International Journal of School Social Work

Volume 1 | Issue 1 Article 1

2016

Exploring 21st Century Skills and Learning

Environments for Middle School Youth
Annahita Ball
University at Buffalo, State University of New York, annahita@buffalo.edu

Hillary D. Joyce
Auburn University, hdj0002@auburn.edu

Dawn Anderson-Butcher
Ohio State University - Main Campus, anderson-butcher.1@osu.edu

Follow this and additional works at: http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw

Part of the Child Psychology Commons, Social Work Commons, and the
Student Counseling and Personnel Services Commons

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Recommended Citation
Ball, Annahita; Joyce, Hillary D.; and Anderson-Butcher, Dawn (2016) "Exploring 21st Century Skills and Learning Environments for
Middle School Youth," International Journal of School Social Work: Vol. 1: Iss. 1. https://doi.org/10.4148/2161-4148.1012

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Journal of
School Social Work by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact cads@k-state.edu.
Exploring 21st Century Skills and Learning
Environments for Middle School Youth
Abstract
Resiliency research and strengths-based perspectives highlight the importance of understanding the protective
factors that aid youth in overcoming adversity. Likewise, current research identifies the characteristics and skills
youth need to be successful in post-secondary education and the workforce. These growing bodies of research
emphasize cognitive and noncognitive skills that support youth development and academic success. This
exploratory study sought to develop two distinct measurement instruments: (1) the
st st
21 Century Life & Career Skills scale (21C-LCS); and (2) the 21 Century Skills Classroom Environment scale
(21C-CE). We also examined students’ perceptions of their own skills in these areas. The measures were
developed and tested using survey data from 262 middle school students. Exploratory Factor Analysis was used
to examine the factorial structure of the measures and descriptive statistics were used to summarize student
perceptions. Results indicated that the 21C-LCS and the 21C-CE are brief psychometrically sound measures.
The 21C-LCS assesses students’ leadership and responsibility; working with others effectively; and, adaptability.
The 21C-CE is a reliable measure of students’ perceptions of the ways in which their classroom environments
st
support their development of 21 century life and career skills. Students reported moderately high perceptions
st st
of their skills in all areas. This study is an important step in measuring 21 century life and career skills and 21
century learning environments. Researchers, youth development professionals, educators, and other service
providers can utilize these measures in ongoing investigation, assessment, and progress monitoring to foster
st
and advocate for 21 century life and career skill development among youth.

Keywords
21st century skills, scale development, life and career skills, learning environment

This article is available in International Journal of School Social Work: http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1

 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

Exploring 21st Century Skills and Learning Environments for Middle School Youth

Annahita Ball1, Hilary D. Joyce2, Dawn Anderson-Butcher3

*Correspondence should be directed to Dr. Annahita Ball, School of Social Work, University at Buffalo,

annahita@buffalo.edu, 716-645-8951

1 Dr. Annahita Ball is an Assistant Professor in the School of Social Work at University at

Buffalo, Buffalo, New York. Please address all correspondence to Dr. Annahita Ball

(annahita@buffalo.edu).

2 Dr. Hilary D. Joyce is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology,

Anthropology, and Social Work at Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.

3 Dr. Dawn Anderson-Butcher is a Professor in the College of Social Work at The Ohio State

University, Columbus, Ohio.

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 1

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

Abstract

Resiliency research and strengths-based perspectives highlight the importance of understanding

the protective factors that aid youth in overcoming adversity. Likewise, current research
identifies the characteristics and skills youth need to be successful in post-secondary education
and the workforce. These growing bodies of research emphasize cognitive and noncognitive
skills that support youth development and academic success. This exploratory study sought to
develop two distinct measurement instruments: (1) the 21st Century Life & Career Skills scale
(21C-LCS); and (2) the 21st Century Skills Classroom Environment scale (21C-CE). We also
examined students’ perceptions of their own skills in these areas. The measures were developed
and tested using survey data from 262 middle school students. Exploratory Factor Analysis was
used to examine the factorial structure of the measures and descriptive statistics were used to
summarize student perceptions. Results indicated that the 21C-LCS and the 21C-CE are brief
psychometrically sound measures. The 21C-LCS assesses students’ leadership and
responsibility; working with others effectively; and, adaptability. The 21C-CE is a reliable
measure of students’ perceptions of the ways in which their classroom environments support
their development of 21st century life and career skills. Students reported moderately high
perceptions of their skills in all areas. This study is an important step in measuring 21st century
life and career skills and 21st century learning environments. Researchers, youth development
professionals, educators, and other service providers can utilize these measures in ongoing
investigation, assessment, and progress monitoring to foster and advocate for 21st century life
and career skill development among youth.

