Exam Review Sheet 1
Exam Review Sheet 1
Exam Review Sheet 1
FEEDBACK
1. Open Area: info about you is known and 2. Blind Area: information others know
open. about you. But, you don’t know about
(behavior, knowledge, skills, attitudes, and yourself.
“public” history.) Generally described as (Ex. your colleagues know that although
DISCLOSURE
cocktail party information. you are a nice and caring person, you
KNOWN TO SELF chronically interrupt and talk over others in
KNOWN TO OTHERS conversation.)
UNKNOWN TO SELF
KNOWN TO OTHERS
3. Hidden area: likes and dislikes you do 4. Unknown area: things unknown to you
not want to share with others. and unknown by others.
(your values, beliefs, fears, and past (area of potential growth or self-
experiences you do not reveal to actualization. This is all the things you have
others) never tried or experienced.
KNOWN TO SELF UNKNOWN TO SELF
UNKNOWN TO OTHERS UNKNOWN TO OTHERS
The Johari Window is a feedback process. Created by Joe Luft and Harry Ingram. The two
key concepts: (1) you can build trust with others by disclosing information about
yourself, and (2) with the help of feedback from others, you can learn about yourself
and come to terms with personal issues.
Semantic Triangle
Noise
Sorting
Naïve Realism
Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis
Nonverbal Communication:
Proxemics
Kinesics
Paralanguage
Facial/Eye Behavior
Communication Flows
Vertical
Horizontal
Diagonal
Virtual
Communication Networks:
Chain
Wheel
Circle
All-Channel
Perception
Attitude
Cognitive Dissonance
Halo/Horn Effect
Contrast Effect
Projection
Stereotyping
Pygmalion/Galatea Effect
Self-Efficacy
Self-Actualization
Agency
Clayton Alderfer
Abraham Maslow
Learned helplessness
Resilience
Aggression
Empowerment
Paul Ekman
Human Universals
Hawthorne Studies: Elton Mayo, Frederick Roethlisberger, and their colleagues from
Harvard Business School conducted several experiments from 1924 to 1933 at the
Hawthorne Plant of the Western Electric Company in Cicero, Illinois.
Origination of human relations/ behavioral management movement
These studies were important because the researchers demonstrated the important
influence of human factors on work productivity.
There were four phases of the Hawthorne Study: Purpose of these phases was to
determine the effect of working conditions on productivity
1. Illumination Experiments: conducted to determine whether increasing or decreasing
lights would impact productivity.
Researchers found that productivity improved with both the control (no light
change group) and the experimental group (lighting changed either brighter or
dimmer)
Ultimately, researchers found that it was not lighting the improved productivity, it
was the attention received by the group.
2. Relay-assembly Group Experiments: a segregated group’s productivity was
observed as they were exposed to different working conditions. They were observed
for five years.
First part of experiment: The working conditions were improved by increasing
rest periods, decreasing workday length, and providing them a “free day” and
lunches. Also, these workers were consulted because any change was made. The
workers also had the freedom to interact with one another. The researchers paid
attention to the worker’s opinions, hopes, and fears during the experiment. During
this period the worker’s productivity increased.
Second part of experiment: The original work conditions were restored.
Researchers found that the productivity of the workers stayed the same as it was
at the improved conditions. This result is due to the group dynamics because the
group could develop socially with a common purpose.
3. Bank-wiring Observation-room Group Studies: this experiment results were
similar to the relay-assembly group experiment. A group of workers were segregated
so their productivity and group dynamics could be observed.
The workers were paid with a piecework rate the reflected both group and
individual efforts. Researchers found that the wage incentive did NOT work. The
group created their own standard to what a “proper day’s work” was. The
productivity remained constant because they did not want management to know
they could work harder.
If someone worked harder than the agreed upon level the group would influence
the worker to return to the normal level.
If someone worked below the agreed upon level, the workers traded jobs to ensure
the constant level of work.
The researchers concluded that there was no cause-and-effect relationship
between working conditions and productivity and that any increase or decrease
in productivity was attributed to group dynamics.
Due to the bank-wiring experiment, researchers were interested in exploring
informal employee groups and the social functions that occur within the group
and that influence the behavior of the individual group members.
4. Interviewing Program: A major outcome of these interviews was that the
researchers discovered that workers were not isolated, unrelated individuals; they
were social beings and their attitudes toward change in the workplace were based
upon
The personal social conditioning (values, hopes, fears, expectations, etc.) they
brought to the workplace, formed from their previous family or group associations
The human satisfaction the employees derived from their social participation
with coworkers and supervisors.
Theory X and Theory Y: Douglas McGregor proposed the theory that managers viewed
their employees by two theories. McGregor stated that Theory X managers were not effective
in the work place because they expected for a worker to solely need physiological concerns
and safety. But, research showed that workers needed more than just job security.
Fayol’s “set of rules” for managers: Henri Fayol (1949) developed a set of rules for
managers to follow to be successful.
In general; no need to know every rule. However, know what 3 principles are the most
important
1. Why did the Hawthorne Studies have an impact on the study of OB?
2. Describe Kelley’s Attribution Theory Model and explain how it “allows” managers to
justify workers’ behaviors.
3. How does Satisfaction–Performance relate to Expectancy and Equity theories?
4. How can goals be determined under Goal-Setting Theory? What are management’s
responsibilities?
5. Why is Reinforcement Theory included in discussion about motivation?