Annotated Bibliography Second Draft
Annotated Bibliography Second Draft
Annotated Bibliography Second Draft
Annotated Bibliography
Kira Marsh
UWRT 1104
10/18/18
Marsh 2
Annotated Bibliography
Brody, Yosef. “Losing Sleep in the 21st Century.” Psychology Today, Sussex Publishers LLC,
This developed article from popular news source Psychology Today discusses how and
why much of the American society has developed insomnia and grave sleep deprivation
as compared to other centuries. Author and clinical psychologist Yosef Brody, PhD, cites
the U.S Center for Disease Control in saying that these two issues are now a “public
health epidemic.” He notes that scientists don’t know exactly why sleep is needed, but
that it does cause various, untreated, specific physical and mental effects (many of which
cited later, including the affective point that driving quality significantly decreases,
causing a safety hazard). Brody then goes into various reasons why each of these may be
happening by using valid sources as evidence to his points. For example, he uses
sociologist Juliet Schor’s book The Overworked American as well as surveys and
statistics from The National Sleep Foundation to illustrate that sleep deprivation (and
sleep quality) is likely linked to the developing American society, i.e, a decrease of
leisure time and an increase in ‘digital media.’ Brody henceforth uses analyzes of the
pharmaceutical industry all over the world to cite the growth of sleep drugs, pointing out
that though these drugs may cause cancer and death (but not really better sleep in the long
term), the American society is still one of the highest consumers them. Finally, he ends
the article by citing the actual best ways to improve sleep quantity and quality as stated
by professionals and The Mayo Clinic, the main solution being cognitive behavioral
therapy.
Marsh 3
Because this article is fairly recent (May 2013), by someone with great authority on the
topic, and well substantiated with other organizations/people with great authority, it is
highly reliable and likely accurate. In addition to the credibility already stated, Yosef
Brody has been the president of Psychologists for Social Responsibility. This is
significant because psychologists often are the main people who research and discuss
sleep, and having the point of view from a psychologist with high standing gives me great
biased on what the solution to the sleep problem is, and this article isn’t much of an
exception. He never says much about the benefits of using sleeping drugs nor mentions
any other solution. This tells me that I should not take this as set in stone truth, even if he
is a high standing professional. It is unlikely that the article is complete hogwash though,
since Psychology Today is a popular, trusted health magazine that has been produced
since the 1960s. Still, I should think of how times have and will change since 2013 to
As stated before, this article is a great source for the psychology point of view on sleep
issues of the nation, as through evidence and clear statements, Brody has helped me
better understand and support their point of view on the topic. Additionally, the contents
of this article can help me more accurately evaluate the viability of where others think
our sleep habits should and are heading as well as two solutions to the problem: bettering
sleep hygiene and taking medication. I never thought of the long-term consequences of
sleep medication before, and this article made me think it is not a suitable solution to the
problem, while I used to think it was. Additionally, this article also talks briefly about
Marsh 4
what happens if you build up ‘sleep debt,’ or cumulative loss of sleep over time, which,
like before, will help me better evaluate other opinions and information I collect. I didn’t
know the general mechanics of sleep debt until this article. Because of all this, this source
Galambos, Nancy L., et al. “Rise and Fall of Sleep Quantity and Quality with Student
Experiences Across the First Year of University.” Journal of Research on Adolescence, vol. 21,
This peer-reviewed scholarly journal article by Nancy Galambos, PhD and Psychology
sleeping habits of 1st Year, Canadian college students under 20 years old taken from first-
year English classes (as well as engineering classes separately) via a year-long study. It
uses well-known and trusted scaled questionnaires such as Pittsburgh Quality Sleep Index
(PSQI), the Perceived Stress Scale, and the Positive Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) to
precisely and accurately measure subjective truths as well as unarguable facts such as
gender, high school GPA, and housing situation to draw connections between various
qualities/factors of a college student and their sleep quality and quantity. The
questionnaires were given about once a month for 7 months, during which they were only
required to recall facts feelings from 14 days ago because “recall of emotions over 14
days is accurate within 1 or 2 days.” Results showed that 45% of sleep quantity variation
was due to internal, “within person” factors while 55% was from external, “between
Marsh 5
persons” factors. Controversially, sleep quality variation was 67% from within person
and 33% from between persons. Other, more specific connections are also made. For
example, it is said that “higher social support predicted more sleep disturbance, an
This study does examine Canadians, and therefore should be taken with a grain of salt
since my focus is intended to be The United States. This should still be a good baseline
for what college specifically does to a person’s sleep schedule, but analyzing the
differences between Canadians and Americans is necessary if my focus does not shift.
