E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company
Please find appended below a report regarding the future capital structure of the company. An
analysis and evaluation of the potential options for adoption of a suitable new structure has
been included. A final recommendation and corresponding action plan are also provided at the
end.
i
Executive Summary
The conservative financial policy that Du Pont followed is no longer possible due to change in
new market dynamics. To maintain its competitive position, it is essential that company pursues
increased capital spending programs. As such, a choice has to be made between two capital
structures (25% or 40% Debt to Capital ratio). Taking into consideration the impact on financial
flexibility, future bond ratings, competitive position, the risks and company’s profit sharing, it
is recommended that company should move forward with 25% debt to capital ratio.
ii
Table of Contents
Memo ....................................................................................................................................................... i
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ ii
Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................... iii
Situational Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 1
Problem Statement .................................................................................................................................. 1
Options .................................................................................................................................................... 1
Criteria for Evaluation ............................................................................................................................ 2
Evaluation of Options ............................................................................................................................. 2
Recommendation .................................................................................................................................... 3
Action Plan.............................................................................................................................................. 3
Exhibits: .................................................................................................................................................. 4
iii
Situational Analysis
The increase in Du Pont’s debt to total capital ratio to 42% for acquisition for Conoco, Inc.
lead to losing its AAA bond rating as the acquisition was made at 77% above its pre-acquisition
market value. This was the second time that the company deviated from its conservative capital
policy. The performance of Conoco has been affected by declining oil prices in 1982. Also, the
economic recession in the same year has hit the whole chemical industry. The company has
been given AA bond rating owing to the quick appreciation in financial leverage.
The last two decades had witnessed the increased volatility in the company’s basic businesses.
The company’s profitability and competitive position has deteriorated in many product lines.
Excess industry capacity and the higher economies of scale led to reduced gross margin. Hence
it is critical to minimize the company’s cost position in existing products through consistent
capital spending.
In view of the importance and magnitude of Du Pont’s projected financing needs, it is necessary
to analyse the effect of cost and availability of debt on its ability to pursue capital spending
programs.
There are two financing alternatives for Du Pont to fulfil its large financing needs
1. Target ratio of debt to capital 25%
2. Maintaining 40% of target debt ratio
Reducing the debt ratio from 36% in 1982 to 25% by the end of 1986 would require large
equity issues but Du Pont’s lower stock price would make it difficult for required new equity
financing. However, higher debt policy (40%) would require relatively lower or no equity
issues. 25% debt ratio would help Du Pont maintain its AA rating which will help the company
to raise funds easily reducing the risk.
Higher debt ratio could substantially degrade the bond rating to as low as BBB making it
difficult for Du Pont to finance debt at the lower cost which can pose critical risk to its capital
spending programme.
Problem Statement
What should be the targeted Future Debt Capitalization ratio for company’s capital structure
policy?
Options
1. 25% Debt-Capitalization Ratio
2. 40% Debt-Capitalization Ratio
1
Criteria for Evaluation
1. Impact on Financial Flexibility: The low debt policy maximized flexibility and
insulated operations from any financial constraints. This ensures protection from
market fluctuations and has to the highest priority.
4. Impact on Risk: Volatility of Du Pont has increased in last twenty years. Intense
Competition had pressured prices and profits of the Du Pont. A higher debt could put
Du Pont more prone to risk.
5. Impact on Profit Sharing: Lower Debt to Capital will result into higher issuance of
Equity hence, profit sharing will be high. This has to be given the final priority.
Evaluation of Options
2
million in 1987. It will also increase in the number of shares in profit from 9.5
million to 25.2 million. (Exhibit 1)
Recommendation
Du Pont should target 25% Debt capital structure for next five years. The 25%
synchronize with the company conservative policy and operation insulation from
market volatility. It will also reduce cost of borrowing due to AA credit rating. Though
profitability indicators will be lower compared to one’s in 40% debt ratio, exposure to
risk and volatility will reduce.
Action Plan
Du Pont finance its fund requirement at 12.3% (Exhibit 3) fixed interest rate and issue
equity at $47 per equity (Exhibit 1) in forward contract.
3
Exhibits:
Exhibit 1 Projected Financial Results Under Two Financial Policy Alternatives
Earnings per share ($) 4.20 4.98 6.02 6.31 6.62 10%
Return on equity (%) 9.0 10.1 11.5 11.5 11.4 5%
4
Exhibit - 3 Interest rates in 1983