0enterprise Risk Management Policy and Procedures
0enterprise Risk Management Policy and Procedures
0enterprise Risk Management Policy and Procedures
I. Policy Introduction
The Board of Directors and Management of Lorenzo Shipping Corporation (LSC) consider risk
management as a central or integral part of the organization’s strategic management. It is the
process whereby LSC methodically address the risks attaching to their activities with the goal of
achieving sustained benefit within each activity and across the portfolio of all business activities.
Risk Management is the culture, processes and structures that are directed towards realizing
potential opportunities and managing adverse effects. It is a tool to help Management improve
its decision-making process, minimize its losses, as well as maximize its profits. It offers a
framework or process for effectively managing uncertainties, responding to risks, and exploring
opportunities as they arise to ensure that value is created, protected, and enhanced.
The purpose of this risk management procedure is to provide all personnel of Lorenzo Shipping
Corporation with the skills to apply consistent and comprehensive risk management methodology
which includes how to identify, analyze, evaluate and control risks.
The risk management process contained in this manual follows the COSO Enterprise Risk
Management Framework. It is a continuous and developing process which runs throughout the
organization’s strategy and the implementation of that strategy. It should address methodically
analyze all the risks surrounding the organization’s activities in the past and present so we can
learn from it and protect the future.
Risk management is a responsibility of all LSC employees, with specific risk responsibilities being
allocated to different groups and levels within the organization. It is important to have complete
and current risk information available as this information assists management to make more
informed decisions around both strategic direction and operational objectives.
Risk management is not a stand-alone discipline but requires integration with existing business
processes such as business and budget planning, in order to provide us with the greatest benefits.
The objectives of a risk management framework are to:
Make available accurate and concise risk information that informs decision making
including business direction;
Adopt risk treatment strategies that are cost effective and efficient in reducing risk to an
acceptable level; and
Monitor and review risk levels to ensure that risk exposure remains within an acceptable
level.
Our ability to conduct effective risk management is dependent upon having an appropriate risk
governance structure and well-defined roles and responsibilities.
LSC
Board of Directors
LSC President
Risk Management
Executive Committe
Risk Management
Group
(Headed by Chief Risk Officer)
LSC Employees
Board of Directors
A board committee, either dedicated or one with other responsibilities, should assist the board to
review risks, the risk management process and the significant risks facing the company.
The Risk Committee, is composed of the following members from the Board of Directors:
- Ms. Doris Magsaysay-Ho – Chairman
- Mr. Antony Loius L. Marden – Member
- Mr. Michael L. Escaler – Member
President
The President together with the Board of Directors creates an environment for risk management
to operate effectively and, at the same time, ensuring that significant internal and external factors,
including stakeholder interests, are considered in defining risk tolerance levels. The President
act as:
The RMEC has the overall responsibility for risk management at the enterprise Ievel, including:
Strategic risk;
Project risk; and
Business or operational risks
The Risk Management Group supports the RMEC in performing its responsibility in
institutionalizing a sustainable risk management process within the organization.
- Chairman: Chief Risk Officer
- Members: Cluster Finance and Accounting Manager, Legal Manager, Compliance
Officer, HR and Corporate Service Head, Technology Solutions Manager, Corporate
Strategy Head, Branch Coordinating Manager and Internal Audit Manager.
The overall responsibility of the Risk Management Group includes the following:
Review / validates / confirms risk issues generated by the Risk Management teams;
Recommends RM tolerances to the RC;
Evaluates measurement methodologies;
Develop risk management policy, strategies, and initiatives for the approval of RC;
Develop risk appetite strategy;
Develops and implement systems, policies, and procedures for identification, collection,
assessment and analysis, and mitigation of risks;
Oversee the implementation of the risk management strategies and initiatives in
compliance with established risk appetite;
Assign owners of significant risk;
Determine risk management tools and training requirements of the Risk Management
Team; and
Evaluates effectiveness of risk governance infrastructure for managing specific risks.