However, even if Canadian and American colleges and people are too different, it would
be a great comparing factor in my EIP. I could say ‘While America is this way because _,
Canada is another way because _. This difference points to the fact (or solution) _.”
Nevertheless, this source is very reliable. The article is peer reviewed and from a source
(Wiley Online Library) that is highly trusted and authoritative. The editor of the journal it
is a part of (The Journal of Research on Adolescence) is Nancy Guerra, who, like the
author, has a PhD and is a psychology professor, but also edited two scholarly books such
as Treating the Juvenile Offender. Furthermore, the study was published in 2010,
meaning the findings aren’t ancient enough to disregard as recent but also aren’t new
showed before, the study was very well controlled and produced reliable results free of
researcher bias. There may be participant bias due to them being paid to do the study and
the subjective topics involved, however this was limited with tested scales that limit
Marsh 6
subjectivity and researchers not saying what results are ‘wanted.’ It is also probable that
the type of participant is well varied when necessary, as most freshman, regardless of
their major, takes a 1st-year English class. Overall, since the article is published in a peer
This article is great for figuring out what the average college student, or at least Canadian
college students, can do to best avoid falling into a void of poor sleeping habits and sleep
debt, which then could lead into poor future sleeping attitudes, inventions, and behavior.
In addition, the results of this article can be applicated, to a degree, to populations other
than what is studied. For example, the external reasons why sleep quality/quantity goes
down for those studied can probably be applied to most adults, helping to analyze what
the future of society means for the future of sleep (and then vis-versa). I never thought
about the difference between ‘within person’ and ‘between persons’ factors, and this
article has helped me consider them as an easy way to categorize and analyze causes. I
would definitely use the results of this study as a source to share how sleep
average reader might not consider, as it is as accurate and trustworthy as something could
This is the website for a non-profit organization that contains a plethora of information
about sleep myths, sleep disorders, proper sleep environment, and sleep behaviors in
Marsh 7
America. It also contains a section with articles discussing trending sleep topics/problems
such as “Does Sleep Hypnosis Work?”, “How to Feel Satisfied with Your Sleep,” and
even very specific topics such as “How to Handle Obstructive Sleep Apnea During
Menopause.” The topic is always sleep, but what about sleep varies widely. Additionally,
there is a peer-reviewed journal called “Sleep Health” that is run by the company linked
on the website. The organization also conducts sleep polls, the results of which are posted
on the site. An example of a useful data sheet from a poll was one conducted this year
(2018). The poll was given to random American citizens and analyzed the way they
prioritized their needs. The average prioritization came to be fitness/nutrition first, work
second, hobbies/interests third, and sleep second to last, 1% above social life. While I
expected sleep to be low, I did not expect fitness/nutrition to be so prioritized nor did I
expect social life to be slightly less than sleep. These interesting points changed my view
on how Americans prioritize the things in their life, which is part of my topic.
The National Sleep Foundation is a known U.S, non-profit organization that spreads
information regarding sleep. Because publishes a peer reviewed journal and has access to
sleep professionals on the website, at least portions of the website are highly trustworthy.
Additionally, the example poll used a good representative population, meaning that the
polls should also be reliable. The CEO of the foundation is David Cloud, someone with
an MBA who has worked with the American Medical Association and other healthcare
with the organization. Moreover, the NCBI found the organization’s sleep health index to
Marsh 8
be reliable, making it very likely that most of the site is widely and rightly trusted as well.
The foundation’s mission is to help people make informed decisions about their health
rather than push people in one direction, so bias in the site’s information is limited. While
the reliability of every detail on the site is uncertain, the basis/majority seems to be
reliable. In other words, one article may be full of bias, but the website as a whole can be
trusted. I just have to make sure to look out for those unreliable outliers.
