2011 Karp Etal Life History
2011 Karp Etal Life History
2011 Karp Etal Life History
org on February 25, 2011 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Supplemental http://rnajournal.cshlp.org/content/suppl/2011/02/02/rna.2310111.DC1.html
Material
P<P Published online February 22, 2011 in advance of the print journal.
Email alerting Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the
service top right corner of the article or click here
Advance online articles have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet
appeared in the paper journal (edited, typeset versions may be posted when available prior to final
publication). Advance online articles are citable and establish publication priority; they are indexed
by PubMed from initial publication. Citations to Advance online articles must include the digital
object identifier (DOIs) and date of initial publication.
ABSTRACT
Animals have evolved mechanisms to ensure the robustness of developmental outcomes to changing environments. MicroRNA
expression may contribute to developmental robustness because microRNAs are key post-transcriptional regulators of
developmental gene expression and can affect the expression of multiple target genes. Caenorhabditis elegans provides an
excellent model to study developmental responses to environmental conditions. In favorable environments, C. elegans larvae
develop rapidly and continuously through four larval stages. In contrast, in unfavorable conditions, larval development may be
interrupted at either of two diapause stages: The L1 diapause occurs when embryos hatch in the absence of food, and the dauer
diapause occurs after the second larval stage in response to environmental stimuli encountered during the first two larval stages.
Dauer larvae are stress resistant and long lived, permitting survival in harsh conditions. When environmental conditions
improve, dauer larvae re-enter development, and progress through two post-dauer larval stages to adulthood. Strikingly, all of
these life history options (whether continuous or interrupted) involve an identical pattern and sequence of cell division and cell
fates. To identify microRNAs with potential functions in buffering development in the context of C. elegans life history options,
we used multiplex real-time PCR to assess the expression of 107 microRNAs throughout development in both continuous and
interrupted life histories. We identified 17 microRNAs whose developmental profile of expression is affected by dauer life
history and/or L1 diapause, compared to continuous development. Hence these microRNAs could function to regulate gene
expression programs appropriate for different life history options in the developing worm.
Keywords: microRNA; dauer; development
RNA (2011), 17:00–00. Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Copyright ! 2011 RNA Society. 1
Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on February 25, 2011 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Karp et al.
Ambros 1991; Euling and Ambros 1996; Riddle and Albert and the dauer larvae remain at a developmental stage equiv-
1997; Braendle and Félix 2008). In order to identify miRNAs alent to the L2-to-L3 molt (L2m) (Cassada and Russell
that could mediate interactions between physiological and 1975). When environmental conditions improve, dauer
developmental pathways, we assayed the expression level of larvae restart their cell division cycles and re-enter develop-
107 miRNAs during development through alternative life ment, progressing through post-dauer L3 and post-dauer L4
histories: the continuous development that occurs in favor- (PDL3, PDL4) stages (Riddle and Albert 1997). We refer
able environments, and the interrupted development that to these two alternative developmental paths—of either
can occur in unfavorable environments. continuous or dauer-interrupted development—as ‘‘life
C. elegans development consists of embryogenesis fol- histories’’ (Fig. 1; Fielenbach and Antebi 2008).
lowed by four larval stages (L1–L4) punctuated by molts Besides the dauer diapause, which occurs after the L2d
(see Fig. 1). In favorable environments, larval development stage, C. elegans larvae can undergo another, distinct dia-
proceeds rapidly and continuously over z40–50 h at 20°C pause at the beginning of L1. The L1 diapause occurs prior
(Sulston and Horvitz 1977). Unfavorable environmental to larval development, in situations in which embryos
conditions sensed during L1 cause the larva to progress to hatch in the absence of food (Fig. 1). Larvae in L1 diapause
the L2d stage, which is z50% greater in duration than the share some features with larvae in dauer diapause: They are
rapid L2 stage (Golden and Riddle 1984). L2d larvae pre- developmentally arrested and nonfeeding. Furthermore,
pare for future harsh conditions, while continuing to assess larvae in L1 diapause display some stress resistance and
environmental cues. If conditions remain poor, larvae will lengthened life span, although to a lesser extent than dauer
enter the dauer diapause, a developmentally arrested, long- larvae (Johnson et al. 1984). Upon exposure to food, these
lived, and highly stress-resistant stage (Riddle and Albert arrested larvae exit L1 diapause and proceed with larval
1997). All cells remain quiescent during dauer diapause, development. Post-diapause L1 animals are not necessarily
committed to L2d or dauer arrest; they can choose either
continuous or dauer-interrupted life histories depending
on the environmental conditions encountered as they prog-
ress through the first two larval stages (Golden and Riddle
1984; Johnson et al. 1984).
