A Conservation Program For The Bolgoda Wetland Complex
A Conservation Program For The Bolgoda Wetland Complex
A Conservation Program For The Bolgoda Wetland Complex
1
Partners
i
Executive Summary
Sri Lanka Water Partnership implemented a one year project “Our Wetlands- Our future” starting from
Jan 2016 in partnership with Biodiversity Sri Lanka and Sampath Bank. This project was initiated, designed
and carried out with the broad aim of conserving Bolgoda wetland, which is considered as island’s largest
fresh water wetland. Project emphasis was on two key aspects that of awareness raising of stakeholders
and field studies to understand the current condition of the ecosystem. The major outcomes of the
consultative workshop, awareness programs and vulnerability study are presented here.
There were two phases of the project, identified as ‘Wetworking’ and ‘Biodiversity assessment’ Under
phase I, “Wetworking”, a stakeholder consultation workshops for enhanced community participation for
wetland conservation and awareness was held where 48 participants from government institutions , local
authorities and local community groups and other interested groups participated on invitation. All ke
stakeholders expressed their views and shared information on good wetland governance. Contribution by
the community organization’s which were established in 2013, committed for conservation measures of
Bolgoda wetlands through the initiative of SLWP and under the guidance of CEA, added many spheres to
the discussions. Many valuable suggestions were bought forwarded to conserve the wetlands by
government and non-government organizations. Enthusiasm shown by the Western Provincial Council to
take up this matter in their annual by k program is also encouraging and their continuous participation in
this project is a positive sign for sustainability of the program.
In addition, awareness raising programmes were held in 3 selected schools in the area for which more
than 300 students from inhabitant families participated. They learned about the significance of the
Bolgoda wetland and it was the first time for most of the students to learn about their neighborhood as a
national treasure. The students participated actively in the discussions and were able to produce creative
works within a short given time, since Bolgoda wetland is in the vicinity of the schools and their homes.
In Phase II, a biodiversity assessment and vulnerability survey was carried out in selected locations in the
wetland spreading in 12 months. (Survey started in 2015 November) The survey was planned to cover
butterflies, dragonflies, fish, amphibians, reptiles and mammals. Accordingly, it was found that there were
153 species in the North lake where in the South lake 163 species were recorded. There were a few
endemic and threatened species. A rapid plant survey too was carried out and records more species (107)
at south lake than in north lake (57). Results of the vulnerability survey revealed that 80 % of the sites
studied in the North lake were vulnerable to pollution, habitat loss and degradation whereas in the South
part it was only 20%. In an integrated approach, Kawatayagoda in the south lake can be identified as one
of the most vulnerable sites with high animal and plant diversity.
To our knowledge, this is one of the most comprehensive recent studies carried out on the fauna in
Bolgoda wetland.
This project thus has served as an educational tool, valuable information gathering platform and
stakeholder relations development mechanism.
ii | P a g e
Introduction
“Our Wetlands- Our future” is a one year project implemented by SLWP with the partnership of
Biodiversity- Sri Lanka and Sampath Bank. Objective of this project was to continue the intervention made
by SLWP from year 2008 in conserving Bolgoda wetland, which is considered as island’s largest fresh water
wetland. The project’s emphasise was on two key areas viz. awareness raising of stakeholders and field
studies for a biodiversity assessment and vulnerability survey of ecosystem.
The project was implemented in two main themes identified as ‘Wetworking’ and ‘field surveys on
Biodiversity and vulnerability’. Under, “Wetworking”, a stakeholder consultation workshop and three
awareness workshops for school children were held. The stakeholder consultation workshop was aimed
to get views on current situation and practical approach for wetland conservation with the participation
of government officials , local authorities, local community organizations and other interested groups.
Three programs for awareness raising of school children were held at 3 selected schools in the area for
which more than 300 students participated.
A biodiversity assessment and a vulnerability survey were carried out at selected locations in the wetland
under the category of field surveys. The vulnerability survey was planned to cover butterflies, dragonflies,
fish, amphibians, reptiles and mammals. To our knowledge, this is one of the most comprehensive recent
studies carried out on the fauna in Bolgoda wetland Vulnerability survey was carried out to study the
threats to the Bolgoda wetland in the pilot project area.
iii | P a g e
2. Wetlands
Wetlands are nature’s true gifts. In a tropical country like Sri Lanka, wetlands exist everywhere
with their numerous links with the society by providing significant economic, social and cultural
benefits. They are important for primary products such as pastures, timber and fish and support
recreational and tourist activities. Wetlands also helps to reduce the impacts of natural disasters
such as flooding and droughts, maintain good water quality in rivers, recharge groundwater, store
carbon, helps to stabilize climatic conditions and provide cool micro climatic conditions especially
in cities. They are also important sites for biodiversity.