Keywords: 21st century skills, scale development, life and career skills, learning environment

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 2
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

Resiliency research and strengths-based perspectives point to the importance of

understanding the protective factors that aid youth in overcoming adversity (Delgado, 1997;

Zolkowski & Bullock, 2012). Other researchers across a number of disciplines (e.g., education,

social work, psychology) have examined the specific characteristics and skills youth need to be

successful in post-secondary education and the workforce (Strayhorn, 2011; Unrau, Font, &

Rawls, 2012). Collectively, these growing bodies of research highlight an emphasis on a number

of cognitive and noncognitive skills that support academic success. Recently, however, attention

has focused on empirical evidence indicating the importance of non-cognitive skills in

successful youth development (Heckman & Rubenstein, 2001; Lleras, 2008; Park, 2004).

Schools, positive youth development programs, and workforce development initiatives are

turning to these skills, sometimes broadly referred to as skills for success (Tooley & Bornfreund,

2014), to inform program development and guide interventions designed to improve youth

outcomes. Additionally, the much-debated national Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in

the United States emphasize integrating non-cognitive skills in curricula and instruction (CCSS

Initiative, 2014). School social workers are often integral in providing services and programs

that enhance non-cognitive skills (Frey et al., 2012; Kelly et al., 2010); thus, it is critical that

social workers engage in research and practice discussions about these initiatives. This

manuscript reports on the development of two measures that assess students’ perceptions of non-

cognitive skills, specifically those identified as 21st Century Skills, as well as reports a summary

of findings from one sample of middle school youth.

Non-Cognitive Skills

Non-cognitive skills are often characterized as character strengths or developmental assets.

Character strengths refer to a core set of attributes or abilities and include characteristics

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 3

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

such as motivation, delayed gratification, self-discipline, and grit (Duckworth & Quinn, 2009;

Duckworth, Peterson, Matthews, & Kelly, 2007; Mischel, 1996; Peterson & Seligman, 2004).

Character strengths arose from Peterson and Seligman’s (2004) initial Values in Action (VIA)

model that included 24 universal strengths. Since its development, VIA has been used as a

guiding framework for several measures of character strengths, including the Values in Action

Inventory of Strengths for adults and the Values in Action – Youth (VIA-Y) for child strengths

(Park & Peterson, 2005). The VIA-Y assesses youths’ perceptions of the same 24 universal

strengths in the VIA model (e.g., curiosity, creativity, kindness, zest). Recent studies found that

these strengths are related to life satisfaction, happiness, and positive affect (Proctor et al,

2011; Toner et al., 2012)

Developmental assets are another component of non-cognitive skills for youth. These

assets refer to building blocks of healthy development and serve as protective factors for youth

as they face adverse outcomes (Benson, 2003; Search Institute, 2006). Assets may be internal,

such as self-esteem, decision-making skills, and responsibility, or external, such as support from

others, safe environments, and positive interaction patterns with others (Bensen, 2003; Search

Institute, 2006). Together, internal and external assets have a positive influence on children’s

lives, as research indicated that youth who had multiple assets were more engaged in school,

demonstrated leadership qualities, participated in fewer risky behaviors, and had greater

academic success (Lerner & Benson, 2003; Murphey, Lamonda, Carney, & Duncan, 2004).

At the same time, there has been a push to ensure youth have the skills required to compete and succeed in today’s

workforce. This push is due to reported concern from employers regarding the gap between academic preparation

and workforce skills (Cassell & Kolstad, 1998; Olson, 2006a; P21, 2008; Sparks & Waits, 2011). Specifically, the

demand is growing for skills

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 4
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

such as teamwork, creativity, strong work habits, and social skills (Barton, 2006; Olson,

2006b; Achieve, 2012). As such, in addition to character strengths and developmental assets,

there is a movement toward fostering in youth what are called 21st century skills to ensure

youth are prepared to compete in the changing workforce.

