Tanabe Logic of Species
Tanabe Logic of Species
Tanabe Logic of Species
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Sophia University is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Monumenta Nipponica
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
6TRANSLATION
THE LOGIC OF
by TANABE HAJIME1
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
274 Monumenta Nipponica, XXIV, 3
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TRANSLATION. DILWORTH/SATO, 'Logic of the Species ......' 275
MN: XXIV, 3 E
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
276 Monumenta Nipponica, XXIV, 3
6 The Japanese term kami no kuni * 0) N is therefore developed into a profound philosophical
here translated 'kingdom of God', but later anthropology in Tanabe's thought. The re-
as 'City of God' in reference to St. Augustine. ligious view of Saint Shinran (II73-I262) iS
At the very end of this chapter it is equated withespecially behind Tanabe's recurring themes of
'Land of Buddha' 4A NX. Tanabe's concept that 'mediation' and 'dialectic'. The terms 'practice
religious salvation, i.e. God's redeeming action, and faith' (gyjshin I-iZ4) also derive from Shin-
occurs only through the mediation of the human ran's chief work, Kyjgyoshinshj (Doctrine, Prac-
community is developed from this point on. The tice, Faith, Evidence).
Pure Land doctrine of Other-power (- t) is
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TRANSLATION. DILWORTH/SATO, 'Logic of the Species ..... ' 277
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
278 Monumenta Nipponica, XXIV, 3
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TRANSLATION. DILWORTH/SATO, 'Logic of the Species ...... 279
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
280 Monumenta Nipponica, XXIV, 3
which is dialectical in and through itself. The fact that it is not a logic is the
reason that it is a logic.
Dialectical logic must be paradoxical. Since the negative medium for dialectical
logic is existence, as we have already seen, it must be called a logic of existence.
A mere logic of identity cannot be such. For this logic of identity and existence
stand opposed as antinomies, in the relation of mutual negations. As long as
it is a pure logic of identity, it cannot be called a logic of existence. Logic cannot
be related to existence only by the logical relation of identical connotation.
Existence destroys and transcends this logical relation. Existence takes, not
self-identity, but contradiction, as its structure. Dialectic is established on the
basis of this break through negation, and return through conversion, of logic.
It is the species which joins together existence and logic as the ground of their
conversion through negation.
Therefore the logic of the species is a dialectical logic. The species does not
merely take logical identity as its content. It is the support and ground of the
unity between logic and self-contradictory existence which negates logical
identity, i.e. of the conversion of logic through negation, or the resurrection of
logic through absolute negation.
However, what we must focus attention upon in this instance is the mean-
ing of the phrases 'conversion through absolute negation' and 'return or re-
surrection in the species'. On the surface, these concepts can be understood in
the sense of returning to the basic condition of an original state which was once
lost, and the reappropriation thereof. If we speak concretely concerning logic,
the logic of self-identity is negated and destroyed because of self-contradiction
which stands in opposition to it negatively. Thus these concepts can be consider-
ed to mean that since the negation is itself negated in so-called absolute negation,
logical self-identity is returned through conversion to an identity in the sense
of the 'self-identity of contradiction'. Nevertheless, if the fundamental condi-
tion can be resurrected in its original state as self-identity, dialectical logic would
no longer be a logic of absolute Nothingness, and would cease to be a logic of
absolute negation. It would, on the contrary, be a logic of absolute being, a logic
of absolute affirmation. In other terms, self-contradiction has been subsumed
within a self-identity of a higher order, and has not fallen into mutual destruc-
tion and negation. On the contrary, it can be regarded as a synthesis of the two,
which constructs an even higher unity without destruction.