Since the pace and/or continuity of larval development
are profoundly affected by larval life history, while the
patterns of cell divisions and the associated sequences of
cell lineage fates are unaffected, there must be mechanisms
to integrate the progression of cell lineage development
with the environmental and physiological signals that govern
the dauer versus continuous life history choices. Genes
involved in enabling animals to successfully traverse these
distinct alternative life histories could include genes that
display life history–dependent differences in expression.
There is evidence that life history affects the expression
of protein-coding genes. The majority of previously pub-
lished studies have compared mRNA levels or protein levels
in dauer larvae to non-dauer animals of various develop-
mental stages (Dalley and Golomb 1992; Jones et al. 2001;
FIGURE 1. Schematic representation of continuous and interrupted
life history options. C. elegans larvae develop continuously through Holt and Riddle 2003; Wang and Kim 2003; Ruzanov et al.
four larval stages in favorable environmental conditions, but can 2007; Jeong et al. 2009b; Ruzanov and Riddle 2010). An
interrupt their development by entry to the stress-resistant L1 dia- additional study monitored gene expression changes during
pause or dauer diapause in unfavorable environmental conditions. entry to dauer (Jeong et al. 2009a). These studies focused
(Red shading) Unfavorable or (blue shading) favorable environmen-
tal conditions sensed by larvae. These environmental conditions on identifying genes that could contribute to the stress
drive larvae to either continuous or diapause-interrupted life histories. resistance, altered metabolism, and/or long life span char-
(Dashed lines) Junctures where larvae may switch between diapause- acteristic of dauer larvae, rather than on the developmental
interrupted and continuous life history depending on the severity of effects of dauer diapause. However, two previous studies
the conditions encountered. Developmental stages at which miRNA
levels were assessed in each life history: (blue) stages are within the did compare mRNA levels between developmentally equiv-
continuous life history; (red) stages are within the dauer-interrupted alent stages in different life histories. Liu et al. (2004)
life history. Developmentally equivalent stages were compared (Table compared late L2d/early dauer TGFb mutants to late L2/
1); these are the red and blue stages at the same point along the
vertical axis. (Orange) L1 diapause, which can lead to either con-
early L3 staged wild-type larvae, and Harvey et al. (2009)
tinuous or dauer life histories, was compared to both embryos and compared wild-type early-staged L2d larvae to wild-type
continuously developing L1 larvae (Table 2). continuously developing L2 larvae. Liu et al. (2004) found
www.rnajournal.org 3
Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on February 25, 2011 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Karp et al.
To ascertain which miRNAs differed significantly be- appear in Table 1 are either poorly expressed (Supplemen-
tween the life histories, we obtained the mean Ct values for tal Table S2), variable between experiments (Supplemental
each stage and life history across all three biological rep- Table S4), or more ambiguous with respect to fold-change
licates. Mean Ct values were normalized to the 25 micro- between life histories, such that they do not meet the
RNAs that were least variant across all stages and condi- criteria we define above (Supplemental Table S3).
tions. The complete list of these normalized mean Ct values We noticed that miRNAs whose expression changes
and the standard deviations associated with them are listed dramatically during a particular larval stage displayed a high
in Supplemental Table S2. We observed a range of ex- standard deviation at that stage. For example, lin-4 expres-
pression levels for the microRNAs that we assayed, and sion is very low in newly hatched L1s but high by the end of
a range of developmental profiles (Fig. 2). L1 (Feinbaum and Ambros 1999). We find a high standard
The normalized mean Ct values and their standard deviation for the lin-4 Ct values of the three biological
deviations were used to calculate fold-changes, error, and replicates during the L1 stage, but not other stages when
statistical significance between developmentally equivalent lin-4 levels are more stable (Supplemental Table S2). This is
stages of continuous versus dauer-associated development likely due to the fact that each biological replicate captures
(see Fig. 1). These calculations were carried out by standard an imperfectly synchronized population of larvae (see
methods (see Materials and Methods; AppliedBiosystems Supplemental Methods).