Figure 1 - Bolgoda Wetland depicting aquatic vegetation Figure 2 - Blue water lily in Bolgoda South lake
iv | P a g e
3. Past involvement of Sri Lanka Water Partnership (SLWP) and continuation
Recognizing the importance of investigating the present condition of and threats to urban
wetlands and possible remedial measures to restore and conserve them, SLWP initiated
integrated studies and discussions on selected urban wetlands as far back as 2008. In most of
these activities our key collaborators were Central Environmental Authority (CEA) and Sri Lanka
Land Reclamation and Development Corporation (SLRDC).
The SLWP organized several interactive seminars/ awareness workshops as part of a series of
programmes in 2013. These programmes were designed to raise awareness highlighting the
services and values of urban wetlands as well as the legislative and policy framework that
governs these natural resources. Different stakeholder groups included participants from the
following:
Together with our new collaborative partners, Sri Lanka Biodiversity and Sampath Bank PLC this
one year pilot project was launched to protect wetlands.
A pilot area in Bolgoda wetland was selected for this project as it is the largest natural freshwater
lake in the country and also facing threats due to various interventions. This complex is inter-
connected to major urban wetlands including Diyawanna and the Talangama tank.
The lake which covers 400 square kilometres, comprises two vast fresh water bodies, namely,
the Bolgoda North Lake and the Bolgoda South Lake connected by Weres Ganga. It is a crucial
part of the Kalu Ganga river basin. (Pl see map below (Figure 3) for micro picture)
v|Page
Bolgoda North
Weras Ganga
Bolgoda South
The Bolgoda wetland, although best known for its natural beauty and wildlife habitat values,
provides many water quality improvement and management services too . It is tightly linked with
the lives of the communities of the area and hence diverse community / ecosystem interactions
exist. It serves as a rich fishery ground on which many people depend on for their livelihood.
Another prominent aspect is opportunities for the tourism and hospitality industry which is
rapidly growing in the area. Thus, protecting and restoring the wetland and its sustainable
development will contribute positively to the economic health, public safety and quality of life of
the local communities.
As per anecdotal and empirical evidence, the significant ecosystem services and social and
economic benefits offered by this wetland provide adequate rationale for enhanced its
conservation efforts.
Yet, this ecosystem is under immense pressure from unsustainable anthropogenic activities. In a
pilot study carried out by the Sri Lanka Water Partnership (SLWP), it was evident that some areas
are adversely affected by indiscriminate discharge of industrial effluents and raw sewage which
have led to pollution of the water. In addition, the disposal of solid waste in different forms are
common in the lowlands. Due to increased developmental pressure, unsustainable land use
practices including encroachment, filling and illegal constructions too are rampant in this
environmentally sensitive area.
vi | P a g e
5. Project activities and Progress (January - December 2016)
6.
The project was designed to be carried out as a Pilot project. Activities were proposed to be
carried out in two phases to address pressing conservation needs. (Pl see the activity schedule
and Work plan agreed in annex 1,2 )
Phase II : Field Study on the Bolgoda wetland complex (Vulnerability Assessment and
Biodiversity Survey)
This chapter outlines some of the key accomplishments and new scientific findings established
during the project period.
This progarmme was designed to raise awareness highlighting the services and value of Bolgoda
wetland complex as well as legislative and policy framework pertaining to this ecosystem.
One major stakeholder who participated in awareness raising is the regulator, Central
environmental Authority. This time the focus group was representatives from Governmental
Organizations and Local Authorities, Grama Niladharis (GS), Developmental Officers and citizens
groups in Bolgoda area and included 48 participants.
Eng. Badra Kamaladasa,. Hon. Chair/ SLWP, explained the activities carried out by SLWP in
relation to wetland conservation and while Prof. Deepthi Wickramasinghe, Hon. Executive
Secretary/ SLWP delivered a speech explaining the values and services of wetlands and the
importance of conserving these habitats. Prof. Champa Nawaratne gave a presentation on the
economical services provided by wetlands. Ms. Priyanganie Gunathillake , Dy. Director/ Wetland
Unit, CEA made a presentation on Bolgoda wetland and the role of the CEA as the regulatory
Authority.