*jin chapter four, 'Contemplation of the Absolute Nishida', pp. 76-II2, of this same work.
and Practice-Faith: Critique of Plotinus and
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TRANSLATION. DILWORTH/SATO, 'Logic of the Species .....' 28I
Plotinus' contemplation of the One was precisely a merging with unity in this
sense. Since at the same time it transcended the negative opposition between
logic and existence, and was a return to the fundamental identity of the two,
it was understood as establishing a transcendental synthesis of logic and existence,
as the intuition of logic's breaking through itself-qua-creation of existence. The
fact that Plato's doctrine of the absolute unity of the many-qua-one, and non-
being-qua-being, which went no further than the self-realization of dialectical
action, became the content of contemplation which transcended dialectics in
Plotinus, was because Plotinus thought that the return and perdurance of this
kind of self-identity was made possible by the transcendent, absolute One.
Nevertheless, if the absolute identity of logic and existence can thus be resurrec-
ted and preserved by transcending the contradiction and opposition of these
two antinomies, the absolute negativity of dialectic would still be transcended,
and its negative opposition subsumed within absolute unity. In this case,
mediation through negation would still lack unity through conversion between
dynamic confrontation and spiritual embrace, and would be reducible to a quiet
contemplation of a two-dimensional connotation. It would not, in other terms,
be that love of 'making a believer attain the merit of Nirvana even while not
stopping the human passions',8 but a contemplation in which sin and evil were
purified and united mysteriously in God.
In contradistinction to Plato having a position analogous to that of the subject
of zange through the Other-power (4tt) of absolute Compassion, Plotinus'
position would be nothing more than a 'mystical intuition' in which the self was
Deified, and God identified with the self. In this latter standpoint, there would
be no conversion in the sense of incessant death and resurrection. There would
only be the abolition of limits, the expansion and strengthening, of the self.
Therefore, the specificity of the species, which becomes mediation for the
definition of the individual, here means only the limit of self-identity. If it tran-
scends it and abolishes that specificity, it would of itself be reducible to the
totality of absolute unity. Negation would merely mean the limit of this absolute
unity. Absolute negation would only mean the abolition of this limitation. Its
resurrection would be a return to the former life; it would merely be a resurrec-
tion of self-identity. Moreover, this kind of expansion and strengthening of the
self-identity of the soul is only possible in the subject of the aesthetic creation
of culture. To the end, the possibility of reducing it to the unity of absolute
8 This text, quoted by Shinran, can be traced Shinshb Shogyj zenshb A ' R (I), p. 3I9.
to Donran CC, Oojjronchb 11 JA i, in the The original text reads: T- Wr M, tI g ix A ;7.
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
282 Monumenta Nipponica, XXIV, 3
identity by the abolition of the specific limitations of the self can be contem-
plated.
Moreover, the 'return from the Pure Land', in which the self dies to itself and
lives for others by obeying a specific society as its medium in spite of its opposi-
tion to itself, is in this view both unnecessary and impossible. In other terms,
instead of a religious conversion, instead of a conversion of rebirth, there appears
aesthetic imagination as its interpretation, which takes self-identity as its interior
substance. This is the reason why the concept of the 'creation of life' enters upon
the stage instead of that of the spirit's practice and faith (gyoshin i4tM). But in
faith such as expressed by Paul's words 'It is no longer I, but Christ who lives
in me' (Galatians 2:20), iS there really a consciousness of the self-identity of the
old self and the new self? Even if we call this 'the self-identity of absolute con-
tradiction' or 'the continuity of discontinuity', insofar as it is self-identity and
continuity, it still is not the experience of practice and faith through conversion,
but its reflection and interpretation. Or it is nothing but an intuition as the
foundation of that reflection and interpretation. It is the revival in identity,
and the continuity in identity, of the logic of self-identity in the broad sense.
In other terms, it is not a self-consciousness of the very subjectivity of re-
surrection through religious conversion, but, on the contrary, an intellectual
reflection and interpretation of it. The concept of identity employed therein
is not one which belongs to religious experience. It is a concept of the philosophy
of religion and theology. In many cases, it pertains to philosophy which cannot
become religious practice and faith. There is no such thing in true religious prac-
tice and faith. For in the latter there is no self-identity to cause the continuity
of death and resurrection.