2008). Fold-changes were deemed significant if they met all
of the following criteria: (1) The fold-change had a P-value
Five miRNAs are significantly up-regulated
of #0.05 as assessed by t-test (Materials and Methods); (2)
during L1 diapause
the fold-change was $twofold; and (3) the miRNA was
expressed highly enough to be well measured by the assay In order to identify miRNAs whose expression is affected
(Supplemental Methods). The complete list of fold-changes by L1 diapause, we compared starved L1 (stL1) larvae
of all 107 miRNAs at each larval stage is provided in (starvation of newly hatched L1 larvae causes them to arrest
Supplemental Table S3. To assess the reproducibility of in L1 diapause) to embryos and to continuously developing
these results, particularly during dauer diapause when gene L1 larvae. We define miRNAs whose expression responds
expression in general is substantially affected, we performed to L1 diapause to be those whose expression is higher (or
completely independent experiments, assaying all miRNA lower) in stL1 animals compared to both embryo and L1
levels in samples of staged populations of dauer and L3 stages. From this comparison, we identified five miRNAs
larvae obtained independently of those in Supplemental that were significantly up-regulated in stL1 larvae (Table 2),
Tables S2 and S3. The results of these experiments were and no miRNAs to be significantly down-regulated in stL1
essentially in agreement with those in Supplemental Table larvae (Supplemental Table S6).
S3. There were a few cases of discordant results, in which StL1 larvae share some features with dauer larvae: They
an miRNA displayed a significant change in dauer larvae in are developmentally arrested, quiescent, and nonfeeding.
one set of experiments, but not the other set. The data for However, unlike dauer larvae, stL1 larvae are active in
these are listed in Supplemental Table S4. Only those pharyngeal pumping, do not adopt the dauer-characteristic
miRNAs for which the results of both sets of experiments cuticle morphology, and lack the extreme longevity and
were in agreement are reported in Table 1 and Figure 3. stress resistance of dauer larvae (Johnson et al. 1984). The
Using the above criteria, we identified 14 miRNAs that five miRNAs we find to be significantly up-regulated in stL1
were significantly different in level when corresponding larvae show a range of behaviors in the dauer larva life
stages of the continuous and dauer life histories are com- history. miR-238 is unaffected by dauer life history at any
pared (for at least one stage) (Fig. 3; Table 1). In Supple- stage (Table 1), suggesting that its up-regulation in stL1
mental Table S5, we also provide a list of 15 miRNAs whose larvae is a specific response to L1 diapause. In contrast,
expression changes are less substantial (1.5–1.9-fold), yet still miR-34 and miR-71 are also up-regulated in L2d, dauer,
statistically significant by t-test (Materials and Methods). In and PDL3 stages (Fig. 3; Table 1), suggesting that up-
our analysis, however, we focus on miRNAs whose levels regulation of these miRNAs may be a more general response
were changed at least twofold, because we have greater to environmental stress. miR-234 and miR-254 are both up-
confidence in the biological relevance of expression changes regulated in dauer diapause (P # 0.05), but the fold-change
of this magnitude. is <2, such that we have less confidence in the biological
In contrast to the miRNAs that we found to be sig- significance of this effect (Supplemental Table S5).
nificantly affected by life history, we also identified a set of
miRNAs that, based on our data, appear to be unaffected by
Developmental profiles of miRNA expression
life history (Table 1). These miRNAs are well expressed, as
defined by having Ct values <30; their mean fold-change To characterize how the developmental trajectories of
across the three biological replicates was #1.4–1.5, and the miRNA expression are affected by life history, we per-
error was #0.53 the fold-change. miRNAs that do not formed hierarchical clustering on the Ct values of all 107
FIGURE 2. Hierarchical clustering of miRNA expression profiles during developmental progression. Hierarchical clustering was carried out
using Cluster 3.0 and visualized using Java TreeView programs (Materials and Methods) on (A) embryo (Emb), L1, L2, L3, and L4 staged
continuously developing larvae or (B) embryo (Emb), L1d, L2d, PDL3, and PDL4 staged larvae progressing through the dauer life history. Note
that a 1-Ct difference corresponds to a twofold change in expression level. (**) An miRNA whose expression changes significantly and
substantially between life histories (see Fig. 3; Table 1).
miRNAs in dauer versus continuous life histories. In order diapause and dauer diapause were omitted) (Fig. 2). The
to focus on progression through development, we used clusters we observed were generally similar between life
only stages that were not developmentally arrested (i.e., L1 histories (Fig. 2). In each case, hierarchical clustering
www.rnajournal.org 5
Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on February 25, 2011 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Karp et al.
www.rnajournal.org 7
Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on February 25, 2011 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Karp et al.
www.rnajournal.org 9
Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on February 25, 2011 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Karp et al.
likely to fall into developmentally uniform clusters (13 of miRNAs whose expression is affected by life history
17 miRNAs) (Fig. 2A). This general trend suggests a re- (Esquela-Kerscher et al. 2005; Martinez et al. 2008b; Kato
lationship between developmental progression and the et al. 2009b; Alvarez-Saavedra and Horvitz 2010). These
physiological changes that accompany life history choice, miRNA gene transcriptional reporters showed various
such that the targets of miRNAs that are present at expression patterns, including broad temporal and ana-
relatively uniform levels throughout development may tomical expression and more specific expression patterns.