The programme ended up with an interactive discussion on the issues and problems related to
the ecosystem and possible remedial measures.
vii | P a g e
Participants shared their views and made suggestions after elaborative group works, for
enhanced conservation of the Wetland complex which is given below (figure 4) as a summary.
Agenda (Annex 3), Attendance sheet (Annex 4) and Report of the Programme (Annex 5).
Figure 4
viii | P a g e
Figure 6 - Participant at the workshop Figure 6 - Participants sharing their view and suggestions
Under this phase three interactive workshops were organized for the school children. These
programs were designed to raise awareness among the school children highlighting the services
and value of Bolgoda wetland complex.
In these three schools, most of the students are residing in the watershed of the wetland. All of
them, their family members and school mates are somehow or other are stakeholders of this
wetland conservation. Most of the chidren are from the families whose livelihood depends on
the Bolgoda wetland/ lake.
ix | P a g e
SLWP distributed an information leaflet (Annex 6) on wetlands and a badge on “Water
Messenger” to the students.
As the final activity at each programme, the students were given a chance to express their
understanding about wetlands and its conservation, using their creative abilities in poetry,
art and essay writing. This was carried out by individual students as well as groups and
interestingly students came out with excellent poems, posters and essays.
Figure 9-Students’ thoughts about wetlands in a poem (DV) Figure 10 - Poster by a group of student following an interactive learning session
(SJKV)
x|Page
5.2 Phase II - Field Study on the Bolgoda wetland complex
Field studies were carried out through out 12 months to compile information on biodiversity in
the selected section and also assess the vulnerability of the wetlands.
A survey on aquatic (fish and amphibian) and terrestrial (butterflies, dragonflies, reptiles, birds
and mammals) fauna in the wetland and immediate surroundings was started and carried out
and representative parts of the wetland complex (Bolgoda North Lake, South Lake) was taken
into consideration. In the selected areas, the faunal surveys were carried out according to
standard protocols and methodologies that include line transect method and visual encounter
surveys. No animals were captured or collected and all activities were carried out with the
minimal disturbance to the environment. Prof. Wickramsinghe and her assistants carried out the
field work.
In each month from January – September, at least 3 days were spent on field study visits to
investigate faunal species. Yet in June, only 2 days were possible due to inclined weather. A rapid
plant survey too was carried out to investigate prominent plant species (focusing on emergent in
the aquatic environment) as well as in an area of 5 m from the edge of water).
Identification of species was done using standard filed guides, keys and literature.
A species list with information on endemicity, conservation status as per the IUCN Red List was
also compiled
To our knowledge, this is one of the most comprehensive recent studies carried out on the fauna
in Bolgoda wetland. Yet, one limitation is the underrepresentation of amphibian fauna due to the
inadequacy of filed investigations carried out during the night time. Yet, there were many
Philautus species (tree and shrub frogs) who are endemic to Sri Lanka. These species need close
monitoring as well as fine field techniques to be identified which was not the scope of this study.
According to the results (figure 11) the faunal profile of both north and south lakes comprised of
153 and 163 species respectively and more of less same species are found in both lakes. One
interesting observation is the higher species diversity of dragonflies in the south lake. Dragonflies
are considered as bioindicators of water quality where they choose to lay eggs in unpolluted
water.
There are a few endemics in both lakes as well as some endangered animals. Out of these,
endangered fishing cat and all endemic species need special attention in conservation agenda.
Detailed results are presented in Annex 7
xi | P a g e
Bolgoda- North Lake
Type of Species No: Species No. of Endemic Species Species Occurrence %
Dragonflies 16 0 10.46
Butterflies 34 0 22.22
Fish 22 1 14.38
Amphibians 2 0 1.31
Reptiles 8 1 5.23
Birds 66 4 43.14
Mammals 5 1 3.27
Total Species 153
Altogether 107 plant species were found in the South lake with 7 endemic species (Annex 8). One salient
feature is the highest species diversity in Kawatayagoda. Similarly, in the north lake, 57 species recorded, out
of which one species is endemic. This results clearly show that north lake accommodate less floral diversity
and low endemicity. In addition, several invasive plants too were reported from this site. Yet, a through survey
is needed to reflect some refined information and hidden diversity of plant species.
xii | P a g e
5.2.2 Development of a Vulnerability Index for different areas of the wetland to determine the
extent of environmental degradation
The above component was started to identify the activities that can pose harm to the health of
wetland. Representative parts of the wetland complex (Bolgoda North Lake and South Lake)
were selected and visited to study the activities that degrade the environment including water
pollution input, solid waste dumping, filling and encroachment, destruction of natural
vegetation.