The experience of a 'dying life' which one lives 'after having become dead
while living' is hardly a continuity in self-identity of death and life.9 It is a dis-
continuity, a severance. Again, it is a leap, a new life. Here conversion through
negation preserves the unity of Nothingness only because the unity of tran-
scendental conversion of absolute Nothingness, which is the motivating power
of this leap to a new life, mediates the death and resurrection of the self by being
the ground of practice and faith as Other-power. It is absolute Nothingness which
9 This text, also used by Shinran, is a quota- TtA C 9 X( C 9 1A1 -C- 3t \, , 0)IA1_ t 6
tion from the Zen master Shido Bunanzenji X ? M . The translator is indebted to Mr.
X - b O O. Cf. Shid6 bunanzenji shb T A Sato
O Taira for the references of the last two
notes.
#9T1A , Sokushinki z zi i,, Shunjiusha, 1956,
p. 3I. The text, in verse, reads: \ s ' -'
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TRANSLATION. DILWORTH/SATO, 'Logic of the Species.....' 283
unifies life and death. It is God. It is not consciousness of being which pertains
to our finite relative being.
Such Nothingness is never the object of immediate intuition. An object of
intuition, insofar as it is such, would not be Nothingness, but rather being.
Therefore, the unity of this Nothingness cannot be contemplated in the sense
of a continuity as self-identity. It must be entirely restricted to being the object
of practice. Herein resides the correctness of Plato's concept of action, in con-
tradistinction to Plotinus' contemplation. The latter takes a mysterious unity
of God and man as a possibility; the former preserves the negative mediation
of man over against God as the unity of absolute Nothingness. The Plotinian
position establishes an intuition of a trans-dialectical identity between God and
man, and attempts to identify God and man. Plato takes the dialectic of absolute
mediation to its logical conclusion. Plato's expression can never be taken as an
affirmation of identity; it always adheres to paradox. Even the famous words of
Paul cited above hardly derived from the standpoint of contemplation. Since
'it is no longer I, but Christ who lives in me,' there is only severance and leap.
From the standpoint of action, such severance and leap are realized and paradox-
ically expressed as unified in themselves through the transcendent unity of
absolute Nothingness, which is the mediation of practice and faith through
Other-power.
Religious action, which is an action of the self, is really the negation of the
action of the self. It is the action of Other-power as the action of the Other which
the self cannot become. The self which acts by being stirred to action by it goes
no further than being the mediation of that Other-power. Conversely, the nega-
tion of the action of the self must be the absolute act of Other-power. To act
'as the dead while living' is because of it. Even though we say Oneness of life
and death, or death-qua-life in this instance, this is hardly in the sense of self-
identity. As long as we are finite and relative beings, self-identity, which is
enlightenment through contemplation, is impossible. Such an explanation of it
is nothing more than an arrogance which likens the self to God, usurping the
concept of the unity and return to the same source of God and man. In such a
standpoint, the practical nature of the adventure and risk of faith is neither
necessary nor possible. It is nothing less than a cowardice and disbelief which,
entirely forgetting the finitude and relativity of man, would seek to escape death
which is the negation of man. This is the reason that instead of negation, am-
plification of the self causes it to be proudly satisfied with aesthetic creations.
Since, in contrast to this, negative unity is the unity of Nothingness, it is some-
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
284 Monumenta Nipponica, XXIV, 3
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TRANSLATION. DILWORTH/SAT6, 'Logic of the Species ......' 285
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
286 Monumenta Nipponica, XXIV, 3
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
TRANSLATION. DILWORTH/SATO, 'Logic of the Species .....' 287
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
288 Monumenta Nipponica, XXIV, 3
This content downloaded from 129.100.49.88 on Tue, 11 Sep 2018 19:23:40 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms