Formation of 18th canal in Uthamapalayam Taluk -

Construction of an Anicut across Suruliyar in the upstream of Vairavanar anicut

STABILITY ANALYSIS OF CHECKDAM

PROFILE:
It is proposed to have a WES peofile with 1H:3V slope on U/S side and downstream
slope of 0.7h:1V conforming to the equation
X 1.836 = 1.936 Hd 0.836 Y
as per Hydraulic design chart 111-7 Corps of Engineers.
D/S PROFILE:
D/S slope is 0.7 :1
dy/dx= 1/ 0.7
The equation to the WES profile
X 1.836 = 1.936 Hd 0.836 Y

differentiating w.r.t. X
1.836 X 0.836 = 1.936 Hd 0.836 dy/dx
1.836 X 0.836 = 1.936 0.75 0.836 1 by 0.7
X= 1.224339
Y= 0.952645
For y= 0.952645 x= 1.224339

X X 1.836 Y= x 1.836 by 1.936* 0.75^0.836

0.1 0.014588 0.009584
0.2 0.052082 0.034216
0.4 0.185944 0.122159
0.6 0.391458 0.257175
0.8 0.663855 0.436131
1 1 0.656967
1.2 1.39758 0.918164
1.22434 1.450067 0.952646
1.22434 1.450065 0.952645

1.F.R.L : 471.50
2.M.W.L : 472.25
3.T.B.L : 474.00
4.Head over crest : 0.75
5.Maximum discharge : 2650 cusecs
6.Ground level : 467.1
7.Down stream side slope of
spillway 0.7
8.Upstream side slope of
spillway 1 in 3

9. Upstream second slope

1 in 0
10.Downstream Bed level 467.10
11. Crest level: 471.50
12.Rear water level: 467.95
13. Tangent point: 1.22434 0.95264

424652411.xls
Page 1
chkdamstb
Stability analysis at foundation level
The stbility of over flow section is checked for the following seven
conditions as per the IS-6512-1984
1 Reservoir empty -With out EQ-- Loading combination A
2 ReservoiratMWL,Fulluplift,Maximum tail water,WithoutEQ-Loadingcombination-F
3 Reservoir empty -With EQ-- Loading combination-D
4 Reservoir at FRL, Full uplift, No tail water, With EQ- Loading combination-G

472.25
0.750
471.500 0.17775
1 471.452 0.04815 1 467.950
3 0.904 3 2 4 0.953
5.1 470.547 0.301498 0.17775 1.22434 4.40
0 0.7 0.850
3.447 1 7 5 1
467.100 6 467.100
4.4 0 1.703587 2.413149 O
0.75 4.11674
5.15
0.850 0.850
5.150
4.300

Unit weight of masonry 2.4 t/m3

Weight of water 1 t/m3
Stability analysis: 1.ReservoiremptywithoutEQ-Loading combination-A
SLNO DESCRIPTION FORCE L.A MOMENT
Coefficien length depth Unit wt. V H +
Weight of masonry&Concrete
1 0.667 0.178 0.048 2.400 0.014 3.704 0.051
2 1.000 0.178 0.904 2.400 0.386 3.726 1.438
3 0.500 0.301 0.904 2.400 0.327 3.916 1.281
4 0.667 1.224 0.953 2.400 1.866 3.148 5.874
5 1.000 1.704 3.447 2.400 14.095 3.265 46.019
6 0.500 2.413 3.447 2.400 9.983 1.609 16.060
7 0.500 0.000 3.447 2.400 0.000 4.117 0.000
SV= 26.671 SM= 70.723

Base width= 4.117

X= SM / SV = 2.652
e = b/2-X 0.593
6e/b= 0.865

Maximum stress = SV/b*(1+6e/b)

= 12.0812 T/m^2

Minimum stress = SV/b*(1-6e/b)

= 0.876 T/m^2

424652411.xls
Page 2
chkdamstb
2.Reservoir at MWL, Fulluplift,with tailwater,without EQ-Loading combination- B
SLNO DESCRIPTION FORCE L.A MOMENT
Coefficien length depth Unit wt. V H + -
Weight of masonry&Concrete
1 0.667 0.178 0.048 2.400 0.014 3.704 0.051
2 1.000 0.178 0.904 2.400 0.386 3.726 1.438
3 0.500 0.301 0.904 2.400 0.327 3.916 1.281
4 0.667 1.224 0.953 2.400 1.866 3.148 5.874
5 1.000 1.704 3.447 2.400 14.095 3.265 46.019
6 0.500 2.413 3.447 2.400 9.983 1.609 16.060
7 0.500 0.000 3.447 2.400 0.000 4.117 0.000

weight of water
1 0.333 0.178 0.048 1.000 0.003 3.771 0.011
2 0.500 0.301 0.904 1.000 0.136 4.016 0.548
3 1.000 0.301 0.048 1.000 0.015 3.966 0.058
4 0.500 0.000 3.447 1.000 0.000 4.117 0.000
5 1.000 0.000 0.953 1.000 0.000 4.117 0.000
6 1.000 0.479 0.750 1.000 0.359 3.877 1.394

