for local villages.
- Infrastructure Development
BPCL shall also extend its support in social infrastructure development like
tube-wells for drinking water in near by v illages, v illage r oad dev elopment,
road side shelters etc.
- Social Afforestration
To m aintain ec ological bal ance, BPCL will pr omote af forestation

programmes by providing s aplings t o s chools, v illage communities and
individuals. I nitially, about 5 -6 schools will be m otivated annually t o plant
trees within their compounds.
SECTION-9 9-10 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
- Games, Sports and Culture
BPCL will also extend their support for games, sports and cultural activity
of the locality.
Occupational Safety and Health
BPCL has t he hi ghest c oncern and c ommitment f or pr otecting the Health and
Safety of all employees, c ontractors, c ustomers and t he c ommunities i n w hich
BPCL oper ates and f or c onservation of t he E nvironment. B PCL c omply with al l
Statutory Regulations and may ev en g o bey ond t hese f or t he benef it of our
environment. BPCL consider Health, S afety and E nvironmental as pects ar e an
integral part of BPCL’s business planning and operation processes.
HSSE Policy
Based on these guiding principles, BPCL shall demonstrate their commitment by

:
• Providing and maintaining safe facilities and working conditions.
• Recognizing that all employees have responsibility for their own safety
and actions which could affect the safety of others.
• Adoption of appropriate technologies to minimise the impact of our
activities on the Environment
BPCL shall establish clear objectives and targets to:
• Improve continuously for prevention of ac cidents oc cupational i llnesses

and minimising any impact of our activities on the environment.
SECTION-9 9-11 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
• Promote learning through t raining and s haring of ex periences and bes t
practices; i ncluding with c ontractors, c ustomers and the publ ic, wherever
required.
• Inculcate values and at titudes conducive to achieve excellence in Health,
Safety and Environmental performance.
BPCL shall provide means to achieve their mission by:
• Assigning clear roles and responsibilities at all levels and periodically

reviewing and recognising contribution to HSE objectives.
• Allocating adequate resources.
• Fostering a spirit of participation by all employees in Health, Safety and
Environmental conservation efforts.
• Creating appropriate forums for deliberations on Health, Safety and
Environmental issues.
BPCL shall monitor performance by:
• Periodically aud iting work processes, systems pr actices and pr omptly

correcting deficiencies.
• Incorporating HSE performance as a parameter for assessing the overall

performance of Employees, Business Units, Contractors and Business
Associates.
Details of proposed Occupational Health Surveillance Program for the present

year for the employees are furnished as EXHIBIT 9.1.
SECTION-9 9-12 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
Security Policy
BPCL has the highest concern for the Security of human lives and Corporation’s
properties, g oods and s ervices. BPCL is also c ommitted to be al ert and
responsible t o pr event t heft, m is-use, loss, dam age, pi lferage and s abotage of
any nature which will hamper their business interests / continuity. Commensurate
with this commitment, BPCL shall:
• Adhere to security rules, regulations and laws of the land.

• Provide effective and pr oactive m easures f or P hysical and I nternal
Security as ex plained i n t he S ecurity M anual – at al l R efineries and
Marketing establishments.
• Keep our selves i n r eadiness t o m eet al l em ergency situations by
appropriate action plans.
• Actively participate in i mplementation of s ecurity m easures t o c ombat
external threats.
• Reinforce t he s ecurity s et up by pr oviding r egular t rainings and up
gradation of facilities.
• Monitor effectiveness of security measures by surprise checks, mock drills
and take corrective actions.
Emergency Preparedness (Disaster Management Plan)
Emergency scenario may ar ise due t o t he ac cidental r elease of hazardous

chemicals. A well-formulated D MP i s c onceived f or c ombating em ergency
scenarios. T he details of t he D MP under c ondition of em ergency ar e already
discussed in a separate DMP.
Regular and i ntensive aw areness c ampaigns w ill be m ade w ithin t he staff
SECTION-9 9-13 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
members of BPCL and the nearby villagers. T o ensure appropriate combating of
emergency s cenarios, BPCL will ar range dec lared and un -declared M ock D rills
with di fferent s cenarios t o c heck t he ef fectiveness and staff members’ alertness
about the Disaster Management Program.
Audit
An audit is a retrospective look at an ex isting operation to see how successfully

the env ironmental i ssues ar e bei ng addr essed. I t hel ps t o s afeguard t he
environment, by assisting with and substantiating compliance with local, regional
and national laws and regulations, and with company policy and standards.
The audi t p rocedure involves gathering relevant background and env ironmental
data, r eports and pr ogramme det ails. A n i nspection c hecklist i s g enerally used
during the site inspection by the audit team. This team may be ei ther internal or
external, depending on the objectives of the exercise.
An environmental audit gives an ov erall v iew of t he c ompany's m echanisms

and their effectiveness i n env ironmental c ontrol, as w ell as r egulatory
compliance.
Management systems auditing (full environmental auditing) covers such issues

as:
- lines of responsibility for environmental controls;
- resources allocated; and
- effectiveness of security and protection measures.
In addi tion t o regulatory compliance and management system auditing,

specific t echnical audi ts of ener gy c onsumption, w aste and pollution sources,
SECTION-9 9-14 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
and site contamination are possible. Each technique has its own application and
the methodology i s des cribed i n oper ations m anuals. R egulatory c ompliance
covers issues such as establishing the actual level of environmental discharges;
site contamination; and accidents, etc.
Waste and pollution audits can pinpoint exactly where in a process most of the
wastes originate and why they are allowed to be released.
Energy audits seek t o i nvestigate t he pat tern of ener gy c onsumption w ithin a

company and to propose cost-effective conservation measures.
Both w aste and ener gy audi ts of ten l ead t o s ubstantial c ost s avings w ithin a
company by identifying where excessive wastage occurs.
Site audits try to doc ument t he s tate of s oil c ontamination, and per haps al so
groundwater c ontamination. T his m ay hav e an ec onomic pay back in identifying
the practices that l ed t o t he c ontamination. R emedial c lean-up m easures bei ng
notoriously expensive, such audits may result in improved operating procedures,
thereby avoiding further expenditure during the eventual site closure phase.
The audi ting pr ocess s hould ens ure t hat t he m onitoring pr ogramme adequately
measures the true nature and extent of all contaminated discharges to water and
air, whether chemical or physical.
9.1.4 Hierarchical System to Deal with Environmental Issues
The i mplementation of t he Environmental Management P lan needs s uitable

organisation and manpower and s uccess of any Evironmental Mnagement
Pogramme depends upon the efficiency of the organizational setup responsible for
the i mplementation of t he pr ogramme. R egular monitoring of the various
environmental parameters is al so nec essary t o ev aluate t he ef fectiveness of t he
SECTION-9 9-15 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
______________________________________________________________________________
management programme so that corrective action / measure can be taken in case
there are some drawbacks in the proposed programme.
Out of 42 O & M personnel of the existing POL terminal, people having sufficient
educational and pr ofessional q ualification and ex perience in t he f ield of
environmental management is nominated to discharge responsibilities related to
environmental management. Thus an Environmental Management Cell (EMC)
is already formed in the POL Terminal. The Cell is under the overall supervision
of t he Terminal Manager and is responsible f or m onitoring of the
implementation of the various actions which are to be ex ecuted by the agencies
specified in the EMP. The broad functions of EMC are:
 To implement the environmental management plan,

 To assure regulatory compliance with all relevant rules and regulations
 To ensure compliance with EC conditions
 To r eport non c ompliance / v iolations of env ironmental nor ms, i f any , to
the Board of Directors of BPCL through Terminal Manager
 To ensure regular operation and maintenance of pollution control devices,
 To minimize environmental impacts of operations as by strict adherence to
the EMP
 To initiate environmental monitoring as per approved schedule.
 Review and interpretation of monitored results and corrective measures in
case monitored results are above the specified limit.
 Maintain documentation of g ood env ironmental pr actices and appl icable
environmental laws as ready reference.
 Maintain environmental related records.
 Coordination w ith r egulatory ag encies, ex ternal c onsultants, m onitoring
laboratories.
 Maintain log of public complaints and the action taken
------- 0 -------
SECTION-9 9-16 BPCL

SECTION – 10
SUMMARY & CONCLUSION
EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SECTION - 10
SUMMARY & CONCLUSION
10.1 OVERALL JUSTIFICATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT
Meeting National as well as Regional Demand
Demand of pet roleum products has i ncreased w ith ur banization of the pl aces
around P iyala. I n o rder t o m eet t he dem and, BPCL pr oposes t o i ncrease t he
storage capacity of their existing depot at Piyala.
The proposed project is meant for improving supply position of POL products in
the villages and small towns around Piyala.
The proposed project will improve supply position of the petroleum products in
Haryana, which is vital for economic growth as well as improving the quality of
life. The i mproved pe troleum s upply w ill h ave s trong l ogistical support f or
delivering the products to customers without interruption. The project will also
provide indirect employment to unskilled, semiskilled and skilled categories.
Studying all the abov e f actors, Bharat P etroleum Corporation Li mited (BPCL)
proposes to enhance the storage capacity of the existing depot at Piyala.
Physical Infrastructure
Establishment of large developmental projects of this category will improve the

availability of t he physical i nfrastructures like appr oach r oads, dr ainage,
communication and transportation facilities etc.
SECTION-10 10-1 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Social Infrastructure
Implementation of the project will indirectly boost up the social infrastructure of

the surrounding, like local education, medical and communication of the whole
surrounding area.
Employment Potential
The project implementation will indeed generate direct and indirect employment
potential. During operation phase there will be employment opportunities, mainly
in service sector, as per the requirement. In addition to this, additional jobs will be
generated by local business in the supply of goods and services.
Other Benefits
Besides above, indirect benefits are also expected to be accrued to the region
by way of r eduction o f delivery di stance by tankers w hich i n turn will r educe
trucks on t he r oad r educing t he v ehicular l oad on t he p ublic r oads. This w ill
result in reduced air pollution and reduced probability of accidents on the roads
due to less movement of tank trucks.
Thus, the proposed project has ushered in the social and economic up-liftment
of the persons living in the vicinity of the Project i.e. of society at large.

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
10.2 SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

Environmental
Component
Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
Construction Phase
i) Land For t he pr oposed Hence, t here w ill be
acquisition expansion pr oject, t he no i mpact due t o t his
total l and ( including t he issue.
land required f or
proposed ex pansion) i s
under possession o f
BPCL.
ii) Site BPCL will ensure use of Impacts a re
Physical Environment
development - water sprinklers liberally temporary i n nat ure.

leveling to minimize / e liminate Impacts w ill b e
/grading & fugitive dus t nui sance confined t o s hort
related during s ite distances, as c oarse
construction development. particles w ill b e
activities settled w ithin s hort
distance f rom
activities. Thus m inor
impact is envisaged at
construction si te
premises. No negative
impact i s ex pected
outside t he s ite
boundary.

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Environmental
Component Potential Impact Mitigation Measures Residual Impact
At emporary Accommodations o f No neg ative i mpact i s

immigration of construction w orkers anticipated du e to
persons will b e will be ar ranged in influx of w orkers. B ut,
there. Most of t he nearby v illages. T here some s ignificant
Socioeconomic Environment
unskilled a nd s emi are l arge nu mbers of positive i mpact i s

skilled l abour s hall residential buildings envisaged du e t o
be f rom nearby available i nt he increased
villages and towns. villages. employment
However, temporary opportunity, new j ob
infrastructures l ike s ite generation an d
offices, stores, material additional j obs t hat
yard, R est r ooms e tc. will be g enerated
will be c onstructed a t indirectly i n t he form
Project site. of l ocal bus iness i n
the s upply of g oods
and services.
Fugitive dust will be This problem has to be Whatever adv erse
generated d uring mitigated b y impact might be there,
excavation and introducing dus t all w ill be t emporary
other ear thmoving suppression m easure and c onfined t o the
Air Environment
activities, dur ing through sprinkling o f construction ar ea

concreting w ork water i n dus t prone only. T here w ill be no
and m ovement o f activities. significant r esidual
vehicles es pecially negative impact to the
on un metalled environment on a n
roads. overall concept.

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Environmental
Some w aste w ater - All s anitary w aste There will b e n o

will be g enerated from the site shall b e significant r esidual
from on going treated i n t he s eptic negative impact.
construction tanks.
activity. - An oi l t rap s hall be
provided i nt he
drainage line t o
prevent
contamination o f
surface w ater by
accidental spillage o f
Water Environment
oil / grease.
- Wash waste shall be
- drained pr operly.
Here al so a baffled
oil-water s eparator
will be provided.
To pr event
contamination f rom
accidental spillage of
oil, t he oi l s torage
areas will be bunded
and will be inspected
and cleaned at
regular intervals.

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Environmental
Noise s hall be The eq uipment, which There w ill be no

generated m ainly is t he s ource of high significant r esidual
due t o oper ation of noise, will have built-in negative impact.
machinery/ type n oise c ontrol
equipment used f or abatement m easure.
construction a nd Provision of s upplying
transportation o f protective dev ices l ike
materials t o t he ear muff / plugs to the
Noise Environment
site. workers who will b e

working i n t he noi se
prone areas.