remain at those same levels in either life history. The three tissues where reporter expression was most often
A relationship between gene expression changes in dauer seen were the hypodermis, the vulva, and the nervous
larvae and gene expression changes that occur in aging system (Supplemental Table S10). The hypodermis is an
adults has been described (for review, see Golden and endocrine tissue where signaling regulating the dauer
Melov 2007). Indeed, many of the same genes that regulate formation decision occurs (Gerisch and Antebi 2004).
dauer formation also regulate life span (see Golden and Furthermore, the timing of stage-specific cell fate decisions
Melov 2007; Hu 2007). Two previous studies characterized within the hypodermis is regulated by lin-4 and let-
the expression of miRNAs during aging in wild-type adult 7-family miRNAs. This regulation can be altered by dauer
C. elegans hermaphrodites (Ibáñez-Ventoso et al. 2006; de formation (Liu and Ambros 1991). The vulva is an
Lencastre et al. 2010). While many of the miRNAs whose ectodermal tissue that is lineally related to some hypoder-
expression is affected by aging are distinct from those mal cells (Sulston and Horvitz 1977). It has been noted that
whose expression is affected by life history, it is interesting mutations in genes affecting vulval development can pro-
to note that miR-34 and miR-71, two of the three miRNAs duce altered phenotypes when these animals progress
that are up-regulated in the dauer life history (Table 1), are through dauer life history (Ferguson and Horvitz 1985;
also up-regulated in older adults (Ibáñez-Ventoso et al. 2006; Euling and Ambros 1996; Braendle and Félix 2008). Finally,
de Lencastre et al. 2010). Intriguingly, miR-71, promotes certain sensory neurons are the source of signals regulating
longevity, as well as resistance to both heat and oxidative the dauer formation decision. Furthermore, the morphol-
stress in adulthood, whereas miR-34, is required for a robust ogy of some neurons is altered in dauer diapause (for
DNA damage response (Kato et al. 2009b; de Lencastre et al. review, see Riddle and Albert 1997; Hu 2007). Therefore,
2010). These roles are consistent with the up-regulation of many of the miRNAs whose levels are affected by life
these miRNAs during L1 diapause and in the dauer life history are apparently transcribed in tissues that are also
history, in response to environmental stress (Fig. 3). affected by life history and/or that participate in life history
choices.
In conclusion, we have identified a core set of miRNAs
Transcriptional regulation of miRNA expression
whose expression is altered by diapause-associated life his-
The data presented in Figure 4, combined with previous tory. These microRNA include four let-7-family microRNAs.
reports, demonstrate that the effect of dauer diapause The let-7 family had been previously implicated in a mech-
on miRNA expression can be mediated transcriptionally anism that coordinates stage-specific cell fate decisions with
(Martinez et al. 2008a; Bethke et al. 2009). The previously life history choice (Hammell et al. 2009). This coordination
characterized transcriptional regulation was assessed by the is necessary for the robustness of cell fate specification to
association of core dauer pathway transcriptional regula- environmental changes and life history that is observed in
tors with miRNA promoters. These core components wild-type C. elegans animals (Liu and Ambros 1991; Euling
include the DAF-12 nuclear hormone receptor, which is and Ambros 1996; Braendle and Félix 2008). We have also
absolutely required for dauer formation, and the DAF-3 identified 10 other microRNAs whose expression is altered
Smad, which promotes dauer formation downstream from by life history choice. Future genetic analysis of the func-
TGF-b signaling (Thomas et al. 1993; Patterson et al. 1997; tions of these additional miRNAs should reveal whether
Antebi et al. 2000). Yeast one-hybrid assays have been and how they may also participate in the coordination of
performed for the promoters of most miRNAs (Martinez developmental and physiological gene expression in the con-
et al. 2008a). Interestingly, DAF-3 binds to seven of the text of diapause-associated life history choices.
