BPV Certification Form Checklist Accreditation
BPV Certification Form Checklist Accreditation
BPV Certification Form Checklist Accreditation
GUIDE
FOR
ASME REVIEW TEAMS
FOR
REVIEW OF APPLICANTS
FOR
ASME CERTIFICATES OF AUTHORIZATION
{A, M, PP, S, E, H, HLW, U, UM, U2, U3, PRT and T}
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Two Park Avenue
New York, NY 10016
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 ‐ 03‐26‐2018 0 | P a g e
INTRODUCTION
This Guide is prepared for the use of ASME Review Teams. It is not intended to replace or interpret the
requirements of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (B&PVC).
In addition, to assist the ASME Review Team, this Guide will be provided to Applicants for ASME Certificates
of Authorization for their use in cross referencing the paragraphs in their written description of the Quality
Management/{Quality Control ((QC)) Manual} with the applicable control requirements of the Code, and as a
guide as to what is expected for a demonstration of the QC System.
This Guide is based on Section I, Section IV, Sections VIII Divisions 1, 2 and 3, and Section XII of the B&PVC.
The Guide is subject to revision based on changes made in the aforementioned Sections in the B&PVC.
A Review must cover a QC Manual and its implementation. It is recognized that the scope of work, QC Manual,
and Manual implementation will vary from Applicant to Applicant. Therefore, the ASME Review Teams are
advised that all aspects of this Guide may not apply and that this Guide may not outline all possible aspects of
each Review. The Manual need not follow the format of this Guide.
Questions of possible need for Code interpretation raised by Review Teams shall be submitted to the ASME
Director, Accreditation and Certification. When a request for an interpretation is to be submitted by an
Applicant, the Team Leader shall advise the Applicant that all such inquiries must be submitted to the Secretary
of the applicable Boiler and Pressure Vessel Book Section, and that a copy of the inquiry and reply should be
provided by the inquirer to the Applicantʹs Authorized Inspection Agency and cognizant Jurisdiction, if
appropriate.
Suggestions for revisions or clarification to this Guide should be directed to the ASME Director, Accreditation
and Certification.
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 ‐ 03‐26‐2018 1 | P a g e
REVIEW DEMONSTRATION
The purpose of the Review Demonstration is to evaluate the Applicant’s Quality Control System (QCS) and its
implementation. For evaluation of the QCS, the Applicant must demonstrate to current Code rules sufficient
administrative and fabrication functions of the QCS to show that they have the knowledge and ability to produce
the Code items typical of those covered by the QCS. It is expected that fabrication functions be demonstrated
using typical Code work. However they may be demonstrated using current work, a mock‐up, or a combination
of the two. Any current Code work ongoing at the time of the joint review is subject to the Team’s review.
While the Applicant must address each element of the QCS in the Code, the Applicant need only demonstrate
those elements within the intended scope of activities that apply to their program.
Demonstration Item1: An Applicant2 requesting a single Certificate of Authorization (e.g. “A”; “S”; “PP”; “PRT”;
etc.) must demonstrate on an item that will be fabricated for the requested Certificate Designator and scope of
Certificate of Authorization. The demonstration must be an implementation of ALL aspects of the QC System
and is to include a demonstration of actual welding if welding is included in the scope of Code activities. If
computer calculations are to be used, the Applicant shall demonstrate that the computer program has the
capability of producing acceptable calculations.
For Applicants requesting multiple Certificates of Authorization, it is not necessary to have a demonstration
item with design calculations for each Certificate Designator. A demonstration item fabricated to any one of the
requested Certificates may be used as the demonstration item for the implementation portion of the Review. The
Applicant is advised to select a demonstration item based on type of code item normally and most frequently
manufactured. However, please note that if the demonstration item selected does not cover all the Certificates
requested, the applicant will be required to prepare and present to the Review Team design documents for those
Certificate designators not covered by the selected demonstration item.
For example, an Applicant for U and U2 Certificates could demonstrate its QCS on a Section VIII, Div. 1
demonstration item including design. However, since the Section VIII, Div. 1 demonstration item does not cover
the U2 Certificate Designator, the applicant will also be required to prepare and present to the Review Team
design documents for Section VIII, Div. 2 such as, Examination and Inspection plan, Manufacturer’s Design
Report with supporting User Design Specification, Certification of the design documents by an Engineer, as
applicable.
For guidance in the selection of the demonstration item recommended/required based on Certificate Designator
requested, refer to Table 1 below:
1 The demonstration item shall be based on the latest Code Edition in effect at the time a complete Application is received by ASME.
2 This does not apply to an Engineering Contractor under Section I. For an Engineering Contractor Organization under Section I,
without a fabricating facility, a physical demonstration item is not required. However, a design specification must be provided as
well as additional administrative functions to demonstrate compliance with the organization’s QCS.
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 ‐ 03‐26‐2018 2 | P a g e
Table 1
Demonstration & Certificate Coverage Matrix
Demonstration Certificate Coverage
B31.1 [BEP] – Need to show PP
compliance with BEP
Section I PP, S, E, M, U, UM, H, HLW
Section IV H, HLW
Section VIII, Div. 1 PP, S, H, HLW, U, UM, T
Section VIII, Div. 2 Class 1 PP, S, H, HLW, U, UM, T, U2 Class 1
Section VIII, Div. 2 Class 2 PP, S, H, HLW, U, UM, T, U2 Classes 1 & 2
Section VIII, Div. 3 U3
Section XII T
Note: For “PRT” or “A” Certificates, no design calculations are required.
