Commented (1) : I Like This Personal Anecdote: Amounts? 8000-50,000/yr ?
Commented (1) : I Like This Personal Anecdote: Amounts? 8000-50,000/yr ?
Commented (1) : I Like This Personal Anecdote: Amounts? 8000-50,000/yr ?
Mrs. Thomas
UWRT 1104
4 November 2018
As a child, my mom would always share her story where she had to take a gap year after
high school because she could not afford to go to college. Her family was poor and did not have
the money to pay for college. She had to get a job and work long hours to earn the money for
college. Eventually, she was able to get into UNC Charlotte, however, she is now stuck with Commented [1]: I like this personal anecdote
major debt. However, my dad played soccer, and was able to get scholarship money to help pay
for UNC Charlotte. Some people have been lucky to attend college, while others have not been
so lucky. If college is now an essential requirement, why is it so expensive? If we need college to Commented [2]: could you include a range of
amounts? 8000-50,000/yr ?
get a successful career, why would the government not allow everyone an equal opportunity to Commented [3]: Any stats on the percentage of
people who take out loans? How much?
get a higher education? So, my question is, should public higher education be free?
amount of money people have to pay for for college is ridiculous. The amount of debt people
have to live with is absolutely insane. Which made me wonder, if college could not only be
I discovered that Denmark is an example of a country that provides their citizens with
free college. In fact, they not only get a free public higher education, but they also get paid by the
government to go to college. That's crazy! I would sure love for the U.S. government to pay us to
go to a free college. However, Denmark's tax rate stands at 55 percent, while the U.S. tax rate at
37 percent (“Denmark”). I know that people would love to have a free higher education, but most Commented [4]: key point
people probably won't be willing to change their tax rate any higher than it already is. Since
1985, U.S. college costs have surged by about 500 percent, tuition fees keep rising, causing U.S.
politicians to constantly argue about how much students should actually pay for higher
education. Denmark's free college has presented a couple of negative outcomes, but it mostly
provides positive and beneficial outcomes for the country. Rick Noack, senior writer for The
Washington Post presents the negatives, which are that the for-free culture at Danish universities
encourages students to earn degrees that do not meet the demand of the country’s labor market
and industries that are economically important face a shortage of suitable graduates. Although,
the positives are that the youth unemployment is 11 percent, most Danish graduate without
significant student debt, and there are no negative economic consequences (Noack). I believe
that the U.S. should give free college a chance just like Denmark has been doing for a while
now.
Denmark is not the only place who has experimented with free college. American Commented [5]: nice transition
Behavioral Scientist, a peer-reviewed academic journal writes about Tennessee, Oregon, and
Scholarship is advertised as
“making college possible” and “helping to alleviate the crushing burden of student debt”. The
Oregon Promise offers eligible students a “state grant that covers most tuition at any Oregon
community college”. And the Tennessee Promise provides a last-dollar grant covering up to the
cost of tuition and fees not covered by the Pell Grant, Tennessee HOPE Scholarship, or the
Tennessee Student Assistance Award (TSAA). This article argues that “by eliminating the cost
of tuition, free tuition programs may encourage college enrollment among at least some
individuals who would not otherwise have enrolled” (2017). It is too early to assess the impact of Commented [6]: I don't think a citation is needed here
as this info is easily found. a date of when these
programs began would help.
free tuition initiatives on educational attainment, but consideration of the case studies in light of
prior research provides clues about potential effects. I believe that it would definitely encourage
more students to go to college and graduate with a degree. Some see free college as beneficial
affordability of college education. Former President Obama tried to move forward on making
community colleges free to eligible students, although we haven’t seen too much traction from
that as of yet. As with any political or financial issue, there are pros and cons to it. Free sounds
great, but not everyone believes free public higher education is the prime solution. Free college Commented [7]: It looks like you have some rally good
sources. Work on building a frame around their ideas
more (TSIS p. 47+) ie. introduce the writer in the
tuition has been an ongoing debate for several years now. Democratic presidential candidates are sentence. ex. Andrew Kelly, senior writer for the New
York Times, writes.....
divided over how much should be done to ease the cost of higher education.Some say we can rather than demolish, take up?
afford free college while others argue free college isn’t actually free. Andrew Kelly, senior writer
for the New York Times, writes against free college, arguing that a national push for tuition-free
college would hassle public budgets even further, leading to shortages rather than increased
access. And because middle and upper-income students will demolish up many of the free public
slots, rationing will hurt those who need access the most (Kelly). Ellen Anderson, guest blogger Commented [8]: A possible solution is putting a
program similar to FAFSA that only allows low income
students to take part in the free public slots.
for College Raptor also argues that if all public colleges and universities are made tuition free,
we could see the decline of private schools. Since these schools rely on tuition, endowments, and
alumni donations for a good portion of their funding, competing with free public schools could
force many private schools to close. This would reduce the amounts of job opportunities for
professors and could result in the death of many fantastic programs. She also states that college
might not seem as important, the younger generations would not know how to handle finances, Commented [9]: good point
more people would not go to college, and the money would have to come from taxes (Anderson).