nine tested promoters of miRNAs whose mature levels are
affected by life history. In contrast, DAF-3 binds to only
one of the 10 tested promoters of miRNAs whose expres- MATERIALS AND METHODS
sion is unaffected by life history (Supplemental Table S10;
Martinez et al. 2008a). This raises the possibility that the Strains and growth conditions
effect of life history on miRNA expression may be mediated The wild-type reference strain N2 was grown on the OP50
directly by the factors that regulate the life history choice bacterial strain at 20°C in all cases. To synchronize larvae, we
itself, at least in some cases. isolated embryos by hypochlorite treatment and then added them
Additionally, information about the expression of tran- directly to either standard NGM plates to prepare continuously
scriptional reporters is available for 10 of the promoters of developing larvae, or small (2 mL) NGM plates lacking peptone
and with the addition of 30 mg/mL streptomycin and 50-mL crude number of predicted targets of any of these miRNAs was 34. We
dauer pheromone (Vowels and Thomas 1994) to isolate L1d and therefore used the top 34 predicted targets of each of the miRNA
L2d larvae. Pheromone-containing plates were seeded with 20 mL families of the indicated group (up-regulated in L1 diapause, up-
of 63 OP50. To prepare dauer larvae and post-dauer stages, regulated in the dauer life history, down-regulated in the dauer life
a mixed-stage population of animals was grown on standard history, or unaffected by dauer life history) to compare to the
NGM plates until the food supply was exhausted and the entire C. elegans genome using functional annotation clustering
population density was sufficient to induce dauer larvae forma- within DAVID (Huang et al. 2009) in order to ask for significantly
tion. Dauer larvae were then selected by washing with 1% SDS and enriched functional terms.
either harvested immediately (for dauer larvae) or added to fresh
NGM plates seeded with OP50 (for post-dauer stages). All stages Hierarchical clustering
were confirmed by microscopic examination of stage-specific
anatomical characteristics, with the exception of the dauer stage, To compare normalized expression levels of miRNAs during
which was defined by SDS resistance. For more details, see the developmental progression, we used Cluster 3.0 to analyze !DCt
Supplemental Methods. values using an uncentered correlation and average linkage (de
Strains containing transcriptional reporters of miRNAs include Hoon et al. 2004). The DCt is the mean Ct of the three biological
VT1113 unc-119(ed3)III; maIs135[pmir-237TGFP, unc-119+], VL347 replicates, minus the mean Ct of the 25 least variant miRNAs (see
unc-119(ed3)III; wwEx19[pmir-230TGFP, unc-119+] (Martinez et al. the Supplemental Methods). We used the negative of the DCt so
2008b), and VT2514 unc-119(ed3)III; maEx221[pmir-345kbTGFP, that higher Ct values would be visualized as lower expression. The
unc-119+]. These strains were grown on 60-mm NGM plates seeded mean Ct of the 25 least variant miRNAs was 20.4 when nor-
with OP50 at 20°C. Dauer larvae were isolated from crowded and malized; therefore miRNAs with Ct values close to 20.4 had
starved plates and examined in parallel with continuously grown a !DCt of 0. The clustering was visualized with Java Tree View
larvae at the L2m or early L3 stage. Dauer larvae were picked from 1.1.3. Because the range of !DCt values displayed by this program
starved plates and examined directly (Fig. 4). The presence of dauer was limited to !3 to +3 (corresponding to normalized Ct values
alae was verified in these larvae. Images were obtained on a Zeiss of 17.4 to 23.4), we added additional colors using Adobe
Axio Imager D1 with an AxioCam MRm camera, and a X-Cite 120Q Illustrator to better represent miRNA expression outside this
light source (EXFO Photonic Solutions, Inc.). range. For clarity, the key shown in Figures 1 to 3 is in terms of
normalized Ct values, instead of !DCt values.
RNA preparation and mir-Taqman assay
Harvested larvae were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA was SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
extracted using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). Dauer larvae Supplemental material is available for this article, including a
(which have very tough cuticles) were subjected to three or more Supplemental Methods section (with additional experimental
rounds of freeze-cracking by alternating between liquid nitrogen details) and 10 Supplemental Tables of data, as referred to in the
and a 37°C water bath. Two microliters of a 3 ng/mL RNA dilution Results and Discussion sections.
was used for multiplex miR-Taqman reactions according to the
manufacturer, with an ABI 7900HT Fast-Real Time PCR System
(Applied Biosystems). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Caifu Chen of Applied Biosystems Inc. for development
mir-Taqman analysis and use of the C. elegans–specific miR-TaqMan assays. We also
thank Iva Greenwald for the use of equipment and reagents. We
To identify the 25 least variant miRNAs across all conditions, we
are grateful to James Chen for advice about enrichment of
calculated the variance among the mean Ct’s of three biological
functional terms, and to Maria Sallee for helpful discussions and
replicates across all stages and conditions (embryo, stL1, L1, L2,
critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported
L2m, L3, L4, L1d, L2d, dauer, PDL3, PDL4). The miRNAs
by National Institutes of Health Grants GM30428 (to V.A.),
identified are listed in Supplemental Table S2. For each larval
F32 GM73307 (to X.K.), F32 GM087039 (to M.H.), and F32
stage and life history, the mean of the 25 least variant miRNAs was
GM070118 (to M.C.O). Core resources supported by the Diabetes
calculated and then used to calculate DCt, DDCt, and fold-change
Endocrinology Research Center grant (DK32520) were also used.