However the applicant shall demonstrate the QCS using a demonstration item
representative of the Certificate scope (e.g. For “PRT” fabrication of a part shall
be demonstrated and for “A” fabrication/assembly of a Section I boiler shall be
demonstrated).
If the demonstration item is based upon current work that is being fabricated to a previous Code edition, the
Applicant shall address changes in the Code that would require different actions in the demonstrations to be in
compliance with the current Code requirements.
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 ‐ 03‐26‐2018 3 | P a g e
QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST
1. GENERAL QUALITY CONTROL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
(a) QC System is documented in detail in a QC Manual that addresses all requirements
of the applicable Code Section and includes:
(1) a cover sheet that contains the company name and physical address as it will
appear on the requested Certificate of Authorization;
Note: The cover sheet may also contain the effective date of the QC Manual, mailing
address, phone number or other information desired by the Certificate Holder or
Applicant.
(2) a brief description of the products being fabricated and/or work being
accomplished under the Code including applicability of QC System to shop
activities, field activities or both;
(3) control features to demonstrate Code compliance;
(4) Manual revision control system;
(5) provision for review and approval of QC Manual to ensure it is current;
(6) provision for submittal of QC Manual revisions to the Authorized Inspector
(AI) and T Class 3 for acceptance prior to implementation including timely
updating of all copies to reflect accepted revisions; and
(7) provision for the custody and control of the Certification Mark to prevent
loss or unauthorized use.
(b) In the case where the QC Manual exists in more than one language, at least one
version is in English and identified as the authoritative version.
Note: A glossary of terms is desirable from the standpoint of clarity if abbreviated titles of
personnel and control documents are used throughout the QC Manual. This,
however, is not mandatory.
2. AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY
(a) The authority and responsibility for QC by management is documented.
Note: In practice, a Statement of Policy and Authority must be signed by a senior
company official responsible for Code activities (e.g., President, Vice President,
Plant Manager, etc.).
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 – 03‐26‐2018 4 | P a g e
QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 – 03‐26‐2018 5 | P a g e
QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST
(6) {Applicable to T Class 3 only}
provisions for Design Certifying Engineer.
5. MATERIAL CONTROL
(a) Procedures for material control exist to assure that the material received is properly
identified and has documentation, including, as applicable, required material
certifications or material test reports, to satisfy Code requirements as ordered.
(b) The material control system assures that only the intended material is used in Code
construction. For Section XII only, material shall satisfy the applicable modal
appendices requirements.
(c) If substitution of materials is allowed, the applicable procedures for control of this
activity are documented, including designation of the individual authorized to
approve substitutions.
(d) The title of the individual responsible for identifying the need for material test
reports or certificate of compliance is designated.
(e) The title of the individual responsible for performing a receiving inspection of Code
materials is designated.
(f) Information to be provided to the receiving inspector concerning the characteristics
to be checked is documented.
(g) A procedure exists for handling materials that are found to be nonconforming at
receiving inspection.
(h) If further material testing is required to be performed at receiving inspection or
during manufacturing operations, the applicable procedures for control of this
activity are documented.
(i) Measures are established to assure the proper marking, handling and storage of
materials.
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 – 03‐26‐2018 6 | P a g e
QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST
6. EXAMINATION AND INSPECTION PROGRAM
(a) Fabrication operations, including examinations and test procedures are described in
sufficient detail to permit the Authorized Inspector (AI) to determine at what stages
specific inspections are to be performed. Specifically:
(1) Provisions for the use of checklists, process sheets, travelers, etc., for listing of
examinations and tests to be performed and for designation of inspection
points;
(2) Such checklists, process sheets, travelers, etc., are made available to the
Authorized Inspector prior to the start of fabrication; and
(3) {Applicable to UIG} A basic production flow diagram exists and includes in‐
plant inspection and check‐off points and means of recording the same.
(b) Material test reports or certificates of compliance, examination reports, test records,
and other fabrication records are available to the Authorized Inspector.
(c) Measures provide for transferring markings to assure traceability is maintained.
(1) If a coded marking system is used, it is documented and acceptable to the
Authorized Inspector.
(d) Measures to ensure that the Authorized Inspector is informed of approaching inspection
points.
(e) AI concurrence is obtained for repairs to material. {Not applicable to T Class 3}
(f) Measures are established to assure that a final inspection is performed to assure all
specified requirements have been met prior to obtaining AIʹs concurrence for
application of the Certification Mark. {Not applicable to T Class 3}
(g) Measures are established to provide for the preparation, certification, and distribution
of the applicable Data Reports.
(h) Measures are established to control field activities, when applicable.
(i) {For operations under UG‐90(c)(2), HG‐515.4(b), or TS‐200.7}
Documented procedures exist and are accepted by the Authorized Inspection Agency
(AIA), Jurisdictional Authority, and ASME Designee.
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 – 03‐26‐2018 7 | P a g e
QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 – 03‐26‐2018 8 | P a g e
QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 – 03‐26‐2018 9 | P a g e
QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 – 03‐26‐2018 10 | P a g e
QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 – 03‐26‐2018 11 | P a g e
QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST
BPV‐GUI‐01 Issue 1, Revision 3 – 03‐26‐2018 12 | P a g e