MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: _______________________________ Name of Rater: EFRENIA A DAWAGAN

Position: TEACHER III Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: TABUK CITY Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 22.5% 1. Classroom Quality

Education Knowledge and knowledge of observation tool
Services Pedagogy content within and (COT) rating sheet
across curriculum and/or inter-observer
teaching areas. agreement form
about knowledge of
content within and
across curriculum
teaching areas
2. Lesson
plans/modified DLLs Efficiency
developed
highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within
and across subject
areas
3. Instructional
materials
highlighting mastery
of content and its
integration in other
subject areas
4. Performance Timeliness
tasks/test material(s)
highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within
and across subject
areas
5. Others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. Used a range of 1. Classroom Quality
Education teaching strategies observation tool
Services that enhance (COT) rating sheet
learner and/or inter-
achievement in observer agreement
literacy and form about teaching
numeracy skills. strategies that
enhance learner
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy skills
2. Lesson
plans/modified DLLs Efficiency
used in teaching
highlighting learner-
centered strategies
that promote literacy
and/or numeracy
skills
3. Instructional
materials
highlighting learner-
centered strategies Timeliness
that promote literacy
and/or numeracy
skills
4. Performance
tasks/test
material(s) used in
teaching
5. Results of
assessment used in
teaching
6. Others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 3. Applied a range 1. Classroom Quality
Education of teaching observation tool
Services strategies to (COT) rating sheet
develop critical and and/or inter-
creative thinking, as observer agreement
well as other form about teaching
higher-order strategies to
thinking skills. develop critical and
creative thinking, as
well as other higher-
order thinking skills
2. Lesson
plans/modified DLLs
used in teaching
highlighting different Efficiency
teaching strategies
that develop critical
and creative
thinking and/or other
HOTS
3. Instructional
materials
highlighting different
teaching strategies
that develop critical
and creative Timeliness
thinking and/or other
HOTS
4. Performance
tasks/test
material(s) used in
demonstration
teaching
5. Results of
assessment used in
teaching
6. Others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 22.5% 1. Classroom Quality
Education Environment classroom structure observation tool
Services and Diversity to engage learners, (COT) rating sheet
of Learners individually or in and/or inter-
groups, in observer agreement
meaningful form about
exploration, managing
discovery and classroom structure Efficiency
hands-on activities that engages
within a range of learners in various
physical learning activities
environments. 2. Lesson
plans/modified DLLs
highlighting various
classroom
Timeliness
management
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/tasks in
different physical
learning
environments
3. Others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)
Basic 5. Managed learner Classroom observation Quality
Education behavior tool (COT) rating sheet
Services constructively by and/or inter-observer
applying positive agreement form about
and non-violent teacher management of
discipline to ensure learner behavior using
the following strategies:
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

learning-focused Efficiency
environments. 1. Providing motivation
2. Praising the
learners/Giving
positive feedback
3. Setting house
rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’
active participation
5. Allowing learners to
express their
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal Timeliness
opportunities to
learners
7. Encouraging
learners to ask
questions
8. Others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)
Basic 6. Used 1. Classroom Quality
Education differentiated, observation tool
Services developmentally (COT) rating sheet
appropriate and/or inter-
learning observer agreement
experiences to form about using
address learners’ differentiated,
gender, needs, developmentally
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

strengths, interests appropriate learning Efficiency

and experiences. experiences
2. Lesson
plans/modified DLLs
developed
highlighting
differentiation in
content, product,
process, learning
environment or
others according to
learners’ gender,
needs, strengths,
interests and Timeliness
experiences
3. Instructional
materials developed
highlighting
differentiation in
content, product,
process, learning
environment or
others according to
learners’ gender,
needs, strengths,
interests and
experiences
4. Others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 22.5% 1. Classroom Quality
Education and Planning managed and observation tool
Services implemented (COT) rating sheet
developmentally and/or inter-
sequenced observer agreement
teaching and form about using
learning processes developmentally
to meet curriculum sequenced teaching
requirements and and learning
process
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