21st Century Skills

Despite the increased push for schools to develop 21st Century skills among youth,

scholars have had difficulty identifying these core skills. For instance, a recent review of

literature on 21st Century Skills indicated little consensus on the core skill areas and definitions

of specific skills (Lai & Veiring, 2012). Still, a number of institutions, such as the Partnership

for 21st Century Skills (P21), the American Association of School Librarians (AASL), and the

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) offer frameworks and guidelines that

outline the core skills needed to meet the challenges of the modern age. While there are

differences across the three proposed frameworks, several similarities emphasize the need for

focus on a set of three main categories of skills: learning and innovation (e.g., creativity, critical

thinking, collaboration); information, media, and technology (e.g., digital literacies); and life and

career skills, the focus of this paper (P21, 2009).

Life and career skills encompass key skills necessary for students to live and work in diverse,

complex environments. These include: leadership; time management; initiative and self-directed

learning; and working with others effectively. More specifically, leadership skills involve guiding

others, identifying and employing the strengths of others, and motivating others to accomplish a

common goal (P21, 2009). Time management includes utilizing time and managing workload

efficiently (P21, 2009). Initiative and self-directed learning are skills defined by behaviors such as

goal-setting with measureable criterion for success, establishing a balance

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 5

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

between long and short term goals, and exploring new learning opportunities (P21, 2009).

Working with others effectively includes one’s ability to interact effectively with others

including knowing when to contribute, when to listen, and respecting different values and

opinions (P21, 2009).

Life and career skills are the focus of this paper; as they represent non-cognitive skills

that have the potential to improve academic achievement, promote postsecondary success, and

foster career readiness. Collaborating and working effectively with others can have a lasting

positive impact on individual student learning (Saner et al., 1994) and increase social

competency (Ginsburg-Block, Rohrbeck, & Fantuzzo, 2006). Motivation, a research construct

often related to life and career skills such as flexibility, is also related to academic achievement

(Broussard & Garrison, 2004) and motivation contributes to resilience in youth (Masten, 2001).

In addition, possessing life and career skills enhances future employability given the high value

and priority employers are placing on skills such as the ability to work on a team and time

management (Barton, 2006). Given the numerous benefits, assessing and developing life and

career skills among youth is important. Further, the development of these skills may be

facilitated across youth settings such as schools, afterschool, sports, and youth employment.

These contexts represent opportunities for youth to practice 21st century skills, which is critical

to 21st century skill development (P21, n.d.; AASL, 2007). Understanding 21st century skills is

not sufficient to support children’s acquisition of such skills. It is also important that children

have the opportunity to practice these skills, thus, a learning environment that fosters 21st

century learning is likely essential; however, little is known about the opportunities youth have

to practice 21st century skills.

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 6
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

In summary, 21st century skills represent characteristics students should possess to overcome

adversity and achieve success in postsecondary education and the workforce. Instruments are needed

to assess these important characteristics (Silva, 2009). This study aimed to develop a

psychometrically sound measure of several core 21st century life and career skills for use with

children and youth. We also assessed the degree to which students have opportunities to practice 21 st

century life and career skills in their learning environments. Finally, we explored the extent to which

youth reported possessing 21st century life and career skills.

Method

Two distinct measures were developed for this study - the 21st Century Life & Career

Skills scale (21C-LCS) and the 21st Century Skills Classroom Environment scale (21C-CE). All

steps for development of the two scales were based on the recommendations of DeVellis (2003).
The Institutional Review Board at The Ohio State University approved this study.

Instrument Development

21C-LCS. Following a thorough review of the literature, we initially developed a pool of

26 items to measure skills within the 21st century skill domain of life and career skills.

Specifically, we drew from two existing frameworks of 21st Century Skills – one developed by

the Partnership for 21st Skills (2009) and one developed by the National Research Council’s

Committee on the Assessment of 21st Century Skills (National Research Council, 2011). Items

were developed to assess the skills highlighted within the life and career skills (Partnership for

21st Century Skills, 2009) and intrapersonal skills (National Research Council, 2011) domains

of these two models. These included skills such as leadership, adaptability, goal-setting, self-
regulation; social and cross-cultural skills, and productivity and accountability. All items utilized
a 5-point Likert-type response scale (1=Not at all true; 5=Really true). Example items include:

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 7

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

“I lead others to accomplish a goal,” “I control my temper when working with others on a

project,” and “I think about how others see things.”