values as per the ‘‘Relative Quantitation Method’’ outlined in
V.A. is a member of the UMass DERC (DK32520).
materials provided by Applied Biosystems (AppliedBiosystems
2008). See the Supplemental Methods for more details. Statisti-
Received June 8, 2010; accepted January 11, 2011.
cal significance was assessed by performing a t-test (two-tailed,
heteroscedastic) on the normalized Ct values of each miRNA at
each developmental stage, comparing the three biological repli- REFERENCES
cates obtained for one life history with the three biological
replicates obtained for the other life history. Abbott AL, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Miska EA, Lau NC, Bartel DP, Horvitz
HR, Ambros V. 2005. The let-7 microRNA family members mir-
48, mir-84, and mir-241 function together to regulate develop-
Functional terms mental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Cell 9: 403–414.
Alvarez-Saavedra E, Horvitz HR. 2010. Many families of C. elegans
Predicted targets of the miRNA families in Tables 1 and 2 were microRNAs are not essential for development or viability. Curr
identified using mirWIP (Hammell et al. 2008). The smallest Biol 20: 367–373.
www.rnajournal.org 11
Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on February 25, 2011 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Karp et al.
Antebi A, Yeh WH, Tait D, Hedgecock EM, Riddle DL. 2000. daf-12 Hall SE, Beverly M, Russ C, Nusbaum C, Sengupta P. 2010. A cellular
encodes a nuclear receptor that regulates the dauer diapause and memory of developmental history generates phenotypic diversity
developmental age in C. elegans. Genes Dev 14: 1512–1527. in C. elegans. Curr Biol 20: 149–155.
AppliedBiosystems. 2008. Guide to performing relative quantitation Hammell CM. 2008. The microRNA-argonaute complex: A platform
of gene expression using real-time quantitative PCR. http://www3. for mRNA modulation. RNA Biol 5: 123–127.
appliedbiosystems.com/cms/groups/mcb_support/documents/ Hammell M, Long D, Zhang L, Lee A, Carmack CS, Han M, Ding Y,
generaldocuments/cms_042380.pdf. Ambros V. 2008. mirWIP: microRNA target prediction based
Barriere A, Felix MA. 2005. High local genetic diversity and low on microRNA-containing ribonucleoprotein-enriched transcripts.
outcrossing rate in Caenorhabditis elegans natural populations. Nat Methods 5: 813–819.
Curr Biol 15: 1176–1184. Hammell CM, Karp X, Ambros V. 2009. A feedback circuit involving
Bartel DP. 2004. MicroRNAs genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and let-7-family miRNAs and DAF-12 integrates environmental signals
function. Cell 116: 281–297. and developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl
Bartel DP. 2009. MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory Acad Sci 106: 18668–18673.
functions. Cell 136: 215–233. Harvey SC, Barker GL, Shorto A, Viney ME. 2009. Natural variation
Baugh LR, Demodena J, Sternberg PW. 2009. RNA Pol II accumulates in gene expression in the early development of dauer larvae of
at promoters of growth genes during developmental arrest. Science Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Genomics 10: 325. doi: 10.1186/1471-
324: 92–94. 2164-10-325.
Bethke A, Fielenbach N, Wang Z, Mangelsdorf DJ, Antebi A. 2009. Hilgers V, Bushati N, Cohen SM. 2010. Drosophila microRNAs 263a/b
Nuclear hormone receptor regulation of microRNAs controls confer robustness during development by protecting nascent sense
developmental progression. Science 324: 95–98. organs from apoptosis. PLoS Biol 8: e1000396. doi: 10.1371/
Braendle C, Félix MA. 2008. Plasticity and errors of a robust devel- journal.pbio.1000396.
opmental system in different environments. Dev Cell 15: 714–724. Holt SJ, Riddle DL. 2003. SAGE surveys C. elegans carbohydrate
Brenner JL, Jasiewicz KL, Fahley AF, Kemp BJ, Abbott AL. 2010. Loss metabolism: evidence for an anaerobic shift in the long-lived dauer
of individual microRNAs causes mutant phenotypes in sensitized larva. Mech Ageing Dev 124: 779–800.
genetic backgrounds in C. elegans. Curr Biol 20: 1321–1325. Holtz J, Pasquinelli AE. 2009. Uncoupling of lin-14 mRNA and
Butcher RA, Fujita M, Schroeder FC, Clardy J. 2007. Small-molecule protein repression by nutrient deprivation in Caenorhabditis
pheromones that control dauer development in Caenorhabditis elegans. RNA 15: 400–405.
elegans. Nat Chem Biol 3: 420–422. Hu PJ. 2007. Dauer. WormBook 2007: 1–19.