This vulnerability assessment was carried out in natural landscape (minimized human activity)
and in disturbed areas (visible impacts due to anthropogenic activities.
Figure 13 - Bolgoda North lake: areas under invasive Figure 14 - Ibis at Bolgoda south lake
Salvenia and Wel atta
xiii | P a g e
A rank was given for each visible activity and a cumulative index was developed at a later stage
as follows:
0-No signs of threat
2-Less vulnerable
3- Vulnerable
4- Highly vulnerable
5-Extremely vulnerable
For each lake, 5 sites were selected as follows and the sites were visited once in two months and
a rank was given. (please see figure 3 for locations) Finally, cumulative index was developed and
an average vale for vulnerability was calculated. Percentage vulnerability was used to depict
results.
Locations
North Lake
Kaputuduwa
Idagaha Totupala
Moratumulla
Dampe Thudawa
South Lake
Mestiya
Kawatayagoda Road
Bellana
End of Bodhikkarama Road
End of Weragama Road
I. Water pollution (WP) (point sources: toilets, sewage, industrial / commercial activities
including saw dust; non point sources: agriculture etc)
II. Solid wastes (SW) – saw dusts, plastic, cardboard , metal from industrial and domestic activities
Encroachment/ Destruction of habitat (EN) – filling and converted areas, land use changes and
destruction
III. Salinity Intrusion – the indicator of some brackish water fish species and sometimes jellyfish
Invasive plants (In Plants) – Anona glabra (terrestrial), Water hyacinth and Salvenia (aquatic)
Invasive animals (In animals) – Fish including tank cleaner
xiv | P a g e
Kaputu Doova KD
10.71%
20.95%
26.67%
17.86%
23.81% 17.86%
17.86%
Figure 15 - Vulnerability of sites in North lake Figure 16 - Contribution of each threat category in
Kaputu duwa
Vulnerability status of the sites in North lake is illustrated in figure 15. As it shows, Kaputu doowa
is the most vulnerable site , having the highest percentage vulnerability. Contribution of different
threat factors in Kaputu Doowa is depicted in figure16.
Vul% Kawatayagoda KG
15.52% 15.52%
18.97%
31.03% 16.67%
22.22%
18.97%
22.22% 5.56%
Mestiya MS
16.67%
Kawatayagoda Road KG
16.67%
Bellana BL
End of Bodhirukkarama Road BD
End of Weragama Road WR WP SW EN Salinity In_plant In_animal
Figure 17 Vulnerability of sites in South lake Figure 18 - Contribution of each threat category in Kawatayagoda
Similarly, the most vulnerable site in the south lake was Kawatayagoda (figure 17) and the
description is depicted in figure18.
xv | P a g e
The analysis shows that 80 % of the sites studied in the North lake were vulnerable to pollution,
habitat loss and degradation (percentage Vulnerability index > 20) whereas in the South part it
was only 20% of the sites.
In an integrated approach, Kawatayagoda can be identified as one of the most vulnerable sites
with high animal and plant diversity.
Just before the completion of the project, on 21st November 2o16, SLWP arranged an informal
meeting with the official partners of the project. Biodiversity Sri Lanka and Sampath Bank and
also with other major stakeholders of Bolgoda wetland, the government regulators. CEA,
Irrigation Department, Westerns Provincial Council, District Secretaries and Piliyandala
Pradesheeya Sahba were invited to listen to the key findings of the project and to get suggestions
for further follow up action. According to the feed back received following activities are identified
for continuation of the wetland conservation effort :
xvi | P a g e
a. Local intervention in an area of pristine habitat characteristics (Eg: Bandaragama) and a
polluted area (Eg: Moratumulla) and carry out wetland restoration in polluted area
b. Formation of community organisations for conservation measures
c. Strengthening and capacity building of the community organisations
d. Awareness campaign over the findings on vulnerability and unique biodiversity features
e. Island survey in Bolgoda wetland – Biodiversity and physical features
Due to inclined weather (heavy rains, flooding) persisted in some periods in May – June, field
visits had to be limited.
It should be mentioned here that organizing programmes in schools was difficult since there
were many hurdles to overcome specially obtaining permission from Zonal Educational
Officers. Intervention by the Western Provincial Council is appreciated for facilitating
approval from the education authorities.