While I agree that free college is not truly free and there will be some negative outcomes that
come with it, I also have to disagree that money would have to come from taxes. Recent studies Commented [10]: support? Consider naming the
studies, being more specific.
from Robert Samuels book, “Why Public Higher Education Should Be Free: How to Decrease
Cost and Increase Quality at American Universities” have shown that college tuition cost is
increasing while the quality of undergraduate education is decreasing. Samuels argues that “once
a system is no longer focused on its central mission, it simultaneously increases its cost and
decreases its quality”. A large portion of tuition money goes toward administrative costs,
research, and non-educational programs. Institutions have been pouring our money into new
free (Samuels). Free public higher education Commented [11]: Possibly give statistics to help the
reader understand around how much of the school,s
funding is going towards expenses not related to
has some downfalls, but it also has its educational programs.
Commented [12]: good comment
advantages.
also be worthwhile and helpful. Ellen Anderson, guest blogger for College Raptors shares not
only the negative outcomes of a free college, but also the positive outcomes. Free college can
allow students more freedom to choose a major they enjoy. Student debt will also no longer
crush the younger generations and allow more lower income students to reach graduation. And it
will allow more people to attend college (Anderson). Katrina vanden Heuvel, a senior writer for
The Washington Post also agrees that we can afford free college. If public college was free,
students would attend school or advanced training, the United States would gain the benefits of a
better educated citizenry and workforce, and the young people, not burdened by debt, could be
more entrepreneurial and more public spirited. College costs have soared at a rate faster than
health-care costs. Since 1980, the cost of living has nearly doubled; health-care costs have
quadrupled, and college tuitions and fees have exploded eight times over. The average college
graduate with loans now leaves college $25,000 in debt. Student loan debt exceeds $1 trillion
and is now greater than credit card debt. And the debts are inescapable. Bankruptcy doesn’t
extinguish them; even Social Security payments can be garnished to repay them. Heuvel states
that “congress should act to ensure loan rates don’t double. But real reform will come only if
students, parents and those who understand how student debt weighs down our recovery join
together to demand it” (Heuvel). The NEA, The National Education Association, shares how just
about everyone agrees that college should be more affordable. Over a century ago, high school
was becoming a necessity, not a luxury; today the same is happening to college. We have made
K-12 education free because it is good for the individual and for society. The same is true for
higher education. College is an essential for building a career and being a full participant in our
democracy as high school once was. We all deserve free quality education. College should be
free, paid for by public dollars and treated as a right of all members of our country. The NEA
argue that “we can make this happen but only if we, faculty, staff, and K-12 teachers, too, stand
together with students and parents and demand that public higher education is a right for
everyone, and not a privilege for the few” (Page). I agree that college has now become more of a
requirement in today’s world. College is all any teacher or parent can ever talk about. It’s
expected for students to go to college and get a degree, so they can get a successful career. Most
jobs today require people to have a college degree. It’s unfair for others who do not get the same
opportunity and are forced to work the lower pay and less successful jobs. So why not make
Throughout my childhood, my parents and teachers would always talk about college and
how important it is for me to go. College is not for everyone, but it should be available for
anyone. I have discovered that everyone would
a successful life. We all deserve the opportunity to get a better education and a better lifestyle.
Free college might bring in some disadvantages, but for the most part, I believe that free college
Anderson, Ellen. “Pros and Cons of Tuition-Free College.” College Raptor Blog, 23 Oct. 2018,
www.collegeraptor.com/find-colleges/articles/affordability-college-cost/pros-cons-
tuition-free-college/.
“Denmark Personal Income Tax Rate 1995-2018 | Data | Chart | Calendar.” Denmark Personal
tradingeconomics.com/denmark/personal-income-tax-rate.
Heuvel, Katrina vanden. “Free College? We Can Afford It.” The Washington Post, WP
it/2012/05/01/gIQAeFeltT_story.html?utm_term=.5fbf87edfdbc.
Kelly, Andrew P. “Should College Be Free?” The New York Times, The New York
free/the-problem-is-that-free-college-isnt-free.
Noack, Rick. “Why Danish Students Are Paid to Go to College.” The Washington Post,
www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/02/04/why-danish-students-are-
paid-to-go-to-college/?utm_term=.16a055b4cc5e.
Page, Max, and Dan, Clawson. “It's Time to Push for Free College.” NEA,
www.nea.org/home/62740.htm.
Perna, Laura W., et al. “‘Free College:’ A New and Improved State Approach to
Increasing Educational Attainment?” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 61, no. 14,