Midyear Review Form

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: LANSANG, KELVIN GATDULA Name of Rater: Tambio, Carmelita T.


Position: MASTER TEACHER II Position: Assistant Principal II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DepEd Manila- Doña Teodora Alonzo High School Date of Review:
Rating Period: SY 2021-2022 (August 2021-July 2022)

Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality 5 OUTSTANDING

Education Knowledge and applications of content sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
Services Pedagogy knowledge within and about effective applications of content
across curriculum knowledge within and across curriculum
teaching areas. teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
demonstration teaching highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas
3. Instructional materials developed
highlighting effective application of content
knowledge within and across subject areas Efficiency 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
demonstration teaching highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas
5. Results of assessment used in
demonstration teaching highlighting mastery
of lessons learned
6. Others (Please specify and provide Timeliness
annotations)
Basic 2. Collaborated with 1. Copy of the research proposal focused on Quality 5 OUTSTANDING

Education colleagues in the conduct enriching knowledge of content and


Services and application of pedagogy
research to enrich 2. Proof of participation and/or contribution to a
knowledge of content and collaborative research (e.g. e-mail, actual Efficiency 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
pedagogy. output submitted, terms of reference, etc.)
3. Certified completed collaborative research
focused on enriching knowledge of content
and pedagogy
4. Proof of dissemination of research findings Timeliness 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
with colleagues
5. Proof of utilization of research findings
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

6. Others (Please specify and provide


annotations)
Basic 3. Developed and applied 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education effective teaching sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
Services strategies to promote about using effective teaching strategies to
critical and creative promote critical and creative teaching, as
thinking, as well as other well as other higher-order thinking skills
higher-order thinking 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
demonstration teaching highlighting different
skills.
teaching strategies that develop critical and
creative thinking and/or other HOTS
Efficiency 4 VERY
3. Instructional materials highlighting different SATISFACTORY
teaching strategies that develop critical and
creative thinking, and/or other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment used in the
demonstration teaching
6. Others (Please specify and provide Timeliness
annotations)
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education Environment colleagues to model and sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
Services and Diversity of share effective techniques about sharing effective techniques in the
Learners in the management of management of classroom structure
classroom structure to 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
engage learners, demonstration teaching highlighting effective
classroom management strategies that Efficiency 4 VERY
individually or in groups, SATISFACTORY
engage learners in activities/tasks in
in meaningful exploration,
different physical learning environments
discovery and hands-on 3. Minutes of LAC highlighting the sharing on
activities within a range of effective classroom management techniques
physical learning 4. Instructional materials used in
environments. demonstration teaching
5. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Timeliness
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 5. Exhibited effective and Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education constructive behavior and/or inter-observer agreement form about
Services management skills by effective teacher management of learner
applying positive and non- behavior using the following strategies:
violent discipline to 1. Providing motivation
ensure learning-focused 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive
feedback
environments.
3. Setting house rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active participation Efficiency 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
5. Allowing learners to express their
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask questions
Others (Please specify and provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked with 1. Minutes of LAC session/s, highlighting one’s Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education colleagues to share sharing of strategies on differentiated and
Services differentiated, developmentally appropriate opportunities to
developmentally address learners’ differences
appropriate opportunities 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
to address learners’ strategies on differentiated and
developmentally-appropriate opportunities to
differences in gender,
address learners’ differences
needs, strengths,
3. Corresponding instructional materials
interests and Efficiency 4 VERY
showing differentiated and developmentally- SATISFACTORY
experiences. appropriate opportunities to address
learners’ differences
4. Others (e.g. testimonial, write-up from
colleagues of the lessons/insights gained
from the Master Teacher's sharing)
Timeliness
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education and Planning effective strategies in the sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
Services planning and about using effective strategies in
management of implementing developmentally sequenced
developmentally teaching and learning process
sequenced teaching and 2. Results of learners’ assessment during the
actual teaching
learning processes to
3. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
meet curriculum Efficiency 4 VERY
demonstration teaching highlighting SATISFACTORY
requirements and varied developmentally sequenced teaching-
teaching contexts. learning process
4. Instructional materials showing effective
strategies in developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process
5. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
6. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Timeliness
8. Reviewed with 1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
colleagues, teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
learner feedback to plan, teacher and learner feedback to enrich
facilitate and enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance
teaching practice. 3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Efficiency 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY

Timeliness
Basic 9. Advised and guided 1. colleagues and critiqued on their alignment Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education colleagues in the to learning goals
Services selection, organization, 2. Lesson plans by colleagues critiqued in
development and use of terms of the alignment of the teaching and
appropriate teaching and learning resources to the indicated learning
learning resources, goals and appropriateness to the target Efficiency 4 VERY
learners SATISFACTORY
including ICT, to address
3. Others (Please specify and provide
specific learning goals.
annotations)

Timeliness
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 4. Assessment 10. Worked 1. Any proof of collaborative review if the test is Quality 3 SATISFACTORY

Education and Reporting collaboratively with designed based on its purpose (e.g.
Services colleagues to review the diagnostic, formative and summative)
design, selection, 2. Any proof of collaborative review of the
organization and use of a alignment of the test with the curriculum
range of effective 2.1. formative test attached to a lesson plan Efficiency 3 SATISFACTORY
2.2. summative assessment with TOS
diagnostic, formative and
2.3. diagnostic test with its TOS
summative assessment
3. Others (Please specify and provide
strategies consistent with
annotations)
curriculum requirements.
Timeliness
Basic 11. Interpreted 22.5% 1. Collaborative interpretation of the index of Quality 3 SATISFACTORY

Education collaboratively monitoring mastery obtained from 1 class


Services and evaluation strategies 2. Collaborative interpretation of item analysis
of attainment data to of quarterly examinations
support learner progress 3. Collaborative interpretation of results of
and achievement. performance assessment Efficiency 3 SATISFACTORY
4. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills in the 1. Sample agreement for learners at risk Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education effective communication signed by parents and corresponding
Services of learner needs, evidence of improvement
progress and 2. Record of dialogue and/or parent-teacher
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

achievement to key conferences and corresponding evidence of Efficiency 4 VERY


SATISFACTORY
stakeholders, including improvement
parents/guardians. 3. Anecdotal record communicated to and
signed by the learners and/or parents with
corresponding evidence of improvement
4. Sample of learners' test results signed by
parents and corresponding evidence of
improvement
5. Sample of accomplished rubrics given for
performance task and corresponding
evidence of improvement
6. Attendance sheet/minutes of parent-teacher
conference
7. Signed report cards of students at risk with
corresponding evidence of improvement
8. Correspondence notebook/letters/proof of
communication using other modalities (e.g.
e-mail, SMS, etc.) and corresponding
evidence of improvement
9. Learners’ performance record
10. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Timeliness
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various 10% 1. Served as reliever of classes in the absence Quality 5 OUTSTANDING

Education related works/activities of teachers


Services that contribute to the 2. Served as OIC in the absence of the
teaching-learning principal
process. 3. Represented the principal in meetings and
conferences
4. Observed classes of Teachers I-III
5. Assisted the school selection committee in
the evaluation of credentials when hiring or
promoting teachers
6. Certificate of Recognition or Participation
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

7. Certificate of Training Efficiency 5 OUTSTANDING

8. Certificate of Speakership
9. Committee involvement
10. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities
11. Book or Journal
Authorship/Co-authorship/Contributorship
12. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
13. Coaching and mentoring learners in
competitions
14. Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers
15. Others (Please specify and provide Timeliness
annotations)

TAMBIO, CARMELITA T. LANSANG, KELVIN GATDULA PASCUA, MA. MELANIE T.

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like