21C-CE. Nine items were developed to measure students’ perceptions of their classroom

environments in relation to the 21st century life and career skills identified in existing

frameworks (P21, 2009; Committee on the Assessment of 21st Century Skills). All items utilized

the same 5-point Likert-type scale from the 21C-LCS. Example items include: “My teachers

give me the opportunity to lead groups” and “My teachers help me set goals for myself.”

Data Collection Procedures and Sample

Data were collected on the newly-developed 21C-LCS and 21C-CE using a cross-sectional

survey research design within one urban middle school in the Midwest. The sample included

262 students in grades 6 (35.8%), 7 (35.8%), and 8 (28.4%). All participants had parental

consent to participate in the study. The sample was almost evenly split by gender, with 50.8% of

the participants reporting as male and 49.2% reporting as female. Half of the participants

reported as Black/African American, 25.7% as White, 21.6% as multi-racial, 1.2% Latino(a),

and 1.2% as Asian.

Data Analysis

To address the first and second study objectives, we utilized two separate exploratory

factor analyses (EFA) to identify the number of factors within the 21C-LCS and the 21C-CE.

One EFA was conducted with principal axis factoring and promax rotation for each of the scales.

First, we applied the Kaiser-Guttman retention criteria and examined the scree plots to retain

factors that had eigenvalues greater than 1.00 (Tabachnik & Fidell, 2007). Next, we screened

item factor loadings on the pattern matrix to identify factor loadings that fit the retention criteria

established by Comrey and Lee (1992). Specifically, items with factor loadings greater than 0.45

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 8
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

were retained in this analysis. After examining individual factor loadings, we identified factors

and named them depending on the conceptual constructs they assessed. Existing frameworks

of 21st century skills were also considered to assess the conceptual fit of items and factors.

Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal consistency of the items within each factor and

of the scale as a whole. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations were used to explore the

extent to which youth report possessing 21st century life and career skills and their perceptions

of their learning environments.

Results

Factor analysis was deemed appropriate for each scale given significant (p < 0.01)

Bartlett’s (1954) Tests of Sphericity and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure (KMO; Kaiser,

1974) values of 0.91 and 0.88. The results of each analysis will be described here, followed

by a summary of descriptive and correlational results.

21C-LCS

The initial run of the EFA indicated that the 26 items of the 21C-LCS resulted in a 6-

factor solution accounting for 61.16% of the total variance. An examination of the scree plot and

factor loadings indicated that two factors were not well-defined and nine items cross-loaded on

multiple factors. As such, these nine items were eliminated and the EFA was conducted again to

identify the most parsimonious solution. The results of the second EFA indicated that the

remaining 17 items included four factors accounting for 60.32% of the total variance. Two items

did not sufficiently load on any of the four factors and two additional items cross-loaded on

multiple factors. The four problematic items in this run of the EFA may have been somewhat

ambiguous in relation to context for middle school participants (e.g., “I focus my attention”). The

decision was made to eliminate these four items and run the EFA again. In this third run, the

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 9

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

results indicated a four-factor solution accounting for 67.34% of the total variance. Two items

cross-loaded on multiple factors and were removed as well. The results of the fourth run of the

EFA with the remaining 11 items resulted in three underlying factors accounting for 62.15% of

the variance. The factor loadings from the pattern matrix, descriptive statistics, and reliability

information for the 21C-LCS are outlined in Table 1.

Factor 1 included five items that accounted for 37.17% of the variance and was labeled

Leadership and Responsibility. All of the items in this factor indicate students’ perceptions of

their ability to lead others and accomplish goals. The second factor, labeled Working with Others

Effectively, included four items and accounted for 13.74% of the variance. This factor describes

students’ perceptions of the extent to which they listen to others and consider differing

perspectives and cultures. The third factor was labeled Adaptability and is a measure of students’

perceived adjustment and openness to change. Factor 3 accounted for 10.70% of the variance and

included two items.