Managers
Operating and Line Managers are responsible for conducting a periodic risk assessment in their
area of operations using the tools and methodology provided in this document. Among other
things, they are responsible for the following:
Internal Audit
The Internal Audit function will be responsible for providing assurance to RMEC and the Board of
Directors on the appropriateness of the implementation of risk management strategies and the
effectiveness of the risk management processes, methodologies and internal controls.
External Auditors
External audit, as part of their audit processes review controls that impact on the preparation of
LSC’s Financial Statements.
LSC Employees
All LSC employees must comply with the company’s risk management policies and procedures.
They are also responsible for identifying and reporting new emerging risks in their respective area
of responsibilities to the appropriate level of authority.
Performance Management
All risk responsibilities, whether a general responsibility to use the risk management process
or specific responsibilities such as risk ownership or implementation of risk treatments
should be included within the relevant individuals’ performance plans (KPIs and KRAs).
Internal Audit
1. Internal Environment
Internal Environment reflects the philosophy or attitude of the whole organization through
directives from the Board. This can be achieve through but not limited to the following
activities:
a. Risk Policies
The Board reviews and amends the risk management governance structure including
clear delineation of authority and responsibility over risk management at all levels
across the organization if necessary;
The Board sets changes to risk appetite and risk tolerances of specific business
activities or projects of the organization.
Objectives that support and are aligned with our organization’s mission and are consistent
with risk appetite must be established before management can identify potential events
affecting their achievement.
3. Event Identification
After a clear understanding of the vision, mission, objectives and strategies, both internal and
external inherent risks events and opportunities must be identified.
For common risk language, the risk assessment team should use the Risk Business Model
table below during their event identification process.
Environment - Arises when there are external forces that could affect the viability of
the firm’s business model, including fundamentals that drive the overall objectives and
strategies that define the model. These risks are outside management’s ability to
control.
Process Risks - The risks that business processes within the organization are not
clearly defined, are poorly aligned with business objectives and strategies, do not
satisfy customer needs dilute shareholders value, or expose assets & resources to
misappropriation or misuse.
A risk definition or glossary for each risk of categories under each major risk classification
are provided in Appendix A of this Manual for easy reference.
4. Risk Assessment
Once the Inherent Risks are identified, each potential risk is analysed based on an
assessment of its consequence and likelihood.
Consequence is measured according to the magnitude of a loss, if the risk comes to pass.
How bad are the scenarios? How significant is the potential loss? How damaging is this to the
image of the organization? Does this warrant management interest or attention?
Below is a sample matrix for consequence:
CONSEQUENCE NUM
DESCRIPTION
(Impact/Severity) VALUE
- >Php ___ M impact on profitability; or
- Loss of key alliances; or
Material 5 - Sustained serious loss in market share; or
- Immediate Board and Sr. Management
attention required
- >Php ___M to <Php ___M or x% impact on
profitability; or
- Key alliances are threatened; or
Significant 3 - Serious diminution in brand value & market
share with adverse publicity; or
- Events and problems require Board and Sr.
Management attention
- <Php ___M impact on profitability; or
- No potential impact on market share; or
Insignificant 1 - No impact on brand value; or
- Issues would be delegated to Managers and
staff to resolve.
Likelihood is measured according to the probability of the occurrence of the event……in other
words, its frequency. Will this really happen? Has this happened in the past? This could be
based on your experiences, history of previous events or relevant knowledge and expertise.
After each potential risk event are measured according to its likelihood and consequence,
those involve in risk assessment will need to plot those risks into the Risk Heat Map as shown
below:
Highly
Probable Critical
(Probability\Frequency)
(5)
Likelihood
Reasonably
Possible
High
(3)
Remote
(1) Low
By plotting the risks identified into the Risk Heat Map taking into consideration its consequence
and likelihood, we can now visualize risks in relation to each other and can be used as a basis
for assessing and addressing risks in accordance to their potential impact on the business
strategy.
After risks have been identified, measured and prioritized, the next step is to consider risk
response options that could bring the level of the risk impact to a desired level acceptable to
Management and the Board.
