Midyear Review Form
Midyear Review Form
Midyear Review Form
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality 5 OUTSTANDING
Education Knowledge and applications of content sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
Services Pedagogy knowledge within and about effective applications of content
across curriculum knowledge within and across curriculum
teaching areas. teaching areas
2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
demonstration teaching highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas
3. Instructional materials developed
highlighting effective application of content
knowledge within and across subject areas Efficiency 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
4. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
demonstration teaching highlighting
integration of content knowledge within and
across subject areas
5. Results of assessment used in
demonstration teaching highlighting mastery
of lessons learned
6. Others (Please specify and provide Timeliness
annotations)
Basic 2. Collaborated with 1. Copy of the research proposal focused on Quality 5 OUTSTANDING
Basic 5. Exhibited effective and Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education constructive behavior and/or inter-observer agreement form about
Services management skills by effective teacher management of learner
applying positive and non- behavior using the following strategies:
violent discipline to 1. Providing motivation
ensure learning-focused 2. Praising the learners/Giving positive
feedback
environments.
3. Setting house rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active participation Efficiency 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
5. Allowing learners to express their
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask questions
Others (Please specify and provide annotations)
Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked with 1. Minutes of LAC session/s, highlighting one’s Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education colleagues to share sharing of strategies on differentiated and
Services differentiated, developmentally appropriate opportunities to
developmentally address learners’ differences
appropriate opportunities 2. Lesson plans/modified DLLs highlighting
to address learners’ strategies on differentiated and
developmentally-appropriate opportunities to
differences in gender,
address learners’ differences
needs, strengths,
3. Corresponding instructional materials
interests and Efficiency 4 VERY
showing differentiated and developmentally- SATISFACTORY
experiences. appropriate opportunities to address
learners’ differences
4. Others (e.g. testimonial, write-up from
colleagues of the lessons/insights gained
from the Master Teacher's sharing)
Timeliness
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and applied 22.5% 1. Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education and Planning effective strategies in the sheet and/or inter-observer agreement form
Services planning and about using effective strategies in
management of implementing developmentally sequenced
developmentally teaching and learning process
sequenced teaching and 2. Results of learners’ assessment during the
actual teaching
learning processes to
3. Lesson plans/modified DLLs used in
meet curriculum Efficiency 4 VERY
demonstration teaching highlighting SATISFACTORY
requirements and varied developmentally sequenced teaching-
teaching contexts. learning process
4. Instructional materials showing effective
strategies in developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning process
5. Performance tasks/test material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
6. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Timeliness
8. Reviewed with 1. Implemented LAC/FGD Plan Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
colleagues, teacher and 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD sessions on use of
learner feedback to plan, teacher and learner feedback to enrich
facilitate and enrich teaching practice with proof of attendance
teaching practice. 3. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations) Efficiency 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Timeliness
Basic 9. Advised and guided 1. colleagues and critiqued on their alignment Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education colleagues in the to learning goals
Services selection, organization, 2. Lesson plans by colleagues critiqued in
development and use of terms of the alignment of the teaching and
appropriate teaching and learning resources to the indicated learning
learning resources, goals and appropriateness to the target Efficiency 4 VERY
learners SATISFACTORY
including ICT, to address
3. Others (Please specify and provide
specific learning goals.
annotations)
Timeliness
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 4. Assessment 10. Worked 1. Any proof of collaborative review if the test is Quality 3 SATISFACTORY
Education and Reporting collaboratively with designed based on its purpose (e.g.
Services colleagues to review the diagnostic, formative and summative)
design, selection, 2. Any proof of collaborative review of the
organization and use of a alignment of the test with the curriculum
range of effective 2.1. formative test attached to a lesson plan Efficiency 3 SATISFACTORY
2.2. summative assessment with TOS
diagnostic, formative and
2.3. diagnostic test with its TOS
summative assessment
3. Others (Please specify and provide
strategies consistent with
annotations)
curriculum requirements.
Timeliness
Basic 11. Interpreted 22.5% 1. Collaborative interpretation of the index of Quality 3 SATISFACTORY
Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills in the 1. Sample agreement for learners at risk Quality 4 VERY
SATISFACTORY
Education effective communication signed by parents and corresponding
Services of learner needs, evidence of improvement
progress and 2. Record of dialogue and/or parent-teacher
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
8. Certificate of Speakership
9. Committee involvement
10. Advisorship of Co-curricular activities
11. Book or Journal
Authorship/Co-authorship/Contributorship
12. Coordinatorship/Chairpersonship
13. Coaching and mentoring learners in
competitions
14. Mentoring pre-service/in-service teachers
15. Others (Please specify and provide Timeliness
annotations)