8. Suggestions for further Activities
During the consultative and awareness workshops and also during the field visits, SLWP
identified many areas that need intervention from policy level to community
implementation level. Few selected activities are listed below under two categories viz;
continuation of this project and new activities.
xvii | P a g e
a. Continuation of activities under current Project
i) Awareness raising
To provide educational information on the value of the Bolgoda wetlands.
This can be carried out by erecting placards/ boards. Major findings of the
field surveys can be presented.
To initiate and sponsor tours of the local wetland to the community and
students
iii) To strengthen the six CBOs which were initiated by SLWP in 2015 and build their
capacity to involve actively in Bolgoda conservation work
b. Suggestions for next phase – these are almost new ones: most of these can be implemented
9. Acknowledgement
The project team acknowledges with gratitude the support received from Mr. Ranjith Ratnayake,
country coordination, the Project Committee and Mr Takshila Dilhan of SLWP, Mr Rukmal
Ratnayake and Himesh Jayasinghe and several others in field work and Ms. Sujeewa
Wanniarachhci and Mr. Lakmal of Western Provincial Council.
xviii | P a g e
Resource persons:
Observers
Ms. Sujeewa Wanniarachhci and Mr. Lakmal Perera – Dy. Directors, Western
Provincial council
i
Annex 1 and 2
Activity Month
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Final report
Annex 3
2016.02.29
Agenda
Schedule:
9.30- 10.30 – The role of SLWP in conserving wetlands- Eng. Badra Kamaladasa,
Chair, Sri Lanka Water Partnership.
10.30- 11.00 – CEA’s role of wetland management with a focus to Bolgoda complex– Ms. Priyangani
Gunathilake, Deputy Director, Central Environmental Authority.
11.00- 12.30 – Interactive session on the issues of Bolgoda/ Kesbewa wetlands – Representatives from
Kesbewa Pradeshiya sabha, NGOs and CBOs
12.30-13.30 – A way forward – Action plan/ networking towards conserving Bolgoda wetland complex
13.30 – Lunch
Report of the
IWMI Auditorium
One major stakeholder who participated in awareness raising is the regulator, Central
environmental Authority. This time the focus group was representatives form
Governmental Organizations and Local Authorities, Grama Niladharis (GS),
Developmental Officers and citizens groups in Bolgoda area and included 48 participants.
Eng. Badra Kamaladasa,. Hon. Chair/ SLWP, explained the activities carried out by SLWP
in relation to wetland conservation and while Prof. Deepthi Wickramasinghe, Hon.
Executive Secretary/ SLWP delivered a speech explaining the values and services of
wetlands and the importance of conserving these habitats. Prof. Champa Nawaratne gave a
presentation on the economical services provided by wetlands. Ms. Priyanganie
Gunathillake , Dy. Director/ Wetland Unit, CEA made a presentation on Bolgoda wetland
and the role of the CEA as the regulatory Authority.
The programme ended up with an interactive discussion on the issues and problems related
to the ecosystem and possible remedial measures.
Group activity carried out at the Stakeholder seminar- Bolgoda
wetland project on “how to conserve Bolgoda wetland”
The following were the problems identified by each group and their suggestions
to improve the conditions.