The internal consistency estimates (α) for the factors indicated that each of the three

factors demonstrated adequate internal consistency. Specifically, Factor 1 (Leadership and

Responsibility) had a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.77, Factor 2 (Working with Others

Effectively) had a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.76, and Factor 3 (Adaptability) had a

Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.73. The entire scale also demonstrated high internal

consistency (α = 0.83). The intercorrelations among the three factors were statistically significant

and ranged from 0.36 to 0.42, representing moderate correlations in explaining the total variance

in the concept of life and career skills for the 21st Century.

21C-CE

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 10
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

The EFA of the six-item scale measuring the 21st century classroom environment yielded a

one-factor solution (eigenvalue = 3.51) that accounted for 58.54% of the total variance. All of the 6

items loaded on the one factor sufficiently, with factor loadings ranging from 0.65 to 0.76. The full

list of items and factor loadings are available in Table 2. The overall reliability of the measure was

determined via Cronbach’s alpha of .86. Inter-item correlations ranged from .41 to

.60 and were each statistically significant.

Student Perceptions

Mean scores were calculated for each of the three subscales within the 21C-LCS, as well

as for the scale in its entirety. Higher mean scores indicated higher reported use of 21st century

life and career skills. The mean scores for each of the subscales suggested that participants in this

study had moderately high perceptions of their skills in relation to leadership and responsibility

(M = 3.70; SD = 0.91), working with others effectively (M = 3.97; SD = 1.00), and adaptability

(M = 3.58; SD = 1.10). Participants reported the most positive perceptions of their skills for

working with others effectively. All three subscales were significantly and positively correlated

(Table 3), indicating that students who reported greater skill in one area also reported greater

skill in the other two areas. Likewise, participants in this sample noted that their classroom

somewhat supported their learning of 21st skills (M = 3.56; SD = 0.94). Scores on the 21C-CE

were significantly and positively related to scores on the 21C-LCS as well.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that the 21C-LCS and the 21C-CE are brief,

psychometrically sound measures of two distinct aspects of 21st Century Skills in educational

settings. The 21C-LCS assesses students’ perceptions of the following critical skill areas: (1)

Leadership and Responsibility; (2) Working with Others Effectively; and, (3) Adaptability.

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 11

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

Additionally, the 21C-CE is a reliable measure of students’ perceptions of the ways in which

their classroom environments support their development of 21st century life and career skills.

Within the 21C-LCS, leadership and responsibility explained the most variance in 21st

century life and career skills (37.71%) and measures students’ perceptions of their ability to lead

others and accomplish goals. Working with others effectively explained 13.74% of the total

variance. This factor measures students’ perceptions of the extent to which they listen to others

and consider differing perspectives and cultures. Participants in this study reported the most skill

in this area, compared to the other two areas measured by the 21C-LCS. Adaptability also

emerged from the analysis and is a measure of students’ perceived adjustment and openness to

change. However, it was only comprised of two items and explained only 10.70% of the total

variance. The small amount of explained variance may be an indication that adaptability is

somewhat different from leadership and responsibility and working with others effectively. The

results did not support the inclusion of several other life and career skills identified in previous

frameworks, such as initiative and self-directed learning and time management. Initiative/self-

directed learning and time management appear distinct from leadership and responsibility and

working with others effectively as the latter characteristics occur within the context of

collaboration. This could also explain the lower percent of explained variance for the adaptability

items.

The 21C-CE measures students’ 21st century learning environment experiences.

Specifically, it assesses students’ perceptions of having opportunities to work with others and

consider the opinions of others. It also measures students’ perceptions of having opportunities or

being encouraged to set goals, organize time, and ask questions. Although it is a subjective

method of evaluation, the 21C-CE measures an important domain of 21st century learning

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 12
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

environments, which is having the opportunity to practice 21st century life and career skills.

Students’ perceptions of their learning environments was positively related to their perceptions

of their own 21st Century skills, suggesting that more attention to understanding classroom

environments may be warranted.

Limitations

Additional scale development procedures, such as a confirmatory factor analysis, will

provide more information about the psychometric properties of these measurement tools.

Moreover, these measures are limited in that they assess students’ perceptions of their own

skills and classroom environments. Generalizability is another limitation as the sample relied on

students from one school and included only one age group (i.e., middle school). Finally, factor

three of the 21C-LCS warrants more investigation as it only had two items, explained 10.70% of

the variance, and had the lowest internal consistency reliability; however, it still seemed

conceptually distinct from the other two factors. It may be an important component of 21st

century life and career skills that has not been investigated previously.

