Extraction of Forest Plantation Resources in Selected Forest of San Manuel, Pangasinan, Philippines Using Lidar Data For Forest Status Assessment
Extraction of Forest Plantation Resources in Selected Forest of San Manuel, Pangasinan, Philippines Using Lidar Data For Forest Status Assessment
Extraction of Forest Plantation Resources in Selected Forest of San Manuel, Pangasinan, Philippines Using Lidar Data For Forest Status Assessment
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 11(7) 2017 530
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
Vol:11, No:7, 2017
III. METHODOLOGY nc90, nc99 and the composite band of the municipality to be
classified. These bands in tif format are prerequisite in
A. Study Area
classifying LiDAR point clouds to forest cover classes.
The selected study area is a part of the protected forest
plantation in San Manuel, Pangasinan (120° 39’ 31’’E, 16° F. Forest Cover Classification
04’ 23’’N) with an area of 0.445 square kilometers or 44.5 x This particular method is applicable for forested areas and
104 square meters. Trees planted in the area composed mainly the basis of its forest extent was the NAMRIA land cover
of broadleaf trees (Fig. 1). classification. Composite band of the municipality was used in
ENVI to classify LiDAR point clouds to different forest
classes, wherein a spectral angle mapper was used as the
classification method. Moreover, majority analysis was
applied in ENVI to produce a smoother classification with a
kernel size of 15 m x 15 m.
Generated type of classification (lower class, upper class or
mangroves class) was the input to finally classify and separate
Digital Open Science Index, Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Vol:11, No:7, 2017 waset.org/Publication/10007712
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 11(7) 2017 531
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
Vol:11, No:7, 2017
3 shows that highest elevation of the forest area ranging from meters to 17 meters. Overall, the mean average generated was
141 to 191 meters high. Hence, the elevation of the majority of 2 meters high (Fig. 5).
the forest area ranged from 94 - 141 meters, followed by 66
meters to 94 meters high.
Digital Open Science Index, Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Vol:11, No:7, 2017 waset.org/Publication/10007712
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 11(7) 2017 532
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
Vol:11, No:7, 2017
E. Forest Cover Classification direct relationship with each other, as obviously shown in the
Based on the model generated, there were three classes of Open Broadleaf Plantation as well as the other two forest
Forest Cover in the study area, namely and as Fig. 6 shows: cover, whereby, a tree with a bigger DBH has a heavier AGB
Broadleaf, Open Broadleaf and Closed Broadleaf. The area, and with a concomitant high acquisition in CS. An indication
however, was dominated by Closed Broadleaf with 21 that the forests are in a very healthy status as it has the
hectares followed by Broadleaf with 20 hectares and the Open capability to acquire high ground biomass and carbon from the
Broadleaf, which only occupies an area of 3.5 hectares (Table atmosphere. Similar results were also observed in the other
I). types of forest cover. Moreover, DBH, AGB and CS were also
found to be highest in the Closed Broadleaf as compared to the
Open Broadleaf and Plantation Broadleaf forest covers.
E. Tree Count
Shown in Fig. 7 is the delineated tree crown and tree count
of the selected forest area. The red dots (local maxima) inside
the Thiessen polygon are the representation of tree counts. The
Digital Open Science Index, Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Vol:11, No:7, 2017 waset.org/Publication/10007712
TABLE I
AREA OF THE GENERATED DIFFERENT FOREST COVER TYPES
CANOPY COVER TYPE AREA (ha)
Broadleaf Plantation 20.10
Closed Broadleaf 17.96
Open Broadleaf 2.50
TABLE II Fig. 7 Extracted Thiessen polygon and local maxima for the tree
ESTIMATED MEAN AVERAGE DBH, AGB AND CS OF DIFFERENT FOREST
COVER
count of forest area. The red points are the representation of tree
counts
Forest Cover Type DBH (mm) AGB (kg) CS (kg)
Broadleaf Plantation
Minimum 265.16 2731.02 1283.58
V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Maximum 849.77 8609.82 4046.61 In this study, researchers were determined and used the
Mean 595.13 5912.65 2778.94 important parameters, namely: CCM, CHM, DTM Forest
Closed Broadleaf Cover Types, DBH, AGB and the generated Tree Count in
Minimum 366.29 4955.69 2329.18 forest status assessment. These parameters are of great help to
Maximum 1137.48 20819.59 9785.21
assess forest inventory and general status of the forest. Based
Mean 679.49 11276.03 5299.73
on the results, the Canopy Height of the forest ranged from 12
Open Broadleaf
m to 17 m, with a mean canopy height of 2 m, while the
Minimum 191.97 1936.09 909.96
Maximum 801.09 15545.57 7306.42
elevation of the forest location was from 94 m to 141 m high.
Mean 500.86 6316.66 2968.83 The selected forest plantation has high percentage Canopy
Cover reaching as high as 80% of the forest area and with an
D. DBH, AGB and CS estimated CS of 21138.24 kg. The total Tree Count is 18,824
As Table II shows, among the three types of forest cover, trees or with an average of 414 trees per hectare at an
the Closed Broadleaf was observed to have the highest DBH approximate distance of 5 m X 5 m in between trees.
of 1137.48 mm, AGB of 20819.59 kg and CS of 9785.21 kg. This study could provide the needed data to the Philippine
This was followed by the Open Broadleaf with 801.09 mm data base on forest status assessment. By giving the forest
DBH, 15545.57 kg AGB and 7306.42 kg CS, and the lowest inventory and forest status to the local communities, they will
value was Broadleaf Plantation that has 849.77 mm DBH, be able to plan on how to protect and manage their forests. It
8609.82 kg AGB, and 4046.61 kg CS. will indicate which areas should be conserved and areas which
It was observed further that the three parameters have a need rehabilitation.
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 11(7) 2017 533
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology
International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering
Vol:11, No:7, 2017
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Researchers would like to thank the Department of Science
and Technology (DOST) for funding the Phil- LiDAR Project
as well as the Department of Science and Technology-
Philippine Council for Industry, Energy and Emerging
Technology Research and Development (DOST- PCIEERD)
for the management and monitoring of the project.
Digital Open Science Index, Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Vol:11, No:7, 2017 waset.org/Publication/10007712
REFERENCES
[1] Philippines, Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Forest
Management BureauPhilippines Forestry Outlook. Asia-Pacific Forestry
Sector Outlook Study II: Working Paper No. APFSOS II/ WP/2009/10.
Bangkok: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,
Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. 2009.
[2] Philippine Tropical Forest Conservation Foundation, Inc. Status of
Philippine Forests. http://www.ptfcf.org/wp-
content/uploads/2015/07/Status_of_Philippine_Forests. pdf
[3] Kangas, A., J. H. Gove and C. T. Scott. Introduction. In A. Kangas and
M. Maltamo. Forest Inventory. 2006. Springer, The Netherlands, pp. 3–
11.
[4] Marklund L. G. and M. Henry. Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations. Status of forest biomass and carbon stock assessment in
South and Central America. 2003
[5] Wulder M. A., Bater C. W., Coops N. C., Hilker T. and J. C. White.
2012. The role of LiDAR in sustainable forest management. The
Forestry Chronicle. Downloaded from pubs.cif-ifc.org by
216.183.154.252 on 01/19/12.
International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 11(7) 2017 534