BECSR
BECSR
BECSR
Social Responsibility
• Social responsibility is an obligation of
business to account for the interests of several
groups that constitute society beyond the
consideration of profit.
Need for Social Responsibility
• Today businessmen are aware that society is the
biggest force which controls the entire business
operations, right from acquisition of land to final
produce. It is now assumed that a business
cannot operate in societal isolation.
• The success of a business depends on the growth
of the society because the goods and services of
the business are ultimately consumed by the
society. Hence steps should be initiated to lead to
its economic upliftment.
Dimensions of Social Responsibility
• Economic Responsibility: Business has an
economic obligation to produce goods and
services that society wants and sell them at
profit. Unless business is economically viable
it cannot take up its other responsibilities well
and to achieve this well it must be effective,
efficient and make wise strategic decisions.
• Legal responsibility: Businesses need to follow
certain rules and regulations laid down, within
which business is expected to operate, so as to
ensure that it assumes a productive role in the
society
• Ethical responsibility: The ethical responsibility of
a business includes taking up activities like drive
against environment pollution, discrimination
against workers, producing dangerous products
and ensuring that there is no misleading
advertising done by the company
• Voluntary responsibility: The society expects
the businessmen to contribute to the society
through their business giving or philanthropy.
Such acts like giving money or other resources
for a charitable cause, initiating adopt a school
program, starting an executive loan program
in the community, conducting an inhouse
program for drug abuse, sponsoring civic
events etc.
Types of ethical behaviour
• Descriptive Ethics: it is the presentation of
actual ethical behaviour of individuals or
member of an organisation. It is used when
one just wants to know and understand the
course of ethical behaviour. Here no
interpretation is made concerning why the
given course of ethical behaviour took place.
• Analytical Ethics: it can be described as
understanding the reason behind a course of
ethical behaviour that took place. It
understands the motive behind the ethical
behaviour of an organisation as to how it
happened. Thus analytical ethics helps to
determine the legality of a specific ethical
behaviour.
• Normative Ethics: it is described as prescribed
course of action that ensures that the ethical
behavior will take place accordingly. This deals
with what and how one should conduct in
future. It enables an organization to address
probable ethical issues well before they take
place and by following the acceptable and
avoiding the unacceptable behavior.
Theories of Ethics
• Teleological Theory: Also termed as
Consequentialist Theory, It is the study of
ends, goals and purpose, it judges the
rightness of an action based on its
consequences in terms of ends, goals and
purposes. In other words a moral theory is
regarded as teleological if the actions finally
bring about good or happy consequences. The
final result of an action is regarded as the sole
criteria to consider an action as right.
• Three forms:
1) Ethical egoism: An action is morally right if
the consequences of that action are more
favorable than unfavorable only to the agent
performing the action.
2) Ethical altruism: An action is morally right if
the consequences of the action are more
favorable than unfavorable to everyone except
the agent.
3) Utilitarianism: An action is morally right if the
consequences of that action are more
favorable than unfavorable to everyone.
Three main theories under teleological theory:
1. Theory of utilitarianism: it is based on the
principle of utility where o e’s actions add to
the overall utility of the community impacted
by those actions. It is founded on the ability
to predict the consequence of an action. To a
utilitarian, an action is ethically right that
produces the greatest benefit to the greatest
number of people.
Thus this principle claims that we choose the
action most likely to bring about the greatest
happiness to the greatest number of people.
Eg: under one situation action A may be the
most appropriate to give greatest happiness to
the greatest number, while under another
situation, action B may be appropriate to give
happiness to greatest number.
2. Theory of justice and fairness: This theory
was given by John Rawls. It means giving
what is due to one. Distributive Justice: It is
concerned with giving fair and just social
benefits to everyone in the society.
Redistributive Justice: It upholds the view
that a defaulter should be awarded some
form of punishment.
3. Theory of Virtue Of Ethics: This theory talks
on what kind of traits we should have to
perform the right action. Some of these
virtues are honesty, loyalty, duty, patience,
perseverance. These traits are derived from
natural internal tendencies but need to be
nurtured once established to become a
stable habit.
Deontological Theory
• According to this theory rightness of an action does not
depend on its consequences but on the act itself. For a
deontologist the ends or consequences of our actions
are not important, but our actions and duties are
important to judge them as ethically right. It is also
called as Non- Consequentialist Theory. Eg: Some
actions like bribery are wrong by nature itself,
regardless of their consequences.
• Eg: Case of N.R. Narayana Murti where he refused to
pay bribe to an Income Tax officer and instead chose to
pay a bigger amount of money due as tax.
• Duty Theory: It says that certain duties are
universally binding and which are the result of
contracts between the people, these basic duties
are: Avoid wrongdoing towards others, treat
people as equals and promote the good of
others.
• Rights Theory: A right is an entitlement of a
person to have others act in a certain way toward
him. Rights are tightly correlated with duties in
the sense that rights of one person implies the
duties of another person.
• Rights are classified as following:
• Claims: it entitles a person to demand something from
another person. Eg: an employee has a claim in terms
of salary from his or her employer.
• Privilege: It refers to o e’s freedom to do something.
For eg: an adult citizen above the age of 18 years
enjoys the freedom of casting his vote in the elections.
• Power: It refers to the power entrusted to someone
due to his position. Eg: a manager is entrusted to
exercise his power to control the behavior of his
subordinates.
