Educ. 202 Reynaldo C. Cruz Ed. D. Educational Statistics and Analysis Professor
Educ. 202 Reynaldo C. Cruz Ed. D. Educational Statistics and Analysis Professor
Educ. 202 Reynaldo C. Cruz Ed. D. Educational Statistics and Analysis Professor
Graduate School
EVELYN S. ACOSTA
MAEd- Educational Management
Part I : COMPUTATION
𝑁
−𝑓𝑏
Mdn = l+𝑖 ( 2 )
𝑓𝑝
50
−𝑓𝑏
Mdn = 44.5 + 5 ( 2 )
𝑓𝑝
50
−𝑓𝑏
2
Mdn = 44.5+5 ( )
𝑓𝑝
The most scored obtained by the students lies on the range of 40-44 with 9 accountancy
students based on the computed mode of 42.83.
The Range of the score listed from the students of accountancy students is 53.
5. Quartile Deviation
Q1 = l + i [ (N/4 - fb) / fp ]
𝑄1 = l + 5 [ (N/4 - fb) / fp ]
12.5 −9
𝑄1 = 34.5 ( )
7
3.5
𝑄1 = 34.5+5 ( )
7
𝑄1 = 34.5+5 (0.5)
𝑄1 = 34.5 + 2.5
𝑄1 = 37
Q2 = l + i [ (3N/4 - fb) / fp ]
Q2 = 44.5 + 5 (2(50)/ 4 - fb) / fp ]
Q2 = 44.5 + 5 (25- fb/fp
Q2 = 44.5 + 5 (25- 25/ 8)
Q2 = 44.5 +5 (0)
Q2 = 44.5
Solving for the Third Quartile (Q3)
3𝑁
−𝑓𝑏
𝑄3 = l+𝑖 ( 4 𝑓𝑝 )
3(50)
−𝑓𝑏
4
𝑄3 = 49.5 + 5 ( 𝑓𝑝
)
37.5 −𝑓𝑏
𝑄3 =49.5 + 5( 𝑓𝑝
)
37.5−33
𝑄3 =49.5+5 ( )
7
𝑄3 =49.5+5 (0.642)
𝑄3 = 44.5 + 3.21
𝑄3 = 52.71
𝑄3 −𝑄1
𝑄=
2
52.71−37.0
𝑄=
2
52.71−37.0
𝑄=
2
15.71
𝑄 =
2
𝑄 = 7.85
Q2 44.5 Q2 44.5
-Q 7.85 +Q 7.85
36.65 52.35
6. Standard Deviation
∑ 𝑓𝑥′2 ∑ 𝑓𝑥' 2
σ=𝑖√ −( )
𝑁 𝑁
293 35 2
σ = 5√ 50 − (50)
σ = 5√5.86 − (0.7)2
σ = 5√5.86 − 0.49
σ = 5 (2.317)
= 11.58
σ
𝑀3
a. 𝛼3 =
σ3
1132.92
=
11.583
1132.92
=
1552.83
= 0.72
m 45.5 m 45.5
−𝛼3 -0.72 +𝛼3 +0.72
44.78 46.22
The verbal ability score of the 34 accountancy student is greater than or equal to 44.78 but less than or
equal to 46.22. (44.78 < σ< 46.22)
7. Skewness
∑ (x-m)3
M3=
𝑵
56645.875
=
50
=1132.92
𝑀4
𝛼4 =
σ4
38810.21
=
11.584
38810.21
=
17981.84
= 2.15
The distribution of the verbal ability of the accountancy student is negatively skewed, having a
skewness value of 2.15.
8. Kurtosis
M3 = ∑ ( X- M)4
N
= 1940510.68
50
= 38810.21
The distribution of verbal ability of the accountancy student is heterogenous, having the value
of below 4.0, hence the kurtosis is platykurtic.
Part II – ANALYSIS
Fifty accountancy students of LCUP has an average verbal ability score of 45. 5, a computed
median of 44.5 which means 58% of the accountancy students has the most verbal ability while 58% of
the accountancy students has less verbal ability.
Mostly of the accountancy student got the score of 42.83 which represents the mode of the
datum which means that 52 is the most common verbal ability among the given sample population. The
range of the population from 25 to 78 is 53, but in terms of Interquartile Range, the scores of the 26
accountancy student based on their verbal ability score is greater or equal to 36.65 but less than or
equal to 52.35. Moreover, about 12 accountancy student fall under Q1 which is 37 and the remaining 12
lies above Q3, that is 52.71.
Based on the computed standard deviation, the verbal ability test score of the 34 accountancy
student is greater than or equal to 44.78 but less than or equal to 46.22.
The distribution of the verbal ability of the accountancy student is negatively skewed, having a
skewness value of 2.15, we can assume that mostly of the students got scores that is higher than the
mean and fewer students that is lower than the mean. The distribution of verbal ability score is
heterogenous, having the value of below 4.0, hence the kurtosis is platykurtic, the scores are
widespread and varies greatly.
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
10
5
c
0
25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79