Big Bubble & Credit Financial Crisis of 2007-2008

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

BIG BUBBLE & CREDIT

FINANCIAL CRISIS OF
BY: GROUP 6
2007-2008 BALDOMERO, GARLIAN
BALINGIT, JAIME IV
MAGTOTO, PATRICIA ANN
PINEDA, JETRHO
ROMERO, CZARINA
1) What are the causes of the big
bubble & credit financial crisis?
● It's a belief that home prices do not decline and it is this belief that led generations of
consumers to regard a home purchase as the foundation of their financial programs.
As the rate of appreciation in home values dramatically increased during the early years of the
21st century, many people began to think that home values not decline, but that they would also
continue to rise indefinitely. One particular scenario in the housing sector which experienced a
dramatic bubble and subsequent downfall was the subprime mortgage market. Subprime
mortgages are issued to households with below-average credit or income histories and are
generally considered more risky than traditional "prime" mortgages. Although they refer to a
minority of the overall market, subprime mortgages became increasingly important over the
years. Other subprime borrowers were lured into their mortgages by the initially low payments,
but when these seducing rates reset to current market rates, many homeowners could not
afford the new, much higher payments. As the decline in home prices drastically increases, an
increasing number of people found themselves struggling to make their monthly mortgage
payments. This situation eventually led to higher levels of mortgage defaults. Many of these
mortgages had been "securitized" and resold in the marketplace. This dispersion of risk is
generally a good thing, but in this instance it also meant that potential losses from defaults
were spread more widely than they otherwise might have been. Defaults had an inordinate
impact on certain bond issues. This is because in a typical mortgage-backed security deal, any
mortgage defaults initially affect only the lowest-rated tranches. This means that even if the
overall default rate for the pool of mortgages is relatively low, the loss for a particular tranche of
mortgage-backed securities could be substantial. When the investors that hold these tranches
employ leverage, losses can be even greater. As concerns about the housing decline grew,
market participants began avoiding mortgage-related risks. Investors soon began to question
whether financial institutions knew the true stage of the losses on their books. This uncertainty
led to sharp decrease in the stock prices of many financial firms, and a thriving unwillingness
to bid for risky assets. As investors unsuccessful to sell in a market with no buyers, prices fell
further. Soon, most risky assets were falling rapidly in price and panic began to creep into the
marketplace. The credit crisis had started.
2) Who must be held accountable
or responsible for the crisis?
● The persons who are to be blamed and held
responsible for the incident are the lenders. They
were too busy on how to get higher income thinking
that if they were to add risk, big returns will be the
outcome. They didn't require down payments on
mortgages. They lack discipline and were poor in
monitoring which leads to their difficulty in
collecting. Many instances showed that
irresponsible homeowners had been considered
default and eventually will not pay their debts
afterwards.
3) Would it be easy to make these
people accountable?
● The crisis that happened in 2007-2008 started with the intention of
the bank to make much money as they can by granting loans. Not
thinking that even if they gain a lot of money it can still effect the
economy. The increase in money supply had led the banks to
increase the prices of houses and in return the increase in the prices
of the houses had pushed the people to borrow money from the
bank. Debts are growing faster than income and there will always be
some persons who won't be able to pay their debts. Because of this
scenario the banks were frightened that more and more debts will be
unpayable. This situation was the cause of the financial crisis, banks
will only grant loans on which they thinks that lenders will have tha
capability to pay. Through this case prices went down and everythng
else followed including the economy.
4) How do you relate the crisis to
good governance?
● Good governance is about the processes for making and
implementing decisions. It’s not about making ‘correct’ decisions, but
about the best possible process for making those decisions.
The crisis began with different parties. They bear in mind that it is
okay to pass along the risk that they made to another party without
properly analyzing whether it would be beneficial to them. They did
not look into the possible outcome that what they're doing is making
a huge crisis to the economy. Because of this, the economy
experienced an economic boom. If only they were able to apply
good governance along with other solutions, when the time comes,
they might even prevent or reduce the risk to an acceptable level.
Remember, the economy is a moving body, one movement on its
part will cause the others to move.
END OF SLIDESHOW!

THANK
YOU!!!

You might also like