Chap 1 Preamble
Chap 1 Preamble
Chap 1 Preamble
INTRODUCTION:
1
Mob : 9781572400
SOURCES OF CONSTITUTION:
SOURCE PROVISION
JAPANESE CONSTITUTION
Procedure established by Law.
While drafting the Constitutional Draft, several provisions were borrowed from
various written
and unwritten Constitutions all over the world.
Similarly the Constitution as a whole stands to its effect after having incorporated
several unique features and provisions from several other Constitutions.
2
Mob : 9781572400
CHAPTER 1
PREAMBLE
“WE, THE PEOPLE OF INDIA, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST
SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC
LIBERTYof thought, expression, belief, faith and worship; EQUALITYof status and ofopportunity;
FRATERNITY assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation;
3
Mob : 9781572400
PURPOSE OF PREAMBLE
Preamble begins with a short statement of its basic values and it contains the
philosophy on which our Constitution is built. It is just like an introduction or
preface of a book. Preamble actually embodies the spirit of theConstitution.
It is a key to the minds of thedraftsmen.
It is also the soul of theConstitution.
This phrase simply indicates that it’s we people, the people of Indiawho are
the source of authority behind theConstitution.
This also has an implication that the Constitution has been drawn up and
enacted by the people through their representatives, and not just handed
down to them by a king or any outsidepowers.
“sovereign”
This indicates that India is a sovereign, a nation free from any external control
or interference
i.e. no external power can dictate the government of India. India is internally
and externally sovereign i.e. externally free from the control of any foreign
4
Mob : 9781572400
power and internally, it has a free government which is directly elected by
the people and makes laws that govern thepeople.
Constitution may appear to be sovereign as it is the supreme law of the land.
However, a document cannot be a sovereign. The people of India, according
to this Constitution have given to themselves this Constitution and therefore,
we can say that the political sovereignty lies in “We, the people..” and the
legal sovereignty lies in the Constitution ofIndia.
The word “Sovereign” emphasizes that India is no more dependent upon any
outsideauthority.
It’s membership of that Commonwealth of Nations and that of the United
Nations Organization do not restrict hersovereignty.
“socialist”
The word “socialist” was not there in the original draft of the Constitution.
This has been incorporated in the Preamble by the 42nd Constitutional
Amendment,1976.
This is also reflected in the words “..economic justice..” in the preamble. In a
democracy, socialism simply refers to a system of government in which the
means of productions are wholly or partly controlled by theState.
It implies social and economic equality. Social equality in this context means
the absence of discrimination on the grounds only of caste, colour, creed, sex,
religion, or language. Under social equality, everyone has equal status and
opportunities. Economic equality in this context means that the government
will endeavour to make the distribution of wealth more equal and provide a
decent standard of living for all. This is in effect emphasized a commitment
towards the formation of a welfare state. India has adopted a socialistic and
mixed economy and the government has framed many laws to achieve
theaim.
In D.S. Nakara v. Union of India (UoI), the Supreme Court has observed
that the basic framework of socialism is to provide a decent standard of
living to the people and specially provide basic social security from cradle to
grave. Therefore, it clearly marks the economic equality and equitable
distribution ofincome.
{Art. 39(b) and (c)}
“secular”
The word “secular” also was not there in the original draft of the
Constitution. This has also been incorporated in the Preamble by the
Constitutional (42nd Amendment) Act,1976.
It simply indicates that the State does not recognize any religion as its own
religion and thus, treats all religions equally. It’s a status of being neither
pro-religion nor anti-religion. It is also not based on total neutrality towards
religion. It is based on equal respect for all religions. It embodies the age old
concept of ‘sarva dharmasambhava’.
Art. 25 to 28 constitutes the right to freedom ofreligion
5
Mob : 9781572400
Citizens have complete freedom to follow any religion, and there is no
official religion. The Government treats all religious beliefs and practices
with equal respect andhonour.
In a secular State, the State regulates the relationship between man and man
and it is actually not concerned with the relation of man withGod.
“democratic”
This is based on the legal status of “Damus Cratus” which means rule of
peoplei.e. where the Government gets its authority from the will of the
people. The rulers are elected by the people and are responsible tothem.
There is a famous definition of democracy as given by Abrahim Lincoln that
“democracy is by the people, of the people and for thepeople.”
The first part of the preamble “We, the people of India” and, its last part
“give to ourselves this Constitution” clearly indicate the democratic spirit
involved even in the Constitution. India is a democracy.
This simply means that the government of our country is carried on by the
people of the State through their representatives and the executive head of the
State i.e. the President of India is an elected representative of the People (and
not a hereditary monarch as like King of England). In India, President is
elected by the people although he is elected indirectly. The people of India
elect their governments at all levels (Union, State and local) by a system of
universal adult franchise; popularly known as "one man one vote". Every
citizen of India, who is 18 years of age and above and not otherwise debarred
by law, is entitled to vote. Every citizen enjoys this right without any
discrimination on the basis of caste, creed, colour, sex, religion or education.
“republic”
Here, these words indicate that the Indian Constitution aims at achieving
three-fold justice. It’s simply about the attainment of common good and that the
people cannot be discriminated on the basis of caste, religion or gender or so and
that the government or the State should work for the welfare of the people as a
whole irrespective of their social status.
Economic justicecan be and ought to be ensured by rational policy making
and it’s proper implementation. Socio-economic justice has been ensured by
provision such as Art. 38 and39.
Political justiceis ensured by way of the right of adult franchise i.e. exercise
of right to vote as soon as a citizen attains the age of 18years.
Social justiceactually requires the abolition of all sorts of inequities which
result from inequalities of wealth, opportunity, race, caste and religion. Art.
14 to Art.18 provides for equality of status andopportunity.
The concept of social justice thus enables the legislature to enact and the
Courts to uphold such legislations-
(a) to protect the interests of the weakersections;
(b) to remove economicinequalities;
(c) to provide a decent standard of living to the people of thecountry.
“..fraternity, assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the Nation..”
“Fraternity” means the spirit of brotherhood. Simply put it’s that all of us should
behave as if we are members of the same family and no one should treat any
other person as inferior owing to any factor. India being a multilingual and
multi-religious State, the unity and integrity can be preserved only through a
spirit of brotherhood that pervades the entire country, among all its citizens,
irrespective of their differences. Indian Constitution provides for a single
7
Mob : 9781572400
citizenship. All citizens have been given the right to move freely throughout the
territory of India and to reside and settle in any part of the territoryofIndia.
[Art.19(1)(d) andArt.19(1)(e)]
“..In our Constituent Assembly this twenty-sixth day of November, 1949, do hereby ADOPT,
ENACTAND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.”
The Supreme Court held that preamble is not a part of the Constitution as it
does not create any substantive rights or obligations or powers. It cannot be a
source of powers or restrictions on such powers. Further held that preamble is
just an important tool for the interpretation of the Constitution.
8
Mob : 9781572400
Supreme Court held that the preamble forms a part of the Constitution.
9
Mob : 9781572400
10
Mob : 9781572400