Water Pressure
1 1.000 4.400 0.750 1.000 3.300 2.200 7.260
1 0.500 4.400 4.400 1.000 9.680 1.467 14.197
Up lift pressure
1 1.000 4.117 0.850 1.000 -3.499 2.058 -7.203
2 0.500 4.117 4.300 1.000 -8.851 2.744 -24.291

SV= 14.8336 SM= 41.2386 21.4573

Base width= 4.116736

X= SM /SV = 1.333544
e = b/2-X 0.724824
6e/b= 1.056406
Maximum stress = SV/b*(1+6e/b)
= 7.40972 T/m^2
Minimum stress = SV/b*(1-6e/b)
= -0.2032 T/m^2

Seismic forces
As per the investigation the location of the dam site is contemplated in zone II
of map in IS 1893--1984.
Basic horizontal seismic coefficient= ao= 0.02
Design value of horizontal sesmic coefficient=
Where
a coefficient depending upon the soil foundation system= 1 for dams on rocks.
a coefficient depending upon the importance
of the dam structures=(vide table 4 of IS1893/1984.) 3 for dams
h= 0.06
h at top of dam= 0.09
v at top of dam 0.045

424652411.xls
Page 3
chkdamstb
 Horizontal& Vertical coefficient
0.09 471.500 0.045

0.089409 1 471.47111 0.0447

0.079765 2 470.9996 0.03988

0.078308 4 470.9284 0.03915
0.076681 3 470.8489 0.03834
0.035257 5 468.8237 0.01763
0.023505 6 468.2491 0.01175
0.023505 7 468.2491 0.01175

467.1
HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Vertical coefficient for water

0.045 471.500

0.044852 1 471.4856
0.044754 3 471.4759
0.041424 2 471.1504
0.040129 5 471.0237
0.023505 4 469.3982

467.1

3.Reservoir empty with earth quake- Loading combination - D

Sl no Description Forces LA Moments
Coeff length depth unit.wt e.q.coef V H + -
Wt. of Masonry&Concrete(vertical acceleration)
1 0.667 0.178 0.048 2.400 1.045 0.014 3.709 0.053
2 1.000 0.178 0.904 2.400 1.040 0.401 3.726 1.495
3 0.500 0.301 0.904 2.400 1.038 0.340 3.916 1.331
4 0.667 1.224 0.953 2.400 1.039 1.939 3.148 6.104
5 1.000 1.704 3.447 2.400 1.018 14.343 3.265 46.830
6 0.500 2.413 3.447 2.400 1.012 10.100 1.609 16.249
7 0.500 0.000 3.447 2.400 1.012 0.000 4.117 0.000

Wt. of Masonry&Concrete(horizontal acceleration)

1 0.667 0.178 0.048 2.400 0.089 0.001 4.371 0.005
2 1.000 0.178 0.904 2.400 0.080 0.031 3.900 0.120
3 0.500 0.301 0.904 2.400 0.077 0.025 3.749 0.094
4 0.667 1.224 0.953 2.400 0.078 0.146 3.828 0.559
5 1.000 1.704 3.447 2.400 0.035 0.497 1.724 0.857
6 0.500 2.413 3.447 2.400 0.024 0.235 1.149 0.270
7 0.500 0.000 3.447 2.400 0.024 0.000 1.149 0.000

27.138 73.967

424652411.xls
Page 4
chkdamstb
 Base width= 4.117
X= SM/ SV= 2.726
e=b/2-X 0.667
6e/b= 0.972
Maximum stress = Sv/b*(1+6e/b)
= 13.003 T/m2

Minimum stress = Sv/b*(1-6e/b)

= 0.182 T/m2

HYDRO DYNAMIC EFFECTS OF RESERVOIR

Due to the horizontal acceleration of the foundation and dam, there is an instantaneous
hydrodynamic pressure(or suction) exerted against the dam in addition to hydrostatic
forces. The direction of hydrodynamic force is opposite to the direction of earth quake .
acceleration.Based on the assumption that water is incompressible, the hydrodynamic
pressure at depth'Y' below the reservoir shall be determined as follows.

