Material Balance Method Presentation

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 22
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that different reserve estimation methods are applicable at different stages of reservoir development and have different data requirements. The volumetric method, material balance method, decline curve analysis, and reservoir simulation are some of the predominant methods discussed.

The main methods for estimating hydrocarbon reserves discussed are the volumetric method, material balance method, decline curve analysis, and reservoir simulation. The volumetric method is used early on while the other methods are used later as production and pressure data become available.

The material balance method can be applied when about 20% of the initial estimated reserve has been produced, or when 10% of the initial reservoir pressure has declined.

Material Balance Method

Dr. Mahbubur Rahman

Department of Petroleum & Mineral Resources Engineering


Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology

Short Course on
Petroleum Reserve Estimation, Production and
Production Sharing Contract (PSC)

Directorate of Continuing Education (DCE)


BUET
29-30 April, 2008
Presentation Outline

• Introduction
• Material Balance Method- Basic Principle
• Material Balance Equation (MBE)
– General Form
– Linear Form
• Applications
– Oil Reservoirs
– Gas Reservoirs
• Flowing Material Balance
• Drive Mechanisms
• Conditions for Application
• Conclusions
Introduction
• Reserve Estimation Methods: More than one available.
• Different methods applicable at different stages of
development.
• Data requirement different for each method, with some
common
• predominant methods:
1.Volumetric Method
• Early stage of reservoir development
• Geology, Geophysics, Rock and Fluid properties
• Recovery Factor (RF) assigned arbitrarily
• No time dependency, No Production data
2.Material Balance
• Later stage of development (after 20% of initial oil/gas is
produced, or 10% of initial reservoir pressure has
declined)
• Geological data, Rock and Fluid properties, Production
data
• RF is calculated
• Time dependant
Introduction (contd.)
3.Decline Curve Analysis
• Later stage of development, when production rate
undergoes natural decline
• Mostly Production data
• RF is calculated
• Time dependant
4.Reservoir Simulation
• Can be applied at any stage but more useful and reliable
for matured reservoirs
• Geological data, Rock and Fluid properties, Production
data
• More useful as reservoir management tool

• Uncertainties associated with each method


• More than one method should be used when
applicable
Material Balance Method- Basic Principle
• A = Increase in HCPV due to the
expansion of the oil phase (oil +
dissolved gas).
• B = Increase in HCPV due to the
expansion of the gas phase (free gas
in the gas cap).
• C = decrease in HCPV due to the
combined effects of the expansion of
the connate water and the reduction
in reservoir pore volume.
• D = decrease in HCPV due to water
encroachment (from aquifer)

Volume changes in the reservoir associated with a finite


pressure drop ∆p;(a) volumes at initial pressure pi (b)
at the reduced pressure p.

Underground withdrawal
(oil + gas + water) = Expansion of oil + dissolved gas (A)
+ Expansion of gas-cap gas (B)
+ Reduction in HCPV (C)
+ Cumulative water influx (D) (1)
Material Balance Equation (MBE)

Np [Bo + (Rp – Rs) Bg] + Wp Bw [


= N (Bo − Boi )+ (Rsi − Rs )Bg ]
+ m N Boi (Bg / Bgi – 1)
(1+ m)NBoi
+ (cwSwc + c f )∆p
(1− Swc )
+ We Bw (15)

N = oil originally in place (STOIIP), (stb)


G = Initial free gas in place in the gas cap (GIIP), (scf)
We = Cumulative water influx into the reservoir (stb)
HCPV = total hydrocarbon pore volume (oil zone + gas cap) (rb)
m = Initial gas cap ratio

Initial hydrocarbon volume of the gas − cap GBgi


m= =
Initial hydrocarbon volume of the oil NBoi
MBE- Definitions of Variables
Production data
Np = Cumulative oil produced (stb)
Gp = cumulative gas produced (scf)
Wp = Cumulative water produced (stb)
Rp = Gp/Np = Cumulative produced gas-oil ratio (scf/stb)
Reservoir Data
pi = Initial mean pressure in the reservoir (psi)
p = current mean pressure in the reservoir, (psi)
Swc = connate water saturation, (fraction)
cf = Compressibility of formation (psi-1)
Fluid PVT Data
Bgi = Initial gas volume factor at pi (ft3/scf)
Bg = Gas volume factor at current pressure p (ft3/scf)
Boi = Initial oil volume factor at pi (rb/stb)
Bo = Oil volume factor at current pressure p (rb/stb)
cw = Compressibility of water (psi-1)
Bw = Formation volume factor of water at current pressure p (rb/stb)
Rsi = solution gas-oil ratio at initial pressure pi (scf/stb)
Rs = solution gas-oil ratio at current pressure p (scf/stb)
MBE in Linear Form

F = summation of production terms Np [Bo + (Rp – Rs) Bg] + Wp Bw (rb)

Eo = Oil and Dissolved gas [(B


o − Boi ) + (Rsi − Rs )Bg ]
expansion terms
Eg = Gas cap expansion = Boi (Bg / Bgi – 1) (rb/stb)
term
( 1 + m ) B oi
Ef,w = rock and water (c S + c )∆ p
compression/expansion terms (1 − S wc ) w wc f

The complete material balance equation (MBE)

F= N (Eo + m Eg + Ef,w) + We Bw (16)

Equation 16 can be modified as equations of straight lines,


which can be applied to different types of reservoirs.

Some of the applications are illustrated next.


