0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1 views12 pages

Beige Vintage Group Project Presentation

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 12

Search

Me!!!
Activity 5.1
West
Philippine
Sea Dispute
Introduction
The West Philippine Sea (WPS) is a part of the larger
South China Sea, which is a region rich in natural
resources and a crucial shipping route. This area has
become a focal point of territorial disputes, with several
countries, including China, the Philippines, Vietnam,
Malaysia, and Brunei, laying claim to various parts of it.
The Philippines has a historical and legal claim to the
WPS, based on maps, documents, and international law.
In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled in favor
of the Philippines, rejecting China’s expansive claims
over the region. Despite this, China continues to assert
its control, leading to ongoing tensions and
confrontations at sea. The dispute is not only about
territorial sovereignty but also concerns the region’s
strategic importance and valuable resources.
What is at Stake for the
Philippines?
1. 80% of the Philippines’ Exclusive Economic
Zone(EEZ) compromising 381,000 square kilometers
of maritime space,

2. 100% of the Philippines’ Extended Cpntinental


Shelf(ECS), estimated at over 150,000 square kilometers
of maritime space,

Aggregating a huge maritime area of over 531,000


square kilometers, larger than the total area of the
philippines of 300,000 square kilometers, either the
Philippines keeps this huge maritime space or lose it to
China.
China’s 9-Dashed Lines

China’s 9-dashed lines claim encloses 85.7% of


the entire South China Sea. This is equivalent
to 3 million square kilometers surface area of
the South China Sea.

9-dashed line submitted by China to United


Nations on May 7, 2009.

The Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and


Indonesia protested China’s claim under this
9-dashed lines map.
Territorial Disputes in the South
China Sea

https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/territorial-disputes-south-china-sea?
fbclid=IwY2xjawH91KNleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHcE1ZSRTdJzJj6H7ckB9Yc_mAHZCIfKXxJn9OYqc_CmUnQ2nlL_gVp3dqQ_aem_8u_mWXRhuz14JiBdaH0hLA
China’s broad claims over the South China Sea, including its
estimated 11 billion barrels of oil and 190 trillion cubic feet of
natural gas, have led to tensions with other claimants like
Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and
Vietnam. Since the 1970s, countries have laid claim to
resource-rich areas like the Spratly Islands. Diplomatic
failures in resolving these disputes could threaten
international maritime laws and lead to military buildups.

China asserts that foreign militaries cannot conduct


intelligence activities in its exclusive economic zone (EEZ),
while the United States maintains that under the UNCLOS,
countries should have freedom of navigation. In 2016, the
Permanent Court of Arbitration ruled in favor of the
Philippines in a case against China, but China rejected the
ruling.
China has also increasingly expanded its territorial presence
by land reclamation in the Spratly and Paracel Islands,
building military structures like ports, airstrips, and radar
systems. It has militarized Woody Island with fighter jets,
missiles, and radar.
Philippines protests China’s
deployment of ‘monster ship’ in
maritime zone
The Philippines has said China’s deployment of
its largest coastguard vessel inside Manila’s
exclusive maritime economic zone (EEZ) is
alarming and clearly intended to intimidate
fishermen operating around a shoal in the
contested waters of the South China Sea.

Philippines National Security Council


spokesperson Jonathan Malaya said on
Tuesday that Manila has lodged a protest over
the presence of the 165-metre (541ft) long
Chinese coastguard vessel 5901, which was
spotted 77 nautical miles (142km) off the coast
of Zambales province, and demanded its
withdrawal from the EEZ.
Deliberate, Not Desperate: The Philippines'
National Security Strategy On The West
Philippine Sea
The Philippines brought China to arbitration under UNCLOS in 2013 over
the South China Sea dispute, securing a legal advantage as China
refused to participate. A five-judge tribunal was formed, favoring
impartiality, and the Philippines rallied international support to pressure
China. In 2016, the tribunal ruled against China's expansive "nine-dash
line" claims, affirming the Philippines’ maritime rights. While
enforcement remains challenging, the case highlights how smaller
nations can use law and diplomacy to counter major powers, promoting
international rule-based order and regional stability.
Sources:

Deliberate, Not Desperate: The


Philippines' National Security
Strategy On The West Philippine
Sea
Thank
you

You might also like