P= Cs* h*w*h
where P=Hydrodynamic pressure in Kg/m^2 at depth ' Y'.
Cs=A coefficient which varies with shape and depth.
=Cm/2 {Y/h (2-Y/h)+ Y/h(2-Y/h)}
where Cm=maximum value of Cs obtained from fig. 10 of IS 1893/1984.
Y= depth below surface
h=depth of reservoir
h=design horizontal seismic coefficient.
w=unit weight of water in Kg/m^3.
h= depth of reservoir.
The upstream slope is 1H to 0V
therefore Q=tan~1 0= 00
for 0 degree the value of Cm as read from fig10 of IS1893/1984 works out to
Cm= 0.65
AT FOUNDATION LEVEL
y= 4.40 h= 4.40
y/h= 1
Cs= 0.65
P= Cs *a(h)*w*h 0.2
P= 0.2574
Vh= 0.726*P*y
Vh= 0.822239 T 1.812121 m
Mh= 0.299*p*Y^2
Mh= 1.489996 T.Mt.
lever arm at foundation level
= 1.812121 m x
x= 0 1.81212 = 0
AT FRL LEVEL
y= 0 h= 4.40 y/h= 0
P= 0 Cs= 0
Vh= 0
Mh= 0

vertical component of hydrodynamic force

Vv= (V2-V1) tanq
= 0

L.A= 4.116736
Moment of vertical component of hydrodynamic force
= 0 t.m.

424652411.xls
Page 5
chkdamstb
4.Reservoir at FRL,Full uplift, Notail water,with EQ--- Loading combination-E
Sl no Des Description Forces LA Moments
Coeff length depth unit Wt eq.co V H + -
Wt. of Masonry&Concrete(vertical acceleration)
1 0.667 0.178 0.048 2.400 0.955 0.013 3.704 0.048
2 1.000 0.178 0.904 2.400 0.960 0.370 3.726 1.381
3 0.500 0.301 0.904 2.400 0.962 0.315 3.916 1.232
4 0.667 1.224 0.953 2.400 0.961 1.793 3.148 5.644
5 1.000 1.704 3.447 2.400 0.982 13.846 3.265 45.208
6 0.500 2.413 3.447 2.400 0.988 9.865 1.609 15.871
7 0.500 0.000 3.447 2.400 0.988 0.000 4.117 0.000
Wt. of Masonry&Concrete(horizontal acceleration)
1 0.667 0.178 0.048 2.400 0.089 0.001 4.371 0.005
2 1.000 0.178 0.904 2.400 0.080 0.031 3.900 0.120
3 0.500 0.301 0.904 2.400 0.077 0.025 3.749 0.094
4 0.667 1.224 0.953 2.400 0.078 0.146 3.828 0.559
5 1.000 1.704 3.447 2.400 0.035 0.497 1.724 0.857
6 0.500 2.413 3.447 2.400 0.024 0.235 1.149 0.270
7 0.500 0.000 3.447 2.400 0.024 0.000 1.149 0.000

Wt. of water (vertical acceleration)

1 0.333 0.178 0.048 1.000 0.955 0.003 4.386 0.012
2 0.500 0.301 0.904 1.000 0.959 0.261 4.050 1.059
3 1.000 0.301 0.048 1.000 0.955 0.014 4.376 0.061
4 0.500 0.000 3.447 1.000 0.976 0.000 2.298 0.000
5 1.000 0.000 0.953 1.000 0.960 0.000 3.924 0.000

Hydrodynamic shear 0.822 1.490

Hydrostatic pressure
1 0.500 4.400 4.400 1.000 9.680 1.467 14.197
Vertical component of hydrodynamic forces 0.000 4.117 0.000
Full uplift pressure

1 0.500 4.117 4.400 1.000 -9.057 2.744 -24.856

17.424 45.660 17.592

Base width= 4.117
X= SM/ SV= 1.611
e=b/2-X 0.448
6e/b= 0.652
Maximum stress = Sv/b*(1+6e/b)
= 6.994 T/m^2
Minimum stress = Sv/b*(1-6e/b)
= 1.472 T/m^2

