A Reaction Paper of
A Reaction Paper of
A Reaction Paper of
“There seems to be a public image of any city which is the overlap of many
individual images. Or perhaps there is a series of public images, each held by someone
significant number of citizens. Such group images are necessary if an individual is to
operate successfully within his environment and to cooperate with his fellows. Each
individual picture is unique, with some content that is rarely or never communicated,
yet it approximates the public image, which in different environments, is more or less
compelling, and more or less embracing”---Kevin Lynch
In his book, “The Image of the City”, Lynch tackled that in any circumstances in
urban, people direct or orient themselves by means of “Mental maps”. In his book,
there were three cities he compared; American cities (Boston, Jersey City, and Los
Angeles) and analyze at how people orient themselves in these cities. A central notion
in this book is that of legibility (also called imageability and visibility). To be specific,
Legibility means the “apparent clarity of the city scape” or how will it be well read by
people. People who move through the city engage in way-finding. They need to be
able to recognize and organize urban elements into a coherent pattern or can be
recognizable patterns and can be easily visually grasped of recognizable symbols. “In
the process of way-finding, the strategic link is the environmental image, the
generalized mental picture of the exterior characteristics that can be seen by an
individual. This image is the product both of immediate sensation and of the memory of
past experience, and it is used to interpret information and to guide action (p.4). Lynch
proposes that these mental maps consist of five elements: (1) paths: the channels which
the observer moves. They may be streets, walkways, transit lines, canals, railroads; (2)
edges: the linear elements not used as paths by the observer. They are the boundaries
and linear breaks I continuity: shore, walls, etc.; (3) districts: areas characterized by
common characteristics; (4) nodes: strategic focus points for orientation like squares
and junctions; and (5) landmarks: external points of orientation, usually were easily
identifiable physical object in the urban landscape. Out of these five elements, paths
are especially important according Lynch, since these organize urban mobility.
One such question is the about the way-finding thought. It is my curiosity about
the small establishments. Just my concern, how can people know that there is a small
business actively running at a corner of a city? Neither unless some people may take a
picture of those then disseminate it through social media nor can it be found with the
trendy Google Maps. Yes these were also reliable, but to what extent?
Thus, for me, “The Image of the City” is still an applaudable work and can be
reread as a fresh work in this age and still to be or should be recommended. Lynch’s
division of mapping/learning/shaping can well be applied as important questions that
can be posed for each locative media project. Which to be concluded, in my opinion,
his book still gives me the ideal agenda for urban design.