Area’s of so ial i volve e t
Ecology and environmental quality:
1. Cleaning up of existing pollution
2. Design process to prevent pollution
3. Noise control
4. Required recycling
Consumerism:
1. Truth in tending and advertising business
activities
2. Product warranty and service
3. Removal of harmful products
Community needs:
1. Use of business expertise in resolving
community problems. Eg: ITC
2. Healthcare facilities
3. Urban renewal
Governmental regulations:
1. Restriction on lobbying
2. Control of business on political actions
Minorities and disadvantaged persons:
1. Programmes for alcoholics and drug addicts
Whistle Blowing
• Whistle – blowing is the release of information
by a member or former member of an
organization that is evidence of illegal or
immoral conduct in the organization that is
not in the public interest.
• Whistle blowing occurs when an employee
informs the public of inappropriate activities
going on inside the organization.
• The information is the evidence of wrongdoing on the
part of organization: Matters that cause harm to the
public interest come under the purview of whistle
blowing. Thus the matters that merely influence the
course of action but are not contrary to the public
interest are not treated as whistle- blowing.
• Whistle must be blown with moral motive to correct
some wrongdoing: The motive behind whistle- blowing
should only to correct some wrongdoing in the
organization, not with the motive to take revenge. Such
an act would not be termed as whistle- blowing.
• Whistle against the wrongdoing of an
organization must be blown by its member or
former member: The information about the
wrongdoing should be passed on by an
internal member or a former member of the
organization and not by the outsiders like
journalists, social- activists, political leaders
etc. It is thus an action which is takes place
within the organization.
• It must be clear to whom the whistle
regarding wrongdoing is to be blown: Only
then a desired change or an action can be
brought about. Merely revealing the
information about the wrongdoing to the
outside party does not necessarily constitute
whistle blowing but simply an instance of
snitching.
• The information about the wrongdoing in the
organization must be released outside through
normal channels of communication prescribed
by the organization: In most of the organizations
an established procedure is to be followed by the
employees to report the instances of
wrongdoings to their immediate superiors or to
the designated officials Like ombudsman in the
Life Insurance Corporation of India.
• Information about wrongdoing must be released
voluntarily.
Causes of Whistle- Blowing
• Misuse of official funds for private purposes
• Official powers used for private gain
• Discrimination by age, race, or gender
• Corruption
• Dumping of industrial pollutants causing harm to
public
• Deceptive advertising
• Adulteration
• Harassment
• Monopolist pricing
• Use of official funds for political campaign
• Non- enforcement of laws.
Types of Whistle-blowing
• Internal: when the Whistle- blower reports the
wrongdoing to the official, at a higher position in
the organization, it is called internal whistle-
blowing. The usual subject of whistle- blowing
are disloyalty, improper conduct, indiscipline and
disobedience etc.
• External: Where the wrongdoings are reported to
the people outside the organization like media,
public interest groups or enforcement agencies.
• Alumni: When the whistle- blowing is done by
the former employee of the organization, it is
called alumni whistle- blowing.
• Open: when the identity of the whistle-
blower is revealed it is open whistle- blowing.
• Anonymous: when the identity of the whistle
blower is not revealed it is called anonymous
whistle blowing.
• Personal: When the organizational wrongdoings are to
harm one personally, disclosing such acts is called
personal whistle blowing. It is desirable only when
there is danger to o e’s freedom dignity or esteem.
• Impersonal: when the wrong doings is to harm others
it is called impersonal whistle blowing.
• Government: where the disclosure is made about
wrongdoings or unethical practices adopted by the
officials of the government.
• Corporate: When a disclosure is made about the
wrongdoings in a business corporation it is called
whistle-blowing.
Code of Ethics
• It is the set of rules or guides intended to
establish moral standards and decent
behaviour in an organization. It is also the
rules of behaviour that guide the decisions,
procedures and systems of an organization in
a way that contributes to the welfare of its key
stakeholders, and respects the rights of all
constituents affected by its operations.
Benefits of code of ethics
• It creates unanimous agreement of behaving
and operating among the organization.
• It improves team performance
• It helps in improving cohesiveness
• It helps in preventing misconduct
• Guide how to make right decisions in the
organization
• Increases managers confidence
• Improvement in relationship between
customers and organization.
• Product differentiation in the marketplace
• Signal to the stakeholders about the firms
quality
• Take suppliers into confidence and foster a
long- term relationship with them.
How to develop code of ethics
• Decide on goals and meanings of success
• Identify values needed to address current issues in
your workplace: Collect descriptions of behaviors that
produce the issues. Consider which of these issues is
ethical in nature, e.g.., issues in regard to respect,
fairness and honesty. Identify the behaviors needed to
resolve these issues. Identify which values would
generate those preferred behaviors. There may be
values included here that some people would not
deem as moral or ethical values, e.g., team-building
and promptness, but for managers, these practical
values may add more relevance and utility to a code of
ethics.
• Create code development task force
• Data intake and analysis, interviews and focus
groups
• Keep leadership informed
• Draft your code of ethics
• Submit code to leadership for a review
• Field test the code and make any final revisions
• Have code reviewed by your legal counsel
• Obtain board approval of final draft
• Decide on a communication strategy
• Revise and update regularly
Corporate Philanthropy
• It implies giving for the wellbeing of human
beings. It is the pursuit of excellence in every
facet of human life, by giving and
implementing new means and systems. It can
also be defined as private giving of time or
valuables for public purposes. In total it can be
summed up as private initiatives for public
good focusing on quality of life.
Bases Corporate Philanthropy Corporate Social
Responsibility