Satellite images show that China has constructed military installations such as runways, ports, barracks, and storage facilities on the artificial islands it has built in the Spratly Islands, a disputed area in the South China Sea. The images reveal a deep water port serving as a naval base on Mischief Reef, a 2.7 km runway with no civilian facilities, and 14 interceptor aircraft hangars on Subi Reef. Despite China stating it would not militarize the islands, the construction of these defense capabilities suggests it aims to project naval and air power in the region.
Satellite images show that China has constructed military installations such as runways, ports, barracks, and storage facilities on the artificial islands it has built in the Spratly Islands, a disputed area in the South China Sea. The images reveal a deep water port serving as a naval base on Mischief Reef, a 2.7 km runway with no civilian facilities, and 14 interceptor aircraft hangars on Subi Reef. Despite China stating it would not militarize the islands, the construction of these defense capabilities suggests it aims to project naval and air power in the region.
Satellite images show that China has constructed military installations such as runways, ports, barracks, and storage facilities on the artificial islands it has built in the Spratly Islands, a disputed area in the South China Sea. The images reveal a deep water port serving as a naval base on Mischief Reef, a 2.7 km runway with no civilian facilities, and 14 interceptor aircraft hangars on Subi Reef. Despite China stating it would not militarize the islands, the construction of these defense capabilities suggests it aims to project naval and air power in the region.
Satellite images show that China has constructed military installations such as runways, ports, barracks, and storage facilities on the artificial islands it has built in the Spratly Islands, a disputed area in the South China Sea. The images reveal a deep water port serving as a naval base on Mischief Reef, a 2.7 km runway with no civilian facilities, and 14 interceptor aircraft hangars on Subi Reef. Despite China stating it would not militarize the islands, the construction of these defense capabilities suggests it aims to project naval and air power in the region.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 8
The Spratly Islands are a disputed zone, with China, Malaysia, Taiwan, Vietnam, Brunei and the
Philippines all advancing territorial claims, and all except Brunei occupying at least some of the maritime features in the area.
China has repeatedly stated that it has no intention to militarise the artificial islands it has constructed around the reefs it has claimed.
Satellite images provided by DigitalGlobe and analysed by European Space Imagery show strong military construction with a deep water port, completed aerodromes, hangars, military barracks and communications infrastructure on the Subi and Mischief reefs.
30 centimetre resolution images convey extensive detail of the new installations. ESI’s analysis of the Mischief Reef images shows a deep water port which serves as a blue water naval base on the island’s northwest quarter, and a 2.7 kilometre runway with no visible passenger terminals or accommodation, suggesting its intended function as a joint use naval airport.
Military barracks, communication antennae, underground POL (petrol, oil and lubricant) storage tanks and control towers are all visible in the images. The barracks boast completed athletics facilities with basketball and tennis courts, a full track and football fields.
Images of Subi reef display another deep water port and naval base, and an airfield with 14 hangars for small interceptor aircraft along with four large heavy maintenance hangars.
Filipinos celebrate the Hague-based U.N. international arbitration tribunal’s ruling
favoring the Philippines in its case against China on the dispute on South China Sea Tuesday, July 12, 2016 in the financial district of Makati city, east of Manila, Philippines. AP An arbitration panel in The Hague, Netherlands, issued a ruling Tuesday in a long- running dispute between the Philippines and China over the South China Sea. The Philippines had asked the tribunal to declare China’s claims and actions invalid under the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea. Beijing has refused to join the case, rejecting the tribunal’s jurisdiction, and has said it will not accept the decision.
–– ADVERTISEMENT ––
A look at how the dispute has unfolded:
1947: China demarcates its South China Sea territorial claims with a U-shaped line made up of eleven dashes on a map, covering most of the area. The Communist Party, which took over in 1949, removed the Gulf of Tonkin portion in 1953, erasing two of the dashes to make it a nine-dash line. ADVERTISEMENT 1994: The 1982 U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, under which the Philippines has taken China to arbitration, goes into effect after 60 countries ratify it. The agreement defines territorial waters, continental shelves and exclusive economic zones. The Philippines joined the convention in 1984, and China in 1996. The U.S. has never ratified it. 1995: China takes control of disputed Mischief Reef, constructing octagonal huts on stilts that Chinese officials say will serve as shelters for fishermen. The Philippines lodges a protest through the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. 1997: Philippine naval ships prevent Chinese boats from approaching Scarborough Shoal, eliciting a protest from China. The uninhabited reef, known as Huangyan Island in China, is 230 kilometers (145 miles) off the Philippines and about 1,000 kilometers (600 miles) from China. In ensuing years, the Philippines detains Chinese fishermen numerous times for alleged illegal fishing in the area. 2009: China submits its nine-dash line map to the United Nations, stating it “has indisputable sovereignty over the islands in the South China Sea and the adjacent waters.” The submission came in response to applications by Vietnam and Malaysia for recognition of extended continental shelves, which would give them resource rights. The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia protest the Chinese claim. 2011: The Philippines files a diplomatic protest after a chartered ship searching for oil and gas and in Reed Bank near the Spratly Islands complained of being harassed by two Chinese patrol boats, forcing it to change course. 2012: China takes effective control of Scarborough Shoal after a tense standoff between Chinese coast guard ships and a Philippine naval vessel that had stopped a Chinese fishing boat to inspect it. 2013: The Philippines brings its dispute with China to the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, angering Beijing. A five-member panel of international legal experts is appointed in June to hear the case. 2014: The Philippine government summons China’s top envoy in Manila in February to protest what it said was the firing of a water cannon by a Chinese government vessel to drive away Filipino fishermen from Scarborough Shoal. China ignores the protest and calls its sovereignty there “indisputable.”
south-china-sea-dispute#ixzz5JpLY3I7z Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook
China issues a position paper in December arguing that the panel does not have jurisdiction over the case, because it concerns issues of sovereignty and boundary definition, which are not covered by the U.N. convention, and that the Philippines and China had agreed to settle their dispute only through negotiation. 2015: The arbitration panel in The Hague rules in October that it has jurisdiction over at least seven of the 15 claims raised by the Philippines. A hearing on the merits of the claims is held in November. China does not participate. July 12, 2016: The Permanent Court of Arbitration rules that China has no legal basis for claiming much of the South China Sea and had aggravated the regional dispute with its land reclamation and construction of artificial islands that destroyed coral reefs and the natural condition of the disputed areas. The Philippines, which sought the arbitration ruling, welcomed the decision, and China rejected it outright.