MBE Applications: Saturated Oil Reservoirs

Slope = N

Eo

Case 1 MBE for under saturated Case 2 MBE for under saturated oil
volumetric oil reservoirs reservoirs with strong water drive

Volumetric depletion, We = 0 Strong water drive, We ≠ 0


No Gas Cap, m = 0 No Gas Cap, m = 0
Efw = negligible Efw = negligible
F = N Eo F/Eo = N + We / Eo
MBE Applications: Under-saturated Oil Reservoirs

Case 3 Volumetric under saturated oil Case 4 under saturated oil reservoirs
Reservoir with strong water drive

Volumetric depletion, We = 0 Strong water drive, We ≠ 0


Gas Cap present, m ≠ 0 Gas Cap present, m ≠ 0
Efw = negligible Efw = negligible
F We
= N +
F/Eo = N + m N Eg /Eo (Eo + m ⋅E g ) (Eo + m ⋅E g )
MBE for Gas Reservoirs
For GAS RESERVOIRS- MBE (equation 15) can be reduced to:
Gp Bg + Wp Bw = G(Bg – Bgi) + We Bw (19)

For volumetric gas reservoir, We = 0


Assuming water production is negligible, Wp = 0
Equation 19 becomes:
Gp Bg = G(Bg – Bgi) (20)

Applying the definitions of gas volume factor


 z p sc T   z p T   z p sc T 
G   − G  i sc i  = G p  
 p T sc   p i T sc   p T sc 

Assuming Isothermal changes in the reservoir (T = Ti)


p pi pi
= − G p + (22)
z zi G zi
MBE Applications: Gas Reservoirs

Case 5 MBE for Volumetric Gas Case 6 MBE for Gas reservoirs with water
reservoirs influx

Volumetric depletion, We = 0 Strong water drive, We ≠ 0


Efw = negligible Efw = negligible
p p p G pBg + W pBw
= − i Gp + i G +
We
=
z zi G zi B g − B gi B g − B gi
Flowing Material Balance

• Developed for Gas reservoir – later extended for oil


reservoirs

• Does not account for water drive

• Requires pseudo-steady state flow regime:


– Reservoir boundaries are ‘felt’
– pressures at all locations in the reservoir declines
at the same rate

• Requires constant flow rate- later extended for


variable rate
Flowing Material Balance (contd.)
• Classical MBE
– p/z plot requires average
reservoir pressure
– Requires lengthy shut in
tests to determine average
reservoir pressure
• Flowing MBE
– Flowing bottom hole
pressures is used
– pwf/z vs Gp is plotted
– Well head pressures can also
be used
MBE Plotting Technique – Detecting Water Drive

For some water drive gas reservoirs, deviation from p/z plot is not
detected until much later
Error in GIIP- large difference between volumetric and MB estimates
Error in Drive mechanism – wrongly assumed depletion type
Alternative plotting technique is more sensitive
Drive Mechanisms & Drive Indices

• A reservoir can have a predominant drive


mechanism, or can have a combination of
mechanisms.

• Identifying the drive mechanism is important for


development strategy and ultimate recovery.

• The drive indices show the relative magnitude of


each drive mechanism contributing to total
production.
Drive Mechanisms & Drive Indices (contd.)
Dividing through equation 15 by LHS:
[
N ⋅ (Bo − Boi ) + (Rsi − Rs ) ⋅ Bg ]
Depletion Drive Index (DDI) N p (Bo + (R p − Rs ) ⋅ Bg )

 Bg 
N ⋅ B oi ⋅ m ⋅  − 1
 B gi 
Segregation Drive Index (SDI)  
N p (Bo + (R p − Rs ) ⋅ B g )

( 1 + m ) NB oi
(c S + c )∆ p
(1 − S wc ) w wc f
Compaction Drive Index (CDI) N p ( Bo + ( R p − R s ) B g )

(We − W p ) ⋅ Bw
Water Drive Index (WDI) N p ( Bo + ( R p − Rs ) ⋅ B g )

DDI + SDI + CDI + WDI = 1


Pressure
MBE: Conditions for Application

Pressure
Time Time

Figure 10: Individual well pressure declines Figure 11: Non-equilibrium pressure decline
displaying equilibrium in the reservoir in a reservoir

1. There should be adequate data collection on production,


pressure and PVT properties.
2. It must be possible to define an average pressure decline trend
for the system under study.
MBE: Conditions for Application (contd.)
The average pressure
pj, qj, Vj decline can be
determined by the
volume weighting of
pressures within drainage
area of each well

p (avg) = Σ pj Vj / Σ Vj
figure 12

• It is possible to verify the 2nd condition by plotting the individual well


pressures as a function of time (figure 10). It is not really necessary to
have rapid pressure equilibrium across the reservoir.
• Average pressure decline trend can be defined even if there are large
pressure differences across the reservoir under normal producing
conditions.
• Figure 11 shows such a reservoir, where each well has a distinct
drainage area and pressure decline (figure 12).
Conclusions
• Volumetric method is applied at early stage of a reservoir,
with mostly geological and fluid properties data. No
production or time dependency is incorporated in
volumetric estimates. As production continues, other
methods become applicable.

• Material balance can be applied when about 20% of the


initial estimated reserve is produced, or when 10% of
initial reservoir pressure has declined.

• MBE is a powerful tool that helps determine the reserves,


recovery factor, and drive mechanism.

• MBE can be applied to a variety of reservoirs, either with


or without water influx.
Conclusions (contd.)
• Unlike volumetric method, RF can actually be calculated by MBE.

• Volumetric method generally gives the absolute, theoretically


maximum possible hydrocarbon in place. MBE gives an
indication about the volumes that will actually flow.

• Flowing material balance technique can provide reasonably good


approximation of GIIP.

• Flowing material balance technique method removes the need


for determining static average reservoir pressure by long and
expensive shut in tests.
THANK YOU!

Questions?

You might also like