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Environmental
Construction Litter, fuel, oi l dr ums, There w ill be no

related ac tivities used g rease c artridges significant r esidual
could h ave an shall be c ollected and negative impact.
adverse impact on removed properly.
Soil Environment
the s oil r esulting

from c learing, Dustbins / l itter bi ns
excavation, t opsoil shall be pl aced at
removal, s oil strategic locations.
disposal, r oad
construction a nd
refuse/ w aste
disposal.
Disturbance dur ing - Land c learing f or The greenery being
construction phas e construction s ite w ill developed will
shall be c onfined t o be k ept at t he improve the ecological
the l and ac quired absolute m inimum status as w ell as
for t he pr oposed practicable. aesthetics of the area.
plant only. - Plant L ayout w ould
be designed t o
Ecological Environment
minimize the removal

of soil and vegetation
- The g reenery will be
developed f rom early
date of construction.

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Environmental
Operation Phase
Existing 4 2 O & M The s ite bei ng eas ily It i s ex pected t hat
personnel w ill cater accessible f rom the civic s ervices in t he
Socioeconomic Environment
the pr oposed nearby ar eas t hat al so locality will f urther

expansion al so. have a g ood nu mber of improve. T he project
However, s ome housing f acilities, local will hav e a pos itive
indirect housing w ill not be beneficial effect on
employment w ill be stressed t o any deg ree socioeconomic
generated du e t o of concern. environment.
implementation of
the ex pansion
project.
NOx, H C & PM will Existing DG sets h ave The i mpact on ai r
be em itted t hrough stack of ad equate environment due to the
stack for existing height, a s per proposed e xpansion
DG se ts. However, recommendation of will be insignificant.
no n ew D G s et i s CPCB. Mo reover,
proposed f or the greenery is bei ng
expansion. developed ar ound the
Air Environment
terminal i n t he v acant
land space to check the
fugitive dust emission .

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Environmental
Wash w ater m ixed All w astewater w ill be The a quatic l ife of the
with o il will b e passed t hrough t he Oil receiving water body
discharged. Water Separator will not be di sturbed.
Water Environment
(OWS). Separated oil Controlled di scharge

will be s tored conforming to nor ms
separately while t he of SPCB / M OEF is
clean water will be used not expected t o
for g reenery induce any
development. detrimental i mpact o n
the s urface w ater
quality.
Noise w ill b e DG sets are put i n t he The entire plant will be
generated onl y acoustic en closure and so pr ocured/installed
Noise Environment
from r unning of noise f rom t he p umps so t hat the r esultant

pumps and existing will be within permissible noise l evel w ithin t he
emergency DG limits. plant p remises
sets. remains within 7 5
dB(A) dur ing d ay t ime
and 7 0 dB (A) dur ing
night time respectively.
The s oil Sludge will be disposed Some s mall ar ea of
environment m ay off to t he recyclers land w ill be dedicated
not degrade since authorized by t he state for storage of sludge.
Soil Environment
there w ill be no PCB.

direct di scharge.
Only s ome s ludge
will be g enerated
out o f p eriodical
cleaning o f t he
tanks.

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Environmental
The ec ological All m easures t o c ontrol There w ill be no

environment air pol lutants, w aste significant r esidual
Ecological Environment
around t he water di scharge an d negative impact.

proposed Terminal solid waste disposal are
will not be a ffected conceived as s tated
since t here i s no above.
emission an d
discharge o f
effluents beyond
the per missible
limit.
------- 0 -------

SECTION – 11
DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS
EIA REPORT FOR
PROPOSED PROPOSED CAPACITY EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL TERMINAL
CONSULTANTS
SECTION - 11
DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS
11.1 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED
• Development Consultants Private Limited (DCPL)
Development Consultants Private Limited (DCPL) is an I ndia bas ed

transnational Consulting Engineering Group rendering the entire gamut of Project
Engineering services starting f rom c oncept t o c onstruction s upervision and
commissioning for diverse core sector and high-technology projects in India and
abroad.
Since i ts i nception i n 1950 , as t he I ndian ar m o f w orld r enowned c onsulting

engineers – The K uljian C orporation o f U SA, t oday an I SO-9001 ac credited
100% I ndian C ompany, DCPL has an or ganizational s trength o f near ly 1000
Technocrats a nd P rofessionals from al l p ertinent fields of e ngineering an d
technology. S tarting with P ower, the sphere of activities has increased multifold
encompassing a w ide r ange of i ndustries l ike C ement, P aper, C hemical, P etro-
chemical, S teel & M etals, S pace, D efence, M ining & M ineral P rocessing,
Software, A rchitectural, I nfrastructure D evelopment, E nvironmental and
Management Consultancy.
DCPL oper ates t hrough i ts C orporate H eadquarters at K olkata with B ranch

offices i n t he ot her t hree(3) m ajor M etropolis bac ked-up by ex ecutive of fices i n
Hyderabad a nd B angalore. To c ater for i ts g lobal oper ation, D C G roup h as
offices in USA, UK, Japan, Hong Kong, Egypt, Libya and Singapore.
• Green Cell of DCPL
Green Cell of Development Consultants Private Limited (DCPL) has carried

out a l arge nu mber o f as signments i n Environmental I mpact assessment an d
Environmental management plan, waste water management, water supply, risk
analysis and em ergency pl anning r elated t o haz ardous c hemicals et c.. T he
Green Cell of DCPL is ac tively eng aged i n t he pr eparation of E nvironmental

EIA REPORT FOR
PROPOSED PROPOSED CAPACITY EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL TERMINAL
CONSULTANTS
Impact Assessment (EIA) reports and Environmental Management Plans (EMP)

in the following fields :
√ Thermal Power Stations

√ Mining and Mineral Beneficiation
√ Chemical & Petrochemical Industries
√ Cement & Paper Plants
√ Tidal Power Plant
√ Housing Projects including Townships
Till date Green Cell of DCPL has carried out more than one hundred (100) EIA.
The di vision i s al so c apable o f u ndertaking pos t pr oject i mpact studies. The
division has c arried out E nvironmental s tudies l eading t o t he de velopment o f
environmental standards also.
• Accreditation of NABET / QCI
DCPL is al so ac credited by National A ccreditation B oard o f E ducation an d

Training/Quality C ouncil of India ( NABET / Q CI) t o c arry out E IA S tudies for
different s ectors like Thermal P ower P lants, M ining of m inerals including
opencast / underground mining, M etallurgical I ndustry ( Ferrous) - both pr imary
and secondary, Cement Plants, Pulp & Paper industry excluding manufacturing
of pap er f rom w aste p aper an d m anufacture of p aper from ready pulp w ithout
bleaching, Townships and A rea d evelopment pr ojects, Isolated storage &
handling of Hazardous chemicals (As per threshold planning quantity
indicated in column 3 of Schedule 2 & 3), Petro-chemical complexes
(industries based on processing of petroleum fraction & natural gas and /
or reforming to aromatics) etc. DCPL has already carried out more than 100
EIA s tudies i n di fferent s ectors. A c opy o f N ABET / Q CI’s l etter r egarding
accreditation is also enclosed here as EXHIBIT 11.1.
------- 0 -------

ANNEXURE
EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
ANNEXURE - 1 : BROAD LIST OF FLORA FOUND WITHIN STUDY AREA
TREES
Scientific Name Local Name Family
Mangifera indica L. Aam Anacardiaceae
Albizia lebbeck (L.) Benth. Siris Mimosaceac
Albizia odoratissima (L.f.) Benth. Kala Siris Mimosaceae
Albizia procera (Roxb.) Benth. Safed siris Mimosaceae
Ficus glomerata Roxb. Gular Moraceae
Ficus religiosa L. Bo tree Moraceae
Ficus elastica Roxb. Atta bar Moraceae
Ficus hispida L.f. Dumbar Moraceae
Kigelia pinnata DC. Jhar fanoos Bignoniaceae
Lagerstroemia indica L. Phurush Lythraceae
Delonix regia (Boj.) Raf. Gulmohor Caesalpiniaceae
Cassia fistula L. Amaltas Caesalpiniaceae
Cassia siamea Lamk. Kassod phul Caesalpiniaceae
Tamarindus indica L. Imli Caesalpiniaceae
Michelia champaca L. Champa Magnoliaceae
Cordia dichotoma Willd. Lassora Ehretiaceae
Azadirachta indica A. Juss. Neem Meliaceae
Vitex negunda L. Nirgandi Verbenaceae
Syzygium cumini (L.) Skeels Jamun Myrtaceae
Butea monosperma (Lamk.) Taubert Dhak Fabaceae
ANNEXURE-1 A-1 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
TREES
Bixa orellana L. Sinduria Bixaceae
Acacia auriculiformis A. Cunn. Sona jhuri Mimosaceae
Acacia nilotica (L.) Willd. ex Del. Babul Mimosaceae
Acacia senegal (L.) Willd. Kumta Mimosaceae
Zyziphus mauritiana Lamk. Ber Rhamnaceae
Zyziphus nummularia (Burm. f.) Jharber Rhamnaceae

Wight & Arn.
Anthocephalus chinensis (Lamk.) A. Kadam Rubiaceae

Rich. ex Walp.
Dillenia indica L. Girnar Dilleniaceae
Magnolia grandiflora L. Him champa Magnoliaceae
Milletia peguensis Ali Kachnar Fabaceae
Millingtonia hortensis L.f. Neem chameli Bignoniaceae
Mimusops elengi L. Moulsari Sapotaceae
Holarrhena antidysenterica (Roth.) A. Kurchi Apocynaceae

DC.
Terminalia arjuna (Roxb. ex DC.) Wight Arjun Combretaceae

& Arn.
Terminalia bellirica (Gaertn.) Roxb. Bahera Combretaceae
Gardenia jasminoides Ellis Gundhraj Rubiaceae
Grevillea robusta A. Cunn. ex R. Br. Rupasi Proteaceae
Thespesia populnea (L.) Soland. ex Gajhand Malvaceae

Corr.
ANNEXURE-1 A-2 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
TREES
Peltophorum pterocarpum (DC.) Backer Arunjyoti Caesalpiniaceae

ex K. Hyne
Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br. Chatim Apocynaceae
Aegle marmelos (L.) Corr. Bel Rutaceae
Melia azedarach L. Bakain Meliaceae
Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. Vitaiti Babul Mimosaceae
Acacia jacquemontii Benth. Kikar Mimosaceae
Acacia lencocephala (Roxb.) Willd. Ronj Mimosaceae
Artocarpus lakoocha Roxb. Barhas Moraceae
Morus alba L. Tut Moraceae
Morus nigra L. Kala tut Moraceae
Streblus asper Lour. Siora Moraceae
Eucalyptus citriodora Hook. Eucalyptus Myrtaceae
Erythrina suberosa Roxb. Pangra Fabaceae
Eucalyptus globulus Labill. Eucalyptus Myrtaceae
Eucalyptus paniculata Sm. Eucalyptus Myrtaceae
Emblica officinalis Gaertn. Amla Euphorbiaceae
Roystonea regia (H.B. & K.) O.F. cook Botol palm Arecaceae
Arenga sacoharifera Labill. Sago palm Arecaceae
Livistona chinensis R. Br. ex Mart. Fan palm Arecaceae
Saraca asoka (Roxb.) de Wilde Sita asok Caesalpiniaceae
ANNEXURE-1 A-3 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
TREES
Spathodea campanulata Beanv. Tulip briksh Bignoniaceae
Polyalthia longifolia Thw. Ashok Annonaceae
Annona squamosa L. Sarifa Annonaceae
Grewia asiatica L. Phalsa Tiliaceae
Parkinsonia aculeata L. Vilaiti kikar Mimosaceae
Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre Karanja Fabaceae
Ailanthus excelsa Roxb. Arua Simaroubaceae
Moringa oleifera Lamk. Sahinja Moringaceae
Prosopis cineraria (L.) Druce Sami Mimosaceae
Prosopis chilensis (Molina) Stuntz Kabuli kikkar Mimosaceae
Pithecellobium dulce (Roxb.) Benth. Jangli jalebi Mimosaceae
Tabernaemontana divaricata (L.) R. Br. Tagar Apocynaceae
ANNEXURE-1 A-4 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SHRUBS
Caesalpinia pulcherrima (L.) Sw. Guletura Caesalpiniaceae
Calliandra haematocephala Hssk. Powder puff Mimosaceac
Callistemon citrinus (Curtis) Skeels Botol brush Myrtaceae
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. Gulhan Malvaceae
Hibiscus schizopetalus (Mast.) Hook. Jhumka jaba Malvaceae
Hibiscus tiliaceus L. Chelwa Malvaceae
Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Patwa Malvaceae
Ixora chinensis Lamk. Makrichijhar Rubiaceae
Jasminum sambac (L.) Ait. Bela Oleaceae
Nerium oleander L. Kaner Apocynaceae
Nyctanthes arbor-tristis L. Harsinghar Nyctanthaceae
Pandanus odoratissimus L.f. Kewra Pandanaceae
Punica granatum L. Anar Punicaceae
Lantana camara L. Mewaphal Verbenaceae
Datura metal L. Sada dathura Solanaceae
Lantana indica Roxb. Tulsidal Verbenaceae
Cestrum nocturnum L. Rat ki rani Solanaceae
Calotropis gigantea (L.) R.Br. Akan Asclepiadaceae
Calotropis procera (Willd.) Ait. Akan Asclepiadaceae
Jatropha integerrima Jacq. Jatropa Euphorbiaceae
ANNEXURE-1 A-5 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
SHRUBS
Jatropha panduraefolia Andr. Jatropa Euphorbiaceae
Adhatoda vasica Nees Basak Acanthaceae
Datura innoxia Mill. Dhatura Solanaceae
Solanum torvum Sw. Bhurat Solanaceae
Ricinus communis L. Arandi Euphorbiaceae
Jatropha gossypifolia L. Bherenda Euphorbiaceae
Ixora coccinea L. Rangan Rubiaceae
Vitex agnus-castus L. Sarmhalu Verbenaceae
Mirabilis jalapa L. Gulabbas Nyctaginaceae
Duranta repens L. Duranta Verbenaceae
Crotolaria juncea L. San Fabaceae
Cassia sophera L. Kasaundi Caesalpiniaceae
Callicarpa longifolia Lamk. Kathuli Verbenaceae
--------------
ANNEXURE-1 A-6 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
ANNEXURE – 2 : BROAD LIST OF FAUNA FOUND IN HARYANA
Wildlife
Sl.No. Local Name Scientific Name
Schedule
MAMALS
1. Indian Fulvous Fruit Bat Rousettus leschanualti V

2. Short nosed Fruit Bat Cynopterus sphinx -
3. Rhesus Macaque Macaca mulatta II
4. Common Indian Fox Vulpes bengalensis II
5. Jackal Canis aurius II
6. Indian Gray Mongoose Herpestes edwardsi II
7. Small Indian Mongoose Herpestes auropunptatus II
8. Indian Hare Lepus nigricollis IV
9. Five striped Palm Squirel Funambulus pennanti IV
10. House Rat Rattus rattus V
11. Indian Bush Rat Golunda ellioti V
12. House Mouse Mus musculus V
13. Common Indian Field Mouse Mus booduga V
14. Lesser Bandicoot Rat Bandicota bengalensis V
15. Large Bandicoot Rat Bandicota indica V
16. Barking Deer Muntiacus muntjak III
17. Common Otter Lutra lutra II
18. Common Langur Presbytis entelus II
19. Crabeating Mongoose Herpestes urva IV
20. Hog deer Axis procinus III
21. Indian Elephant ** Elephus maximus I
22. Indian Giant Squirel Ratufa indica II
23. Indian Pangolin Manis crassicaudata I
24. Jungle Cat Felis chaus II
25. Large Indian Civet Viverra zibetha II
26. Leopard Cat Felis bengalensis I
27. Sambhar Cervus unicolor III
28. Spotted Deer Axis Axis III
29. Crabeating Mongoose Herpestes urva IV
30. Indian Hare Lepus nigricollis IV
31. Common Indian Field Mouse Mus booduga V
32. Wild Dog Cuon alpines IV
ANNEXURE - 2 A-7 BPCL

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Wildlife
Schedule
33. Neel Gai Boselaphus tragocamelus III
** Very recently a herd of Indian Elephants have made their home in the Kalesar Forest
BIRDS
1. Common Myna Acridotheres tristis IV

2. Blyth's Reed Warbler Acrocephalus dumetorum IV
3. Common lora Aegithina tiphia IV
4. Yellowbacked Sunbird Aethopyga siparaja IV
5. Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis IV
6. Indian Pied Hornbill Anthracoceros malabaricus I
7. Indian Tree Pipit Anthus hodgsoni IV
8. Jungle Myna Aoridotheres fuscus IV
9. Streaked Siderhunter Aracnothera magna IV
10. Pond Heron or Paddy Bird Ardeola grayii IV
11. Ashy Swallow -Shrike Artamus fuscus IV
12. Spotted Owlet Athene barma IV
13. Brown Fish Owl Bubo zeylonensis IV
14. Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis IV
15. Great Pied Hornbill Buceros bicornis I
16. Crow-Pheasant Centropus sinensis IV
17. Whitecapped Redstart Chaimarrornis leucocephalus IV
18. Emerald Dove Chalcophaps indica IV
19. Goldenfronted Chloropsis Chloropsis aurifrons IV
20. Goldmantled Chloropsis Chloropsis cochinchinensis IV
21. Blackbacked Woodpecker Chrysocolaptes festivus IV
22. Black Stork Ciconia nigra IV
23. Blue Rock Pigeon Columba livia IV
24. Shyama Copsychus malabaricus IV
25. Magpie Robin Copsychus saularis IV
26. Indian Roller Coracias bengalensis IV
27. Smaller Grey Cuckoo-Shirke Coracina melaschistos IV
28. Large Cuckoo-Shirke Coracina novaehollandiae IV
29. Jungle Crow Corvus macrorhynchus IV
30. House Crow Corvus splendens IV

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Wildlife
Schedule
31. Common Hawk-Cuckoo Cuculus varius IV
32. Greyheaded Flycatcher Culicicapa ceylonensis IV
33. Palm Swift Cypsiurus parvus IV
34. Nepal House Martin Delichon nipalensis IV
35. Indian Tree Pie Dendrociotta vagabunda IV
36. Himalayan Tree Pie Dendrocitta formosae IV
37. Thickbilled Flowerpecker Dicaeum agile IV
38. Lesser Goldenbacked Dinopium benghalense IV
Woodpecker
39. Indian Goldenbacked Dinopium javanense IV
Threetoed Woodpecker
40. Himalayan Goldenbacked Dinopium shorii IV
Threetoed Woodpecker
41. Little Egret Egretta garzetta IV
42. Rubythroat Enicurus calliope IV
43. Blackbacked Forktail Enicurus immaculatus IV
44. Koel Eudynamys scolopacea IV
45. Broadbilled Roller Eurystomus orientalis IV
46. Grey Patridge Francalimus pondicerianus IV
47. Red Jungle Fowl Gallus gallus IV
Blackgorgetted Laughing
48. Garrulux pectoralis IV
Thrush
49. Barred Owlet Glaucidium cuculoides IV
50. Hill Myna Gracula religiosa IV
51. Indian White Backed Vulture Gyps bengalensis IV
52. Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvous IV
53. Indian Longbilled Vulture Gyps indicus IV
54. Whitebreasted Kingfisher Halcyon smyrnesis IV
55. Wiretailed Swallow Hirundo smithii IV
56. Black Eagle Ictaenaetus malayensis IV
57. Fairy Bluebird Irena puella IV
58. Brown Shrike Lanius cristatus IV
59. Greybacked Shrike Lanius tephronotus IV
60. Whitethroated Munia Lonchura malabarica IV
61. Spotted Munia Lonchura punctulata IV
62. Bluethroated Barbet Megalaima asiatica IV

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Wildlife
Schedule
Crimsonbreasted Barbet /
63. Megalaima haemacephala IV
Copper Smith
64. Lineated Barbet Megalaima lineata IV
65. Large Green Barbet Megalaima zeylanica IV
66. Chestnutheaded Bee-eater Merops leshenaulti IV
67. Green Bee Eater Merops Orientalis IV
68. Bronze Winged Jaeana Metopidius indicus IV
69. Redbreasted Falconet Microhierax caerulescens IV
70. Rufous Woodpecker Micropternus brachyurus IV
71. Grey Wagtail Monticola cinerea IV
72. White Wagtail Motacilla alba IV
73. Large Pied Wagtail Motacilla maderaspatensis IV
74. Brown Flycatcher Muscicapa latirostris IV
75. Little Pied Flycatcher Muscicapa westermanni IV
76. Blackheaded Oriole Oriolus xanthornus IV
77. House Sparrow Passer domesticus IV
78. Baya Ploceus philippinus IV
79. Black Ibis Pseudibis papillosa IV
80. Redvented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer IV
81. Redwhiskered Bulbul Pycnonotus jocosus IV
82. Spotted Dove Streptopelia chinensis IV
83. Little Brown Dove Streptopelia senegalensis IV
84. Pied Myna Sturnus contra IV
85. Grey headed Myna Sturnus malabaricus IV
86. Brahminy Myna Sturnus pagodarum IV
87. Jungle Babbler Turdoides striatus IV
88. Barn Owl Tyto alba IV
REPTILES
1. Garden lizard Calotes versicolor

2. House geeks / House Gecko Heamidactylus brooks / brooki
3. Common skink Mabuya carinata
4. Cobra Naja naja II
5. Land monitor lizard Varanus bengalensis

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Wildlife
Schedule
6. Fan-throated lizard Sitana ponticerina
7. Bark geeks Heamidactylus leschenauti
8. Painted bronze backed tree

snake Drendraphis picta
9. Indian Krait Bangarus caeruleus II
10. Indian Python Python molorus molorous II
AQUATIC BIRDS
1. Cormorant Phalacrocoran niger IV

2. Darter Anlinga rufa IV
3. Pond heron Ardeola graagii IV
4. Medium Egret Egretta intermedia IV
5. Little Egret Egretta garzetta IV
6. White breasted Kingfisher Halcyon smymensis IV
7. Common blue kingfisher Alcedo althis IV
AMPHIBIA
1. Indian bull frog Rana tigrina IV

2. Common Tree frog Hyla hyla
3. Common toad Bufo melanostictus
4. Leaping frog Rana erythraea
5. Tree frog Polypedalis luecomystax
FISH
1. Khoira Clupea chapon

2. Phansa Engraulis telere
3. Chital Notopterus chitala
4. Phalus Notopterus Notopterus
5. Rahu Labeo rohita
6. Chela Chela lau-buca
7. Bhola Barillus barna
8. Joia Barillus bendelisis

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
Wildlife
Schedule
9. Koksa Barillus shacra
10. Chebli Danio acquipinnatus
11. Nipati Danio dangila
12. Banspata Danio devario
13. Dankikha Rasbora daniconius
14. Mowa Amblypharimgodon mola
15. Utla Puntius chagunio
16. Catla Catla catla
17. Punti Puntius putitora
18. Swarna Punti Puntius sarana sarana
19. Tila Punti Puntius tieto tieto
20. Chorpoia Garra gotyla
21. Kalbosh Labeo kalbasu
22. Kursa Labeo dero
23. Utli Labeo pungusia
24. Badangi Semiplotus semiplotus
25. Titari Psilorhynchus sucatio
26. Tita Kabri Balitora brucei brucei
27. Getu Botia dayi
28. Magur Clarius batrachus
29. Singhi Heteropneustes fossilis
30. Boal Wallago attu
31. Tangra Mistus cavasius
32. Kala kabri Glyptothoras horai
33. Chang Chana gachua

EIA REPORT FOR
CONSULTANTS
ANNEXURE – 2A : ENDANGERED & THREATENED FAUNA IN HARYANA
Wildlife
Schedule
A. MAMMALS
1 Leopard Cat Felis bengalensis I
2 Clouded Leopard Neofelis nebulosa I
3 Serow Cupricornis sumatraensis I
4 Indian Pangolin Manis crassicaudata I
B. BIRDS
1 Common Peafowl Pavo cristatus I
C. MAMMALS
1 Jungle Cat Felis chaus II
2 Large Indian Civet Viverra zibetha II
Indian Giant
3 Squirel Ratufa indica II
4 Rhesus Macaque Macaca malatta II
5 Common Langur Presbytis entellus II
6 Common Otter Lutra lutra II

EXHIBIT
EXHIBIT- 1.1
APPROVED TERMS OF RERFERENCE OF
EIA STUDY
EXHIBIT- 2.1
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
EXHIBIT 2.1: SITE PHOTGRAPHS
Sheet 1 of 1
EXHIBIT- 3.1(A)
MICRO METEOROLOGICAL DATA
– GURGAON OBSERVATORY
EXHIBIT-3.1 (A) [Sheet 1 of 2]
jalavaayavaI saarNaI
CLIMATOLOGICAL TABLE BACK
sqoSana : gauzgaaVMva AxaaMSa doSaaMtar samaud/I tala maaDya sao WMcaaeX maIqr pa/xaNaaoM par AaDaairta
STATION : Gurgaon LAT. 28° 25' LONG. 77° 00' HEIGHT ABOVE M.S.L. 229 METRES BASED ON OBSERVATIONS 1971-2000
vaayau taapamaana vaPaaX
maaDya carma Aad/Xtaa maoGa kI maa…aa
vaPaXsaihta vaPaXsaihta 24
dOinak dOinak idnaaMk vaPaaX ko sabasao nama SauPktama GaMqaokI idnaaMk maaDya
sqoSana ka SauPk nama AiDak nyaUna maah maoM maah maoM AaOr idnaaMk AaOr saapaoxa maaisak idnaaoMkI mahInao ka mahInao ka sabasao BaarI AaOr pavana
maah satah daba balba balba tama tama wccatama inamnatama wccatama vaPaX inamnatama vaPaX Aad/Xtaa baaPpa daba samasta maoGa inamna maoGa yaaoga saMKyaa yaaoga yaaoga vaPaaX vaPaX gaita
AIR TEMPERATURE RAINFALL
CLOUD TOTAL IN TOTAL IN
MEA N EXTREMES HUMIDITY
AMOUNTS WETTEST DRIEST HEAVIEST
STATION HIGHEST LOWEST DATE NO. OF MONTH MONTH FALL IN DATE MEAN
RELATIVE VAPOUR ALL LOW
LEVEL DRY WET DAILY DAILY IN THE IN THE AND LOWEST DATE MONTHLY RAINY WITH WITH 24 AND WIND
HUMIDITY PRESSURE CLOUDS CLOUDS
MONTH PRESSURE BULB BULB MAX MIN MONTH MONTH HIGHEST YEAR AND YEAR TOTAL DAYS YEAR YEAR HOURS YEAR SPEED
AakaSa ko ik.maI./
Eca.paI.E iz. saoM iz. saoM iz. saoM iz. saoM iz. saoM iz. saoM iz. saoM iz. saoM pa/itaSata Eca.paI.E APQmaaSa ima.ima. ima.ima. ima.ima. ima.ima. pa/. GaM.
O O O O O O O O
hPa C C C C C C C C % hPa Oktas of sky mm mm mm mm Kmph
janavarI I 10.1 8.5 20.9 5.9 25.2 1.9 28.0 29 0.0 11 79 9.9 2.2 1.5 15.2 1.5 29.8 0.0 28.8 29 3.2
JAN II 19.2 13.5 1969 1971 50 11.1 2.5 1.5 1994 1986
frvarI I 13.3 10.8 23.7 8.4 29.1 3.5 33.5 17 0.7 21 72 11.2 2.3 1.6 21.4 1.8 122.0 0.0 49.2 28 4.0
FEB II 22.1 15.1 1993 1974 45 11.8 2.4 1.6 1990 1990
maacaX I 19.2 15.0 29.8 13.1 35.9 7.4 39.5 31 3.7 1 62 13.9 2.2 1.2 12.0 1.3 46.4 0.0 23.2 23 4.8
MAR II 28.2 18.2 1999 1972 35 13.0 2.7 1.5 1982 1975
ApaO/la I 26.5 18.8 36.9 19.1 42.1 13.2 44.8 28 9.2 2 46 15.6 1.5 0.7 16.6 1.2 157.2 0.0 123.4 16 4.9
APR II 35.1 21.2 1979 1965 26 14.0 2.0 1.1 1983 1983
maeX I 30.4 21.7 40.4 24.1 44.7 18.5 49.0 10 14.8 14 45 18.9 1.4 0.8 30.4 2.0 112.8 0.0 58.0 2 5.7
MAY II 38.0 23.8 1966 1982 28 17.9 2.2 1.2 1982 1987
jaUna I 31.3 24.6 39.7 26.6 44.9 21.8 47.5 9 12.0 8 57 25.6 2.5 1.6 73.2 3.8 266.1 5.3 261.2 30 6.7
JUN II 37.2 25.6 1993 1965 40 23.7 3.1 2.1 1981 1965 1981
jaulaaeX I 29.3 26.0 35.2 26.3 40.1 23.1 45.0 5 21.0 10 77 31.0 4.7 3.5 201.5 9.0 617.4 31.0 282.2 14 5.0
JUL II 32.7 26.9 1987 1985 65 30.9 5.0 3.7 1977 1987 1968
Agasta I 28.3 25.7 33.7 25.5 37.5 23.1 41.0 12 15.5 11 81 31.1 4.8 3.6 207.2 8.5 477.2 38.4 166.2 9 3.3
AUG II 31.4 26.8 1987 1978 70 31.7 5.0 3.7 1975 1986 1978
isatambar I 27.5 23.9 34.2 23.4 37.2 20.1 41.2 16 13.9 24 73 26.9 2.6 1.8 102.1 4.5 419.4 0.0 257.4 2 3.4
SEP II 31.8 25.2 1974 1972 59 26.8 3.2 2.2 1978 1978
A@taUbar I 23.4 19.0 33.1 17.4 36.3 12.4 39.3 12 9.3 7 64 19.0 0.9 0.5 13.7 1.1 76.0 0.0 46.0 5 2.7
OCT II 30.3 21.2 1987 1997 43 17.8 1.3 0.8 1997 1975
navambar I 17.1 13.7 28.6 11.1 32.8 7.0 38.4 6 2.6 28 66 13.0 0.9 0.5 10.9 0.7 63.0 0.0 56.4 21 2.4
NOV II 25.6 17.8 1974 1969 44 14.2 1.1 0.6 1990 1990
idsambar I 11.5 9.5 22.9 6.7 27.1 2.7 32.5 6 -0.4 5 77 10.5 2.0 1.3 7.6 0.8 69.5 0.0 33.8 30 2.6
DEC II 20.4 14.7 1978 1966 52 12.4 1.9 1.0 1967 1990
vaaiPaXk yaaoga
I
yaa maaDya 22.2 18.0 31.5 17.2 45.0 1.8 49.0 10 -0.4 5 67 18.8 2.3 1.5 712.0 36.1 1698.2 350.6 282.2 14 4.1
ANNUAL
TOTAL OR II
MEAN 29.2 20.8 5 1966 12 1966 46 18.7 2.7 1.7 1978 1987 7 1968
vaPaaoXMkI saM I
NUMBER
II
OF YEARS 27 27 28 28 28 28 32 32 27 27 22 22 26 26 31 31 33 18
299
[Sheet 2 of 2]
jalavaayavaI saarNaI
CLIMATOLOGICAL TABLE
sqoSana : gauzgaaVMva
STAION : Gurgaon
maaOsama pairGaqnaa pavana maoGa dRSyataa
pavana kI gataI ko saaTa
idnaaoM kI saMKyaa pavana kI idSaa ko idnaaoM kI maoGa maa…aa (saBaI maoGa) saihta inamna starI maoGa maa…aa saihta
ko saaTa idnaaoM kI saMKyaa (ik. maI. p/a. GaM.) saMKyaa ka p/aitaSata idnaaoM kI saMKyaa - APQmaaMSa idnaaoM kI saMKyaa - APQmaaMSa dRSyataa saihta idnaaoM kI saMKyaa
vaPaXNa
20
0.3 DaUla 62 1 ik.maI.
ima.ima.yaa BarI caMz yaa 20- 1- kuhra ik.maI. 1-4 4-10 10-20 sao
maah AiDak Aaolao gajaXna kuhra AaMDaI vaata AiDak 61 19 0 w wpaU paU dpaU d dpa pa wpa SaaMta 0 lao-2 3-5 6-7 8 0 lao-2 3-5 6-7 8 8 tak ik.maI. ik.maI. ik.maI. AiDak
WEATHER PHENOMENA WIND CLOUD VISIBILITY
No. OF DAYS WITH No. OF DAYS WITH CLOUD No. OF DAYS WITH LOW CLOUD
PERCENTAGE No. OF DAYS
No. OF DAYS WITH WIND SPEED AMOUNT (ALL CLOUDS) AMOUNT
WIND FROM OKTAS OKTAS
(Km. p. h.) No. OF DAYS WITH VISIBILITY
PPT 62 OVER
0.3 mm THUN DUST SQU Or FOG UP TO 1-4 4-10 10-20 20
MONTH Or more HAIL DER FOG STORM ALL more 20-61 1-19 0 N NE E SE S SW W NW CALM 0 T-2 3-5 6-7 8 0 T-2 3-5 6-7 8 8 1 Km. Kms. Kms. Kms. Kms.
janavarI I 1.7 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 20 11 1 4 3 8 2 14 14 18 36 16 4 5 3 3 21 1 5 2 2 0 2.8 7.1 13.0 6.2 2.0
JAN II 0 1 23 7 3 6 2 9 1 3 9 44 23 11 7 8 3 2 20 2 6 2 1 0 0.3 2.8 9.4 16.1 2.4
frvarI I 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0 0 20 8 0 4 2 10 3 14 17 19 31 14 4 5 3 2 19 1 4 2 2 0 1.5 4.7 12.3 8.6 1.0
FEB II 0 1 22 5 3 5 2 11 2 5 10 45 17 10 7 6 3 2 19 1 5 2 1 0 0.1 1.7 7.8 16.6 1.7
maacaX I 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0 0 24 7 2 4 2 10 3 15 16 24 24 12 8 6 3 2 23 1 4 2 1 0 0.5 3.7 14.6 11.0 1.3
MAR II 0 1 27 3 3 6 3 10 2 4 11 50 11 8 9 7 4 3 21 2 5 2 1 0 0.2 2.5 8.1 18.7 1.5
ApaO/la I 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 22 7 2 4 3 10 4 13 17 24 23 16 7 4 2 1 25 0 3 1 1 0 0.3 4.6 14.1 10.4 0.6
APR II 0 2 25 3 2 5 2 4 2 9 17 50 9 12 9 6 2 1 22 1 4 2 1 0 0.2 3.4 12.6 13.7 0.1
maeX I 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0 2 22 7 1 5 3 16 4 13 18 18 22 19 5 4 1 2 26 1 2 1 1 0 0.4 4.9 16.0 8.5 1.2
MAY II 0 2 26 3 2 7 3 10 2 9 16 40 11 13 8 6 2 2 24 1 4 1 1 0 0.8 3.8 13.8 11.6 1.0
jaUna I 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 2 25 3 2 7 3 25 6 12 15 18 12 15 4 5 3 3 20 2 4 2 2 0 0.5 5.0 16.2 7.8 0.5
JUN II 0 2 26 2 2 13 6 19 3 8 13 28 8 8 6 10 3 3 16 3 7 2 2 0 0.7 4.2 15.5 9.2 0.5
jaulaaeX I 11.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 22 8 1 9 5 23 3 10 11 13 25 3 5 10 5 8 10 2 8 6 5 0 0.0 2.8 11.8 14.2 2.2
JUL II 0 1 23 7 2 12 8 18 5 7 7 16 25 1 5 12 6 7 7 4 10 6 4 0 0.1 2.4 10.0 16.5 1.9
Agasta I 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1 18 12 1 4 6 20 2 6 8 10 43 1 6 8 5 11 9 2 10 6 4 0 0.2 3.8 7.9 17.8 1.3
AUG II 0 0 20 11 3 9 6 17 3 5 5 15 37 0 5 13 6 7 5 4 14 5 3 0 0.1 3.1 7.2 18.6 2.0
isatambar I 6.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 19 11 1 6 3 15 1 9 12 13 40 10 8 6 3 3 16 4 5 3 2 0 0.0 2.8 8.6 16.4 2.2
SEP II 0 0 21 9 2 8 5 10 1 5 9 27 33 4 11 8 4 3 13 5 8 3 1 0 0.0 1.4 9.0 17.4 2.2
A@taUbar I 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 17 14 1 2 3 11 3 12 10 12 46 21 5 3 1 1 27 1 2 1 0 0 0.1 3.6 9.8 15.6 1.9
OCT II 0 0 21 10 2 9 3 6 1 3 7 33 36 18 6 4 2 1 25 2 3 1 0 0 0.0 2.8 8.1 17.5 2.5
navambar I 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0 0 13 17 1 3 1 5 3 12 13 11 51 22 4 2 1 1 26 1 2 1 0 0 0.7 3.7 9.8 13.1 2.6
NOV II 0 1 16 13 2 5 2 5 1 4 5 31 45 19 5 4 1 1 25 1 3 1 0 0 0.2 2.7 5.6 18.4 3.1
idsambar I 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0 0 19 12 1 2 1 5 2 17 17 13 42 16 5 5 2 3 23 1 4 1 2 0 2.8 5.2 13.8 7.5 1.7
DEC II 0 0 20 11 2 2 1 5 1 5 9 36 39 15 7 6 2 1 24 1 4 1 1 0 0.3 2.3 9.9 15.9 2.5
vaaiPaXk yaaoga I
47.3 0.0 0.2 3.9 0.1 0.0 0 8 242 115 1 5 3 13 3 12 14 16 33 171 65 61 31 37 251 16 51 27 20 0 9.8 52.0 153.8 131.0 18.4
yaa maaDya
ANNUAL II
TOTAL 0 11 268 86 2 7 4 11 2 6 10 34 24 127 84 83 37 34 221 27 71 29 17 0 2.9 33.1 114.8 192.6 21.5
OR MEAN
vaPaaoXMkI saM I
NUMBER II
OF
YEARS 28 26 26 23 23 27
300
EXHIBIT- 3.1(B)
SITE MONITORED MICRO
METEOROLOGICAL DATA (DECEMBER
2013 – JANUARY 2014)
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
SITE MONITORED MICRO METEOROLOGICAL DATA
Date: 03.12.2013 to 04.12.2013
Time(Hr.) WS (m/sec.) WD Temp. [0C] RH [%] RAIN [mm]