Cassada RC, Russell RL. 1975. The dauerlarva, a post-embryonic Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. 2009. Systematic and
developmental variant of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics
Dev Biol 46: 326–342. resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44–57.
Dalley BK, Golomb M. 1992. Gene expression in the Caenorhabditis Ibáñez-Ventoso C, Yang M, Guo S, Robins H, Padgett RW, Driscoll
elegans dauer larva: developmental regulation of Hsp90 and other M. 2006. Modulated microRNA expression during adult lifespan
genes. Dev Biol 151: 80–90. in Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell 5: 235–246.
de Hoon MJ, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S. 2004. Open source Ibáñez-Ventoso C, Vora M, Driscoll M. 2008. Sequence relationships
clustering software. Bioinformatics 20: 1453–1454. among C. elegans, D. melanogaster and human microRNAs
de Lencastre A, Pincus Z, Zhou K, Kato M, Lee SS, Slack FJ. 2010. highlight the extensive conservation of microRNAs in biology.
MicroRNAs both promote and antagonize longevity in C. elegans. PLoS ONE 3: e2818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002818.
Curr Biol 20: 2159–2168. Jeong PY, Kwon MS, Joo HJ, Paik YK. 2009a. Molecular time-course
Esquela-Kerscher A, Johnson SM, Bai L, Saito K, Partridge J, Reinert and the metabolic basis of entry into dauer in Caenorhabditis
KL, Slack FJ. 2005. Post-embryonic expression of C. elegans elegans. PLoS ONE 4: e4162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004162.
microRNAs belonging to the lin-4 and let-7 families in the Jeong PY, Na K, Jeong MJ, Chitwood D, Shim YH, Paik YK. 2009b.
hypodermis and the reproductive system. Dev Dyn 234: 868–877. Proteomic analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods Mol Biol
Euling S, Ambros V. 1996. Reversal of cell fate determination in 519: 145–169.
Caenorhabditis elegans vulval development. Development 122: Johnson TE, Mitchell DH, Kline S, Kemal R, Foy J. 1984. Arresting
2507–2515. development arrests aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
Feinbaum R, Ambros V. 1999. The timing of lin-4 RNA accumulation Mech Ageing Dev 28: 23–40.
controls the timing of postembryonic developmental events in Jones SJ, Riddle DL, Pouzyrev AT, Velculescu VE, Hillier L, Eddy
Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 210: 87–95. SR, Stricklin SL, Baillie DL, Waterston R, Marra MA. 2001.
Ferguson EL, Horvitz HR. 1985. Identification and characterization of Changes in gene expression associated with developmental arrest
22 genes that affect the vulval cell lineages of the nematode and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Res 11: 1346–
Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 110: 17–72. 1352.
Fielenbach N, Antebi A. 2008. C. elegans dauer formation and the Kato M, Slack FJ. 2008. microRNAs: small molecules with big
molecular basis of plasticity. Genes Dev 22: 2149–2165. roles—C. elegans to human cancer. Biol Cell 100: 71–81.
Gerisch B, Antebi A. 2004. Hormonal signals produced by DAF-9/ Kato M, de Lencastre A, Pincus Z, Slack FJ. 2009a. Dynamic
cytochrome P450 regulate C. elegans dauer diapause in response to expression of small non-coding RNAs, including novel micro-
environmental cues. Development 131: 1765–1776. RNAs and piRNAs/21U-RNAs, during Caenorhabditis elegans
Git A, Dvinge H, Salmon-Divon M, Osborne M, Kutter C, Hadfield J, development. Genome Biol 10: R54. doi: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-5-r54.
Bertone P, Caldas C. 2010. Systematic comparison of microarray Kato M, Paranjape T, Müller RU, Ullrich R, Nallur S, Gillespie E,
profiling, real-time PCR, and next-generation sequencing tech- Keane K, Esquela-Kerscher A, Weidhaas JB, Slack FJ. 2009b. The
nologies for measuring differential microRNA expression. RNA mir-34 microRNA is required for the DNA damage response in
16: 991–1006. vivo in C. elegans and in vitro in human breast cancer cells.