5. Risk Response
Risk response involves examining possible treatment options to determine the most
appropriate action for managing a risk. Management actions or risk responses are required
where the current controls are not managing the risk within defined tolerance levels.
Response could involve improving existing controls and implementing additional controls.
Take – do nothing, retain the risk and accept impact of the risk (ex. Self-insure);
Transfer – transfer risk ownership and liability to a 3rd party (ex. insurance, outsourcing,
hedging, etc.);
Treat - undertake actions aimed at reducing the cause and impact of the risk (e.g.
process or control improvement, re-organization, re-design, etc.)
When determining the preferred risk response option, consideration should be given to the
cost of the treatment as compared to the likely risk reduction that will result (cost benefit
analysis).
On selecting the preferred treatment option, the following should occur:
The cost of any actions should be incorporated into the relevant budget planning
process;
A responsible person should be identified for delivery of the action, with this
expectation being communicated to them;
Identifying controls currently in place to manage the risk by either reducing the
consequence or likelihood of the risk;
Identifying the potential consequence or impact that would result if the risk was to
occur.
6. Control Activities
When evaluating the effectiveness of current controls, the factors to consider include
consistency of application, understanding of control content and documentation of controls
where appropriate. Controls are aimed at bringing the risk within an acceptable level. The
evaluation of current controls can occur through several different processes including:
Control self-assessment;
It is also important for the effectiveness of the risk management framework to be monitored
and reviewed. This framework drives the extent to which risks will be adequately managed
throughout the organization. Monitoring implementation of the Risk Management Strategy is
one available monitoring mechanism.
In addition, the risk management framework itself will be reviewed annually, with results being
reported to the RMC and the Board. As risk management developments are constantly
occurring, this review mechanism will provide us with information on current risk management
developments, facilitating us making continuous risk management improvements.
Area, unit, process, activity or project with which the risk is associated
Objective/s or goal/s to be achieved
Risk description
Business Risk Category
Business Objective Category
Risk reference number
Assessment score for likelihood (5, 3, 1)
Assessment score for consequence (5, 3, 1)
Overall risk assessment (H, M, L)
Value at risk or significance
Existing controls that mitigate the risks
Residual risk after existing controls
Future or action plan to further improve mitigation controls including timeline,
responsible person, and status
This detailed risk register is accomplished or produced during the annual risk review process
unless otherwise specifically requested by the Board, RC, or RMEC.
I. Environment Risk
Environment risk arises when there are external forces that can affect a company’s
performance, or make its choices regarding its strategies, operations, customer and supplier
relationships, organizational structure or financing obsolete or ineffective. These forces are
outside management’s ability to control.
A. Competitor Risk
Major competitors or new entrants to the market take actions to establish and sustain
competitive advantage over the company or even threaten its ability to survive.
B. Customer Wants Risk
The company is not aware that customer needs and wants change. Such needs and wants
may apply to desired quality, willingness to pay and/or speed of execution.
C. Technological Innovation Risk
The organization is not leveraging advancements in technology in its business model to
achieve or sustain competitive advantage or is exposed to the actions of competitors or
substitutes that do leverage technology to attain superior quality, cost and/or time
performance in their products, services, and processes.
D. Sensitivity Risk
Sensitivity risk results when management commits the company's resources and expected
cash flows from future operations to such an extent that it reduces the company's tolerance
for (or ability to withstand) changes in environmental forces that are totally beyond its control.
E. Shareholder Expectations Risk
The risk of failing to manage shareholder expectations, resulting in a decline in investor
confidence that may impair the company's ability to efficiently raise capital and reduce stock
evaluations over time.
F. Capital Availability Risk
The company does not have efficient access to the capital it needs to fuel its growth, execute
its strategies, and generate future financial returns.
G. Sovereign/Political Risk
The risk of adverse consequences through political actions in a country in which a company
has made significant investments (a major project, for example), is dependent on a significant
volume of business or has entered into an agreement with a counter party subject to the laws
of that country.
H. Legal Risk