Group 01
Main problem of the Bolgoda Wetland
Environmental Problems
- Waste discharge - Wood dust, Domestic waste, Industrial waste, Toilet waste discharge
Impact of Endemic spices of fish
Destruction of Mangrove
Sand mining and unauthorized building constructions
Illegal Prawn cultivation
Social Problems
- Odor / Bad smell
- Pollution of natural water sources
- Spreading of fly and mosquitoes- diseases
- Decreasing of value of land
Economic problems
- Decreasing of endemic fauna related to loss of fishery / income
- Illegal tourism activities
Relevant government organizations fail to perform fully their duties and functions
Suggestions
- Awareness
- political expose
programmes for the
- in that case increase community of the area
crocodiles
- inactivation of Low - Establishment of
community base
committees
- it is effected to the human
life - inefficient involving of
administrative levels - Controlling and
evaluation between
organizations
- Awareness
programmes about E-
- Increase of Health - Not enough Waste and its effect
problem with the E- community knowledge for the community of
waste discharge of the about E-Waste the area
Ambalndoowa area,
(Panadura)
Group 03
Social, Economic and Environmental problems
01. “Weres Ganga” river bank used as waste dumping site. These areas can be identified as sensitive
area. but the land pollution is increase day by day
02. River bank erosions
03. Illegal land filling and constructions
04. Solid waste, toilet waste discharge to the Bolgoda river
05. Speeding of invasive plant Water Hyacinth
06. Pollution of biodiversity
Suggested options
Environmental problems
Economic problems
Options
- Attitude change
- Compilation of new rules and regulations
- To implement regulations for all without being biased
- Introduce eco-friendly waste management activity at home level
- Develop environmental friendly tourism activities
Checklist of fauna- Bolgoda South Lake (Annex 7A)
Dragonflies
National Global
Family Species
Family Species Common Name Country Status Conservation Conservation
Number Number
Status 2012 Status 2012
Butterflies
National Global
Family Species
Family Species Common Name Country Status Conservation Conservation
Number Number
Status 2012 Status 2012
Fish
National Global
Family Species
Family Species Common Name Country Status Conservation Conservation
Number Number
Status 2012 Status 2012
1 Anabantidae 1 Anabes testudineus Climbing Perch LC DD
2 Aplocheilidae 2 Aplocheilus dayi Sri Lanka Day's Killifish E EN
3 Aplocheilus parvus Dwarf Panchax LC
3 Cichlidae 4 Eutroplus suratensis Green Chromide LC LC
5 Oreochromis niloticus Nile Tilapia Invasive
6 Etroplus maculatus Orange Chromide LC LC
7 Oreochromis spp Unidentified Tilapia spp Exotic
4 Cyprinidae 8 Dawkinsia singhala Sri Lanka Filamented Barb E LC LC
9 Rasbora dandiya Broad Line Strip Rasbora LC
10 Rasbora microcephalus Narrow Line Rasbora
Amblypharyngodon melattinus Silver Carplet LC LC
11
Amblypharyngodon Sri Lanka Large Silver Carplet E EN
grandisquammis
12
13 Puntius vittatus Silver Barb LC LC
5 Eleotridae 14 Eleotris fusca Brown gudgeon LC LC
6 Gobidae 15 Awaous melanocephalus Scribbled Goby LC
16 Glossogobius giuris Bar-eyed Goby LC
7 Poeciliidae 17 Poecilia reticulata Guppy
18 Poecilia spp Ornamental Guppy spp Exotic
8 Osphronemidae 19 Trichopodus trichopterus Three spot gourami Exotic
9 Oryziidae 20 Oryias dancena Common Blue-eye
10 Hemiramphidae 21 Zenarchopterus dispar Feathered River Garfish
11 Synbranchidae 22 Monopterus desilvai Sri Lanka Lesser Swamp Eel E CR
12 Belontidae 23 Pseudosphromenus cupanus Spike Tailed Paradise Fish LC LC