The polls conducted would be more useful if they were repeated over various years to get
a good sense of how these things changed over time, but since they are on random topics
and the earliest one was in 2012, I can only use these poll results as a 21st century point in
the evolution of sleep (or, more specifically, a point for that year, as things change
quickly). Likewise, the foundation was founded in 1990, so all articles and information
on the website will be likely more applicable to modern and/or future sleep topics, which
is still applicable to my EIP. The information spectrum is so broad on just my topic that
this website would be great anytime I need a definition, additional information on a sleep
site, as it is like an encyclopedia of sleep information and data. Because this website
would be better for individual points and contains clearly separate articles, however, I am
more likely to cite individual articles within it for my EIP rather than the entire site. Still,
like the poll results detailed earlier did, the discussions and poll results on this site are
likely to help morph my view on the topic, whether they are explicitly used or not.
Marsh 9
Turner, Teri L., et al. “Trending in the Wrong Direction: Changes in Sleep Behaviors, Attitudes
and Knowledge Over Time.” Academic Pediatrics, vol. 13, no. 4, 2013, pp. e7–e7, Science
attitudes, and knowledge from 2010 to 2012 in 140 pediatric trainees at Baylor College of
Medicine in Texas. To do this, the entering trainees (43 in 2010, 51 in 2011, and 46 in
2012) were surveyed anonymously before their training. The survey included questions
regarding sleep behaviors, attitudes, and knowledge as well as the Epworth Sleepiness
Scale, something the NCBI proved was ‘simple and reliable,’ to accurately and precisely
access daytime sleepiness. Results showed the daytime sleepiness scale score increased
by about 1.5 points between 2010 and 2012 while there was a “statistically significant
(SS) decrease” in the amount of sleep students got on weeknights. Additionally, the
participants in 2012 were less likely to “perceive that sleep loss and fatigue had a major
impact on work and medical decisions” while there was no change in sleep’s perceived
article ends with a call to action, namely a push for interventions at undergraduate
The author, study methods, and source all point to this article being highly trustworthy
and useful. Teri Turner is a doctor at the Texas Medical Center with a focus on Academic
General Pediatrics and Developmental Pediatrics. She was also a relatively high-standing
member of multiple pediatric associations. Having studies (and by the end, opinions)
Marsh 10
from a medical doctor rather than a psychologist is not only just as trustworthy but great
for getting a different side and/or angle of the issue. The article was peer-reviewed, and,
as proven before, the methods used were controlled, reliable, and as free of bias as
possible. However, because the subjects and timeframe were limited, stretching the
results to other people must be done with care and inquisition. This includes the fact that
technology and other trends/inventions that affect sleep have significantly increased in
popularity since the study was conducted. Additionally, this article was published on
Science Direct, which is “the world’s leading source for scientific, technical, and medical
research” according to their about page. While this could be a marketing strategy, the
reliability of the source is solidified by it being a database from Elsevier, a widely known
and trusted source of scientific and medical information. Finally, Academic Pediatrics is
the official journal of the Academic Pediatric Association, a credible organization that
The results can be used to help figure out and prove an isolated trends in changes in
sleep behaviors/attitudes, which would then help me find possible reasons why, and
therefore help me predict what shifts will be made in the future. One example of a trend I
did not expect was the minimal change in perceived effect of sleep on social life.
Additionally, I did not think significant data point changes could be seen in such a short
period of time, and the fact that they were points to the rapid worsening of the sleep loss
epidemic. These points make this source necessary to help consider and prove all these
factors. Furthermore, this study was on people just older than the population of interest,
and because of this and the fact that the population studied obviously went to college, I
Marsh 11
could definitely use this source to help understand how and why sleep attitudes change
among those who have gone to college. While the Canadian study looks at students upon
entry to college, this source looks at students upon exiting college. Using the Canadian
study as a starting point and ‘why’ source and this as an endpoint (while also considering
the former is on the average 1st year college student while the latter is on pediatric
students in Texas), I could infer what college does to sleep attitudes and behaviors and
why. Additionally, I could use the professional opinion at the end to help develop my list
of potential solutions to the epidemic. Because this study has a limited scope, I wouldn’t
use this as a sole form of proving trends in sleep attitudes/behaviors. However, due to its
academic nature and interesting findings, it is a good start and/or comparison point for
use in my EIP.