Do Not: 5. Gain Control in Photoreceptors
Do Not: 5. Gain Control in Photoreceptors
Do Not: 5. Gain Control in Photoreceptors
ENROTH-CUGELL
personal communication). Figure 46 indicates that saturation (Dowling and Ripps, 1971). There is not
horizontal cells, and by inference the cones, of the one story for all vertebrates. The proximity of
catfish retina do not adapt but merely saturate, but horizontal cells to photoreceptors suggests that the
that bipolar cells, amacrine, and ganglion cells do receptors might also be very diverse in how they deal
adapt. In the catfish, much of the adaptation to with changes in mean or background illumination.
steady light must take place between cones and This expected diversity is found.
bipolar cells, though Fig. 46 also implies that there
are additional stages of gain control in the inner
plexiform layer. 5. GAIN C O N T R O L IN P H O T O R E C E P T O R S
There are data on the dependence of gain on
background in cat horizontal cells, under conditions Some photoreceptors adjust their gain by
such that the responses were due to photoreceptor adapting in the presence of steady illumination and
input from rods only. The graph in Fig. 49 indicates only saturate in very bright light, and other
that cat horizontal cells, driven by rods, have a gain photoreceptors adapt very little before they
vs background dependence which approximately saturate. This diversity of receptor function with
follows Weber's Law above 1 td [Note this is a "cat respect to gain control and saturation has been
t d " and therefore is equivalent to about 8.10 s suggested already in the discussion of gain controls
quanta(507 nm) (deg 2 s)-'; Steinberg, 1971]. Note in horizontal cells. In order to organize this diverse
that these horizontal cells typically receive mixed material, we will present the data on receptors as
photoreceptor input (Steinberg, 1971), even though follows: (a) photoreceptors which adapt a lot a n d
their major direct synaptic contact is with cones (see also saturate; and (b) photoreceptors which adapt
Appendix 1). This suggests that rod - cone coupling very little and mainly saturate.
is indeed important for determining the response
properties of horizontal cells. In comparing
horizontal cell responses with ganglion cell
4O
responses (Fig. 24), one notices that horizontal cell
gain does not begin to drop until the background
55
is 1 td, which is two to four log units higher than
the transition level of illumination for ganglion
.~_ 30
cells. This suggests that in the cat, as in the catfish, o_
there must be gain control mechanisms more
~ 25
proximal in the retina than the rods or the m