SL NO DESCRIPTION MAXIMUM STRESS MINIMUM STRESS

in t/m^2 in t/m^2

424652411.xls
Page 6
chkdamstb
AT LEVEL +467.1m
1 Reservoir empty with
out EQ. 12.081 0.876
2 Reservoir at MWL,
Full uplift,Max. tail
water,with out EQ. 7.41 -0.203
3 Reservoir empty with
EQ. 13.003 0.182
4 Reservoir at FRL,
Full uplift,No tail
water,with EQ. 6.994 1.472

424652411.xls
Page 7
chkdamstb
PWD, WRO
Irrigation Design Handbook

DESIGN OF HEAD SLUICE

Design Data:
Sill level = 470.00 m
Crest of anicut = 471.50 m
Front M.F.L = 472.25 m
Rear M.F.L = 471.50 m
Top of operating platform = 474.50 m
Size of vents = 1.75 X 1.5 m
Number of vents = 2 Nos.
Designed Discharge 279.00 cusecs 7.90 cumecs
U/S floor level 467.10 m
D/Sfloor level 470.00 m
Exit gradient 1 in 5 0.20
Floor thickness at D/S end 0.90 m
Floor thickness at U/S floor 0.60 m
Thickness of Cut off wall 0.60 m
Depth of water at D/S 1.50 m
Depth of rear water 1.50 m

Q=cd*A*(2gh)^0.5
Cd - Coefficient of discharge= 0.62
Driving head h= 0.3 m
No. of vents = 2
Size of vents = 1.75 X 1.5 m
Q= 7.8969815

Provide 2 vents of size 1.75 X 1.5 m

Provided clear waterway = 3.5 m
Assume the pier width to be 1.25 m
Total width of waterway= 4.75 m

Total Energy level:

Without retrogression and concentration:
Velocity of approach (Va) = Q /A
= 0.32 m/sec
Velocity head (hva) = Va /2g
2
= 0.005 m
say 0.005 m
U/S Total Energy Line(U/S T.E.L) = U/S F.S.L + hva
= 472.255 m
D/S Total Energy Line (D/S T.E.L) = D/S F.S.L + hva
= 471.505 m
Head loss (HL) = U/S T.E.L - D/S T.E.L
= 0.75 m

(III) Typical Design of Various Irrigation Structures- 6.Anicut( Head sluice-Design) Page No.
PWD, WRO
Irrigation Design Handbook

2.Fixation of D/S floor level:

Hydraulic jump calculations:
High flood condition
without
Sl.No. Item concentration
and
retrogression
1 Discharge intensity (q) = Q / R in cumec/m 2.26

2 D/S Water level in m 471.50

3 U/S Water level in m 472.25

4 D/S Total Energy Level ( D/S T.E.L) in m 471.505

5 U/S Total Energy Level ( U/S T.E.L) in m 472.255

6 Head Loss (HL) in m 0.75

7 D/S specific energy Ef2 ( from CBIP, Pub.4) 1.642

8 U/S specific energy Ef1 = Ef2 + HL 2.392

9 Level at which jump would form ( D/S T.E.L - E f2) 469.863

10 Prejump Depth corresponding to Ef1 (from CBIP,Pub.4) D1 0.341

11 Postjump Depth corresponding to E f2 (from CBIP,Pub.4) D2 1.774

12 Length of concrete floor required beyond the jump =5X(D 2-D1) 7.17
____
13 Frounde No. F = q / ÖgD 1
3
3.62

Existing Floor level = 470 m

Hence the D/S basin level is fixed as = 469.9 m
Fix basin level = 469.50
3.Total horizontal floor length:
U/S floor level = 467.10 m
D/S basin level = 469.50 m

1.D/S horizontal floor length (hydraulic criteria) = 7.17 m

2. D/S glacis length with 3:1 slope = 1.50 m
3. U/S slope length (1:1) = 2.90 m
4. Crest width ( Assumed) = 2.00 m
5. Length of U/S floor ( Assumed ) = 1.83 m
Total Floor length = 16.00 m

(III) Typical Design of Various Irrigation Structures- 6.Anicut( Head sluice-Design) Page No.
PWD, WRO
Irrigation Design Handbook

Total floor length from hydraulic criteria consideration 16 m

(surface flow condition)
Laceys Regime Width P = 4.83(Q)0.5
13.575651 m
Bed Width of canal = 4.5 m
Looseness Factor = Actual width of river / Laceys Regime width

0.3314758 < 1
Discharge per metre width q = 2.2571 cumecs
Adopting Lacey's silt factor= 1.25
Hence , Scour depth = 1.35(q 2/ f )1/3 = 2.156435 m
Scour depth= 2.200 m
Design scour depth at U/S side= 1.25xD = 2.750 m
Design scour depth at D/S side= 1.5xD = 3.300 m
U/S scour level= 469.500 m
D/S scour level= 468.200 m
Crest level= 470 m