varied teaching 2. Lesson Efficiency

contexts. plans/modified DLLs
highlighting
developmentally
sequenced
instruction that meet
curriculum goals
and varied teaching
contexts
3. Instructional
materials used to
implement
developmentally
sequenced teaching
and learning
process to meet Timeliness
curriculum
requirements and
varied teaching
contexts
4. Others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)
8. Participated in 1. Personal notes of Quality
collegial teachers on
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meeting
use teacher and s with proof of
learner feedback to attendance
enrich teaching 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
practice. sessions on use of Efficiency
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice
with proof of
attendance
3. Others (Please
specify and provide Timeliness
annotations)
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 9. Selected, 1. Classroom Quality
Education developed, observation tool
Services organized and used (COT) rating sheet
appropriate and/or inter-observer
teaching and agreement form
learning resources, about using
including ICT, to appropriate teaching
address learning and learning
goals. resources, including Efficiency
ICT
Examples:
 Activity
sheets/task
sheets/work
sheets
 PowerPoint
presentations
 Video clips
 Module Timeliness
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention
Materials
 Others
2. Lesson
plans/modified DLLs
with appropriate
instructional
materials appended
3. Others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Designed, 22.5% 1. Classroom Quality
Education and Reporting selected, organized observation tool
Services and used (COT) rating sheet
diagnostic, and/or inter-
formative and observer agreement
summative form about using
assessment diagnostic,
strategies formative and
consistent with summative
curriculum assessment
requirements. strategies
2. Prepared lesson
plans/modified DLLs
highlighting
appropriate use of
formative
assessment
strategies
3. Developed
diagnostic tests: (a)
with TOS reviewed
by superior; (b) with
sample Efficiency
accomplished
questionnaire/answ
er sheets
4. Developed
summative tests: (a)
with TOS reviewed
by superior; (b) with
sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answ
er sheets
5. Developed
performance tasks:
(a) with rubrics
reviewed by Timeliness
superior; (b) with
sample
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

accomplished
rubrics
6. Others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)
Basic 11. Monitored and 1. Compilation of a Quality
Education evaluated learner learner’s written
Services progress and work with summary
achievement using of results and with
learner attainment signature of parents
data. 2. Formative/summativ
e assessment tools Efficiency
with TOS and
frequency of errors
with identified least
mastered skills
3. Class
records/grading Timeliness
sheets
4. Lesson
plans/modified DLLs
showing index of
mastery
5. Others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)
Basic 12. Communicated 1. At least 3 samples of Quality
Education promptly and corrected test
Services clearly the learners’ papers of the same
needs, progress 3 learners in the
and achievement to same learning area
key stakeholders, with parents’ or
including
parents/guardians.
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

guardians’ signature Efficiency

and date of receipt
2. Minutes of PTA
meetings or Parent-
Teacher
conferences in all
quarters with proof
of
parent’s/guardian’s
attendance
Timeliness
3. Report cards with
parent’s or
guardian’s signature
in all quarters
supported by
minutes of meeting
4. Communication with
parents/guardians
using various
modalities
5. Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
6. Other documents
showing learner
needs, progress and
achievement
submitted to other
stakeholders

Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed 10% 1. Certificate of Quality

Education various related Recognition or
Services works/activities that Participation
contribute to the 2. Certificate of
teaching-learning Training
process.
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
KRA Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

3. Certificate of Efficiency
Speakership
4. Committee
involvement
5. Advisorship of Co-
curricular activities
6. Book or Journal
Authorship/Co-
authorship/Contribut
orship
7. Coordinatorship/Cha Timeliness
irpersonship
8. Coaching and
mentoring learners
in competitions
9. Mentoring pre-
service/in-service
teachers
10. Others (Please
specify and provide
annotations)

TOTAL: _____________

EFRENIA A. DAWAGAN CAROLINE O. TORRES

Rater Ratee Approving Authority