13 Channidae 24 Channa straita Murrel LC LC
14 Ariidae 25 Ariius spp Ariid Catfish
15 Carangidae 26 Caranx sexfasciatus Bigeye Trevally
Amphibians
National Global
Family Species
Family Species Common Name Country Status Conservation Conservation
Number Number
Status 2012 Status 2012
National Global
Family Species
Family Species Common Name Country Status Conservation Conservation
Number Number
Status 2012 Status 2012
Birds
National Global
Family Species
Family Species Common Name Country Status Conservation Conservation
Number Number
Status 2012 Status 2012
Mammals
National Global
Family Species
Family Species Common Name Country Status Conservation Conservation
Number Number
Status 2012 Status 2012
Dragonflies
National Global
Family Species Country Conservat Conservat
Family Species Common Name
Number Number Status ion Status ion Status
2012 2012
Butterflies
National Global
Family Species Country Conservat Conservat
Family Species Common Name
Number Number Status ion Status ion Status
2012 2012
National Global
Family Species Country Conservat Conservat
Family Species Common Name
Number Number Status ion Status ion Status
2012 2012
Amphibians
National Global
Family Species Country Conservat Conservat
Family Species Common Name
Number Number Status ion Status ion Status
2012 2012
Reptiles
National Global
Family Species Country Conservat Conservat
Family Species Common Name
Number Number Status ion Status ion Status
2012 2012
Birds
National Global
Family Species Country Conservat Conservat
Family Species Common Name
Number Number Status ion Status ion Status
2012 2012
National Global
Family Species Country Conservat Conservat
Family Species Common Name
Number Number Status ion Status ion Status
2012 2012
Family: Amaranthaceae
කරල් හැබ, ගස් කරල්හැබ,
Amaranthaceae Achyranthes aspera 1 Native LC
කරල්සැබබෝ
Amaranthaceae Aerva lanata 1 බ ොල්කුඩු ළා, බ ොල් ළා Native LC
Amaranthaceae Alternanthera sessilis 1 මුකුණුවැන්න Native LC
Amaranthaceae Amaranthus viridis 1 කූර තම් ලා, සුදුකූර Native LC
Family: Anacardiaceae
Anacardiaceae Lannea coromandelica 1 හික් Native LC
Family: Annonaceae
Annonaceae Annona glabra 1 1 1 බවල් අබනෝදා, බවල් ආත්තා Exotic marsh, invasive
Family: Apocynaceae
රුක් අත්තන, ඇත් මද, ගස්
Apocynaceae Alstonia scholaris 1 Native LC
රුක් අත්තන
Apocynaceae Cerbera odollam 1 1 1 බගොන් කදුරු, දිය කදුරු Native LC marsh edge
කිරි අඟුණ, වැල් අඟුණ, වල්
Apocynaceae Parsonsia alboflavescens 1 1 Native LC
අඟුණ
Family: Combretaceae
Family: Moraceae
Moraceae Ficus hispida 1 1 බකොට දිඹුල Native LC
Moraceae Ficus racemosa 1 අට්ටික්කා Native LC
Moraceae Ficus religiosa 1 බබෝ Exotic
Family: Myrtaceae
Myrtaceae Syzygium caryophyllatum 1 දං, හීන් දං Native LC
Family: Nymphaeaceae
Family: Pontederiaceae
Family: Sphenocleaceae
Sphenocleaceae Sphenoclea zeylanica 1 මහ මුඩුමහ Native LC marsh
Family: Typhaceae
Typhaceae Typha angustifolia 1 හම්බු න් Native LC marsh, invasive
Family: Verbanaceae
Verbenaceae Stachytarpheta urticifolia 1 1 Exotic
Total number of spp recorded 57 35 52
Floral checklist of Bolgoda South Lake - Annex 8b
Bodhirukkaram Kawatayagoda
Name of the location Bellana
a mawatha Road
Lake,scrub Lake,scrub,mar Marsh,lake,
Habitat
marsh sh scrub,canal
Origine - Redlist Micro
Family APG III Species Sinhala Term
Complex 2012 habitat
Family: Acanthaceae
Family: Balsaminaceae
Balsaminaceae Hydrocera triflora 1 දිය කූඩළු, වල් කූඩළු Native LC marsh
Family: Cannabaceae
Cannabaceae Trema orientalis 1 ැඩුඹ Native LC
Family: Cleomaceae
Family: Cyperaceae
Cyperaceae Eleocharis acutangula 1 1 Native LC marsh