10:00 1.42 6 20.5 65 0
11:00 1.54 6 21.5 62 0
12:00 1.26 3 23.0 52 0
13:00 1.12 30 24.5 51 0
14:00 1.34 33 25.0 47 0
15:00 1.26 30 24.5 47 0
16:00 1.22 30 23.5 53 0
17:00 1.20 6 22.5 59 0
18:00 1.54 6 22.0 58 0
19:00 1.82 6 21.0 65 0
20:00 1.96 3 20.5 60 0
21:00 C - 20.0 68 0
22:00 C - 19.5 73 0
23:00 C - 19.0 76 0
00:00 C - 18.5 76 0
01:00 C - 18.0 80 0
02:00 C - 17.5 80 0
03:00 C - 17.5 80 0
04:00 C - 17.5 80 0
05:00 C - 17.0 80 0
06:00 C - 17.0 80 0
07:00 C - 17.5 76 0
08:00 C - 18.5 72 0
09:00 C - 19.5 68 0
1 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 04.12.2013 to 05.12.2013

10:00 1.52 9 21.0 57 0
11:00 1.58 12 21.5 58 0
12:00 1.68 12 22.5 59 0
13:00 2.38 6 23.5 53 0
14:00 2.52 9 25.0 47 0
15:00 2.80 36 25.5 45 0
16:00 2.72 30 25.0 44 0
17:00 1.96 30 24.0 46 0
18:00 1.82 27 23.0 52 0
19:00 1.68 27 21.5 62 0
20:00 1.56 3 21.0 65 0
21:00 1.34 3 20.5 65 0
22:00 C - 20.0 68 0
23:00 C - 19.5 68 0
00:00 C - 19.5 68 0
01:00 C - 19.0 67 0
02:00 C - 19.0 67 0
03:00 C - 19.0 67 0
04:00 C - 18.5 67 0
05:00 C - 18.5 67 0
06:00 C - 18.5 67 0
07:00 C - 19.0 63 0
08:00 C - 19.5 60 0
09:00 C - 20.5 61 0
2 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 05.12.2013 to 06.12.2013

10:00 1.54 33 21.0 53 0
11:00 1.82 33 22.5 48 0
12:00 1.26 9 23.5 46 0
13:00 1.68 9 24.0 43 0
14:00 1.72 6 25.5 39 0
15:00 1.36 9 26.0 39 0
16:00 1.22 30 25.0 41 0
17:00 1.26 30 24.0 46 0
18:00 1.40 33 22.5 52 0
19:00 1.54 3 22.0 54 0
20:00 1.12 3 21.5 58 0
21:00 1.18 9 21.0 61 0
22:00 C - 20.0 65 0
23:00 C - 19.5 68 0
00:00 C - 19.5 68 0
01:00 C - 19.5 68 0
02:00 C - 19.0 67 0
03:00 C - 19.0 67 0
04:00 C - 18.5 67 0
05:00 C - 18.5 67 0
06:00 C - 18.5 67 0
07:00 C - 19.0 63 0
08:00 C - 19.5 60 0
09:00 1.12 3 20.0 60 0
3 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 06.12.2013 to 07.12.2013

10:00 1.24 30 21.5 50 0
11:00 1.46 30 22.5 48 0
12:00 1.54 27 23.0 45 0
13:00 1.82 30 24.5 44 0
14:00 2.24 33 25.5 42 0
15:00 1.82 9 25.0 44 0
16:00 2.24 9 24.5 44 0
17:00 1.96 6 23.0 48 0
18:00 1.82 3 22.5 52 0
19:00 2.10 33 21.5 54 0
20:00 1.68 27 21.0 57 0
21:00 1.26 12 20.5 57 0
22:00 1.12 6 19.5 60 0
23:00 C - 19.0 63 0
00:00 C - 19.0 63 0
01:00 C - 19.0 63 0
02:00 C - 18.5 67 0
03:00 C - 18.5 67 0
04:00 C - 18.5 63 0
05:00 C - 18.0 63 0
06:00 C - 18.0 63 0
07:00 C - 18.5 63 0
08:00 1.12 6 19.5 60 0
09:00 1.20 15 20.5 53 0
4 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 07.12.2013 to 08.12.2013

10:00 2.24 12 21.5 50 0
11:00 1.82 6 22.5 43 0
12:00 1.68 30 23.5 43 0
13:00 2.38 27 24.0 43 0
14:00 2.10 33 25.0 41 0
15:00 2.66 36 25.5 41 0
16:00 1.96 36 24.0 46 0
17:00 1.16 6 23.0 48 0
18:00 1.15 9 22.0 54 0
19:00 1.26 12 21.5 58 0
20:00 1.26 12 21.0 57 0
21:00 1.40 6 20.5 61 0
22:00 1.12 6 20.0 61 0
23:00 C - 19.5 68 0
00:00 C - 19.0 67 0
01:00 C - 19.0 67 0
02:00 C - 18.5 67 0
03:00 C - 18.5 67 0
04:00 C - 18.0 63 0
05:00 C - 17.0 70 0
06:00 C - 17.0 70 0
07:00 C - 17.5 71 0
08:00 C - 18.0 71 0
09:00 C - 18.5 67 0
5 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 08.12.2013 to 09.12.2013

10:00 1.12 30 19.5 68 0
11:00 1.16 6 21.5 62 0
12:00 1.24 30 22.5 59 0
13:00 1.68 6 23.5 53 0
14:00 1.58 6 24.5 51 0
15:00 1.54 30 23.5 53 0
16:00 1.40 30 23.0 52 0
17:00 1.36 6 22.0 58 0
18:00 1.26 6 21.5 62 0
19:00 C - 21.0 65 0
20:00 C - 20.5 69 0
21:00 C - 20.0 73 0
22:00 C - 20.0 65 0
23:00 C - 19.5 73 0
00:00 C - 19.0 76 0
01:00 C - 18.5 76 0
02:00 C - 18.0 80 0
03:00 C - 17.5 80 0
04:00 C - 17.5 80 0
05:00 C - 17.0 71 0
06:00 C - 17.5 71 0
07:00 C - 17.0 75 0
08:00 C - 17.0 75 0
09:00 1.06 30 18.0 71 0
6 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 09.12.2013 to 10.12.2013

10:00 C - 20.0 65 0
11:00 C - 21.0 61 0
12:00 1.54 30 22.5 55 0
13:00 1.26 3 23.5 49 0
14:00 1.48 6 24.0 46 0
15:00 1.62 6 25.0 38 0
16:00 1.12 30 24.0 39 0
17:00 1.12 30 23.5 43 0
18:00 1.26 33 22.0 50 0
19:00 C - 21.0 57 0
20:00 C - 20.0 64 0
21:00 C - 20.0 60 0
22:00 C - 20.0 60 0
23:00 C - 19.5 60 0
00:00 C - 18.5 63 0
01:00 C - 18.0 66 0
02:00 C - 17.5 66 0
03:00 C - 16.0 79 0
04:00 C - 15.5 74 0
05:00 C - 15.5 74 0
06:00 C - 15.5 74 0
07:00 C - 16.0 74 0
08:00 C - 17.0 75 0
09:00 C - 18.0 63 0
7 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 10.12.2013 to 11.12.2013

10:00 C - 20.0 60 0
11:00 C - 21.0 53 0
12:00 C - 22.5 43 0
13:00 1.12 6 23.5 39 0
14:00 1.26 6 24.5 38 0
15:00 1.12 33 24.5 41 0
16:00 1.10 30 23.5 39 0
17:00 0.98 33 22.5 45 0
18:00 C - 21.5 50 0
19:00 C - 20.5 60 0
20:00 C - 20.0 60 0
21:00 C - 19.0 63 0
22:00 C - 19.0 63 0
23:00 C - 19.0 59 0
00:00 C - 18.0 62 0
01:00 C - 17.0 67 0
02:00 C - 17.5 66 0
03:00 C - 16.0 79 0
04:00 C - 15.5 79 0
05:00 C - 15.0 84 0
06:00 C - 15.0 84 0
07:00 C - 15.5 84 0
08:00 C - 16.0 79 0
09:00 C - 18.0 62 0
8 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 11.12.2013 to 12.12.2013

10:00 C - 20.0 60 0
11:00 C - 21.0 53 0
12:00 C - 22.0 47 0
13:00 C - 23.0 41 0
14:00 0.98 6 23.0 45 0
15:00 0.84 3 23.5 39 0
16:00 0.88 6 23.0 38 0
17:00 C - 22.5 41 0
18:00 C - 21.5 47 0
19:00 C - 21.0 49 0
20:00 C - 20.5 53 0
21:00 C - 20.0 56 0
22:00 C - 19.5 56 0
23:00 C - 19.0 59 0
00:00 C - 18.5 59 0
01:00 C - 18.5 59 0
02:00 C - 18.0 62 0
03:00 C - 17.5 62 0
04:00 C - 17.5 62 0
05:00 C - 17.0 61 0
06:00 1.40 33 17.0 61 0
07:00 1.68 30 17.0 61 0
08:00 1.26 30 17.5 62 0
09:00 1.54 27 19.0 59 0
9 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 12.12.2013 to 13.12.2013

10:00 1.82 30 20.5 52 0
11:00 1.54 27 21.5 47 0
12:00 1.68 3 22.5 41 0
13:00 1.96 27 23.5 39 0
14:00 1.12 6 24.0 39 0
15:00 1.26 27 23.5 43 0
16:00 C - 22.5 43 0
17:00 C - 21.0 53 0
18:00 C - 21.5 53 0
19:00 C - 21.0 49 0
20:00 C - 20.5 53 0
21:00 C - 20.5 53 0
22:00 C - 20.0 48 0
23:00 C - 19.0 50 0
00:00 C - 18.5 59 0
01:00 C - 18.0 53 0
02:00 C - 17.5 57 0
03:00 C - 17.0 61 0
04:00 C - 16.5 65 0
05:00 1.40 6 16.0 69 0
06:00 1.68 30 16.0 69 0
07:00 1.14 3 17.0 65 0
08:00 1.18 3 18.0 62 0
09:00 1.12 33 19.0 63 0
10 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 13.12.2013 to 14.12.2013

10:00 2.24 6 20.0 56 0
11:00 2.10 6 21.0 49 0
12:00 1.82 27 22.0 43 0
13:00 1.96 24 23.0 38 0
14:00 1.42 27 24.5 31 0
15:00 1.12 3 24.5 31 0
16:00 1.98 30 24.0 33 0
17:00 0.98 33 23.0 41 0
18:00 C - 21.5 43 0
19:00 C - 21.0 49 0
20:00 C - 20.5 53 0
21:00 C - 20.0 56 0
22:00 C - 20.5 49 0
23:00 C - 20.0 49 0
00:00 C - 19.5 52 0
01:00 C - 19.0 54 0
02:00 C - 18.5 59 0
03:00 C - 18.0 62 0
04:00 C - 17.5 62 0
05:00 C - 16.0 74 0
06:00 C - 16.0 74 0
07:00 C - 16.5 75 0
08:00 C - 17.5 66 0
09:00 C - 18.0 62 0
11 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 14.12.2013 to 15.12.2013

10:00 C - 20.0 86 0
11:00 C - 21.0 53 0
12:00 C - 22.0 50 0
13:00 C - 23.0 48 0
14:00 C - 23.5 46 0
15:00 C - 23.0 48 0
16:00 C - 23.0 52 0
17:00 C - 22.0 52 0
18:00 C - 21.0 61 0
19:00 C - 20.0 68 0
20:00 C - 20.0 64 0
21:00 C - 19.0 67 0
22:00 C - 18.5 72 0
23:00 C - 18.5 72 0
00:00 C - 18.0 62 0
01:00 C - 17.5 66 0
02:00 C - 17.0 70 0
03:00 C - 16.0 79 0
04:00 C - 15.5 79 0
05:00 C - 15.0 84 0
06:00 C - 15.0 78 0
07:00 1.12 27 15.5 79 0
08:00 1.40 33 16.5 75 0
09:00 1.68 6 17.5 66 0
12 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 15.12.2013 to 16.12.2013

10:00 C - 19.0 59 0
11:00 C - 20.0 56 0
12:00 1.54 12 20.5 53 0
13:00 1.68 6 22.0 50 0
14:00 C - 23.0 48 0
15:00 C - 22.5 52 0
16:00 C - 22.0 54 0
17:00 C - 21.0 65 0
18:00 C - 20.0 64 0
19:00 C - 19.5 68 0
20:00 C - 19.0 69 0
21:00 C - 18.5 76 0
22:00 C - 18.0 80 0
23:00 C - 18.0 80 0
00:00 C - 17.5 80 0
01:00 C - 17.0 80 0
02:00 C - 16.5 85 0
03:00 C - 15.5 89 0
04:00 C - 15.5 89 0
05:00 C - 15.0 89 0
06:00 C - 15.0 89 0
07:00 C - 15.0 89 0
08:00 C - 15.5 89 0
09:00 C - 16.0 84 0
13 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 16.12.2013 to 17.12.2013