Implications

This study is an important step in understanding 21st century life and career skills and

21st century learning environments. Additional psychometric analysis will be useful in

determining the underlying factor structure of these measures, as well as the ways in which the

factors interrelate. Future research also is needed to assess the construct validity of the 21C-LCS.

For example, it will be important to understand the ways in which the 21C-LCS relates to other

existing measures of non-cognitive skills, such as the VIA-Y. Likewise, future research may

utilize other methods to assess 21st century life and career skills, such as through observation

(Singleton & Straits, 2005). Finally, more examination of 21st century learning environments is

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 13

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

needed. It is likely that other critical aspects of learning environments are necessary to

developing 21st century skills, such as access to technology, physical spaces that promote

individual and group work, and educator professional development on integrating 21st

century skills practice into the classroom.

This study poses implications for practice with children and youth as well. Although not

often emphasized, school social workers may perform interventions at multiple levels to foster

and advocate for 21st century life and career skill development and assessment among youth.

For instance, practitioners can lead efforts to utilize such tools in school and community

programming (e.g., afterschool programs) to facilitate continuous improvement processes

geared toward developing these skills in youth. Including these measures in progress monitoring

practices will help schools and other programs assess youths’ needs and develop interventions

that target 21st century skills. Additionally, social workers play a key role by collaborating with

others, such as teachers and related service providers, to cultivate learning opportunities that

enhance 21st century skill development. This study provides tools for school social workers to

provide guidance and consultation to school leaders and other teachers focused on integrating

21st Century skills in the classroom. Finally, social workers in schools may advocate for policies that

support teaching and learning methods that facilitate the development these skills. Ultimately,

enhancing 21st century skills better prepares youth for the current workforce; thus, these skills may

prove vital as youth-serving agencies and organizations strive to address skill and education gaps

evident among children and youth. It is especially important for school social workers to emphasize

a holistic, or whole-child, approach to youth development, including both academic and non-

academic priorities. The measures in this study point, not only to ways of

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 14
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

measurement, but also to operationalized constructs that are useful in articulating 21st

century skills and learning environments to multiple stakeholders.

Conclusion

To enhance success in adulthood, today’s high school and college graduates should be

equipped with both academic skills and life and career skills. Therefore, it is essential for schools

and community-based youth-serving organizations to consider student mastery of noncognitive

skills, particularly as this area becomes an emerging priority in education reform and in the

global marketplace. Assessment of such skills is critical; however, few tools exist to measure

21st century skills specifically. This study offered two brief, psychometrically sound measures of

21st century life and career skills and learning environments that will be useful in developing

and monitoring learning opportunities for children and youth. Students reported moderately high

perceptions of their own skills, yet targeted programming and interventions may enhance

students’ ability to utilize these skills in multiple settings. More research also will illuminate the

ways in which 21st century skills may be similar to or different from other critical noncognitive

skills.

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 15

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

References

Achieve, Inc. (2012). The Future Of The U.S. Workforce: A Survey Of Hiring Practices Across

Industries. ERIC. Retrieved from

http://spot.lib.auburn.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&

db=eric&AN=ED537120&site=ehost-live

American Association of School Librarians. (2007). Standards for the 21st century learner.

Retrieved from

http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/aasl/aaslproftools/learningstandards/AASL_LearningS

tandard.pdf

Barton, P. (2006). High school reform and work: Facing labor market realities. Retrieved

from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492034.pdf

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: skills for the future, The Clearing

House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43.

Benson, P. L. (2003). Developmental assets and asset-building community: Conceptual and

empirical foundations. In R. Lerner & P. L. Benson (Eds.), Developmental assets and

asset- building communities: Implications for research, policy, and practice (pp.

19— 43). New York: Kluwer Academic.

Broussard, S.C., & Garrison, M.E.B. (2004). The relationship between classroom motivation and

academic achievement in elementary school-aged children. Family and Consumer

Sciences Research Journal, 33(2), 106-120. doi: 10.1177/1077727X04269573

Cassel, R.N. & Kolstad, R. (1998). Critical job-skill requirements for the 21st century: Living

and working with people. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25(3), 176-181.