DESIGNING OF STILLING BASIN

Length of basin 7.17 m
Say 7.17 m
provide 7.17 *
Basin floor level 469.50 m
Say 469.50 *

DESIGN OF PERMEABLE FOUNDATION

Length of Regulator 4.75 m

Scour depth and depth of cutoff

U/s Floor level (taken = basin level unless specified 467.10 m
If u/s floor level is different type in cell F82 467.10 m
Depth of cutoff required from scour considerations -2.4 m
Provide a u/s cutoff depth of -2.4 m Yu=Depth of u/s water
Provide Depth of u/s cutoff 1.5 m
Bottom of u/s cutoff 465.6 m
D/s Scour level 468.2 m
Depth of Cutoff required from scour considerations 1.8 m
Minimum depth of cutoff 1.35 m
=(Yd/2+0.6);(Yd=Depth of d/s water)
Provide a d/s cutoff depth of 1.8 m
Provide Depth of d/s cutoff 2 m
Bottom of d/s cutoff 468.00 m
Floor Length Required From Exit Gradient Considerations
Exit gradient 0.20
Taking head upto bed level only
H =FRL - D/S bed level 2.25 m
d = Depth of d/scutoff 2 m

Ge = H 1
d PÖl

l = 3.2058656
__________

(III) Typical Design of Various Irrigation Structures- 6.Anicut( Head sluice-Design) Page No.
PWD, WRO
Irrigation Design Handbook

a = Ö (2 l-1)2 -1 5.318537

(III) Typical Design of Various Irrigation Structures- 6.Anicut( Head sluice-Design) Page No.
PWD, WRO
Irrigation Design Handbook

Length of floor required from exit gradient= 10.63707 m

(Subsurface flow condition)
Length of floor required from hydraulic criteria= 16 m
(Surface flow condition)
Maximum 16
Length of floor provided 16 m
Calculation of pressures
u/s pile
a = b/d = 10.666667
1/a = 0.09375 Say 0.09
From table in pg 91 of CBIP pub. no. 12
For 1/a = 0.09
fD = 18.5
fE = 26.55

fE1 =100 - 0 = 100 %

fD1 =100 - 18.5 = 81.5 %
fc1 =100 - 26.55 = 73.45 %
Correction for floor thickness
Assumed floor thickness for U/S = 0.6 m
Correction Cf = 3.22 +ve
Correction for mutual interference of pile
____
Ci = 19x ÖD/b 1
x (d+D)/b
Where
d = depth of pile 0.9
D = depth of pile below the floor -1.50
of the first pile whose inter-
ference has to be determined

Ci = 0

corrected fc1 = 76.67 %

D/S Pile = b/d = 8

1/a = 0.125 Say 0.13
From table in pg 91 of CBIP pub. no. 12
For 1/a = 0.13
fD = 22.3
fE = 32
fE2 = 32 %
fD2 = 22.3 %
fc2 = 0 %

Correction for floor thickness

Assumed floor thickness for D/S = 0.90 m
Correction Cf = 6.7
Correction for mutual interference of pile
Ci = 19x ÖD/b1 x (d+D)/b
Where d = depth of pile 1.1
D = depth of pile below the floor 0.60
of the first pile whose inter-
ference has to be determined

(III) Typical Design of Various Irrigation Structures- 6.Anicut( Head sluice-Design) Page No.
PWD, WRO
Irrigation Design Handbook

Ci = 0.398472
corrected f E2 = 24.65153 %
s.no. f pile1 pile2
1 fE 100 24.65
2 fD 81.5 22.3
3 fC 76.67 0.00

Elevation of HGL
U/S WL D/S WL Head U/S Pile D/S Pile
fE1 fD1 fC1 fE2 fD2 fC2
100 81.5 76.67 24.65 22.30 0.00
Static head for u/s pile
472.25 467.1 5.15 5.15 4.19725 3.948505
472.25 471.29725 471.0485
static head for d/s pile
472.25 469.5 2.75 0.67792 0.61325 0
470.178 470.11325 469.5
Dynamic head for u/s pile
472.25 471.5 0.75 0.75 0.61125 0.575025 0.18489 0.16725 0
472.25 472.11125 472.075 471.685 471.66725 471.5

472.075 472.25
Dynamic HGL
471.0485 471.900
470.600 471.685
Static HGL 471.5
470 1.70
470.178