Golden TR, Melov S. 2007. Gene expression changes associated with Oncogene 28: 2419–2424.
aging in C. elegans. WormBook 2007: 1–12. Li X, Cassidy JJ, Reinke CA, Fischboeck S, Carthew RW. 2009. A
Golden JW, Riddle DL. 1982. A pheromone influences larval develop- microRNA imparts robustness against environmental fluctuation
ment in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 218: 578–580. during development. Cell 137: 273–282.
Golden JW, Riddle DL. 1984. The Caenorhabditis elegans dauer larva: Lim LP, Lau NC, Weinstein EG, Abdelhakim A, Yekta S, Rhoades
developmental effects of pheromone, food, and temperature. Dev MW, Burge CB, Bartel DP. 2003. The microRNAs of Caenorhab-
Biol 102: 368–378. ditis elegans. Genes Dev 17: 991–1008.
Liu Z, Ambros V. 1991. Alternative temporal control systems for Riddle DL, Albert PS. 1997. Genetic and environmental regulation of
hypodermal cell differentiation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature dauer larva development. In C. elegans II (ed. DL Riddle et al.), pp.
350: 162–165. 739–768. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring
Liu T, Zimmerman KK, Patterson GI. 2004. Regulation of signaling Harbor, NY.
genes by TGFb during entry into dauer diapause in C. elegans. Rukov JL, Irimia M, Mork S, Lund VK, Vinther J, Arctander P. 2007.
BMC Dev Biol 4: 11. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-4-11. High qualitative and quantitative conservation of alternative
Martinez NJ, Ow MC, Barrasa MI, Hammell M, Sequerra R, splicing in Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae.
Doucette-Stamm L, Roth FP, Ambros VR, Walhout AJ. 2008a. A Mol Biol Evol 24: 909–917.
C. elegans genome-scale microRNA network contains composite Ruzanov P, Riddle DL. 2010. Deep SAGE analysis of the Caenorhab-
feedback motifs with high flux capacity. Genes Dev 22: 2535–2549. ditis elegans transcriptome. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 3252–3262.
Martinez NJ, Ow MC, Reece-Hoyes JS, Barrasa MI, Ambros VR, Ruzanov P, Riddle DL, Marra MA, McKay SJ, Jones SM. 2007. Genes
Walhout AJ. 2008b. Genome-scale spatiotemporal analysis of that may modulate longevity in C. elegans in both dauer larvae and
Caenorhabditis elegans microRNA promoter activity. Genome Res long-lived daf-2 adults. Exp Gerontol 42: 825–839.
18: 2005–2015. Sulston JE, Horvitz HR. 1977. Post-embryonic cell lineages of the
Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Abbott AL, Lau NC, Hellman AB, nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 56: 110–156.
McGonagle SM, Bartel DP, Ambros VR, Horvitz HR. 2007. Most Thomas JH, Birnby DA, Vowels JJ. 1993. Evidence for parallel
Caenorhabditis elegans microRNAs are individually not essential processing of sensory information controlling dauer formation
for development or viability. PLoS Genet 3: e215. doi: 10.1371/ in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 134: 1105–1117.
journal.pgen.0030215. Vowels JJ, Thomas JH. 1994. Multiple chemosensory defects in daf-11
Patterson GI, Koweek A, Wong A, Liu Y, Ruvkun G. 1997. The DAF-3 and daf-21 mutants of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 138: 303–
Smad protein antagonizes TGF-b-related receptor signaling in 316.
the Caenorhabditis elegans dauer pathway. Genes Dev 11: 2679–2690. Wang J, Kim SK. 2003. Global analysis of dauer gene expression in
Pradervand S, Weber J, Thomas J, Bueno M, Wirapati P, Lefort K, Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 130: 1621–1634.
Dotto GP, Harshman K. 2009. Impact of normalization on Willenbrock H, Salomon J, Søkilde R, Barken KB, Hansen TN,
miRNA microarray expression profiling. RNA 15: 493–501. Nielsen FC, Møller S, Litman T. 2009. Quantitative miRNA
Rasmussen KD, Simmini S, Abreu-Goodger C, Bartonicek N, Di expression analysis: Comparing microarrays with next-generation
Giacomo M, Bilbao-Cortes D, Horos R, Von Lindern M, Enright sequencing. RNA 15: 2028–2034.
AJ, O’Carroll D. 2010. The miR-144/451 locus is required for Zahler AM. 2005. Alternative splicing in C. elegans. WormBook 2005:
erythroid homeostasis. J Exp Med 207: 1351–1358. 1–13.
www.rnajournal.org 13