Ibps So HR Quiz 4
Ibps So HR Quiz 4
Ibps So HR Quiz 4
Directions: Study the following questions carefully and answers the questions given below:
B. The supervisors have a tendency to unload a series of complaints about incidents during an
annual performance review session.
C. It results in very close supervision which may not be liked by the employee.
D. The recording of incidents may be a chore for the manager concerned, who may be too busy
or forget to do it.
C. Paired Comparison
E. Grading Method
8. Which of the following party/ parties is/ are involved in goal setting in MBO?
A. Employee B. Management C. Superior
9. Which of the following is true about the Zero Sum Game Rating?
A. It is typically used to rate the peers in the company.
E. Both B and D
B. HR Scorecard method
Explanations:
1.
Rating Scales Method is a commonly used method for assessing the performance of the employees.
Depending upon the job, appraisal traits like attitude, performance, regularity, accountability and
sincerity etc, are rated with scale from 1 to 10. 1 indicates negative feedback and 10 indicates positive
feedback as shown below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Extremely poor Excellent
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Extremely poor Outstanding
Ultimately, all numbers chosen or marked will be added to determine highest score gained by employee.
The employees scoring more points will be treated as top performers following a descending order.
Options A, B and C are incorrect while option E is a disadvantage. The only correct point is option D.
2.
The forced distribution method is one of the most widely used and also the most criticised
method of performance appraisal. This is a rating system that is used all over the world by
companies to evaluate their workforce. It requires the supervisor to assess each employee
based on certain pre-determined parameters, and thereafter rank them into 3 or more
categories. Most commonly, the employees fall into excellent, good or poor categories, which
can be expanded by the organisation to a 5-point scale as well. It was introduced by General
Electric in 1980s, during the era of Jack Welch who was infamous for cutting down GE’s
workforce regularly by firing low performers.
The forced distribution method is also called bell-curve rating or stacked ranking. This method
is preferred by many employers as it creates a visible differentiation between performances of
each employee in the organisation. This ensures that a small fraction of the entire workforce is
to be placed at the extremes, which is the outstanding performers and poor performers. A
relatively large section of the workforce fall in the middle of the distribution. This is illustrated
in the image below.
For example, a manager of XYZ corporation evaluating 30 employees can be instructed to put 5
employees each in the ‘outstanding’ and the ‘poor’ category, whereas 20 will fall in the range of
average performers. In this manner, the ratee (manager) has forced the distribution of level of
performance of each of the 30 employees into one of the three categories.
There are several issues associated with this method of performance appraisal. Firstly, the
manager must clearly understand the parameters on which employees have to be evaluated.
These parameters must be defined as objectively as possible to avoid unambiguity. Though this
method is known for cultivating a culture of high performance in the organisation and is also
simple and cost-effective to implement, it is criticised because of various reasons. Often, the
employees feel that the evaluation is not fair and hence it can lead to unhealthy competition,
rivalry amongst employees and loss of morale of the workforce.
4.
This technique of performance appraisal was developed by Flanagan and Burns. The manager
prepares lists of statements of very effective and ineffective behavior of an employee. These
critical incidents or events represent the outstanding or poor behavior of employees on the job.
The manager maintains logs on each employee, whereby he periodically records critical
incidents of the workers behavior. At the end of the rating period, these recorded critical
incidents are used in the evaluation of the workers’ performance. An example of a good critical
incident of a sales assistant is the following:
July 20 – The sales clerk patiently attended to the customers complaint. He is polite, prompt,
enthusiastic in solving the customers’ problem.
On the other hand the bad critical incident may appear as under:
July 20 – The sales assistant stayed 45 minutes over on his break during the busiest part of the
day. He failed to answer the store manager’s call thrice. He is lazy, negligent, stubborn and
uninterested in work.
This method provides an objective basis for conducting a thorough discussion of an employee’s
performance. This method avoids recency bias (most recent incidents get too much emphasis).
However, the method suffers from all of the disadvantages mentioned in the question.
5.
Confidential report system is a well known method of performance appraisal system mostly
being used by Government organisations. In this method, the subordinate is observed by his
superiors with respect to his performance and duties. Thereafter, the superior writes
confidential report on his performance, mainly on his behaviour in the organisation and
conduct and remarks if any. These reports are kept confidential and not revealed to anyone and
forwarded to the top management officials. Confidential reports are the main criteria for
promoting or transferring of any employee mainly in the government sector. All governmental
organisations like the judiciary, police, armed forces etc in India use confidential reports
method as a tool to know more about employees and taking decisions regarding the same.
6.
Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) are scales used to rate performance. BARS are
normally presented vertically with scale points ranging from five to nine. It is an appraisal
method that aims to combine the benefits of narratives, critical incidents, and quantified
ratings by anchoring a quantified scale with specific narrative examples of good, moderate, and
poor performance. BARS were developed in response to dissatisfaction with the subjectivity
involved in using traditional rating scales such as the graphic rating scale. A review of BARS
concluded that the strength of this rating format may lie primarily in the performance
dimensions which are gathered rather than the distinction between behavioral and numerical
scale anchors.
7.
The concept of ‘Management by Objectives’ (MBO) was first initiated by Peter Drucker in 1961.
8.
In MBO, the employees and superiors come together to identify the common goals which the
former is expected to achieve for considering as a criterion for measurement of performance
and deciding the course of action to be followed. The essence of MBO is participative goal
setting, choosing the course of action and decision making. Important part of MBO is
measurement and comparison of employee’s actual performance with the standards set.
Hence, option D is correct.
9.
The Zero Sum Game Rating is a method in which any change for the participants adds up to
zero. Example: if two men play cards and if one wins five dollars then the other looses five
dollars. Similarly if there are ten men in a department working at different levels of
effectiveness, five of them by definition are below average. Thus, if two of the below average
leave, then one of the previously above average men must fall in the below - average category.
10.
BARS
MBO
HR Accounting method
Assessment centres
Psychological appraisal
360 degree feedback
HR Scorecard method
Key Result Area method
Balanced scorecard method