Please Disable Your Ad Blocker.: Trump Is Compromised by Russia
Please Disable Your Ad Blocker.: Trump Is Compromised by Russia
Please Disable Your Ad Blocker.: Trump Is Compromised by Russia
SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE NOWLOG IN
Opinion
By Michelle Goldberg
Opinion Columnist
Nov. 29, 2018
o
o
o
o
o
o
President Trump answered questions at the White House on Thursday about a Trump building
project in Moscow. His former lawyer Michael Cohen admitted in court on Thursday that he had
engaged in negotiations on the project well into the 2016 presidential campaign.CreditDoug
Mills/The New York Times
Image
President Trump answered questions at the White House on Thursday about a Trump building
project in Moscow. His former lawyer Michael Cohen admitted in court on Thursday that he had
engaged in negotiations on the project well into the 2016 presidential
campaign.CreditCreditDoug Mills/The New York Times
One of the chief questions in the Trump-Russia scandal has been whether Vladimir
Putin has leverage over the president of the United States, and, if so, what that leverage
looks like. The significance of the fabled “pee tape,” after all, is not that it would reveal
Donald Trump to be a pervert bent on defiling the place where Barack Obama slept.
Rather, the tape matters because, if real, it would show the president to be vulnerable to
Russian blackmail.
That’s also why evidence of Trump’s business involvement with Russia would be
significant, as Trump himself acknowledged shortly before his inauguration, when he
tweeted, “Russia has never tried to use leverage over me. I HAVE NOTHING TO DO
WITH RUSSIA — NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING!”
We still don’t know for certain if Russia has used leverage over Trump. But there should
no longer be any doubt that Russia has leverage over him.
On Thursday morning, Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen — the former executive
vice president of the Trump Organization — pleaded guilty to making false statements to
Congress about efforts to build a Trump-branded property in Moscow that extended
into the 2016 presidential campaign.
More in Opinion about Michael Cohen’s guilty plea
According to Mueller’s filing, all of this was false. Efforts to obtain Russian government
approval for a Trump-branded development in Moscow went on until “approximately
June 2016,” after Trump had effectively secured the Republican nomination for
president. Cohen, Mueller’s document said, “discussed the status and progress of the
Moscow project with Individual 1” more than three times. He also “briefed family
members of Individual 1 within the company about the project.”
[Listen to “The Argument” podcast every Thursday morning, with Ross Douthat, Michelle
Goldberg and David Leonhardt.]
Unblock ads
So we now know that Trump lied to the American people about at least one part of his
business relationship with Russia, a geopolitical foe that interfered in our election
process on his behalf.
In a Jan. 11, 2017, news conference, Trump said that the “closest I came to Russia” was
in selling a Palm Beach mansion to a Russian oligarch in 2008. While we’re just learning
precisely how dishonest this was, Putin has known it all along. That means that
throughout Trump’s campaign and presidency, Putin has had the power to plunge him
into political crisis.
“If the Russians are aware that senior American officials are publicly stating things that
are not true, it’s a counterintelligence nightmare,” Adam Schiff, the California Democrat
in line to take over the House Intelligence Committee, told me.
As he points out, this issue contributed to former national security adviser Michael
Flynn’s downfall. Flynn, you might remember, appeared to have lied to Vice President
Mike Pence about his conversations with the Russian ambassador. This alarmed Sally
Yates, then the acting attorney general, because the Russians would have known that
Flynn was deceiving Pence, and could have used that knowledge against him. “Logic
would tell you that you don’t want the national security adviser to be in a position where
the Russians have leverage over him,” Yates told the Senate last year.
The same, said Schiff, “is true in spades for the president of the United States.”
Opinion | Barry Berke, Noah Bookbinder And Norman Eisen: What Cohen’s Deal Means for
Trump
In light of some other recent revelations in the Mueller inquiry, we can even see Trump
getting talking points, albeit indirectly, from Moscow.
This week, Jerome Corsi, a right-wing conspiracy theorist who appears to have been a
conduit between the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks, released a copy of what he said
was a draft statement of offense against him, given to him during plea negotiations with
Mueller. On Aug. 2, 2016, Corsi wrote to Roger Stone, the political dirty trickster in
frequent contact with Trump, about the “word” on coming document dumps from
WikiLeaks. “Would not hurt to start suggesting H.R.C. old, memory bad, has stroke,”
wrote Corsi.
Shortly afterward, Trump started making sustained attacks on Clinton’s purported lack
of “mental and physical stamina.” (Corsi has since said, on MSNBC, that his apparent
foreknowledge of WikiLeaks’ plans came through a flash of divine intervention on a
trans-Atlantic flight.)
There are still many shoes to drop in this scandal. “Given the extraordinary
obsequiousness the president has shown in his relationship with Putin, it begs the
question of whether there’s more leverage than this,” said Schiff. “That’s one of the
reasons why we’re so determined to make sure that we look into any credible allegations
of financial entanglements, whether that involves potential Russian money laundering
in the Trump Organization or anything else.”
But even before those inquiries begin, we can see that Putin has been in possession of
crucial information about Trump’s business interests that the president deliberately hid
from the American people. In a normal political world, Republicans would have enough
patriotism to find this alarming and humiliating. Every day of the Trump presidency is a
national security emergency. The question now is whether Senate Republicans, who
could actually do something about it, will ever be moved to care.
Michelle Goldberg has been an Opinion columnist since 2017. She is the author of several books
about politics, religion and women’s rights, and was part of a team that won a Pulitzer Prize for
public service in 2018 for reporting on workplace sexual harassment issues. @michelleinbklyn
COMMENT OF THE MOMENT
Clark commented 5 hours ago
Clark
Times Pick
Logic and common sense told us this was quite possibly the case from day 1. If Senate
Republicans have refused to do anything about it at this point, why should they start caring now?
I fear unless there is a smoking gun tape, nothing will change.
2 Replies208 Recommend
Share
Flag
VIEW OFFER
Site Index
Go to Home Page »
NEWS
Home Page
World
U.S.
Politics
New York
Business
Tech
Science
Sports
Obituaries
Today's Paper
Corrections
OPINION
Today's Opinion
Op-Ed Columnists
Editorials
Op-Ed Contributors
Letters
Sunday Review
Video: Opinion
ARTS
Today's Arts
Art & Design
Books
Dance
Movies
Music
Television
Theater
Video: Arts
LIVING
Automobiles
Crossword
Food
Education
Style
Health
Jobs
Magazine
Real Estate
T Magazine
Travel
Weddings
MORE
Reader Center
Wirecutter
The Learning Network
Tools & Services
N.Y.C. Events Guide
Multimedia
Photography
Video
NYT Store
Times Journeys
Manage My Account
SUBSCRIBE
Home Delivery
Digital Subscriptions
Crossword
Cooking
Email Newsletters
Corporate Subscriptions
Education Rate
Mobile Applications
Replica Edition