467.1 1.10
470.20
0.341
465.6 469.86 469.5
1.0899
1.53 2.9 1.5 7.47
2
15.4 468.00

From the above diagram,

It is found that the maximum designed head for dynamic condition is
2/3 of 1.70 = 1.130467
Thickness required = 0.807476
0.9
The maximum ordinate for uplift for static head condition is
= 1.10
DYNAMIC head is the governing factor

FLOOR THICKNESS:

(a) Unbalanced head at 3 m from

centre of d/s pile 0.8500

(III) Typical Design of Various Irrigation Structures- 6.Anicut( Head sluice-Design) Page No.
PWD, WRO
Irrigation Design Handbook

Thickness required 0.6071

Provided thickness 0.8

(III) Typical Design of Various Irrigation Structures- 6.Anicut( Head sluice-Design) Page No.
PWD, WRO
Irrigation Design Handbook

Provide a thickness
Provided thickness 0.8 m

(b) Unbalanced head at 7.47 m from

centre of d/s pile 1.1000
Thickness required 0.7857
0.8

Provided thickness 0.8 m

Provided uniform thickness of 0.90 m.

(III) Typical Design of Various Irrigation Structures- 6.Anicut( Head sluice-Design) Page No.
PWD, WRO
Irrigation Design Handbook

Calculation of Ef1,D1,D2 from graph values

without concentration and retrogression
q = 2.26 cumecs/ m
HL = 0.75 m

HL = 0.6 0.8 0.75

q =
2 1.694 1.758 1.742
2.5 1.885 1.956 1.93825

2.26 Ef2 = 1.642

Calculation of D1
Ef1= 2.392
q = 2.26
2 0.3
2.5 0.38
D1 = 0.341142857
say 0.341

Calculation of D2
Ef2= 1.642
q = 2.26
2 1.8
2.5 1.75
D2 = 1.77
say 1.774

(III) Typical Design of Various Irrigation Structures - 6.Anicut (Head Sluice-cal.sheet) Page No.
PWD, WRO
Irrigation Design Handbook

Table for reading pressure values for permeable foundation

pg 91 CBIP Publication No. 12

1/a fD fE
0.02 8.9 12.7
0.04 12.6 17.9
0.06 15.3 21.8
0.08 17.6 25.1 1/a fD fE
0.1 19.4 28 0.08 17.6 25.1
0.12 21.2 30.6 0.1 19.4 28
0.14 22.7 32.9 0.09 18.5 26.55
0.16 24.1 35 1/a fD fE
0.18 25.3 37 0.12 21.2 30.6
0.2 26.6 38.8 0.14 22.7 32.9
0.22 27.6 40.6 0.13 21.95 31.75
0.24 28.7 42.2 1/a fD fE
0.28 30.5 45.2 0.12 21.2 30.6
0.32 32.1 47.9 0.14 22.7 32.9
0.36 33.6 50.4 0.13 21.95 31.75
0.4 34.8 52.7 1/a fD fE
0.44 36 54.7 0.08 17.6 25.1
0.48 37.1 56.7 0.1 19.4 28
0.52 37.9 58.5 0.09 18.5 26.55
0.56 38.8 60.1 0.1 19.4 28
0.6 39.6 61.7 0.12 21.2 30.6
0.64 40.3 63.2 0.11 20.3 29.3
0.68 40.9 64.5
0.72 41.6 65.8
0.76 42.1 66.9
0.8 42.6 68.1
0.9 43.7 70.7
1 44.6 72.8
1.1 45.2 74.7
1.2 45.8 76.4
1.3 46.3 77.9
1.4 46.7 79.3
1.5 47.1 80.4
1.6 47.3 81.4
1.7 47.7 82.5
1.8 47.9 83.3
1.9 481 84.1
2 48.2 84.9

Interpolation of exact value

u/s pile
For 1/a fD fE
3 0.08 Err:504 Err:504
4 0.08 17.6 25.1

For 1/a fD fE

(III) Typical Design of Variouis Irrigation Structures -6.Anicut (Head Sluice -Cal.sheet) Page No.
PWD, WRO
Irrigation Design Handbook

0.06 Err:504 Err:504

u/s pile
For 1/a fD fE
8 Err:504 Err:504 Err:504
9 0.18 25.3 37

For 1/a fD fE
0.16 Err:504 Err:504

(III) Typical Design of Variouis Irrigation Structures -6.Anicut (Head Sluice -Cal.sheet) Page No.