10:00 C - 16.0 84 0
11:00 C - 17.5 80 0
12:00 C - 20.0 64 0
13:00 C - 21.5 62 0
14:00 C - 22.5 63 0
15:00 C - 22.0 66 0
16:00 C - 21.5 66 0
17:00 C - 21.0 73 0
18:00 C - 20.0 81 0
19:00 C - 19.5 81 0
20:00 C - 19.0 72 0
21:00 C - 18.5 86 0
22:00 C - 18.0 85 0
23:00 C - 17.5 85 0
00:00 C - 16.5 90 0
01:00 C - 16.0 89 0
02:00 C - 15.5 89 0
03:00 C - 15.0 89 0
04:00 C - 14.5 89 0
05:00 C - 14.0 94 0
06:00 C - 14.0 94 0
07:00 C - 15.0 89 0
08:00 C - 15.0 89 0
09:00 C - 15.5 89 0
14 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 17.12.2013 to 18.12.2013

10:00 C - 16.0 89 0
11:00 C - 17.5 80 0
12:00 C - 19.0 76 0
13:00 C - 20.0 73 0
14:00 C - 21.5 66 0
15:00 C - 21.5 66 0
16:00 C - 21.0 65 0
17:00 C - 20.0 73 0
18:00 C - 19.5 77 0
19:00 C - 19.5 77 0
20:00 C - 19.0 76 0
21:00 C - 18.5 76 0
22:00 C - 18.0 80 0
23:00 C - 17.5 80 0
00:00 C - 17.0 85 0
01:00 C - 16.5 85 0
02:00 C - 16.0 84 0
03:00 C - 15.5 84 0
04:00 C - 15.0 80 0
05:00 C - 15.0 89 0
06:00 C - 15.0 89 0
07:00 C - 15.5 84 0
08:00 C - 16.0 79 0
09:00 C - 16.0 79 0
15 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 18.12.2013 to 19.12.2013

10:00 C - 16.5 80 0
11:00 C - 17.5 80 0
12:00 C - 18.5 76 0
13:00 C - 19.0 76 0
14:00 C - 20.5 69 0
15:00 C - 20.5 69 0
16:00 C - 20.0 73 0
17:00 C - 19.5 77 0
18:00 C - 19.5 77 0
19:00 C - 18.5 81 0
20:00 C - 18.0 85 0
21:00 C - 18.0 80 0
22:00 C - 18.0 80 0
23:00 C - 17.5 80 0
00:00 C - 17.5 80 0
01:00 C - 17.0 85 0
02:00 C - 16.5 85 0
03:00 C - 16.0 84 0
04:00 C - 15.5 89 0
05:00 1.68 6 15.0 89 0
06:00 1.54 6 15.0 89 0
07:00 1.96 33 15.0 89 0
08:00 1.68 30 15.5 84 0
09:00 1.12 30 16.0 84 0
16 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 19.12.2013 to 20.12.2013

10:00 1.42 3 17.0 85 0
11:00 1.26 30 18.5 76 0
12:00 1.12 30 19.5 73 0
13:00 1.16 30 20.5 69 0
14:00 1.14 6 21.5 66 0
15:00 C - 21.5 66 0
16:00 C - 21.0 69 0
17:00 1.68 6 20.5 73 0
18:00 C - 20.0 73 0
19:00 C - 19.5 73 0
20:00 C - 19.0 76 0
21:00 C - 18.5 81 0
22:00 C - 18.0 80 0
23:00 C - 18.0 80 0
00:00 C - 17.5 80 0
01:00 C - 17.0 85 0
02:00 C - 16.5 90 0
03:00 C - 16.5 90 0
04:00 C - 16.0 89 0
05:00 C - 16.0 89 0
06:00 C - 16.0 89 0
07:00 C - 16.5 85 0
08:00 C - 16.5 85 0
09:00 C - 18.0 76 0
17 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 20.12.2013 to 21.12.2013

10:00 C - 18.5 72 0
11:00 1.14 36 19.5 68 0
12:00 1.08 3 20.0 68 0
13:00 1.12 27 20.5 65 0
14:00 0.98 30 21.5 58 0
15:00 1.12 30 21.0 61 0
16:00 1.18 27 20.5 65 0
17:00 1.26 6 20.0 68 0
18:00 1.12 6 19.0 72 0
19:00 1.40 6 18.5 76 0
20:00 1.22 30 17.5 80 0
21:00 1.28 27 17.0 85 0
22:00 C - 16.5 85 0
23:00 C - 16.0 84 0
00:00 C - 16.0 84 0
01:00 C - 15.5 84 0
02:00 C - 15.5 84 0
03:00 C - 15.5 84 0
04:00 C - 15.0 84 0
05:00 1.20 30 15.0 84 0
06:00 1.54 3 15.0 84 0
07:00 1.44 30 15.0 84 0
08:00 1.26 27 15.5 84 0
09:00 1.12 27 15.5 84 0
18 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 21.12.2013 to 22.12.2013

10:00 C - 16.5 80 0
11:00 C - 18.0 71 0
12:00 C - 20.0 56 0
13:00 C - 18.0 76 0
14:00 C - 18.0 76 0
15:00 C - 17.5 80 0
16:00 C - 17.5 80 0
17:00 C - 17.0 85 0
18:00 1.12 30 17.5 85 0
19:00 1.18 36 17.5 85 0
20:00 1.26 27 17.5 85 0
21:00 C - 17.5 85 0
22:00 C - 17.5 85 0
23:00 C - 17.0 80 0
00:00 C - 17.0 80 0
01:00 C - 17.0 80 0
02:00 C - 16.5 85 0
03:00 C - 16.5 85 0
04:00 C - 16.0 84 0
05:00 C - 16.0 84 0
06:00 C - 16.0 84 0
07:00 C - 16.0 84 0
08:00 C - 16.5 85 0
09:00 C - 17.0 85 0
19 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 22.12.2013 to 23.12.2013

10:00 1.04 6 17.5 80 0
11:00 1.12 6 18.0 80 0
12:00 C - 18.0 80 0
13:00 C - 19.0 76 0
14:00 C - 19.0 76 0
15:00 C - 19.0 76 0
16:00 C - 18.5 76 0
17:00 C - 18.0 80 0
18:00 C - 18.0 80 0
19:00 C - 18.0 80 0
20:00 C - 18.0 80 0
21:00 C - 17.5 80 0
22:00 C - 17.5 80 0
23:00 C - 17.0 85 0
00:00 C - 16.5 85 0
01:00 C - 16.5 85 0
02:00 C - 16.0 84 0
03:00 C - 16.0 84 0
04:00 C - 15.5 84 0
05:00 C - 15.5 84 0
06:00 C - 15.5 84 0
07:00 C - 15.5 84 0
08:00 C - 15.5 84 0
09:00 C - 16.0 84 0
20 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 23.12.2013 to 24.12.2013

10:00 1.12 6 17.0 80 0
11:00 1.26 6 18.0 71 0
12:00 C - 19.0 67 0
13:00 C - 20.0 64 0
14:00 1.68 3 20.0 64 0
15:00 1.12 3 20.0 60 0
16:00 C - 19.5 64 0
17:00 C - 18.5 72 0
18:00 C - 18.0 71 0
19:00 C - 17.5 76 0
20:00 C - 17.0 80 0
21:00 C - 16.0 79 0
22:00 C - 15.5 79 0
23:00 C - 15.5 79 0
00:00 C - 15.0 78 0
01:00 C - 14.5 78 0
02:00 C - 14.5 78 0
03:00 C - 14.0 78 0
04:00 C - 13.5 83 0
05:00 C - 13.0 83 0
06:00 C - 13.0 83 0
07:00 C - 13.0 83 0
08:00 C - 13.5 83 0
09:00 C - 14.5 78 0
21 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 24.12.2013 to 25.12.2013

10:00 C - 15.5 79 0
11:00 C - 16.5 70 0
12:00 1.12 6 18.0 57 0
13:00 1.26 6 19.0 54 0
14:00 1.56 3 20.0 48 0
15:00 1.68 3 20.0 52 0
16:00 1.12 6 19.5 52 0
17:00 1.26 6 19.0 54 0
18:00 1.08 3 18.0 62 0
19:00 C - 17.5 66 0
20:00 C - 17.0 70 0
21:00 C - 16.5 70 0
22:00 C - 16.0 69 0
23:00 C - 16.5 69 0
00:00 C - 14.5 63 0
01:00 C - 14.0 67 0
02:00 C - 13.5 67 0
03:00 C - 13.0 66 0
04:00 C - 12.5 66 0
05:00 C - 12.0 65 0
06:00 C - 12.0 65 0
07:00 C - 12.5 66 0
08:00 C - 13.0 66 0
09:00 C - 14.5 58 0
22 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 25.12.2013 to 26.12.2013

10:00 C - 17.5 49 0
11:00 C - 18.0 45 0
12:00 1.40 3 19.0 38 0
13:00 1.68 3 20.0 32 0
14:00 1.68 3 20.5 31 0
15:00 1.79 6 20.5 31 0
16:00 1.62 6 20.0 32 0
17:00 1.26 3 19.5 36 0
18:00 1.28 6 18.0 45 0
19:00 C - 17.0 52 0
20:00 C - 16.5 56 0
21:00 C - 16.0 56 0
22:00 C - 15.5 55 0
23:00 C - 15.0 55 0
00:00 C - 14.5 48 0
01:00 C - 14.0 58 0
02:00 C - 14.5 57 0
03:00 C - 13.0 60 0
04:00 C - 12.5 66 0
05:00 C - 12.0 65 0
06:00 C - 12.0 65 0
07:00 C - 12.0 65 0
08:00 C - 13.0 66 0
09:00 C - 14.0 57 0
23 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 26.12.2013 to 27.12.2013

10:00 C - 16.0 41 0
11:00 1.40 33 17.5 40 0
12:00 1.26 33 19.0 30 0
13:00 1.40 30 20.0 25 0
14:00 1.48 27 21.0 27 0
15:00 C - 21.0 27 0
16:00 C - 20.5 27 0
17:00 C - 19.0 34 0
18:00 C - 18.0 21 0
19:00 C - 17.0 47 0
20:00 C - 16.5 47 0
21:00 C - 16.0 43 0
22:00 C - 15.5 50 0
23:00 C - 15.5 43 0
00:00 C - 15.0 42 0
01:00 C - 14.5 53 0
02:00 C - 14.0 57 0
03:00 C - 13.5 62 0
04:00 C - 13.0 66 0
05:00 C - 13.0 66 0
06:00 C - 13.0 66 0
07:00 C - 13.5 62 0
08:00 C - 14.0 57 0
09:00 C - 14.5 58 0
24 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 27.12.2013 to 28.12.2013

10:00 C - 14.5 58 0
11:00 C - 15.0 58 0
12:00 C - 16.0 64 0
13:00 1.36 6 15.5 69 0
14:00 1.40 6 17.0 61 0
15:00 C - 16.5 65 0
16:00 C - 16.5 65 0
17:00 C - 16.0 69 0
18:00 C - 15.5 69 0
19:00 C - 15.5 69 0
20:00 C - 15.0 68 0
21:00 C - 15.0 68 0
22:00 C - 14.5 63 0
23:00 C - 14.0 62 0
00:00 C - 13.5 67 0
01:00 C - 13.0 66 0
02:00 C - 12.5 71 0
03:00 C - 12.5 66 0
04:00 C - 12.0 59 0
05:00 C - 11.5 59 0
06:00 C - 11.5 59 0
07:00 C - 12.0 59 0
08:00 C - 13.0 35 0
09:00 C - 14.0 47 0
25 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 28.12.2013 to 29.12.2013

10:00 C - 15.0 42 0
11:00 C - 16.0 37 0
12:00 1.12 6 18.5 30 0
13:00 1.40 9 19.5 25 0
14:00 1.54 9 20.0 25 0
15:00 1.08 6 20.0 25 0
16:00 C - 19.5 29 0
17:00 C - 18.0 32 0
18:00 C - 17.0 39 0
19:00 C - 16.5 43 0
20:00 C - 16.0 41 0
21:00 C - 15.0 48 0
22:00 C - 14.0 50 0
23:00 C - 13.5 50 0
00:00 C - 13.0 50 0
01:00 C - 12.5 55 0
02:00 C - 12.0 39 0
03:00 C - 11.0 63 0
04:00 C - 10.5 63 0
05:00 C - 10.0 62 0
06:00 C - 10.0 62 0
07:00 C - 10.5 63 0
08:00 C - 11.0 63 0
09:00 C - 12.5 60 0
26 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 29.12.2013 to 30.12.2013