Family: Dilleniaceae
marsh
Dilleniaceae Dillenia retusa 1 1 ග ොඩ ර Native LC
edge
Dilleniaceae Dillenia suffruticosa 1 1 ර, දිය ර, ග ොඩ ර Exotic invasive
Family: Dioscoreaceae
බකමූණු වැල්, ණු
Dioscoreaceae Dioscorea bulbifera 1 Native LC
කගඩොල්, උදල
Family: Eriocaulaceae
Family: Malvaceae
අගනෝදා, ගේත් අගනෝදා,
Malvaceae Abutilon indicum 1 Native LC
වක් අගනෝදා, නා ග ඩි
Malvaceae Hibiscus tilliaceus 1 1 ගබලි ට් , වල් ගබලි Native LC marsh
Malvaceae Sida acuta 1 ස් බැබිල Native LC
Malvaceae Sida rhombifolia 1 හීන් බැබිල Native LC
Malvaceae Urena lobata 1 ට් ඇ ල, ඇ ල Native LC
Malvaceae Urena sinuata 1 1 ට් ඇ ල, හීන් ඇ ල Native LC
Malvaceae Grewia orientalis 1 වැල් කෑලිය, වැල් මැදිය Native LC
potential
Malvaceae Muntingia calabura 1 ජෑම් Exotic
invasive
Family: Melastomataceae
ගබෝවිටියා, ක කළු
Melastomataceae Melastoma malabathricum 1 1 1 ගබෝවිටියා, මහ ගබෝවිටියා, Native LC
ක කළුවා
දැදි කහ, ගදොඩන්කහ, වැල්
Melastomataceae Memecylon capitellatum 1 1 කහ, වැලි කහ, ඉදල් හ, Endemic LC
අඳුන්, කායම්
Family: Menyanthaceae
Menyanthaceae Nymphoides parvifolia 1 බිිං ඕළු Native EN aquatic
Family: Moraceae
Moraceae Ficus religiosa 1 ගබෝ Exotic
Family: Myristicaceae
රුක්, රුක් ග ඩි, තලන්,
Myristicaceae Horsfieldia iryaghedhi 1 1 Endemic VU
ම ගබොඩ
Family: Myrtaceae
Myrtaceae Syzygium caryophyllatum 1 1 1 දිං, හීන් දිං Native LC
Family: Nymphaeaceae
Nymphaeaceae Nymphaea nouchali 1 1 1 මාගනල් Native VU aquatic
Nymphaeaceae Nymphaea pubescens 1 1 ඇත් ඕළු, ඕළු Native LC aquatic
Family: Onagraceae
Onagraceae Ludwigia hyssopifolia 1 1 1 Native LC marsh
Onagraceae Ludwigia octovalvis 1 1 1 Native LC marsh
Family: Oxalidaceae
ස් නිදිකුම්බා, හීන්
Oxalidaceae Biophytum reinwardtii 1 Native LC
නිදිකුම්බා, බිිං ගනල්ලි
Oxalidaceae Oxalis barrelieri 1 Exotic
Family: Pandanaceae
Pandanaceae Pandanus kaida 1 1 1 වැ ගකයියා Native LC marsh
Family: Passifloraceae
ඩ ග ඩි, ඩ වැල්,
Passifloraceae Passiflora foetida 1 1 Exotic
උඩහළු, වැල් ගදළුම්
Family: Phyllanthaceae
මා ත් කැබැල්ල,
Phyllanthaceae Aporosa cardiosperma 1 1 Native LC
කම්ග ොත්ත, ැපිලිය
Phyllanthaceae Breynia vitis-idaea 1 ස් කයිල Native LC
marsh
Phyllanthaceae Glochidion zeylanicum 1 1 1 Endemic LC
edge
එ පි වක්කා, නිරුරි, බිිං
Phyllanthaceae Phyllanthus debilis 1 Native LC
ගනල්ලි
Phyllanthaceae Phyllanthus urinaria 1 රත් පි වක්කා Native LC
Phyllanthaceae Sauropus androgynus 1 මැල්ල දුම්ගකො , ජ න් බටු Native LC
Family: Plantaginaceae
Family: Pontederiaceae
aquatic,
Pontederiaceae Eichhornia crassipes 1 1 1 ජ න් ජබර Exotic
invasive
Pontederiaceae Monochoria vaginalis 1 දිය හබරල, ජබර Native LC
Family: Potamogetonaceae
Family: Rhamnaceae
Rhamnaceae Ziziphus oenoplia 1 හීන් එරමිණියා Native LC
Family: Rhizophoraceae
Rhizophoraceae Carallia brachiata 1 1 දව Native NT
Family: Rubiaceae
Rubiaceae Ixora coccinea 1 1 1 රත්මල් Exotic
Rubiaceae Morinda umbellata 1 කිරි වැල්,මහ කිරි වැල් Native LC
Rubiaceae Oldenlandia auricularia 1 1 ැ ගකො Endemic VU
Rubiaceae Spermacoce ocymifolia 1 1 Exotic
Rubiaceae Spermacoce verticillata 1 Exotic
Family: Salicaceae
කටු කුරුඳු, කටු කීරි, කටු
Salicaceae Scolopia pusilla 1 Endemic LC
ගකන්ද
Family: Sapindaceae
Cardiospermum ග ගනල වැල්, වැල්
Sapindaceae 1 Native LC
halicacabum ග ගනල
Family: Sapotaceae
මූණමල්, මුගුණ, මුකුරු,
Sapotaceae Mimusops elengi 1 Native NT
සිිංහ ගක්සර
Family: Sphenocleaceae
Sphenocleaceae Sphenoclea zeylanica මහ මුඩුමහ Native LC marsh
Family: Symplocaceae
Family: Vitaceae
Vitaceae Leea indica 1 1 1 බුරුල්ල, ගුරුල්ල Native LC
aquatic,inv
Salviniaceae Salvinia molesta 1 1 1 සැල්වීනියා Exotic asive
Total number of spp
57 67 107
recorded