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 16
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2014). Common Core State Standards for

english language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical

subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd Ed.).

Erlbaum, Blanchard, Mumford, & Beachum: Hillsdale, NJ.

DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications:

Thousand Oaks, CA.

Delgado, M. (1997). Strengths-based practice with Puerto Rican adolescents: Lessons from

a Substance Abuse Prevention Project. Social Work in Education, 19(2), 101-112. doi:

10.1093/cs/19.2.101

Duckworth, A.L. & Quinn, P.D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale

(Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2). doi:10.1080/00223890802634290

Duckworth, A.L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M.D., & Kelly, D.R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and

passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6). doi:

10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087

Frey, A.J., Alvarez, M. E., Sabatino, C. A., Lindsey, B. C., Dupper, D. R., Raines, J. C. et al.,

(2012). The development of a national school social work practice model. Children &

Schools, 34(3), 131-

Ginsburg-Block, M.D., Rohrbeck, C.A., & Fantuzzo, J.W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of

social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of

Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732-749. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.732

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 17

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

Heckman, J.J., & Runenstein, Y. (2001). The importance of noncognitive skills: Lessons

from the GED testing program. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 145-149.

International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). NETS for Students 2007. Retrieved

from

http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/NETS_for_Students.ht

Kelly,M. et al. (2010). The State of School Social Work; Findings from the National School

Social Work Survey. School Mental Health, 2:132-141.

Lai, E.R., & Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: Integrating Research Findings.

Vancouver, B.C.: National Council on Measurement in Education.

Lerner, R., & Benson, L. P. (2003). Developmental assets and asset-building communities:

Implications for research, policy, and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic.

Lleras, C. (2008). Do skills and behaviors in high school matter? The contribution of

noncongnitive factors in explaining differences in educational attainment and earnings.

Social Science Research, 37(3), 888-902. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.004

Masten, A.S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American

Psychologist, 56(3), 227-238. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227

Mischel, W. (1996). From good intentions to willpower. In P. M. Gollwitzer and J. A. Burgh

(Eds.). The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior.

New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Murphey,A. D., Lamonda, H. K., Carney, K.J., & Duncan, P. (2004). Relationships of brief

measure of youth assets to health-promoting and risk behaviors. Journal of Adolescent

Health, 34(3), 184-191 doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.05.004

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 18
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

National Research Council (U.S.) Committee on the Assessment of 21st Century Skills.

(2011). Assessing 21st Century Skills. National Academies Press: Washington, D.C.

Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK84215/

Olson, L. (2006a). Economic trends fuel push to retool schooling. Education Week, 25(28).

Retrieved from

http://spot.lib.auburn.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&

db=eric&AN=EJ738205&site=ehost-live

Olson, L. (2006b). Ambiguity and preparation for workforce clouds efforts to equip students

for future. Education Week, 25(3).

Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). The values in action inventory of character strengths for youth.

In K.A. Moore & L.H. Lipman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish:

Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 13-23). Springer:

New York, NY.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). Transition Brief: Policy Recommendations On

Preparing Americans For The Global Skills Race. ERIC. Retrieved from

http://spot.lib.auburn.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&

db=eric&AN=ED519464&site=ehost-live

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved

from http://images.apple.com/education/docs/leaders/Apple-P21Framework.pdf.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (n.d.) 21st Century Learning Environments. Retrieved

from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/le_white_paper-1.pdf.

Peterson, C., & Seligman, M.E.P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and

classification. American Psychological Association: Washington, D.C.

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 19

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

Proctor, C., Tsukayama, E., Wood, A., M., Maltby, J., Fox Eades, J., & Linley, P. A. (2011).

Strengths gym: The impact of a character strengths-based intervention on the life

satisfaction and well-being of adolescents. Journal of Positive Psychology, 6 (5),

377-388. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2011.594079

Saavedra, A. R. & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-

century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13.

Saner, H., McCaffrey, D., Stecher, B., Klein, S., & Bell, R. (1994). The effects of working in

pairs in science performance assessments. Educational Assessment, 2(4), 325-338.

Search Institute. (2006). 40 developmental assets for adolescents (ages 12-18). Search Institute:

Minneapolis, MD.