10:00 C - 15.0 48 0
11:00 C - 16.5 47 0
12:00 C - 17.5 40 0
13:00 C - 18.0 36 0
14:00 C - 19.5 32 0
15:00 C - 20.0 32 0
16:00 1.12 3 19.0 34 0
17:00 1.26 3 18.0 32 0
18:00 C - 18.0 32 0
19:00 C - 17.0 30 0
20:00 C - 15.5 41 0
21:00 C - 14.5 42 0
22:00 C - 14.0 47 0
23:00 C - 13.0 45 0
00:00 C - 12.5 60 0
01:00 C - 11.5 65 0
02:00 C - 11.0 69 0
03:00 C - 10.5 69 0
04:00 C - 10.0 69 0
05:00 C - 10.0 68 0
06:00 C - 10.0 68 0
07:00 C - 10.5 69 0
08:00 C - 11.5 65 0
09:00 C - 13.0 60 0
27 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 30.12.2013 to 31.12.2013

10:00 C - 14.5 58 0
11:00 C - 16.0 50 0
12:00 1.12 36 17.0 43 0
13:00 1.16 36 17.5 45 0
14:00 1.68 33 17.0 52 0
15:00 C - 17.5 53 0
16:00 C - 16.5 65 0
17:00 C - 16.0 69 0
18:00 1.12 30 15.5 74 0
19:00 1.18 33 15.5 74 0
20:00 1.12 33 15.5 74 0
21:00 C - 14.5 84 0
22:00 C - 14.5 78 0
23:00 C - 14.0 78 0
00:00 C - 14.0 78 0
01:00 C - 14.0 78 0
02:00 C - 14.0 78 0
03:00 C - 13.5 83 0
04:00 C - 13.5 78 0
05:00 C - 13.0 83 0
06:00 C - 13.0 83 0
07:00 1.12 3 13.5 78 0
08:00 1.26 3 14.0 78 0
09:00 1.18 6 14.5 78 0
28 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 31.12.2013 to 01.01.2014

10:00 C - 14.5 78 0
11:00 C - 15.0 78 0
12:00 C - 16.0 79 0
13:00 C - 16.5 75 0
14:00 1.40 33 16.5 75 0
15:00 1.26 36 17.5 66 0
16:00 1.12 27 17.0 70 0
17:00 1.12 27 16.0 74 0
18:00 C - 16.0 74 0
19:00 C - 16.0 74 0
20:00 C - 16.0 74 0
21:00 C - 16.0 74 0
22:00 C - 16.0 74 0
23:00 C - 15.5 79 0
00:00 C - 15.0 84 0
01:00 C - 15.0 84 0
02:00 C - 15.0 84 0
03:00 C - 14.5 84 0
04:00 C - 14.5 78 0
05:00 C - 14.0 83 0
06:00 C - 14.0 83 0
07:00 C - 14.0 83 0
08:00 C - 14.5 84 0
09:00 C - 15.0 78 0
29 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 01.01.2014 to 02.01.2014

10:00 C - 16.0 74 0
11:00 C - 17.0 70 0
12:00 C - 18.0 62 0
13:00 1.40 33 19.0 59 0
14:00 1.26 33 19.5 60 0
15:00 1.12 27 20.0 56 0
16:00 1.08 27 19.5 56 0
17:00 1.18 27 18.0 62 0
18:00 C - 16.5 65 0
19:00 C - 16.0 69 0
20:00 C - 15.5 74 0
21:00 C - 15.0 73 0
22:00 C - 15.0 73 0
23:00 C - 15.0 78 0
00:00 C - 15.0 78 0
01:00 C - 14.5 73 0
02:00 C - 14.0 78 0
03:00 C - 13.5 83 0
04:00 C - 13.5 78 0
05:00 C - 13.0 83 0
06:00 C - 13.0 83 0
07:00 C - 13.5 78 0
08:00 C - 14.0 78 0
09:00 C - 15.0 73 0
30 of 31
EXHIBIT 3.1 (B)
Date: 02.01.2014 to 03.01.2014

10:00 C - 16.0 69 0
11:00 C - 17.0 65 0
12:00 1.12 27 18.0 57 0
13:00 1.26 27 18.5 59 0
14:00 1.26 36 19.0 59 0
15:00 1.20 36 20.0 52 0
16:00 1.08 30 19.5 56 0
17:00 1.12 30 18.5 59 0
18:00 1.12 30 18.0 57 0
19:00 C - 17.5 62 0
20:00 C - 17.0 65 0
21:00 C - 16.0 69 0
22:00 C - 15.5 74 0
23:00 C - 15.0 78 0
00:00 C - 14.5 78 0
01:00 C - 14.0 83 0
02:00 C - 14.0 78 0
03:00 C - 13.5 83 0
04:00 C - 13.5 78 0
05:00 C - 13.0 83 0
06:00 C - 13.0 83 0
07:00 C - 13.5 83 0
08:00 C - 14.0 83 0
09:00 C - 15.0 78 0
31 of 31
EXHIBIT- 3.2
SATELLITE IMAGERY STUDY REPORT
Feb
SATELLITE IMAGERY REPORT FOR
CAPACITY EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL TERMINAL DEVELOPMENT
2014
EXHIBIT-3.2
SATELLITE
IMAGERY STUDY
REPORT
[Covering 10 km Radius Around The Project Site]

[FOR CAPACITY EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL TERMINAL AT PIYALA,
NEAR FARIDABAD, HARYANA USING SATELLITE IMAGERY &
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS)]
Prepared for
M/s.BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD
Contents
1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1
1.2 GIS Methodology ............................................................................................. 1
1.3 GIS Map .......................................................................................................... 3
1.3.1 Regional Setting Map ............................................................................. 3
1.3.2 Vicinity Map ............................................................................................ 4
1.3.3 Drainage Map ......................................................................................... 4
1.3.4 Land Use Map......................................................................................... 5
List of Figures
Figure 1: 10 km Study Area Marked In Topo Sheet
Figure 2: Satellite Imagery Map
Figure 3: Regional Setting Map
Figure 4: Vicinity Map
Figure 5: Drainage Map of the Study Area
Figure 6: Land Use Map of the Study Area
1.1 INTRODUCTION
This report furnishing site details covering 10 km radius around the proposed site is based on
Geographic Information System (GIS) that include, apart from other, Vicinity Map,
Topography, Land Use, Drainage Pattern that provides segregated and clarified maps for
better understanding of the basic features of the site and its surroundings.
The maps generated using GIS techniques are enclosed with relevant explanations and
illustrations.
1.2 METHODOLOGY
The term “Geographic Information System” applies to computerized information storage,
processing, analyzing and retrieval systems that have hardware and software specifically
designed to cope with geographically referenced spatial data and corresponding attribute
information. Spatial data are commonly in the form of maps depicting topography, water
resource, forests and grasslands, climate, geology, settlement, landownership, administrative
boundaries, infrastructure (highways, railways, electricity and transportation network), etc.
The capability of combining different maps in a single operation, known as “overlaying", is
one of the most important GIS functions, together with modeling and site selection.
The Analysis and preparation of the various maps in this document is prepared vide ESRI®
ArcMap 10.1TM.
Image Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping,
Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
A standard methodology involving Satellite Images has been used in the present project for
the GIS Mapping. Satellite Data from satellite imagery for the world and high-resolution
imagery for the United States and other areas around the world Is used for this project .Map
Images for the satellite images are prepared and uploaded by ESRI. Satellite imagery of the
project site has been used as base data which has been rectified and geo-referenced with
reference to Survey of India Toposheet. Thereafter, digitization has been done in a GIS
environment of ESRI® ArcMap 10.1TM. Digitization has been done as per layering scheme,
symbology and colour coding followed by the binging out a digital image as an exact replica
of the base map. The Non-Spatial Data has been attached accordingly, from data provided
and the desired output in form of ‘Thematic Maps’ has been obtained.
The digitization process has been accompanied by ground truthing and relevant field and
GPS Survey. The Field Verification has also helped in further process for detail Land
Use/Land Cover Mapping. Once the initial verification and correction has been done, the
Land Use Map has been prepared. The Attribute Data has been used significantly for
producing Theme Based Maps which eases the process of analysis and decision making.
The final compositions have been done as Regional Setting Map, Land use Map, Vicinity
Map and Drainage Map.
1|Page BPCL
The methodology flow sheet is given below.

METHODOLOGY FLOW SHEET
Identification of the project site in the Satellite Image
Collection of Base Data (Toposheet, other Base Maps and Data)
Geo-referencing of Image with reference to Toposheet
Ground Truthing- GPS aided Field Survey
Digitization in GIS Environment
Preparation of Maps
Interpretation and Analysis
2|Page BPCL
1.3 GIS MAP

Subsequent to, geo-referencing, digitization of the image and different layers are prepared
and composed into following maps.
The 10 km study area is marked in the topo sheet and the same is presented as Figure-1.
The Basic satellite imagery map is enclosed as Figure-2 : Satellite Imagery Map.
For Ground truth checking site visit to project site was carried out 21st of January
2014.Normally photography is strictly prohibited in POL terminal Site. However, some of the
plant site photographs of the Non-Licensed area is shown below:
1.3.1 Regional Setting Map

The Regional Setting Map gives an overall view of the location of the project site in
reference to the neighboring state, district and towns. It indicates communication links
including State/ National Highways and Railway.
The Project Site is located at Piyala which is in the south side of Faridabad town in the state
of Haryana. The distance between Piyala and Faridabad is around 20 km. The nearest
railway station is Ballabgarh on the Delhi-Mathura triple track broad-gauge line. Nearest
domestic and international airport is at New Delhi.
3|Page BPCL
The geographic location of the site falls under the Survey of India’s Topo- Sheet No.
H43X7.
The approximate longitude-latitude of the centroid of the proposed site are as follows :
Longitude : 77 o 18' 39”E (approx.)
Latitude : 28 o16' 33” N (approx.)
The Regional Setting Map is given in Figure 3.
1.3.2 Vicinity Map

Vicinity applies to the major features around the proposed project site. It presents the
location of settlements, industry, major roads, rivers and forest etc. within 10km radius in
respect to the project site. It does help to analyze and visualize the access road, man made
sensitive environment (habitation, school, hospital, etc).
There are number of villages in the study area; location of villages with respect to the
project site is in Figure 4.
1.3.3 Drainage Map

It presents the drainage network with major rivers, streams and canals within the given area
with the direction of flow of major channels.
The district is mainly drained by the river Yamuna, which is a perennial river beside this a
number of small streams originates from the hill ranges of the central parts of the district,
which do not meet any major stream or Rivers but disappears in the permeable deposits of
alluvial plains after traversing some distance.
The drainage of the area is dendritic sub parallel to sub-angular pattern. Apart from natural
drains majority of the area is covered by man-made distributaries and canals. The major
canals of the study area are given as hereunder.
Gurgaon Canal
Agra Canal
Saria Distributary
Ghatir Distributary
Sikrona Distributary
Sikrio Distributary
Ballabpur Distributary
4|Page BPCL
Pahaladpur Distributary
Chandpur Minor
Miranpur Minor
Rampur Distributary
The topography of Faridabad district is devoid of any major undulation however there is
mild slope from north to south. This mild slope is also reflected in the drainage map of the
study area .
The Drainage map of the study area is given in Figure 5.
1.3.4 Land Use Map

Land use is defined as the way a land is developed and used in terms of the types of
activities allowed (agriculture, residence, industries and so on). It is the analysis of land
according to its use and relates to the purpose, need or use of land.
It presents the land use categories within 10 km radius.
Land Use Pattern of the Study Area
S. No. Land use Division Area (ha) Area (%)
1 Residential = 3905.0 12.4

2 Industrial = 409.9 1.3
3 Open Scrub = 249.8 0.8
4 Plantation = 234.2 0.7
5 Water body = 359.7 1.1
6 Cultivation = 22549.1 71.8
7 Un-classed Forest = 46.6 0.1
8 Waste Land = 603.8 1.9
9 Others = 3042.0 9.7
The land use in the study area is given in Figure 6.
5|Page BPCL
Land Use Pattern of the Study Area based on the GIS study as mentioned above is
given below:
6|Page BPCL
77°18'30"E
FIGURE : 1
77°20'E
Ë
77°17'E
77°21'E
77°16'E
77°22'E TITLE : 10 km STUDY AREA MARKED
77°15'E
77°22'30"E IN TOPO SHEET
77°14'30"E
28°20'N 77°23'E
28°20'N
PROJECT NAME :
28°19'30"N
28°19'30"N
CAPACITY EXPANSION
28°19'N
28°19'N
OF
PIYALA POL TERMINAL
AT
PIYALA,
28°18'N
28°18'N
NEAR FARIDABAD, HARYANA
!
28°17'N
28°17'N
O PROJECT SITE
!
O
28°16'N
28°16'N
GIS Environment :
ESRI® ArcMap 10.1TM
28°15'N
28°15'N
0 0.75 1.5 3 4.5 6
Kilometers
28°14'N
28°14'N
28°13'30"N
28°13'30"N
Prepared For
28°13'N
28°13'N
77°23'E
77°14'30"E
77°22'30"E
77°15'E Prepared By
77°22'E
77°16'E
77°21'E
77°17'E 77°20'E
77°18'30"E
77°17'30"E
77°18'30"E 77°19'30"E
FIGURE : 2
Ë
77°20'30"E
77°16'30"E
77°21'30"E TITLE : SATELLITE IMAGERY MAP
77°15'30"E
77°22'0"E
77°15'0"E
77°22'30"E
PROJECT NAME :
77°14'30"E CAPACITY EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL
77°23'0"E TERMINAL AT PIYALA, NEAR FARIDABAD, HARYANA
28°20'0"N
28°20'0"N
28°19'30"N
28°19'30"N
28°19'0"N
28°19'0"N
Legend
!
. PROJECTSITE
28°18'0"N
28°18'0"N
Satellite Imagery Used :
High-resolution imagery for the US
28°17'0"N
28°17'0"N
and other areas around the world.
Map Images by ESRI
!
. Source: Map Service
Last Modified: November 13, 2013
28°16'0"N
28°16'0"N
GIS Environment :
Coordinate System: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
28°15'0"N
28°15'0"N
Datum: WGS 1984
False Easting: 0.0000
False Northing: 0.0000
Central Meridian: 0.0000
Standard Parallel 1: 0.0000
Auxiliary Sphere Type: 0.0000
28°14'0"N
28°14'0"N
Units: Meter
0 0.75 1.5 3 4.5 6

28°13'30"N
28°13'30"N
Kilometers
Prepared For
28°13'0"N
77°23'0"E
77°14'30"E
77°22'30"E
77°15'0"E Prepared By
77°22'0"E
77°15'30"E
77°21'30"E
77°16'30"E
S E i Di it lGl b
77°20'30"E
G E i b d USDA USGS AEX G t i A id IGN IGP i t
77°17'30"E
77°18'30"E 77°19'30"E
FIGURE : 3
Ë
77°18'30"E
77°17'0"E 77°20'0"E TITLE : REGIONAL SETTING MAP
77°16'0"E 77°21'30"E PROJECT NAME :
CAPACITY EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL
77°15'0"E
77°14'30"E nal
n Ca BALLABGARH 77°23'0"E
ga o
r
Gu
28°20'0"N
ry
Legend
uto
t ri b
28°19'30"N
28°19'30"N
Railway_Line
Dis
ur
National_Highway
bhp
Sikri Distributory
la
roads
Bal
28°18'30"N
28°18'30"N
Ra
l
na mp
u rD RIVER
Ca
is
t ri
ha
water_body
uc
bu
Ga
to
ry
!
. PROJECTSITE
2
N H-
28°16'0"N 28°17'0"N
28°16'0"N 28°17'0"N
AGRA CA
Map Images by ESRI
Mainlin
Source: Map Service
!
. y Last Modified: November 13, 2013
GIS Environment :
a
NA L
lw

i
tory
Ra
tribu
ur Dis Coordinate System: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
lp Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
ha
Norten
28°15'0"N
28°15'0"N
Datum: WGS 1984
Pa

28°14'0"N
28°14'0"N
C ha
n dp
ur M Units: Meter
in o r
0 0.751.5 3 4.5 6
Kilometers
77°23'30"E
28°13'0"N
Prepared For
77°23'0"E
77°14'30"E
77°22'30"E
77°16'0"E 77°21'30"E
77°17'0"E 77°20'0"E
77°18'30"E
77°18'30"E FIGURE : 4
Ë
77°17'0"E 77°20'0"E
77°16'0"E
77°21'0"E TITLE : VICINITY MAP
77°15'0"E
c
SANJAY COLONY
77°22'0"E
PROJECT NAME :
77°14'30"E
c
SARERPUR
al
BALLABGARH 77°23'0"E
TERMINAL AT PIYALA, NEAR FARIDABAD, HARYANA
Can
c Legend
28°20'0"N
28°20'0"N
on
r ga
c
Gu
c c Places
ry
28°19'30"N
28°19'30"N
uto
RAJENDRA COLONY Railway_Line
trib
TEGA
CHENDAVALI
c
Dis
KARNEERA
28°19'0"N
28°19'0"N
Sikri Distributory
c c National_Highway
ur
BUKHARPUR
bhp
Ra
c roads
la
mp
u
Bal
l
rD
na is RIVER
Ca
t MACHGARH
c
ri
c
ha
28°18'0"N
28°18'0"N
bu
water_body
c
uc
to
SAKRINA
Ga
ry
SAHUPURI DAYALPUR
!
. PROJECTSITE
c c c SUNWAR c c Satellite Imagery Used :
c
KABULPUR JAJERA STAI
-2
AGRA CA
c
28°17'0"N
28°17'0"N
FAFUNDA
BHANAKPUR
e
BHOBALPUR
NH
in
c c c Map Images by ESRI
y Mainl
c c SAHAPUR KHURD
!
. cSAGARPUR
SAHAPUR KALA Source: Map Service
NA L
SIKRI
28°16'0"N
28°16'0"N
PANHERA KHURD
AHOLA
a
c
lw
GIS Environment :
c
i
c ESRI® ArcMap 10.1TM

a
c
R
tory
HARFHALI
tribu FATHEPUR BILOUCH
r Dis Coordinate System: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
c
Norten
SAHARALA u
ha
lp DHIG
c Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere

28°15'0"N
28°15'0"N
Datum: WGS 1984
Pa
c c ASAWATI
c
PAHLADPUR
PANHERA KALA False Easting: 0.0000
CHABRAPRAULA Standard Parallel 1: 0.0000
C ha Auxiliary Sphere Type: 0.0000
28°14'0"N
n dp
28°14'0"N
ur M Units: Meter
in o r
c c c 0 0.751.5 3 4.5 6
28°13'30"N
28°13'30"N
PIRTHALA
Kilometers
c DEVATI
Prepared For
28°13'0"N
SAIDPUR
cc c
MANDEKAUL
77°14'30"E
cDADAULA
MIRANPUR
BAGHAULA
77°23'0"E
77°22'30"E
77°22'0"E
77°16'0"E
77°21'0"E
77°17'0"E 77°20'0"E
77°18'30"E
FIGURE : 5
Ë
77°18'30"E 77°19'30"E
77°17'30"E
77°16'30"E
77°20'30"E TITLE : DRAINAGE MAP
77°21'30"E
77°15'30"E
77°22'0"E PROJECT NAME :
77°22'30"E
l TERMINAL AT PIYALA, NEAR FARIDABAD, HARYANA
ana
77°14'30"E
C 77°23'0"E
on
H
ar
r ga
ch
an
dp
ur
D Gu Legend
ry
is
tr
28°20'0"N i bu
28°20'0"N
uta
ta
ry
Direction
t ri b
Dis
Sikrona Distributary
28°19'30"N 28°19'30"N
RIVER
ur
77°24'0"E
bh p
28°19'0"N 28°19'0"N
water_body
la
Ra
mp
Bal
Sikri Distributary
l
na
ur
Di
st
!
. PROJECTSITE
28°18'30"N ri 28°18'30"N
Ca
Si
bu
ha
77°24'30"E
kr
ta
uc
on
ry
Ga
a
28°18'0"N 28°18'0"N
Di
st
rib

ut
28°17'30"N 28°17'30"N
ory

Gh
a

ti r
28°17'0"N 28°17'0"N
Di
AGRA CA
Map Images by ESRI
st
rib
!
ut
28°16'30"N 28°16'30"N
tary
or
y
D ist r ibu
77°12'30"E
Sa r
28°16'0"N la D
i s tr
28°16'0"N
ibu GIS Environment :
NA L
pur
t ory
tory ESRI® ArcMap 10.1TM
a
h
Sa
28°15'30"N D istribu 28°15'30"N
r
lpu Coordinate System: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
ha Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Pa
28°15'0"N 28°15'0"N Datum: WGS 1984

28°14'30"N 28°14'30"N Central Meridian: 0.0000
28°14'0"N Chandp 28°14'0"N Units: Meter
ur M
i n or
no
r 0 0.751.5 3 4.5 6
28°13'30"N Mi 28°13'30"N
a
Kilometers
l
Bhagau
77°23'30"E
28°13'0"N 28°13'0"N Prepared For
sanpur Khera
Ha L i nk
Dra
in 77°23'0"E
77°14'30"E
Miranpur Minor 77°22'30"E
77°15'0"E
77°22'0"E
77°15'30"E
77°16'30"E
77°20'30"E
77°17'30"E 77°19'30"E
77°18'30"E
FIGURE : 6
Ë
77°18'30"E
77°17'0"E 77°20'0"E
TITLE : LANDUSE MAP
77°16'0"E 77°21'30"E
PROJECT NAME :
77°15'0"E
77°23'0"E
Legend
28°20'0"N
Open_Scrub
28°19'30"N
28°19'30"N
UNCLASSED_FOREST
Plantatation
28°19'0"N
Cultivation
28°18'30"N
Wasteland
Industrial
28°18'0"N
Residential
water_body
!
. PROJECTSITE
28°16'0"N 28°17'0"N
28°16'0"N 28°17'0"N
Map Images by ESRI
!
GIS Environment :
Coordinate System: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
28°15'0"N
28°15'0"N
Datum: WGS 1984
28°14'0"N
28°14'0"N
Units: Meter
0 0.751.5 3 4.5 6
28°13'30"N
28°13'30"N
Kilometers
Prepared For
28°13'0"N
77°23'0"E
77°14'30"E
77°22'30"E
77°16'0"E 77°21'30"E
77°17'0"E 77°20'0"E
77°18'30"E
EXHIBIT- 9.1
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SURVEILLANCE
PROGRAM
EXHIBIT- 11.1
ACCREDITATION OF NABET / QCI

20052015KGP8PLATEIAREPORT

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

20052015KGP8PLATEIAREPORT

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20052015KGP8PLATEIAREPORT

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EIA REPORT

CAPACITY EXPANSION OF PIYALA POL TERMINAL

BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD

DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.

Declaration by Experts Contributing to the EIA/ EMP Studies

Project : ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT

Sl. No. Name Signature

2. Functional Area Experts

1. Mr. Swapan Chakrabarti In-House NV

2. Dr. Rothin Kr. Chakraverty In-House EB

4. Mr. Sahabuddin Ahmed In-House RH

6. Ms. Kuhu Banerjee In-House SE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E-1 to E-10

SECTION - 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 to 1-9

1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT 1-1

1.2 IDENTIFICATION O F P ROJECT & THE

1.3 NATURE, S IZE, L OCATION OF THE

1.4 METHODOLOGY O F E NVIRONMENTAL

1.5 PRESCRIBED T ERMS OF REFERENCE O F

SECTION - 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1 to 2-15

2.1 TYPE OF PROJECT 2-1

2.2 NEED FOR THE PROJECT 2-1

2.3 PLANT LOCATION 2-1

2.4 PLANT CAPACITY & SIZE OF OPERATION 2-2

2.5 TECHNOLOGY A ND P ROCESS 2-2

2.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-3

2.7 DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION MEASURES 2-12

FIG.NO. 2.1 SITE LOCATION MAP 2-15

SECTION - 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 3-1 TO 3-45

3.1 INTRODUCTION 3-1

TABLE 3.1 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA 3-22 to 3-27

TABLE 3.2 SUMMARY OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY DATA 3-28

TABLE 3.3 NATIONAL AM BIENT AI R QUALITY 3-29 to 3-31

TABLE 3.4 GROUND WATER QUALITY 3-32 to 3-33

TABLE 3.5 SURFACE WATER QUALITY 3-34 to 3-35

TABLE 3.6 NOISE LEVEL DATA 3-36 to 3-41

TABLE 3.7 SOIL QUALITY 3-42 to 3-43

FIG. NO. 3.1 AIR Q UALITY M ONITORING S TATION 3-44

FIG. NO. 3.2 WINDROSE DIAGRAM 3-45

SECTION - 4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION

4.1 IDENTIFICATION OF IMPACTS 4-1

4.2 MEASURES F OR MINIMIZING AD VERSE 4-8

4.3 IRREVERSIBLE AN DI RRETRIEVABLE 4-14

4.4 ASSESSMENT O F SI GNIFICANCE O F 4-17

4.5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT MATRIX 4-22

4.6 MITIGATION MEASURES 4-24

TABLE 4.1 GENERAL STANDARDS FOR DISCHARGE OF 4-27

SECTION - 5 ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 5-1 to 5-2

5.1 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED 5-1

SECTION - 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 6-1 to 6-3

6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 6-1

SECTION - 7 ADDITIONAL STUDIES 7-1

7.1 RISK ASSESSMENT 7-1

7.2 R & R ACTION PLANS 7-1

7.3 PUBLIC CONSULTATION 7-1

SECTION - 8 PROJECT BENEFITS 8-1 to 8-2

8.1 PROJECT BENEFITS 8-1

SECTION - 9 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN 9-1 to 9-17

9.1 INTRODUCTION 9-1