Silva, E. (2009). Measuring skills for 21st-century learning. Phi Delta Kappan, May, 630-634.

Singleton, R.A., & Straits, B.C. (2005). Approaches to social research (4th ed). Oxford

University Press: New York.

Sparks, E., & Waits, M.J. (2011). Degrees for what jobs? Raising expectations for universities

and colleges in a global economy. NGA Center for Best Practices: Washington, DC.

Retrieved from

http://www.eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED517709

Strayhorn, T. L. (2011). Traits, commitments, and college satisfaction among Black American

community college students. Community College Journal of Research & Practice,

35(6), 437-453. doi: 10.1080/10668920801901282

Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Toner, E., Haslam, N., Robinson, J., & Williams, P. (2012). Character strengths and wellbeing in

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 20
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

adolescence: Structure and correlates of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for

Children. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(5), 637-642. doi:

10.1016/j.paid.2011.12.014

Tooley, M. & Borfreund, L. (2013). Skills for success: Supporting and assessing key habits,

mindsets, and skills in PreK-12. New York, NY: New American Foundation. Retrieved

from

https://www.newamerica.org/downloads/11212014_Skills_for_Success_Tooley_Bornfre

und.pdf

Unrau, Y.A., Font, S.A., & Rawls, G. (2012). Readiness for college engagement among students

who have aged out of foster care. Children & Youth Services Review, 34(1), 76-83. doi:

10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.09.002

Zolkoski, S.M., & Bullock, L.M. (2012). Resilience in children and youth: A review. Children

and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2295-2303. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 21

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

Table 1. Items, factor loadings, and descriptive statistics for the 21C-LCS (N = 262)

Factor

Item 1 2 3

1. I lead others to accomplish a goal. 0.57 0.09 -0.16

2. Team members can count on me. 0.69 0.01 0.03

3. Others can count on me to accomplish a goal. 0.79 -0.10 -.07

4. I put all my energy into accomplishing my goals. 0.60 0.05 0.13

5. I push myself. 0.60 0.01 0.10

6. I listen to what others say. 0.04 0.45 0.18

7. I think about how others see things. 0.15 0.50 0.06

8. I enjoy learning about different cultures. -0.01 0.84 -0.09

9. I take time to learn about different cultures. -0.07 0.82 -0.01

10. I can adjust to change. 0.08 -0.02 0.70

11. I am open to change. -0.12 0.02 0.85

Eigenvalue 4.15 1.51 1.77

Percent variance 37.71 13.74 10.70

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 22
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

Table 1 continued

Factor

Item 1 2 3

M(SD) 3.70(0.91) 3.97(1.00) 3.58(1.10)

α 0.77 0.76 0.73

Note. Pattern Matrix from the Principal Axis Factor Analysis with a Promax Rotation.

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 23

 International Journal of School Social Work, Vol. 1 [2016], Iss. 1, Art. 1

21st Century Skills Assessment, 24

Table 2. Factor loadings and descriptive statistics for the 21C-CE (N = 262)
Factor
Item Loading M SD
1. My teachers give me the opportunity to lead groups 0.67 3.26 1.35
0.65 3.04 1.42
2. My teachers help me organize my time.
0.70 3.68 1.26
3. My teachers give me time to work with other students.
0.74 3.75 1.27
4. My teachers encourage me to ask questions.
0.76 3.43 1.28
5. My teachers encourage me to consider the opinions of others.
0.74 3.72 1.33
6. My teachers help me set goals for myself.
Note. All items loaded on a single factor. Eigenvalue = 3.51, Percent Variance Explained = 58.54.
Scale M = 3.56; SD = 0.94.

http://newprairiepress.org/ijssw/vol1/iss1/1 24
DOI: 10.4148/2161-4148.1012
 Ball et al.: 21st Century Skills

21st Century Skills Assessment, 25

Table 3. Correlation matrix of 21C-LCS subscales and 21C-CE (N = 262).

Variable Leadership & Working with Adaptability Classroom

Responsibility Others Environment

Leadership & --

Responsibility

Working with .41* --

Others

Adaptability .42* .36* --

Classroom .51* .48* .41* --

Environment

Note. *p < 0.01

Published by New Prairie Press, 2016 25